What is a Noble Lie?
Definition:
A "noble lie" refers to a falsehood or deception that is propagated for what is considered to be a greater good or a beneficial purpose. The term is commonly associated with the realm of ethics and political philosophy, where it is debated whether lying, even for a purportedly noble reason, is justifiable.
Origin:
The concept of the "noble lie" is often traced back to Plato's "Republic," specifically in Book III and Book V, where Plato discusses the idea of propagating myths for the sake of social harmony and the benefit of the state. In the text, these myths are meant to instill values and social cohesion among the citizens, thereby serving a "noble" purpose.
Denis Rancourt is getting better and better at telling the story.
In the recent discussion with McCullough, hosted by Couey, he does a great 25-minute section on explaining what his research team’s data is telling us (video in the masthead).
The full video with some preamble and post McCullough discussion with Couey is here.
He thankfully covers one of my favourite talking points; that about the virus not crossing borders.
I addressed that point when covering his research in July. But it is worth repeating.
A virus without a visa
In fact, the very notion of “spread” during the COVID period is rigorously disproved by the temporal and spatial variations of excess all-cause mortality, everywhere that it is sufficiently quantified, worldwide. For example, the presumed virus that killed 1.3 million poor and disabled residents of the USA did not cross the more-than-thousand-kilometer land border with Canada, despite continuous and intense economic exchanges. Likewise, the presumed virus that caused synchronous mortality hotspots in March-April-May 2020 (such as in New York, Madrid region, London, Stockholm, and northern Italy) did not spread beyond those hotspots.
This is possibly my favourite section.
The virus didn’t spread across national borders. It couldn’t get its visa stamped.
This is proven by countless studies of the “progression and spread” of the virus. Which is proof positive that it was policy and not virus that killed people.
At one point, around 17.30, McCullough makes a very important point I hadn’t heard made before, and he is saying it in relationship to at least 3 dozen countries that have the data: “there is not a single country that will merge the vaccine administration data with the death data.”
Countries all over the world have assaulted, maimed, and killed their citizens and they will do everything in their power to hide that fact.
The hardest part about stopping the iatrogenocide is that the genociders don't care. They don't care at all about the loss of life, the end of the Republic, nor the disappearance of logic & reason. And by "genociders" I'm referring to most of mainstream society. – Toby Rogers
The conversation ends with the recent award of the Nobel Prize, and that’s the thread that I’m going to run with here.
mRNA discovery that paved way for COVID-19 vaccines wins Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine
Katalin Karikó and Drew Weissman honored for showing that modifications of mRNA could lead to a new kind of vaccine
As Senger tweeted:
The Vice Chair of the Nobel Prize Committee told Science Magazine the prize for Medicine was given to mRNA researchers in part to increase COVID vaccine uptake.
“Giving a Nobel Prize for this COVID-19 vaccine may make hesitant people take the vaccine.”
Yes, you read that right. They think this will reduce vaccine hesitancy.
This feels like giving the Nobel prize to Diet Coke for fighting obesity. – Kyle Barnes
Someone should tell the 98.7% who have not taken the latest booster.
NEW: Trust in mRNA "Vaccines" Plunge to an All-Time Low: Less Than 2% Uptake of New Booster
"On October 4, 2023, Reuters indicated that uptake of the new but already outdated XBB.1.5 boosters was a paltry 1.3%. It is now very likely that word-of-mouth on vaccine injuries,…
Seeing that we get our truth from comedians nowadays, let’s see what Jimmy has to report on the matter.
Key Takeaways:
1. The Irony of Masks: The hosts point out the irony of the Nobel Prize winners for the mRNA vaccine wearing masks during the ceremony, suggesting a lack of faith in their own innovation.
2. Historical Background: The Nobel Prize was created by Alfred Nobel, who made his fortune from dynamite. The prize was his way to make amends for his "merchant of death" legacy.
3. Kissinger's Award: The video mentions that the Nobel Prize lost its credibility when it was awarded to Henry Kissinger, who was responsible for the Vietnam War.
4. Lobotomy and Nobel: Another example cited is the Nobel Prize given to the inventor of lobotomy, questioning the ethical considerations of the award.
5. Non-Disclosure Agreements: Dr. Malone had signed NDAs that prevented him from disclosing his work, contributing to the misattribution of credit.
6. Stolen Valor: The term is used to describe the act of taking credit for someone else's achievements, as is alleged to have happened with the mRNA vaccine Nobel Prize.
7. Wikipedia Edits: Dr. Malone's contributions were allegedly edited out of Wikipedia, further erasing his role in the development of mRNA technology.
8. Pharmaceutical Industry Influence: The video suggests that the pharmaceutical industry has a significant influence on academic awards and recognitions.
9. Barack Obama's Nobel: The video criticises the Nobel Peace Prize given to Barack Obama, citing his involvement in drone strikes.
10. Financial Interests: The video speculates that companies like Pfizer may have financial ties to the Nobel Foundation.
Standout Quotes:
1. “The Nobel Prize winners for the mRNA vaccine wearing masks during the ceremony is worth a thousand words.”
2. “The Nobel Prize was created by a man who made his fortune from dynamite, and now it's blowing up in their faces.”
3. “When they gave the Nobel Peace Prize to Kissinger for the Vietnam War, that's when satire died.”
4. “When pharmaceutical industry interests merge with academic competitiveness, ethics gets to ride the back of the bus.”
5. “Barack Obama had a Nobel Peace Prize and a kill list. If that's not irony, I don't know what is.”
6. “This is not just about a prize; it's about the erosion of trust in scientific institutions.”
Ivermectin won the Nobel Prize for Medicine in 2015 and no one needed to wear a mask to accept the award… - @reethkitchards
I hadn’t realised that a Nobel Prize was handed out for lobotomies.
Definition
A lobotomy is a surgical procedure that involves cutting or removing parts of the frontal lobes of the brain. The operation was initially developed as a treatment for severe mental disorders, particularly schizophrenia and other forms of psychosis.
Historical Context
The procedure was popularized in the 1930s and 1940s, largely through the efforts of Portuguese neurologist António Egas Moniz and American neurologist Walter Freeman. Moniz was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1949 for his role in developing the technique.
Procedure Details
1. Prefrontal Lobotomy: The most common form involved severing the connections between the prefrontal cortex and other parts of the brain.
2. Transorbital Lobotomy: This variant involved inserting a surgical instrument through the eye socket to reach the frontal lobes.
3. Techniques: Over the years, various techniques were developed, ranging from crude methods using ice picks to more refined surgical procedures.
Ice picks! Nice. That was The Science™ back then. Frankly not much has changed.
Nobel Prize for Lobotomy: Overview
The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1949 was awarded to António Egas Moniz for the development of prefrontal leucotomy, commonly known as lobotomy. The procedure was designed as a surgical intervention to alleviate severe mental illnesses such as schizophrenia.
Controversies and Ethical Implications
1. Informed Consent: The practice has been heavily criticized for ethical reasons, primarily because many patients subjected to the procedure were not in a position to give informed consent.
2. Side Effects: Lobotomies often resulted in severe cognitive and emotional side effects, including apathy, passivity, and in some cases, a complete loss of personality.
3. Scientific Rigour: The lack of rigorous scientific testing prior to its widespread application also garnered criticism.
4. Subsequent Advances: Subsequent advances in psychiatric medication and therapy have rendered lobotomy largely obsolete and generally considered inhumane.
Current Perspective
Today, the awarding of the Nobel Prize for the development of the lobotomy is often cited as one of the most controversial decisions in the history of the Nobel Prizes. Medical ethics and treatment methods have evolved significantly, making the decision appear deeply flawed in retrospect.
Sources
· Nobel Prize Official Website, "The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1949" Link
· Pressman, J.D. (1998). "Last Resort: Psychosurgery and the Limits of Medicine". Cambridge University Press.
I wonder what they will say in years to come about this year’s award to Kariko and Weissman?
The Nobel Prize was created by the actual "merchant of death". So this is the most fitting Nobel Prize ever won - @bigfootjuice8832
But now I want to get into the weeds a bit.
What exactly did they get their prize for?
The 2023 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine was awarded jointly to Katalin Karikó and Drew Weissman for their groundbreaking work on mRNA vaccines which significantly contributed to the fight against COVID-19. Their discoveries concerning nucleoside base modifications enabled the development of effective mRNA vaccines against the virus, marking a significant advancement in medical science and global health amidst the pandemic1234.
So, what does “nucleoside base modifications” mean?
This is the official line:
Katalin Karikó and Drew Weissman's notable discoveries around nucleoside base modifications significantly propelled the development of mRNA vaccines, particularly for combating COVID-19. Here's a breakdown of their contributions:
1. Fundamental Understanding:
· Their work underscored the crucial role of base modifications in mRNA, addressing a significant barrier to employing mRNA for clinical applications. This paved the way for the development of mRNA-based vaccines, a cornerstone in the fight against COVID-191.
2. Early Developments (2005):
· In 2005, Karikó and Weissman developed nucleoside base modifications to prevent the immune system from initiating an inflammatory response against lab-created mRNA, a hurdle observed in earlier attempts to utilise mRNA therapeutically2.
3. Reduced Inflammation and Enhanced Protein Production:
· Their discoveries entailed modifications that both diminished inflammatory responses and augmented protein production. By doing so, they eliminated critical challenges, facilitating the progression towards effective mRNA vaccines3.
4. Suppression of RNA Recognition:
· Their research indicated that nucleoside modifications suppress the potential of RNA to activate dendritic cells (DCs), which are part of the immune system. This suppression aids in avoiding an undesirable immune reaction to the introduced mRNA, making mRNA vaccines more tolerable and effective4.
Through these discoveries, Karikó and Weissman established a foundation that enabled the rapid development of mRNA vaccines against COVID-19, marking a significant milestone in modern medicine and global health.
But there is a problem with this official story.
It may have “diminished inflammation”, but it didn’t eliminate it.
And the “augmented” protein production means that cells now were producing much more foreign antigen protein than the body would have normally allowed if it wasn’t disabled from stopping it by “suppressing the recognition” of this foreign RNA.
So, said another way, what these two prize winners did is find a way to prevent our bodies from doing what they have evolved to do over millennia, and that is to attack and take out foreign dangerous intruders.
Their secret weapon was Pseudouridine. Here again is the official story.
Yes, pseudouridine is indeed a part of the base modifications made by Katalin Karikó and Drew Weissman which was fundamental to their development of mRNA vaccines. Here are the specifics based on various sources:
1. Replacement of Uridine with Pseudouridine:
· The replacement of uridine with pseudouridine in mRNA was a key modification that rendered the RNA non-immunogenic, which is vital for preventing unwanted immune responses when introduced into the body1.
2. Superior Nonimmunogenic Vector:
· Incorporating pseudouridine into mRNA yielded a superior nonimmunogenic vector with enhanced translational capacity and biological stability. This modification improves the mRNA's ability to code for proteins without triggering adverse immune reactions2.
3. Thwarting Immune Response:
· In 2005, while collaborating, Karikó and Weissman discovered that swapping out uridine for pseudouridine, a nucleoside naturally found in RNA, not only thwarted the immune response but also played a role in the success of mRNA as a platform for vaccine development3.
4. Improved Translational Capacity:
· The mRNAs containing pseudouridines showcased higher translational capacity compared to unmodified mRNAs, indicating an enhanced ability to translate the genetic code into proteins, which is a central aspect for the effectiveness of mRNA vaccines4.
5. Patent for Modified mRNA:
· A patent was filed by the University of Pennsylvania on August 21, 2006, on behalf of Karikó and Weissman for RNA containing modified nucleosides, which included the use of pseudouridine to create a synthetic mRNA code, showcasing the significance of this modification in their work5.
These modifications allowed for the development of mRNA vaccines, marking a monumental advancement in the field of medicine, especially in the rapid development of effective vaccines against COVID-19.
What they basically did is figure out how to create Fiberglass Logs.
This from my article in July 2022, with thanks to Brett Weinstein for the analogy.
Weinstein makes the analogy and Malone runs with it.
Turns out it’s not mRNA after all in these jabs. It’s something else, it’s synthetically modified so as NOT to break down, or at least with greater difficulty. Natural mRNA which is what we all (including these two Nobel candidate level scientists) thought was in the jabs, breaks down very easily, it’s fragile, within 30 mins up to 2 hours. Instead let’s call this new thing they have inserted into the global population SmRNA, and it doesn’t breakdown, it’s there at least 2 months after injection (like a fibreglass log in the woods) generating cytotoxic spike protein.
It looks like a log, it’s called a log, yet it doesn’t behave like a log as it’s synthetically made from fibreglass. Surrounding natural logs decompose and are recycled, not this S-log though…who knows how long it will linger in the woods, seeing that nobody ever run the tests to find out.
So, not only is the spike protein not “safe” and doesn’t stay in the arm, but the lipid nano-particles are not safe and don’t stay in the arm but now the mRNA is actually SmRNA and it doesn’t breakdown (unnatural and accordingly feral and unsafe) and obviously is not just in the arm but all over the body and it doesn’t break drown as it’s made of bloody fibreglass.
So, in case you are wondering what the problem is of having fiberglass logs in your cells producing spike protein for long periods of time, well just one of the problems is directly related to cancer.
This from Jan 2023.
So, let me see if I get this.
IgG4 is good at reducing inflammation and is only called on when there is too much inflammation (thank you Pfizer), but it’s no good at regulating cancerous cells. In other words, it’s not a good multi-tasker, or to be polite, it’s a specialist, or one-trick pony if we’re not being polite.
So, the covid vaccines are causing injury, so much of it that the immune system is producing inflammation, so much of it that anti-inflammatory IgG4 is called on, but because there is so much of it, IgG4, and less of its other brothers and sisters as a consequence, and because it’s no good at dealing with cancerous cells, those cancer cells are having a field day and evading immune surveillance.
So, boom! Old cancers popping up again and brand-new ones emerging.
Thank you, Pfizer, and Moderna (both mRNA vaccines), thank you Government, Heath Ministry, Health Regulators and Medical Bodies. Thank you all for forcefully providing such safe and effective medications. Safe from oversight and accountability, and effective at causing cancer, disease and morbidity.
This is not the only pathway to cancer from these vaccines, but it certainly seems to be one of them. More spike protein because of this Nobel Prize winning technology, means more inflammation which means more IgG4 which means more cancer cells evading immune surveillance which means more cancer.
I have a feeling that the lobotomies might have been a more worthy winner of the prize.
Covid & the Covid response are the greatest disasters in the history of medicine. The Nobel Prize committee can try to cover that up all they want. Western allopathic medicine is a crime scene. – Toby Rogers
Thanks for being here.
Please consider a paid subscription. You will get nothing more for your support, as everything is made freely available. The money goes towards covering the costs of this work, medical freedom causes and support for the vaccine injured.
I am always looking for good, personal GMC, covid and childhood vaccination stories. You can write to me privately: unbekoming@outlook.com
If you are Covid vaccine injured, consider the FLCCC Post-Vaccine Treatment
If you want to understand and “see” what baseline human health looks like, watch (and share) this 21 minutes
If you want to help someone, give them a book. Official Stories by Liam Scheff. Point them to a safe chapter (here and here), and they will find their way to vaccination.
Here are all eBooks and Summaries produced so far:
FREE Summary: Bitten by Kris Newby (Lyme Disease)
FREE Summary: The Great Cholesterol Con by Dr Malcolm Kendrick
FREE Summary: Propaganda by Edward Bernays
FREE Summary: Toxic Legacy by Stephanie Seneff (Glyphosate)
FREE Summary: The Measles Book by CHD
FREE Summary: The Deep Hot Biosphere by Thomas Gold (Abiogenic Oil)
FREE Summary: The Peanut Allergy Epidemic by Heather Fraser
FREE eBook: A letter to my two adult kids - Vaccines and the free spike protein
Nobel Lies