1986 Act, Desmet, Fibreglass Logs and Mubongi

The Unbekoming Express - Edition 10 - 15 minute read

1.      Documentary: 1986 Act.

2.      Fiberglass Logs.

3.      Book: The Psychology of Totalitarianism.

4.      Indian Online Pharmacy.

5.      Last paragraphs of Dissolving Illusions.

6.      Ken Mubongi strikes again.

1. Documentary: 1986 Act

You can buy or rent it here. It’s worth spending money on (and supporting).

Home - 1986: The Act (7thchakrafilms.com)

This documentary should be added to the list of required viewing (learning) on the subject of vaccines and the childhood schedule. I thought it was only about the law that came into effect in 1986, but it’s actually detailed history of the before and after of that moment. I learned plenty, far more than I expected. Here are just a few points:

·         The problems and early pushback against the DTP vaccine.

·         That the contamination of the polio vaccine with live virus due to poor manufacturing was known yet the program was continued.

·         How all polio vaccines in the 1960s were contaminated with a cancer causing simian (monkey) virus, sv40. Who truly knows how much pain and suffering has been poured into the world from this alone.

·         More on the 1976 swine flu malfeasance. I’ve written at length about that already.

·         How they continued with the more dangerous version of the pertussis (whooping cough) vaccine when they had a much safer vaccine technology decades earlier (because it was ever so slightly more expensive (less than 1 cent per dose). This is one of the most striking take outs for me. It’s not news that this industry values profits over lives but the question of degree is highlighted best with this pertussis story.

Robert Kennedy Jr. makes a good point in the doco when he says that mandates are a way of getting the parent out of the way…of getting direct access to the child. Yes, the last line of defence is the parent and mandating vaccines to attend childcare, school, receive tax benefits etc is obviously a way to force the hand of the parent but at its heart it’s about getting them out of the way.

Peter Aaby, obviously an honest vaccinologist, in the doco says, “I guess most of you think that we know what our vaccines are doing [in your body]…we don’t”. That reminds me of my Cane Toad thoughts.

Finally here is just one of many good charts from the doco.

If you already know to avoid the childhood vaccine schedule (at all costs) this doco will simply layer in more knowledge and further steel your resolve.

If you are absolutely new to the question of whether childhood vaccines are “safe & effective” this is one of the best produced and most detailed docos out there.

I would put it second behind Vaxxed 2 as the most important documentary for a newbie to the subject of childhood vaccination.

2. Fiberglass Logs

This is a very important segment of a recent discussion between Weinstein and Malone.

Here is an insurance link (for if/when YouTube remove the clip).

Here is the full interview on Spotify. Well worth the time to listen to the whole thing.

Weinstein makes the analogy and Malone runs with it.

Turns out it’s not mRNA after all in these jabs. It’s something else, it’s synthetically modified so as NOT to break down, or at least with greater difficulty. Natural mRNA which is what we all (including these two Nobel candidate level scientists) thought was in the jabs, breaks down very easily, it’s fragile, within 30 mins up to 2 hours. Instead lets call this new thing they have inserted into the global population SmRNA, and it doesn’t breakdown, it’s there at least 2 months after injection (like a fibreglass log in the woods) generating cytotoxic spike protein.

It looks like a log, it’s called a log, yet it doesn’t behave like a log as it’s synthetically made from fibreglass. Surrounding natural logs decompose and are recycled, not this S-log though…who knows how long it will linger in the woods, seeing that nobody ever run the tests to find out.

This is another good clip from that interview.

So, not only is the spike protein not “safe” and doesn’t stay in the arm, but the lipid nano-particles are not safe and don’t stay in the arm but now the mRNA is actually SmRNA and it doesn’t breakdown (unnatural and accordingly feral and unsafe) and obviously is not just in the arm but all over the body and it doesn’t break drown as it’s made of bloody fibreglass.

I was talking to a new (awake) acquaintance today and I said to him that the problem we have societally now is that to distinguish between what is true and what is not true, you need to do a bit of work…he rightly corrected me and said that you need to do a lot of work…and he’s right, you do.

Desmet (more on him later) talks about the 40-60% that are in the middle during a mass formation, they are not the true believers but they go along so that they can belong. How many of this group will do ANY work to test the truthiness of what is rattling around in their heads?

What is their motivation, if “fixing” an untruth risks unbelonging?

3. Book: The Psychology of Totalitarianism

I’ve just about finished this as an audiobook, and I think that what Desmet has written is something quite special. I even think it will go down as a classic.

The Psychology of Totalitarianism Audiobook | Mattias Desmet | Audible.com.au

The Psychology of Totalitarianism : Desmet,Mattias: Amazon.com.au: Books

I’ve listened to Desmet on several podcasts explain Mass Formation and I believe it’s a more advanced (and more accurate) take on what’s happened, rather than just describing it as a Mass Psychosis (which is also correct in my view), but this psychosis, on scale needs fertile ground to develop and coagulates in a particular way and in a particular direction…that’s what Mass Formation does a great job of explaining.

So, when I saw that he had written a book, I was definitely going to get it, out of support for the man if nothing else, but truthfully, I expected more of the same on Mass Formation…boy was I wrong.

I’ve lived under an Iraqi dictatorship, and I now more properly understand that Totalitarianism and Dictatorship are nothing alike, they are apple and pineapple, two entirely different types of populations and population control.

In Iraq I lived among a population that was governed by a dictatorial regime. A pretty basic, ruthless and fear based model of population control. “Do as I say or else, I will kill you and your family” type of population management. What’s interesting now that I reflect back on those years, is that everyone lived within the same reality, everyone knew Saddam and his cronies were bad, some stayed out of their way (me and my family) and others made hay while the sun was shining, but it was the same reality. The inputs (what I like to call lego bits, or more fancifully called axioms) to everyone’s reality was thereabouts the same.

I can now say, from my cushy suburban home in Sydney’s north-shore that I am now living in a totalitarian state (if you read the book, and I strongly encourage you to do so, you will understand what I’m talking about). The inputs (the lego bits) that form people’s realities have been messed with, they’ve been corrupted, on scale and not just in Australia, and the realities they can construct with those corrupted (untrue) lego bits are different to my reality.

We now exist in two different realities.

In my reality the media lies, in theirs they don’t. In mine the jabs are dangerous in theirs the vaccines (because to them they are vaccines) are not. In my reality lockdowns were the greatest evil (now surpassed by the mass jab experiment) robbing populations of health, wealth, peace of mind and any certainty about the future. In their reality lockdowns saved countless lives…just listen to the daily news and they will tell you. And so on. Iraq was nothing like this, this is something else, this is different, and this is a very different type of scary.

Desmet’s book has helped me really, and for the first time, start to understand where we are at. I don’t like it, but I’d rather know, I can make better decisions by knowing rather than not knowing.

4. Indian Online Pharmacy

In case you missed it, this is a good source of Ivermectin if you decide that you want or need it.

SUNRISE ENTERPRISE

export@sunriseindia.org

A-206, 2nd Floor, Sumel Business Park-6

Dudheshwar Road

Opposite Hanumanpura BRTS, Shaibaug

Ahmedabad, State-Gujarat (India)

Whatsapp -  +919099096658

The evidence is clear (and has been for a long time), it is useful as a preventative for Covid, it is useful for early treatment, it is useful for more severe symptoms, and it turns out to be useful for helping with jab injury.

Basically it is the safe, effective wonder drug that they don’t want you to know about or access, exactly because it is so cheap and effective.

The assassination of Ivermectin and the death of millions

You can check out Ivermectin’s 20 different mechanisms of action here (that we know about).

Quercetin and The War on Zinc

Far too many people that I know are falling ill with one thing or another: stroke, anaphylactic reaction, bronchitis, pneumonia, Covid (obviously and multiple times), infections that take too long to heal, chest and left arm pains, to name just a few…you get the point. These are all jab injuries, but it’s hard to see them as such.

If the jab damages your immune system, and you fall ill with something that you wouldn’t have otherwise fallen ill with, say Covid for the second or third time, of bronchitis etc. then ALL of that is jab injury. Your immune system has been damaged.

I wrote about that at length here:

Barefoot is better: Negative Shoe Efficacy.

When they talk about “negative efficacy” they mean “damaged immunity”:

Words matter, so let’s call it what it really is, damaged immunity.

The genetic intervention damaging our body’s natural ability to deal with a virus. Our natural immunity is injured, disabled, broken…pick your word, any one of these words describes the situation more accurately that Negative Vaccine Efficacy.

Imagine a pair of shoes that had Negative Shoe Efficacy, what that would mean is that those shoes made walking harder, more painful, worse. So, people would be far better walking barefoot because putting those Neg SE shoes on actually handicapped and disabled you.

Imagine airbags that had Negative Airbag Efficacy. That would mean that more people were injured or died BECAUSE of the airbags than without them at all. It would mean they made things WORSE, that you would be better off WITHOUT them.

That’s what Negative Vaccine Efficacy means. The “vaccine” is making things WORSE, you would be better off WITHOUT it.

If you have taken the jab, and believe that you might have a damaged immune system, here is a detox protocol that you might benefit from, and it includes Ivermectin.

I recommend talking to the FLCCC.

Home - FLCCC | Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (covid19criticalcare.com)

If you want to better understand “negative efficacy” watch this great short video from earlier in the year that wonderfully illustrates the UK data on jabs and Covid. It’s easier to understand when you SEE it.

What have they done to our Immune Systems ? - Frightening UK Data (bitchute.com)

5. Last paragraphs of Dissolving Illusions

I recently finished it; I cannot recommend strongly enough.

Dissolving Illusions Audiobook | Suzanne Humphries, Roman Bystrianyk | Audible.com.au

The book has 808 references, not quite the 2,194 of The Real Anthony Fauci, but a mountain of factual evidence never the less. It takes an axe to the very foundation of mass vaccination logic, the idea that mass vaccination rid the world of disease.

It is one of the most important books I have ever read.

I leave you with the last couple of pages of the book:

In the book, the story of Edward Jenner and the “relative safety” of the vaccine are introduced, along with the misunderstood concept of “herd immunity.” Using this lore, the stage is set for the author to discuss the reasons some of us resist such a spectacular discovery. As is customary by vaccine proponents, the case for vaccination is never supported with real data but only assumptions. Instead of attempting to think for himself or analyze any of the numerous available data on his own, the author defers to “experts.”

This leaves us with two choices: We can either take it upon ourselves to do a systematic analysis of all the available information—which becomes ever less feasible as the world grows more complex—or we can trust experts and the media to be responsible about the information and advice they provide. When they’re not, whether it’s because they’re naïve or under resourced or lazy or because they become true believers themselves, the consequences can be severe indeed.

Seth Mnookin, The Panic Virus, Simon & Schuster, 2011, p. 18.

Fear of disease, plagues, and death underlie the narrative of the book. The struggle, according to the author, is between those who believe in vaccination and those who question the paradigm. It is a battle between those who understand the so-called “well-established history and evidence based medicine” and those who do not. We are told that we must accept the belief of the media and experts unless they too are misinformed and do not recognize the already established pro-vaccine position. Thus, all bases are covered in order to delineate anyone with an education and a well-informed opinion that is against the theory of vaccination as unscientific and dangerous.

The belief momentum is so great that the authors of these types of books never take into consideration the possibility that there could be a fundamental problem with their base assumption, and neither does the media that supports them or their readers. The authors become another layer in the false belief, which further builds upon itself. Those who accept the belief are accepted by the group. Anyone who questions the belief in vaccination is attacked and vilified both within and outside the medical profession. Vaccine faith is supposed to be unquestioned because history has allegedly demonstrated the value of vaccination.

Do you think it has?

Fundamentally, we must evaluate the soundness of all ideas no matter how deeply ingrained. British philosopher John Stuart Mill said:

The fatal tendency of mankind to leave off thinking about a thing when it is no longer doubtful, is the cause of half their errors.

Often, when one objectively searches for information, facts are uncovered that can be in shocking contrast to the original understanding. The truth may be uncomfortable, inconvenient, and unpopular, but in the end, if it is the truth, it must be embraced regardless of the cost.

Year after year, layer after layer, the vaccine belief built upon itself until today children are subjected to dozens of vaccines by second grade. Most parents are uncomfortable with this barrage of chemicals, disease, and animal residual. They pray and worry after their children are injected. If they seem unscathed after a few days, they think all is well, and they did a good thing. They may not consider the potential for long-term effects from vaccines or the complete absence of safety data on the vaccine program their children are participating in.

What if the hierarchy is wrong? What if the idea of vaccination is fundamentally flawed? What if we have yet to see the real effects on the immunity of the herd? To date, despite the existence of thousands of never-vaccinated children, there has not been a “completely vaccinated” versus “never vaccinated” study to compare the difference between the short-and long-term health of both groups.

Nobody—not even the most educated immunologists—understands or can describe the complete cascade of events that occurs after injecting a vaccine. If physicians realized how little is known today about the immune system and vaccines, they would be duty bound to tell patients that there are no accurate scientific answers.

Because the whole truth isn’t told, adults are the only line of defense for themselves. Until the minds of pediatricians are emancipated, parents will remain the best line of defense for their children.

The reality… is that vaccinology, as portrayed to the public today, amounts to writing religion on the back of ignorance.

6. Ken Mubongi strikes again

You might remember Ken from his ass-kissing letter to Brad Banducci.

Anyway, I was grazing around in Facebook the other day and saw a post by our NSW Government reminding citizens that the best form of “layered protection” was getting vaccinated, wearing a mask and good hand hygiene…this stuff doesn’t even make me angry anymore, I’d be disappointed in them if they weren’t continuing with their propaganda.

But as I was looking at the comments to see how many of my fellow New South Welshmen “liked” the post, guess who I find, Ken Mubongi, doing what Ken does:

Can you believe this guy?

He’s asking for a 5 in 1 shot…what a Muppet. At least he’s consistent. To my surprise nobody has liked his comment…Ken might be a bit much, even for the four dosed.