Sustainable Slavery

On SDGs, NACs, Debt Slavery and Administered Territory.

Unbekoming

Dec 26, 2023

In our global-capitalist ideological system, mindfucking is one of the primary means of dealing with internal threats. Global capitalism cannot afford to do the Orwellian boot-stomping-your-face thing, not for extended periods, anyway. It needs to maintain a simulation of “freedom,” and some semblance of “the rule of law,” so consumers will continue shopping, and not … you know, launch an armed rebellion. – CJ Hopkins
The UN’s “sustainable development” policies, the SDGs, do not promote “sustainability” as most conceive of it and instead utilise the same debt imperialism long used by the Anglo-American Empire to entrap nations in a new, equally predatory system of global financial governance. – Whitney Webb and Iain Davis

Leave a comment

The world is being rewired and replumbed.

The work started a long time ago; I, like many others, am only realizing now.

The creature has crawled out of the dark and we are starting to see it.

The image is still blurry, but everyday parts of this beast slowly come into focus. There is something definitely there. It’s not our imagination.

I was reflecting on the GMC recently, from the perspective of a Nation State.

I was thinking; “What is the purpose of a Nation State?”

Well, one of its primary functions, surely, is to protect its citizens from outside forces, outside threats.

I don’t think that’s a contentious claim.

If a Nation State opts not to do that [as different to trying and failing]; can we call it a Nation State?

Can we call it Sovereign?

My view is No.

If a Nation State is not a Nation State (as defined by its capacity for Sovereignty and willful protection of its citizens) then what is it; what shall we call it?

I am going with Administered Territory.

So, here’s my question:

Is there a single Country (out of about 200) in the world that protected its citizens from the Safe & Effective™ injections?

Is there one?

No.

5 billion injected people is the proof: your honor.

What does this mean?

It means, at least to me, that there are no longer Nation States. Anywhere. They are a pretense. A show. A form of entertainment in fact.

I’m not sure when it happened exactly, but somewhere along the last 50 odd years, the beast devoured any and all Sovereignty in the world and turned everywhere into an Administered Territory.

But we still have wonderfully colored maps, and Uniparty elections, to pretend otherwise.

Australia, for example, is an Administered Territory.

Administered by whom?

Empire.

Who the hell is Empire?

The next three pieces I think can help us with improving that blurred vision of the creature that is Empire.

This stack was prompted by a Twitter (not calling it X) thread posted by James Lindsay which reminded me that I’ve been meaning to write something about the amazing Whitney Webb, and then topped off with a summary of the great work of Mathew Crawford.

Three of the finest Investigative Journalists in the world.

First, I want to go to Whitney Webb (and Iain Davis) who is the first person that helped me understand what the UNs Sustainable Development Goals were actually about. What was behind the sweet syrupy Utopian lullaby emanating from these supranational structures.

SDGs are a cover for further ensnaring nations into Empire’s debt slavery while at the same time the financialization of that nation’s natural resources.

Here is a summary of Webb and Davis’s essay on the subject.

Sustainable Debt Slavery (unlimitedhangout.com)

Webb and Davis argue that contrary to promoting sustainability, these policies perpetuate a form of economic imperialism, entrapping nations in debt and serving the interests of a financial elite. This is the first instalment in an investigative series aimed at uncovering the true motives and impacts of the SDGs.

Key Points:

Critique of the UN's 2030 Agenda and SDGs: Webb and Davis suggest that the SDGs, while seemingly utopian, in reality serve to entrench the power of the economic elite. They highlight the emphasis on debt in the SDGs and the involvement of former bankers in formulating these policies.
Debt as a Tool for Control: The article describes how developing nations are entrapped in debt, compelling them to adopt SDG-related policies. This practice is seen as an extension of the financial strategies historically used by the Anglo-American Empire.
Questioning the True Intentions: The series aims to explore whether the SDGs genuinely aim to improve global conditions or are just a guise for profit-driven motives based on debt slavery and resource exploitation.
The SDG "Word Salad": The authors criticize the complex and often grandiose language used in UN documents, suggesting it obscures the true nature of the policies.
Global Macroeconomic Stability Redefined: The concept of macroeconomic stability, according to the article, has been redefined by the UN to prioritize “sustainable development” over traditional economic metrics like full employment and stable growth.
The Role of Debt in SDGs: The article emphasizes that debt is central to the implementation of SDGs, especially in developing countries. The World Bank and IMF are cited as instrumental in this process, using debt to influence national policies.
GFANZ and Financial Overhaul: The Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ) is described as a key player in transforming global financial systems, including the roles of the World Bank and IMF, to align with SDG objectives.
The UN's Quiet Revolution: The article discusses the increasing reliance of the UN on public-private partnerships, with significant influence from private financial institutions, multinational corporations, and philanthropic organizations.
Criticisms of Public-Private Partnerships: The authors argue that public-private partnerships, as currently executed, often fail to deliver on their promises and can lead to higher costs and reduced service quality.
Broader Implications of Sustainable Development: The series aims to show how sustainable development policies will affect various aspects of life globally, including finance, natural resources, and governance, often to the detriment of local communities and environments.

For instance, the Rockefeller Foundation’s (RF’s) comprehensive financial and operational support for the Economic, Financial and Transit Department (EFTD) of the League of Nations (LoN), and its considerable influence upon the United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Administration (UNRRA), arguably made the RF the key player in the transition of the LoN into the UN.

In addition, the Rockefeller family, which has long promoted “internationalist” policies that expand and entrench global governance, donated the land on which the UN’s headquarters in New York sits, among other sizeable donations to the UN over the years. It should come as little surprise that the UN is particularly fond of one of their main donors and has long partnered with the RF and praised the organisation as a model for “global philanthropy.” – Webb and Davis

Next, let’s look at Lindsay’s thread about Natural Asset Companies (NACs).

Lindsay is giving us an insight into the financialization (Asset) side of the equation while Wedd and Davis are showing us the Debt side of the equation.

The scam level of Natural Asset Companies is extremely difficult to get your head around, and the SEC is deciding on this demonic creation—supported by WEF, facilitating UN agendas, enriching the oligarchs, pushed by Biden—on Jan 2, when people haven't been paying attention.
Natural Asset Companies allow for the privatization, commodification, and total control of natural assets, including forests, water, minerals, and so on, and are geared to operationalize their value in new ways, notably "sustainable management," i.e., death cult evil.
They also allow for the ability under the heading of "sustainable management" to manufacture a fake water crisis that, in practice, is totally real and a pathway to requiring full digital ID to access water "sustainably," just like the WEF threatened recently. They're the path.

Yet it is perhaps the financialisation of nature, inherent to sustainable development, that is the greatest danger of all. The creation of natural asset classes, converting forests into carbon sequestration initiatives and water sources into human settlement services. As subsequent instalments of this series will show, several SDGs have financialising nature at their core. – Webb and Davis

They also have the capacity to make activities like farming extremely expensive, which can squeeze out most farmers, forcing them to sell their farms for pennies on the dollar to these huge "stakeholder" entities (Bill Gates?) who have the capacity to "manage" it correctly.
Whole rafts of the Leftist agenda fly into action off Natural Asset Companies.
For example, normally, creating something like 15-minute cities and enforcing degrowth would be very costly: you have to buy up all the rural land/mines with "your own" money, like $100s of trillions.
Further, coercing people to move into cities can be expensive too and might get violent. These are just a few major stumbling blocks for the Masters of the Universe without a far more powerful scam even than ESG control (corporate cartel allied with the state).
What they can do instead is set up system (NACs) where they buy up farmland from desperate sellers and natural resources with other people's money (pension funds, university endowments) and then sue anyone who tries to use those resources as violations of your new "property."
Worst, they can use this new system (NACs) to claim this whole scam is all "capitalism." As for money, they can leverage NAC management to leverage farmers, miners, people, etc., into desperation selling by making it prohibitively expensive to use your land.
Because of collusion ("public-private" model), if private fortunes (like Gates) and leveraged pension and retirement money (that is, the ESG management structure for passive investment capital) isn't enough, the IMF and Fed will be there to assist. The NAC legals make it work.
The Biden Administration created the legals here in the US on the back of structures built at the NYSE with the Rockefeller Foundation driving it, and they are trying to slip it under the radar. Public comments got extended under protest but only to January 2, right after Xmas.
This is a scale of evil possibly unprecedented in world history, with all its foundations in Marx's ramblings (Communism was always a new feudalism with the Social Gnostics—Soviets, stakeholders, whatever—on top, save the Lords and Ladies financing them).

It is then little coincidence that many of the driving forces behind SDG-related policies, at the UN and elsewhere, are career bankers. Former executives at some of the most predatory financial institutions in the history of the world, from Goldman Sachs to Bank of America to Deutsche Bank, are among the top proponents and developers of SDG-related policies. – Webb and Davis

And finally, here is a summary of Crawford’s recent summation of where he is at with his Big Picture view of what’s going on. I don’t know if Crawford is right, he admits that he doesn’t know either, but he’s done a lot of work to get to this point, and more importantly he is trying to be right and letting go of ideas once better evidence comes along. I’ve got a lot of time for Crawford.

Crawford is trying to show us the Control and Operational side of the equation, at the highest level he can.

The Bigger Picture - Exercising the Attempt at Cybernetic Modeling (substack.com)

And so far, I've barely found a piece of machinery or a side (either side) of an issue without Rockefeller money behind it. – Mathew Crawford

Crawford, a systems modeler, delves into a comprehensive analysis of global systems and power dynamics, employing cybernetics and cult formations as his primary analytical tools. The article is part of his broader effort to map and understand complex global interactions and influences.

Key Points:

Cybernetic Approach: Crawford uses the lens of cybernetics – the study of regulatory systems and their structures, constraints, and possibilities – to analyze global events and trends. He suggests viewing the world as a vast machine governed by managed feedback loops.
Global Power Structures: The article discusses the role of various global entities and movements, including their funding and influence. Crawford points out that much of the activity, even in what is considered resistance movements, is financed by entities like the Rockefeller family, indicating a pervasive influence across various sectors.
Military and Intelligence Complex: He emphasizes the privatization of military and intelligence as a means of maintaining control over global developments, suggesting a deep intertwining of government and private interests.
Monetary System and Cryptocurrencies: The globalization of the monetary system and the rise of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin are discussed as part of a broader strategy of economic control. Crawford speculates that Bitcoin may have originated from military intelligence sources.
Eugenics and Biowarfare: The article touches on the use of biowarfare and eugenics as tools for population control, indicating a long-term strategy by global elites.
Education and Information Warfare: Crawford highlights the deliberate dumbing down of populations and the use of psychological warfare to manipulate public opinion and maintain power structures.
Election Engineering and Controlled Opposition: The concept of election engineering and the existence of a 'Uniparty' system controlled by technocratic elites are discussed. Crawford also points out the prevalence of controlled opposition within various resistance movements.
COVID-19 and Global Chaos: He refers to the recent pandemic as a part of a larger plan, suggesting that it was used to further certain agendas, including societal division and the imposition of new forms of control.
Future Prospects and Privatization: Crawford expresses concerns about the future, particularly regarding the privatization of government functions leading to a more centralized and controlled society. He foresees the potential for a new caste system and the loss of societal stability.
Call for Self-Education and Awareness: The article concludes with a call for individuals to educate themselves about the broader picture of global dynamics and to engage in thoughtful discussions with others.

Expressed differently, if countries cannot pay the debt they incur through IMF loans and World Bank (and associated Multilateral Development Bank) financing, they will be offered options to “repay” their debt through implementing SDG-related policies. However, as future instalments of this series will show, many of these options supposedly tailored to SDG implementation actually follow the “debt for land swap” model (now re-tooled as “debt for conservation swaps” or “debt for climate swaps”) that precede the SDGs and Agenda 2030 by a number of years. This model essentially enables land grabs and land/natural resource theft on a scale never before seen in human history. – Webb and Davis

Lies are Unbekoming

Discussion about this post