“I have one weapon, and you are listening to it” – Stephen (in masthead video)
I thank my intuition for not getting this poison. And I feel the same as Jimmy [Dore], I can't either accept people's lack of reaction to all this insanity, evil and fascism. - @medusaslair
Stephen, from Perth (Western Australia) in the masthead video, is saying what we all feel like saying to the banal tyrants ruling over us.
What is a Bait & Switch?
Bait: A retail electronics store advertises a high-quality television at an incredibly low price to lure customers into the store. Switch: When customers arrive, they find out that the advertised television is "out of stock," but the salesperson then tries to sell them a more expensive model.
Bait: An online streaming service offers a free one-month trial, promoting a wide range of exclusive shows and movies. Switch: After signing up, users find that many of the exclusive titles are actually behind an additional paywall, not covered by the free trial.
Bait: A company advertises a job opening with a high salary and numerous benefits. Switch: After going through the interview process and receiving an offer, the candidate finds that the salary is actually much lower, and the benefits are not as advertised.
It turns out that “trusted” Pfizer (I mean the US DoD) did a bait and switch on us all.
“The Pentagon did not want to say, did not want to put on the product, this is a Pentagon made Defense Department made product. They essentially paid the pharmaceutical companies for their brand name so people would think they were getting something from Pfizer Moderna.” – Robert Kennedy Jr
Seeing that we now rely on comedians (and cats, see below) to tell us the truth, here is Jimmy Dore to explain what Pfizer did:
Key Takeaways
Two Different Processes: Pfizer used two different manufacturing processes for the vaccine—one for the clinical trials and another for public distribution.
Process 1 vs Process 2: Process 1 used a PCR process to generate the DNA template for mRNA, while Process 2 used bacterial plasmids1 for the same purpose.
Cost-Effectiveness: Process 2 is considered more cost-effective and scalable, but it involves using E. coli bacteria.
Quality Concerns: Process 2 has been found to have higher levels of plasmid DNA remnants and endotoxins2, which are potentially harmful.
FDA Approval: Despite these differences, the FDA has declared the vaccine safe and effective.
Adverse Events: The video suggests that the different manufacturing process could be linked to adverse events reported after vaccination.
Public Apathy: There is a general lack of public outrage or concern about these revelations.
Corporate Interests: The video implies that Pfizer may have prioritised cost-effectiveness over public safety.
Historical Precedent: The video mentions the Cutter Incident3 from the 1950s, where a different manufacturing process for the polio vaccine led to adverse effects.
The same trick was pulled on the public back when Gerald Ford was President and a big scare was raised over Swine flu in 1976 -and Merck got the big contract to make the vaccine. They tested one variety of vaccine and then administered another with a different formula, untested. Some people dropped dead at the time of injection, some came down with crippling Guilliane-Barre syndrome, paralysis or neuropathy, some became deathly ill and never quite recovered, with skinny children losing weight and having years of digestive complaints or painful rashes. This all got covered years afterward on the BBC, on 60 Minutes and in Scientific American Magazine. There’s no evidence that the vaccine safeguarded anyone, but the harm done was obvious, and compensation to victims was scant to nothing. - @Cyallaire
Said as simply as I can: Pfizer tested one product but shipped and injected another.
Said another way: The product injected into billions of people was not tested.
We have been had; again.
Only a criminal would do this, right?
Right.
This is a good moment to reflect on the Holy Pfizer.
Pfizer: A criminal enterprise
Pfizer has been convicted in both civil and criminal trials on multiple occasions. Here's a summary of some notable instances:
Faulty Heart Valves Settlement (1992):
Pfizer, through its subsidiary Shiley Inc., faced lawsuits over faulty Bjork-Shiley Convexo-Concave heart valves. In 1992, a settlement of $215 million was reached to cover recipients' medical consultations, research on identifying fracture risks, valve replacement surgeries, and compensation to each valve recipient.
Neurontin (2004)
Pfizer's Warner-Lambert unit agreed to pay $430 million to resolve criminal and civil charges related to the illegal promotion of its epilepsy drug, Neurontin, for off-label uses.
Bextra Case (2009):
Pfizer agreed to pay a total of $2.3 billion to settle criminal and civil charges related to the misbranding of the painkiller Bextra, which was promoted for conditions and dosages other than those approved by the FDA.
This settlement included a criminal fine of $1.3 billion, the largest in the history of the pharmaceutical industry at the time.
Trovan Case in Nigeria (2009):
Pfizer faced accusations for testing an experimental drug, Trovan, on Nigerian children without proper consent during a meningitis outbreak in 1996. The case was settled with Pfizer agreeing to pay $75 million as compensation to the state of Kano in Nigeria.
Off-label Promotion of Protonix (2012):
Pfizer, via its subsidiary Wyeth, agreed to pay $55 million to settle charges for illegally promoting the drug Protonix for unapproved uses related to treatment of all forms of gastro-esophageal reflux diseases (GERD) between 2000 and 2001.
Zyvox and Lyrica (2012)
Pfizer agreed to pay $60 million to settle allegations that its subsidiaries had bribed doctors and other health-care professionals in Europe and Asia to boost sales of its drugs, including Zyvox and Lyrica.
Chantix Settlement (2013):
Pfizer agreed to settle around 80% of the 2,700 state and federal lawsuits filed against it concerning the drug Chantix, which was linked to psychological effects such as suicidal thoughts. The company took a $273 million charge to cover the costs of these settlements.
Rapamune Settlement (2013):
Pfizer agreed to pay $491 million to settle civil and criminal charges over the illegal marketing of the kidney-transplant drug Rapamune for unapproved uses. This settlement included a criminal fine of $157.58 million.
Medicaid Rebates Settlement (2016):
Pfizer and its subsidiary Wyeth agreed to pay $784.6 million to settle cases regarding the incorrect calculation of Medicaid rebates for a gastric drug, covering a period from 2001 to 2006.
Now let’s learn a thing or two from one of our most trusted cats (el gato malo).
did the pfizer vaccine even really have a drug trial? (substack.com)
the key sleight of hand is this: the pfizer BNT162b2 trial was performed using a compound produced using a very different manufacturing process from the one used to create the drug that was actually shipped and sold.
This is beyond important, it is critical, because as the cat says “the process is the product”:
it was a small batch, high cost process that could not scale to make millions much less hundreds of millions of doses. and that is a VERY big deal because in this sort of biologic, the industry axiom has been constant for 100 years: “the process is the product.” make it a different way, and you have no idea if it’s the same thing. and the FDA knows this full well; it’s been a cornerstone of their approval process since the beginning.
“There are no best manufacturing processes. And so we don't know what the ingredients are. We don't know how it was manufactured we don't know where a lot of these were manufactured, and we just know nothing about these products, and nobody is actually looking at them.” - Sasha Latypova
Pfraud.
the sort of change that pfizer made to manufacturing was not minor, it was massive. and that means, in simple terms, that the vaccine they shipped was a different drug than the one they got approved by the FDA by pretty much any reasonable standard.
and that is pfraud, pure and simple. it means that the drug they jabbed into a billion arms was never tested in any meaningful way.
“process 2” drug is not “process 1” drug and this raises some severe issues about regulatory diligence and quite literally whether anyone, politico, physician, parent, or citizen, could have made proper decisions, recommendations, or given anything resembling actual informed consent.
to reiterate: the process is the product and therefore they had no idea what this new product was. and they shipped it anyway.
Bait & Switch
there is really no other sound conclusion here: this was a bait and switch and the drug pfizer shipped to the general public was not the one they used in the trial and that the FDA approved.
On making Pintos
this was the literal equivalent of building a perfect pinto by hand with master craftsmen for NHTSA and consumer reports to test and then shipping a bunch of junk made in a dysfunctional factory with massive defect rates and a different gas tank to your customers.
No regulator is better than a lying regulator
having a regulator that lies to you and papers over problems is worse than having no regulator at all. it’s the equivalent of thinking you have a seatbelt on when you don’t. it’s no basis for sound decisions.
Pfizer’s protective shield needs to be pierced
if the drug shipped was not the one tested, pfizer (already one of the most fined companies in human history) needs to be have its EUA protections yanked for pfraud and then get sued into bankruptcy as the gates open for class action suits by all those harmed. frankly, these protections (and similar for being on childhood vaxx schedules) should not exist at all.
Let’s end where we started, with this great video about the Mayor of Perth Basil Zempilas, the man standing smugly in the masthead video as Stephen unleashes “the only weapon he has”.
Thanks for being here.
Please consider a paid subscription. You will get nothing more for your support, as everything is made freely available. The money goes towards covering the costs of this work, medical freedom causes and support for the vaccine injured.
I am always looking for good, personal GMC, covid and childhood vaccination stories. You can write to me privately: unbekoming@outlook.com
If you are Covid vaccine injured, consider the FLCCC Post-Vaccine Treatment
If you want to understand and “see” what baseline human health looks like, watch (and share) this 21 minutes
If you want to help someone, give them a book. Official Stories by Liam Scheff. Point them to a safe chapter (here and here), and they will find their way to vaccination.
Here are all eBooks and Summaries produced so far:
FREE Summary: Bitten by Kris Newby (Lyme Disease)
FREE Summary: The Great Cholesterol Con by Dr Malcolm Kendrick
FREE Summary: Propaganda by Edward Bernays
FREE Summary: Toxic Legacy by Stephanie Seneff (Glyphosate)
FREE Summary: The Measles Book by CHD
FREE Summary: The Deep Hot Biosphere by Thomas Gold (Abiogenic Oil)
FREE Summary: The Peanut Allergy Epidemic by Heather Fraser
FREE eBook: A letter to my two adult kids - Vaccines and the free spike protein
Bacterial Plasmids
Bacterial plasmids are small, circular, double-stranded DNA molecules that are separate from a bacterial cell's chromosomal DNA. Unlike chromosomal DNA, which carries essential genetic information for the cell's basic functions, plasmids often contain genes that confer specific advantages to the host bacterium, such as antibiotic resistance.
Key Characteristics:
1. Circular Structure: Plasmids are usually circular in shape, although linear forms can also exist.
2. Replication: They can replicate independently of the bacterial chromosome, meaning they can make copies of themselves within the bacterial cell.
3. Transferability: Plasmids can be transferred between bacteria through a process known as bacterial conjugation, which allows for the sharing of genetic material.
4. Non-Essential Genes: Plasmids often carry genes that are not essential for the basic survival of the bacterium but may provide a survival advantage in certain environments, such as resistance to antibiotics or the ability to metabolise specific nutrients.
5. Size: They are generally smaller than chromosomal DNA and can range from a few thousand to several hundred thousand base pairs.
6. Multiple Copies: A single bacterial cell can contain multiple copies of the same plasmid or different types of plasmids.
7. Applications: Plasmids are widely used in biotechnology for cloning, gene expression, and the production of recombinant proteins.
Functions:
1. Antibiotic Resistance: One of the most well-known functions of plasmids is to provide bacteria with the ability to resist the effects of antibiotics.
2. Metabolic Pathways: Some plasmids contain genes that enable the bacterium to metabolise certain substances that it would not be able to otherwise.
3. Virulence Factors: In pathogenic bacteria, plasmids may carry genes that contribute to the bacterium's ability to infect host organisms.
4. Adaptation: Plasmids can help bacteria adapt to new environments by acquiring new genetic traits.
Endotoxins
Endotoxins are toxic substances bound to the bacterial cell wall and released when the bacterium ruptures or disintegrates. They are lipopolysaccharides (LPS) found in the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria. Unlike exotoxins, which are secreted in soluble form by live bacteria, endotoxins are structural components of the bacteria.
Key Characteristics:
1. Structure: Endotoxins are complex molecules composed of a lipid and a polysaccharide, hence the name lipopolysaccharide (LPS).
2. Heat Stability: They are heat-stable, meaning they can withstand high temperatures that would normally destroy bacteria or other types of toxins.
3. Gram-Negative Bacteria: Endotoxins are specific to Gram-negative bacteria, such as E. coli, Salmonella, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
4. Release: They are released when the bacterial cell disintegrates, dies, or multiplies.
5. Non-Specific Effects: Unlike exotoxins, which have specific targets, endotoxins generally produce non-specific symptoms like fever, malaise, and shock.
Functions:
1. Immune Response: Endotoxins can trigger a strong immune response, leading to inflammation, fever, and even septic shock in severe cases.
2. Cell Activation: They can activate various cell types, including macrophages and B cells, to release cytokines and other inflammatory mediators.
3. Coagulation: Endotoxins can activate the coagulation pathway, leading to disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) in severe cases.
4. Barrier Disruption: They can disrupt epithelial and endothelial barriers, leading to increased permeability and tissue damage.
The Cutter Incident
The Cutter Incident refers to a significant event in the history of vaccines that occurred in the United States in 1955. It involved the accidental distribution of polio vaccines containing live poliovirus, which led to an outbreak of polio among vaccinated individuals and their contacts. The incident is named after Cutter Laboratories, the pharmaceutical company responsible for producing the contaminated vaccine.
Key Events:
1. Polio Vaccine Development: Dr. Jonas Salk developed the first effective polio vaccine, which was an inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV). Clinical trials showed promising results, and the vaccine was hailed as a medical breakthrough.
2. Mass Production: After successful clinical trials, the task of mass-producing the vaccine was distributed to several pharmaceutical companies, including Cutter Laboratories.
3. Quality Control Failure: Cutter Laboratories failed to completely inactivate the poliovirus in some batches of the vaccine, resulting in the distribution of vaccines containing live poliovirus.
4. Outbreak: The contaminated vaccines led to an outbreak of polio. More than 200,000 children were exposed to the live virus, resulting in 40,000 cases of mild polio, about 200 cases of severe, permanent paralysis, and ten deaths.
5. Immediate Aftermath: The incident led to the immediate halt of the polio vaccination campaign, and Cutter Laboratories' license to produce the vaccine was revoked.
Consequences:
1. Public Trust: The Cutter Incident severely eroded public trust in vaccines and led to increased scrutiny and regulation of vaccine production and distribution.
2. Regulatory Changes: The incident led to significant changes in the regulation of vaccines, including more stringent quality control measures and oversight by health authorities.
3. Legal Precedents: Lawsuits following the incident set important legal precedents concerning the liability of pharmaceutical companies.
4. Enhanced Safety Protocols: The incident led to the implementation of more rigorous safety protocols for vaccine development and production.
Share this post