Interview with Vicky Davis

On Globalization, Citizenship and Sovereignty

Dec 26, 2023

Through my computer screen I saw nightmares, while outside I could hear lawn mowers, children laughing, dogs barking – all of the normal sounds that indicate all is well. – Vicky Davis

Background and Journey

Can you share with us your journey into investigative journalism and what drives your focus on the many topics you cover such as community development, international trade, and public health?

My activism on the internet began with learning about international trade agreements because the government was allowing and facilitating the flooding of our labor market with imported foreign workers. At the point I read a conceptual design for a national human resource management system that was put into the Congressional Record, I went into full on research and analysis mode because that’s not consistent with the American system of government. The questions I needed to answer were to determine if they were really doing it and if so, then who was behind it and how it was being done. As an Analyst, I documented what I found all along the way because that’s part of the job. With globalization, the concept of citizenship and sovereignty of the nation-state was flushed down the toilet of history.

How has your background shaped your perspective on these complex issues?

Working on computer systems, I knew the power of information and the value of it. Information systems are management and control tools. When I saw that the government and even the Pentagon was hiring foreign IT people while our domestic economy was collapsing with massive layoffs of Americans, my concern moved from my own personal interest to concern for the country and the future. It became an imperative for me to find out what was happening and why. Foreign programmers bring foreign values to the systems they work on. To an American programmer, a national human resources management system is a fire alarm. To a foreign programmer and depending on the country, a national system like that wouldn’t even generate a little smoke.

Community Development and Social Dynamics

Can you elaborate on how community development initiatives might contribute to a form of economic and social warfare?

If community development is done by local people for local people, then it can be a good thing. When community development is being done as a function of central planning with a boilerplate design using advanced technological systems coming together in a fusion center, that is a set up for economic and social warfare. You have private companies partnered with social groups and NGOs partnered with government including law enforcement. Together, they constitute a secret network of operations that control both the people and the critical infrastructure. Together, it constitutes weaponization of the critical infrastructure with secret networks of people who are in fact, weaponized against the citizens.

In your view, what are the most significant adverse effects of globalization on local communities in the U.S.?

The globalization of business included the globalization of labor. Employers are free to import foreign workers displacing American workers in our own country. It’s a government sponsored economic and social war on Americans in their own local communities. It creates a dystopic nightmare as the American way of life is completely disrupted and destroyed.

Could you discuss the concept of 'community' as an unelected power structure and its implications for American democracy?

The word ‘Community’ defines the network of people including business, non-profits and government people who are collaborators in the implementation of these business-driven, un-American systems of control. The implications for American democracy are that America is dying and it is being replaced with a business-driven system of command and control – virtual enslavement of the people by high tech systems of command and control.

Environmental Policy and Political Influence

Can you elaborate on the historical connection between environmental policy and communist ideologies?

My first significant finding that environmentalism was connected to communist ideologies was when I discovered the connection between the Club of Rome’s founders with the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) in Austria. The IIASA was founded as a bridge between scientists of the east and west working cooperatively. On the American side was the National Academy of Sciences and on the Soviet side, was the Soviet Academy of Sciences.

The Club of Rome was founded by Aurelio Peccei, a former executive with FIAT and Alexander King, Director-General for Scientific Affairs at the OECD – successor to the OEEC and the Marshall Plan. Peccei got his degree in economics at Turin University in 1930. His master’s thesis was on Lenin’s New Economic Policy. The surprise comes with the connection between Harvard University, the Ford Foundation and the IIASA. The biggest surprise of all was that Richard Nixon signed the legislation to create the EPA in 1969 and then he signed an environmental cooperation agreement with the Soviet Union on May 23, 1972.

What are the implications of tax lawyers being heavily involved in environmental policymaking? Can you discuss the potential consequences of intertwining environmental policy with tax law?

Tax law can be used to control behavior. It can incentivize certain activities while inhibiting other activities. Tax lawyers have no accountability to the public so they are free to either find or set up cases of controversy to be resolved in court. Court cases can and have been used to effectively write law through court decisions.

According to the history posted on the EPA’s website (now in the archive), the 1969 National Environmental Protection Act, “This statute recast the government’s role: formerly the conservator of wilderness, it now became the protector of earth, air, land, and water.” With that mission statement combined with tax exempt environmental law firms, it turned law into a weapon for conversion of our economy and our way of life from an American system to a communist system of government control. The inside joke of it was that Americans were paying for the conversion through the tax exemptions afforded to the donors of the non-profit environmental law firms.

Healthcare System and Ethical Concerns

What led you to draw parallels between the current American healthcare system and historical events in Nazi Germany?

When I was in the sixth grade, we had a guest speaker come to our class to talk about Nazi Germany, the prison camps and the human experimentation that took place in the camps. It piqued my curiosity enough for me to find and read several books on the subject and to become aware of the Nuremberg trials. That interest stayed with me for my entire life so in 2007 when IBM and Mayo Clinic gave a presentation at the National Governors Association conference and they talked about the use of computers, nationalized medical records with genetic profiles and “personalized genomic medicine”, I was horrified and terrified. History was repeating but this time, it was in the United States. Through my research, I discovered that our entire health care system was redesigned to accommodate human experimentation behind the cover of networked information systems.

Can you elaborate on your concerns regarding the ‘third-worldization’ of American healthcare?

Poor countries don’t have sophisticated systems of health care with available doctors and hospitals. The villages and towns, if they have anything, have nurses throughout much of the country. One of the significant changes to our redesigned health care system was to license Nurse Practitioners (NP) and Physicians Assistants (PA) as health care providers replacing trained physicians. The marketed reason for that was to lower the costs of health care. That wasn’t really true but it sounded good.

Physicians are trained in body chemistry. NPs and PAs – not so much. A physician can challenge and override a computer system’s diagnosis and recommendations for medications. NPs and PAs don’t have the credentials or training to challenge a computer system’s diagnosis and recommendations for medications based on body chemistry and drug interactions. NPs and PAs are a setup for human experimentation as described by IBM and Mayo Clinic. (Note: I have a personal story that confirmed my analysis of how the system works with NPs and PAs).

The centerpiece of health care reform in the U.S. was universal health insurance (Obama Care). Preauthorization transfers patient care decisions from the physician to the insurance company. It shifts the physician’s focus from patient care to reimbursement for services. Insurance companies use statistical data to determine treatment protocols that define what they will pay for and what they won’t. The preauthorization system is the perfect place to insert artificial intelligence in the practice of medicine. The preauthorization system will be used to say – we won’t pay for what you recommend but we will pay for this course of treatment – adding on at this location which serves as a triage function for research candidates.

What risks do you see in the growing trend of genetic research in healthcare?

With the redesign of the American health care system, there is no way to prevent human medical research and no way to oversee it. They’ve turned the American people into a flock of sheep surrounded by wolves who will simply cut a few out of the herd for experimental purposes. Because of the nature of networked systems, research populations can be distributed so there are no pockets of death or injury. If a family was suspicious, it would take serious time and money to investigate – not to mention the barriers to medical records (at least to those outside the health care system). In my opinion, the redesign of the American system of health care is perfectly evil designed for an evil purpose.

International Agreements and National Sovereignty

How do you believe international agreements have been used to circumvent constitutional processes in the U.S.?

It was a misrepresentation to call the international agreements trade agreements. They were about harmonization of laws and building the economic side of world government. The power to negotiate international agreements was the power to sell out our country and our people and that’s exactly what they did - sector by sector. Nobody votes for the U.S. Trade Representative and his teams of trade negotiators. Despite the fact that Congress gets an up or down vote on trade agreements, the voices of the representatives from the respective states are effectively nullified by design. I found a quote on the internet attributed to Henry David Thoreau – true or not doesn’t matter. The quote is: ‘if you steal the means by which I live, you’ve stolen my life’. That’s what the international trade regime has done. It has stolen our lives – not just individually but for the country as a whole.

Can you elaborate on the ways in which trade agreements impact national sovereignty?

The so-called trade agreements seek to establish a common international regime for business. The national barriers to trade include non-tariff barriers. To overcome the non-tariff barriers, the international regime provided a mechanism. A good example from 2001 was documented in an article in the Multinational Monitor by Mary Bottari. The article: NAFTA’s Investor “Rights” – A Corporate Dream, A Citizen Nightmare documents a dispute between a Canadian corporation and a California law prohibiting a chemical additive to gasoline, methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE). MTBE has grave environmental and health consequences but under the international regime, California had to either allow the use of the toxic substance or pay extortion money to the foreign corporation to cover their losses incurred as a result of the prohibition.

What are the long-term consequences for democratic governance if this trend of 'importing tyranny' continues?

This is probably the easiest question to answer for this interview. Representative government is effectively extinguished. What we have is a facade of a democratic system because corporations have been empowered through various means to override the public voice. The people can elect a candidate who promises to “fix the system”, but he can’t do it. The problems are structural. The internationalization of our economy has made the problems too big for any politician to fix.

Can you discuss any specific international agreements that you believe have had a particularly negative impact on U.S. governance?

The United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP) established the Montevideo Programme in 1982 for the development of international environmental law. On August 14, 1983, President Ronald Reagan signed a framework treaty with Mexico for environmental clean-up of the border region. It was signed in La Paz Mexico so I call it the La Paz treaty. In 1986, the U.S. signed an environmental agreement with Canada concerning the transboundary movement of hazardous waste. In 1987, the U.S. and Canada signed an agreement styled as a free trade agreement (FTA). In 1993 when the NAFTA agreement was ready for signature, they incorporated by reference, the La Paz treaty, and the two agreements with Canada de facto creating a ‘free trade area of North America’ and at the same time, committing us to the UNEP system of international environmental law. This was a surreptitious subversion of our national sovereignty by layering international agreements over time.

In 1993, following the Rio Summit, the UNEP Montevideo Program issued another report adopting Agenda 21 as a “broad strategy” for the development of international environmental law in the 1990s. Also in 1993, President Bill Clinton established the President’s Council on Sustainable Development (PCSD) to define task forces and working groups with a mission and role in the “reinvention of government” project as it pertains to the environment. Sustainable Development is a synonym for Agenda 21.

Refugee Resettlement and Societal Impact

What are your main concerns about the current refugee resettlement programs in the United States?

First, the people being imported are not refugees in the original meaning of the word. They are economic migrants and the importation is a business serving business. The Idaho Office for Refugees is the lead agency. Even though Idaho was included in the title, the Office for Refugee Resettlement is a function of the federal HHS/ACF (Administration for Children and Families). The social programs for refugees are managed through the Public Health Districts. The Public Health Districts are not part of the state government. The state government was only responsible to manage the federal funding to the districts. The Districts are independent, corporate and political. The corruption doesn’t end there. It only begins there. The entire system is a corrosive insurgent operation.

Numerous groups are involved in the various resettlement activities. So-called refugees get preferential job placement, housing, medical care – all at the expense of taxpayers many of whom are victimized by the resettlement programs whether they know it or not. The resettlement groups are connected to local government through community relations offices and they all work together as a syndicate up to and including providing media narratives to avoid negative publicity and to drown out criticism. Federal and corporate money for resettlement buys a lot of cooperation and silence.

How do you propose to balance humanitarian needs with national interests in the context of refugee resettlement?

I don’t intend to balance humanitarian needs with national interest because national interest comes first. What’s happening to our country in the name of humanitarianism is not humanitarianism. It’s only marketed that way. The system is in fact, business serving business. Charity begins at home. We have a lot of social problems with drug abuse, homelessness, mental illness, delinquency, poverty, etc. The social service needs of the American people should be met first before worrying about people in other countries. America isn’t responsible for the whole world. Let other countries step up for a change. If that sounds harsh, too bad. I don’t care. I’m tired of Americans taking second place in our own country.

Vicky Davis and her work can be found here:
The Technocratic Tyranny
Channeling Reality
Vicky Davis: eyeswideoopen@channelingreality.com

Lies are Unbekoming

Discussion about this post

Ready for more?