You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y'all. Stop it. - FDA
Stop taking penicillin y’all. You are not a horse. – Unbekoming
I didn’t think I’d write about Ivermectin again, but here we are.
This tweet from Toby Rogers made we aware of the new 12 minute film:
The new 12 minute film, "The War on Ivermectin," by Mikki Willis & Pierre Kory, is an absolute masterpiece. We are in the midst of the greatest crime in American history, possibly the great crime in the history of the world. - @uTobian
I recommend you watch the video first before we move on.
Let’s get the horse thing out of the way next.
If Ivermectin is horse medicine, then obviously so are all these antibiotics, used in humans and horses.
Penicillins (e.g., Penicillin G, Amoxicillin): These are often used for bacterial infections in both humans and horses.
Tetracyclines (e.g., Doxycycline, Oxytetracycline): These antibiotics are used for a variety of infections, including respiratory and wound infections.
Macrolides (e.g., Erythromycin, Azithromycin): Employed in treating respiratory and soft tissue infections.
Aminoglycosides (e.g., Gentamicin, Amikacin): Commonly used for severe bacterial infections, particularly those involving the gastrointestinal tract in horses.
Sulfonamides (often combined with Trimethoprim): Used for treating a range of bacterial infections in both humans and horses.
Cephalosporins (e.g., Cefazolin, Cephalexin): Effective against a wide variety of bacterial infections and commonly used in surgical prophylaxis.
Fluoroquinolones (e.g., Enrofloxacin, often used in veterinary medicine): These are broad-spectrum antibiotics used for various infections.
The fact that doctors stayed silent on this dual use point, is all you need to know about doctors.
Many doctors actually believed it. It’s not like they all knew it was BS but kept their mouths shut. It is now abundantly clear that the process that manufactures doctors over about one and a half decades does the following:
Establishes an obedience to credentials and authority that cannot be broken. It is militaristic in nature.
Directs their attention and focus for that period in a manner that disables their curiosity.
Breaks their critical thinking skills. They only operate within the parameters of “trusted” inputs fed to them by journals.
Breaks their moral compass.
And just for good measure, ensures that they all understand the value of willful ignorance, in case their minds or their curiosity act up.
As Tucker recently said during a great discussion with the one and only Jimmy Dore.
"Fundamentally everything they said was wrong about the vax. And it's hurt a lot of people...There are tens of thousands of doctors in the United States. Why aren't they all standing up and saying, 'Oh, my gosh, I'm so sorry?'...If you hurt someone unintentionally, you have to say I'm sorry. And I can't believe that 99% of American doctors won't do that. And I'm not going to them by the way. I would never go to a doctor who is still lying about COVID because that's a dangerous person, that's an immoral person and a dangerous person."
And here is Dana White saying the same thing.
"I will never talk to a doctor about my general health ever again... None of them know what they're talking about. They are all full of shit. All they know is to put you on pills and put you on medicine."
If you are new to the Ivermectin story and looking to catch up, I recommend this short video masterfully presented by Dr Tessa Lawrie.
This is quite possibly my favourite table of the whole sorry saga that was covid.
Ivermectin is safer than Vitamin C.
It’s also important to understand that withholding safe, effective and necessary medication is an old part of their playbook. This from the AIDS story.
From The Real Anthony Fauci
According to Callen, “We asked him (Fauci)—no, we begged him —to issue interim guidelines urging physicians to prophylax those patients deemed at high risk for PCP (pneumonia) [with
Bactrim or aerosol pentamidine]. Although it would not have cost the government much to have done so, he (Fauci) steadfastly refused to issue such guidelines. His reason: no data. So, the Catch-22 was complete, and many people died of PCP who didn’t have to.”
When the activists asked Dr. Fauci to at least add AL 721, Peptide D, DHPG, and aerosolized pentamidine to his clinical trials, Dr. Fauci’s refusal was loud: “I can’t do that!” he shouted. “I can’t convene a consensus conference.” The choice, he explained, of which compounds would enter NIAID’s clinical trial pipeline was made, not by public agreement, but by a panel of “independent scientists.” Dr. Fauci did not mention that virtually all the members of his “independent panel” were pharmaceutical PIs, with ties to NIAID and Burroughs Wellcome.
If you still haven’t read The Real Anthony Fauci, it’s never too late. It remains one of the most important books ever written.
By now, my primary takeaway from the Ivermectin story is that they have the Capacity to do what they did, in broad daylight, and on a Global scale. It was such a show of force, strength, synchronicity and confidence.
They withheld a treatment safer than Vitamin C from the whole world.
They made sure that every government, in their own way, played along.
They made sure that all doctors all over the world behaved.
They made sure that only more expensive and more dangerous treatments were available all over the world.
They made sure that all media, all over the world stuck to the narrative.
They made sure that all medical journals towed the line.
They made sure that all people (well most and certainly enough) believed everything they were told, all over the world. The propaganda was stunningly successful.
They had the capacity and confidence to execute a global full court press.
This is new Capacity. The scale of it, and the synchronicity of it is new. It’s never been tried before, at this scale, until now, and it worked.
What can I say but, holy moly and wow.
The Real Anthony Fauci has an excellent chapter on the whole Ivermectin fiasco. Here is a summary and collection of points, excerpts and statistics from that chapter:
This summary covers the COVID-19 treatment ivermectin and how authorities have actively worked to suppress this seemingly safe and effective treatment in favor of more expensive, less proven and potentially dangerous options. Despite substantial evidence of ivermectin's ability to prevent infection and treat COVID-19 based on over 20 mechanisms, along with a strong safety record over decades of global use, the FDA, CDC and others have advised against its use, even falsely labeling it a “horse dewormer.” Meanwhile, drug companies like Merck that originally promoted ivermectin now raise unfounded safety concerns while developing similar, costlier drugs. This coordinated suppression alongside exaggerated warnings seems tied to profit motivations and a national policy focused more on pushing vaccines than exploring promising repurposed treatments. However, the core ethical duty of doctors to help their patients appears under attack.
Ivermectin has shown ability to prevent and treat COVID-19 through over 20 different mechanisms of action against the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
Multiple randomized controlled trials found ivermectin led to large reductions in COVID-19 deaths, hospitalizations, and viral load when used preventatively or for early treatment.
Merck, originally developing and promoting IVM as a "wonder drug," suddenly declared safety concerns and pivoted to a new high-price, IVM-like COVID drug called molnupiravir.
Despite this safety and efficacy, the FDA, CDC and WHO have advised against using ivermectin for COVID and actively restricted access.
The policies limiting ivermectin seem to directly contradict the available science and risk/benefit analysis.
Merck and others originally manufacturing and promoting ivermectin now raise sudden unfounded concerns to discourage its use.
Simultaneously, Merck and Pfizer are developing new expensive antivirals using a similar mechanism of action as ivermectin.
The US government has committed to spend $1.2 billion purchasing Merck's drug at $712 per course despite safety risks and lack of clear benefit over ivermectin.
In coordinated fashion, the FDA, CDC and media began referring to ivermectin as an animal “horse dewormer” unfit for human use.
These statements contradict ivermectin's widespread historical use in humans across the developing world to treat parasites.
Despite warnings of rising overdoses, there is little to no evidence of hospitalizations or deaths from appropriately dosed oral ivermectin.
The warnings about ivermectin safety are directly contradicted by its track record of only 379 deaths over 30+ years, far lower than vaccines, remdesivir or other options.
Doctors' traditional authority to make benefit/risk judgments for their patients appears under attack by rigid policies focused less on individual wellbeing.
Promotion of ivermectin alternatives seem tied to the substantial profit to be made by pharmaceutical companies.
Suppression of ivermectin access shows the growing power of authoritarian systems to override medical ethics in pursuit of profit and policy.
The coordinated efforts against ivermectin signal an alarming erosion of doctors' ability to make independent treatment decisions in patients' best interests.
Policymakers and media seem to prioritize public vaccination policies above the responsibility toward individual patients to provide the best care based on available science.
The false warnings about ivermectin safety highlight a concerning willingness of authorities to misleadingly promote specific policy decisions.
The battles around ivermectin access showcase how financial conflicts of interest can bias health organizations against inexpensive treatments.
Ivermectin suppression underscores a gradual shift in medicine away from respect for individual choice and clinical flexibility toward rigid authoritative control.
The coordinated assault on ivermectin risks establishing a precedent for future government-dictated medical decision making based less on science and more on policy aims.
"Had ivermectin been employed in 2020...millions of lives could have been saved, and the pandemic with all its associated suffering and loss brought to a rapid and timely end."
"With politicians and other nonmedical individuals dictating to us what we are allowed to prescribe to the ill, we as doctors have been put in a position such that our ability to uphold the Hippocratic oath is under attack."
"Never before has our role as doctors been so important, because never before have we become complicit in causing so much harm."
"It's absolutely crystal clear. We can save lives today. If we can get the government to buy ivermectin.”
"The ERs are so backed up that gunshot victims were having hard times getting to facilities where they can get definitive care and be treated.” - False media claims on IVM overdoses.
"This idea that ivermectin is a horse dewormer that poses a lethal risk to humans is pure horse manure."
"Someone got to him, sent him the memo. Andrew Hill has been captured by some really dark forces."
40 years: 379 reported IVM deaths
1.5 million remdesivir patients: 1,499 deaths
10 months of COVID vaccines: 17,000 deaths
66-87% reductions in mortality from early IVM treatment
86% effectiveness as COVID prophylaxis
75%+ mortality reductions shown in meta-analyses
20+ mechanisms outlined for IVM against COVID-19
$1.2 billion purchase of molnupiravir at $712/course
Thanks for being here.
Please consider a paid subscription.
You will get nothing more for your support, as everything is made freely available. The money goes towards covering the costs of this work, medical freedom causes and support for the vaccine injured.
If you are Covid vaccine injured, consider the FLCCC Post-Vaccine Treatment
If you want to understand and “see” what baseline human health looks like, watch (and share) this 21 minutes
Here are all eBooks and Summaries produced so far: