Geoengineering
On Empire's most prized technology, The Dimming (Documentary) and so much more...
I’m writing this to my old self, my BC Self (Before Covid).
That person had no idea that there was even a debate going on. That there was a “conspiracy” to discuss.
That person had never heard the term “chemtrail”.
My ignorance was absolute. It was absolutely constructed. It was agnotological.
I am writing this for anyone who is curious but is where I used to be on this subject.
This will be a long stack, it could be a book, in fact, it very easily could be multiple books. But I’ll try to not overdo it.
Let’s start with some simple yet important questions. I will provide an answer and then give you proofs for the answers as you continue to read.
Do governments spray stuff in the sky? Yes.
Do they do it to influence and control the weather? Yes.
Do they lie about it to the public? Yes.
Have they been doing it for a long time? Yes.
Do they have other weather modification technology? Yes.
Is the origin of this technology military? Yes.
Ok, let’s pause and catch our breath.
What does this all mean?
Well, one of the things it means is that when they talk about Climate Change, they are not lying, because they are changing it, but blaming you for your choice of straw, your selfish desire to travel and your “carbon footprint.”
Let that sink in for a moment.
They. Change. The. Climate.
The Truman Show was a documentary.
Ok, enough with that. Now for some proof.
I will ask you to do the thing that I first did on this journey.
Put aside two hours, make yourself a drink, maybe even a stiff one, and watch The Dimming.
Here it is on Rumble in case the Masters of the Universe decide to remove it from YT.
Seeing that you are here though, let’s keep going with a detailed summary of what the documentary covers. But watching it is far, far better than just reading it.
Comprehensive Summary of The Dimming
Part 1: Understanding Climate Engineering
The Basics of Climate Engineering: An overview of climate engineering, also known as geoengineering, focusing on its goal to manipulate the Earth’s climate system.
Global Dimming and Its Effects: Examining the phenomenon of global dimming, where direct sunlight reaching Earth's surface is reduced due to light-scattering particles in the atmosphere.
Contrails vs. Chemical Trails: Differentiating between contrails (condensation trails) and chemical trails, the latter being intentional dispersions for climate engineering.
Part 2: The Science and Mechanics Behind Climate Engineering
High Bypass Turbofan Jet Engines: Exploring the role of these engines in climate engineering, capable of releasing particles that affect weather patterns.
Weather Modification History: Tracing the history of weather modification from its early stages to the present, including the use of aircrafts for dispersing chemicals.
The Role of Patents in Climate Engineering: Discussing various patents related to weather modification, indicating the technological capabilities in this field.
Part 3: Environmental and Health Impacts
The Environmental Footprint: Assessing the impact of climate engineering on the environment, including the ozone layer, hydrological cycles, and ecosystems.
Human Health Concerns: Exploring potential health risks associated with exposure to chemicals and particulates used in climate engineering.
Biodiversity and Ecological Balance: Analyzing how climate engineering can disrupt ecological balance and affect biodiversity.
Part 4: Controversies and Challenges
Government and Military Involvement: Investigating the role of governments and military in climate engineering, including secrecy and lack of public disclosure.
Public Awareness and Misinformation: Addressing the challenges in raising public awareness and combating misinformation about climate engineering.
Ethical and Legal Considerations: Discussing the ethical implications and legal aspects of manipulating the Earth’s climate system.
Part 5: Climate Engineering and Its Effects on Weather Patterns
Chemical Ice Nucleation and Manufactured Weather Events: Exploring how chemical ice nucleation creates artificial winter weather events. This involves seeding cloud moisture with chemicals, leading to phenomena like frozen rain and ice storms, which are becoming increasingly common.
Impact on Regional Climates: Focusing on how climate engineering affects regional climates, including artificially induced snowstorms and extreme cold events, contrasting with areas experiencing record warmth.
Disruption of the Hydrological Cycle: Examining how climate engineering disrupts the natural rain cycle, leading to altered weather patterns globally.
Part 6: Environmental Impacts
Meltdown of the Cryosphere: Discussing the rapid melting of Earth's ice deposits and how climate engineering attempts to mask this phenomenon through methods like sea surface ice nucleation.
Deforestation and Impact on Flora: The alarming rate of forest die-off, potentially linked to defoliants in aerosol sprays, which disrupts the natural cycle of leaf shedding and growth.
Soil Degradation: Detailing how climate engineering contaminates the soil, leading to the devastation of the soil microbiome and affecting nutrient uptake in plants.
Ozone Layer Depletion: Exploring how climate engineering contributes to the weakening of the ozone layer, leading to increased UV radiation and its effects on ecosystems.
Part 7: Biological Impacts and Health Concerns
Effects on Human Health: Investigating the potential health risks of inhaling chemically nucleated particles, including respiratory and cognitive impairments.
Impact on Wildlife: Assessing the effects of climate engineering on wildlife, particularly focusing on the decline of bee populations due to aluminum exposure.
Aerotoxic Syndrome: The emerging health concern related to the inhalation of nanoparticles, particularly impacting airline industry workers.
Part 8: The Controversy and Secrecy Surrounding Climate Engineering
Government and Military Involvement: Delving into the historical and current involvement of governments and militaries in climate engineering, and the secrecy surrounding these operations.
Lack of Transparency and Public Awareness: Discussing the lack of transparency in climate engineering programs and the challenges in raising public awareness.
Role of Environmental Groups: Critiquing the apparent silence of major environmental groups on the issue of climate engineering.
The Dimming also addresses the role of Electromagnetic and Radio Frequencies
Ionospheric Heating Experiments: Patents by inventor Bernard Eastlund the inspiration for High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP). HAARP accused of secretly testing ability to lift and manipulate ionosphere with powerful radio beam blasts, enabling control over jet stream winds and alteration of global weather patterns.
Weather System Manipulation: Global network of ionospheric heaters beam intense radio frequencies and microwaves into sky to manipulate electrically conductive metals dispersed by aircraft into weather system creation/modification. Includes steering hurricanes and winter weather events. Particles are nano sized for maximum manipulation via specific electromagnetic frequencies and heating.
HAARP
It’s important to note that although discussions about “Solar Radiation Management” are being sanctioned for public consumption, HAARP and related technologies are not.
Here you can listen to the government directly, from a 2014 Committee chaired by Alaskan Senator Murkowski.
Listen to Dr. Walker1 between minute 3.00 - 3.20 talk about their ability to manage and control the Ionosphere2.
They continue with their ionosphere “research”.
Here are some of their current projects.
Kennedy and Wigington
Next let’s go to an excellent discussion that Robert Kennedy Jr had with Dane Wigington.
Again, well worth one hour.
Comprehensive Summary: Kennedy and Wigington Podcast
Introduction
This summary provides a detailed overview of the conversation between Robert Kennedy and Dane Wigington in a podcast. The main topics of discussion revolve around environmental concerns, particularly climate change, geoengineering, and the role of influential figures and organizations in these areas.
Background of Speakers
Robert Kennedy: An environmental activist with a focus on climate science for over 40 years.
Dane Wigington: Producer of the climate engineering documentary "The Dimming". He has a background in solar energy, was a former employee of Bechtel, a licensed contractor in California and Arizona, and has spent 20 years researching global climate engineering operations.
Main Discussion Points
Climate Change and Climate Engineering
Wigington expresses concerns that climate change discussions have been hijacked by entities like the World Economic Forum and Bill Gates.
Focus shifts to geoengineering, particularly solar radiation management (SRM) and its potential as a severe threat, comparable to climate change itself.
Geoengineering: A Deeper Dive
The conversation delves into geoengineering, especially its implementation and effects.
Wigington criticizes the approach of injecting millions of tons of aluminum nanoparticles into the atmosphere as part of SRM, highlighting the lack of consideration for environmental and health consequences.
Chemtrails and Evidence
The topic of chemtrails is addressed. Wigington claims that what's often seen in the sky are particulate trails from aircraft involved in geoengineering, not just condensation trails.
He presents evidence such as film footage of military tankers and commercial aircraft with nozzles, and lab tests showing climate engineering elements like aluminum, barium5, and strontium6.
Public Perception and Conspiracy Theories
Kennedy acknowledges the public's general skepticism towards chemtrails and geoengineering theories.
Wigington argues that there is considerable evidence supporting these theories, including historical references to weather control.
Involvement of Commercial Aircraft
Discussion about whether commercial aircraft are used for spraying particulates in the atmosphere.
Wigington suggests that commercial aircraft might be utilized for climate engineering purposes, possibly without the knowledge of the pilots or crew.
Environmental and Health Impacts
The detrimental effects of these practices on the environment, including soil and water contamination with aluminum, are highlighted.
Health concerns, particularly the link between aluminum exposure and neurological diseases like Alzheimer's, are discussed.
Military and Governmental Involvement
The potential military application of weather control and climate engineering is touched upon.
Wigington suggests a level of governmental cover-up and secrecy regarding these operations.
Climate Engineering as a Weapon
The possibility of using climate engineering as a geopolitical tool, affecting regions like the Middle East, is discussed.
Kennedy and Wigington contemplate the ethical and legal implications of such practices.
Chemtrail and Contrail
Watch as the chemtrail plane switches off the sprayers once it completes delivering its payload.
They have flooded the zone and confused people with talk of “contrails” or condensation trails, which are obviously real, but are well suited to confuse people about all the spraying.
Broad Suite of Technologies
Next let’s have a look at the long list of Geoengineering technologies that we know of.
I would suggest using the terms below for online searches. You will see a whole body of articles and literature that is hidden in plain sight.
Solar Radiation Management (SRM):
Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI):
Injecting sulfate aerosols or other materials into the stratosphere to reflect sunlight back into space.
Marine Cloud Brightening:
Spraying sea salt into the atmosphere to brighten clouds and increase their reflectivity.
Cirrus Cloud Thinning (CCT):
Thinning cirrus clouds to allow more longwave radiation to escape into space.
Space Reflectors:
Placing reflectors in space to deflect solar radiation.
Surface Albedo Enhancement/Modification:
Increasing the reflectivity of surfaces on Earth, such as whitening roofs or modifying vegetation.
Raising Ground-level Albedo:
Changing the surface properties of the ground to reflect more sunlight.
Stratospheric Sulfur Injection:
Injecting sulfur compounds into the stratosphere to reflect sunlight.
Cloud Whitening:
Enhancing cloud reflectivity to reflect more sunlight back into space.
Orbital Mirrors and Sunshades:
Deploying mirrors or shades in space to deflect solar radiation.
Microbubbles:
Generating millions of tiny air bubbles in the ocean to reflect more sunlight back into space.
Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR):
Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS):
Using biomass for energy while capturing and storing the carbon dioxide produced.
Direct Air Capture (DAC):
Capturing carbon dioxide directly from the atmosphere.
Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS):
Capturing carbon dioxide emissions at the source and storing them underground or underwater.
Ocean Fertilization:
Dumping nutrients into the ocean to stimulate phytoplankton growth, which absorbs carbon dioxide.
Enhanced Weathering:
Crushing minerals and spreading them on land or in the ocean to react with and sequester carbon dioxide.
Enhanced Photosynthesis:
Manipulating plant or algae genetics to increase their photosynthetic efficiency and carbon dioxide uptake.
Artificial Upwelling:
Transporting nutrient-rich deep ocean water to the surface to stimulate phytoplankton growth and absorb carbon dioxide.
Carbon Burial:
Burying carbon or biochar in the ground to sequester carbon dioxide.
Carbon Capture Use and Storage (CCUS):
Capturing CO2 from either industry or the atmosphere and using it as a feedstock for manufacturing, resulting in CO2 stored in products.
IPCC Expert Meeting
They have public meetings to discuss it.
IPCC Expert Meeting on Geoengineering — IPCC
Here is the 2011 report from the IPCC gathering in Peru.
Key Points from the 2011 Expert Meeting on Geoengineering
1. Key Terminology in Geoengineering
Geoengineering: Methods to alter the climate system to alleviate climate change impacts, including Solar Radiation Management (SRM) and Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR).
Solar Radiation Management (SRM): Techniques to modify Earth's shortwave radiative budget, like stratospheric aerosol injection and cloud brightening.
Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR): Methods to remove CO2 from the atmosphere, involving natural carbon sinks or chemical engineering, such as iron fertilization and afforestation.
2. Emerging Issues for IPCC’s Fifth Assessment Report (AR5)
Specific Terminology: Recommends using specific terms (CDR, SRM) rather than the broad term 'geoengineering'.
Holistic Assessment Framework: Suggests a common framework to assess geoengineering techniques, including criteria like effectiveness, feasibility, scalability, sustainability, and environmental risks.
Long-Term Focus: Emphasizes considering long-term implications of geoengineering technologies, potentially beyond 2100.
3. Discussion on Solar Radiation Management (SRM) Methods
Holistic Treatment of Costs and Risks: Evaluates costs including social and environmental externalities and assesses risks in the context of climate change.
Knowledge Gaps: Highlights limited empirical data and the need for further research in areas like sustainability, environmental risks, and governance challenges.
4. Discussion on Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) Methods
Method Categorization: Differentiates between ocean-based methods (chemical and biological CO2 absorption) and land-based methods (enhancing natural sinks or reducing natural sources).
Geoengineering Classification: Separates CDR methods into geoengineering and non-geoengineering based on scale and impact, with no consensus on specific boundaries.
Understanding Gaps: Points out limited knowledge on large-scale impacts, economic costs, and social acceptability of CDR methods.
David Keith
You will notice on page 4 of the PDF above of the 2011 IPCC meeting and listed in the Scientific Steering Group a certain David Keith.
Let’s listen to him in his own words.
Stanford on Reflecting Sunlight
Here from Stanford University is a more recent 2021 report on dimming the sun titled Reflecting Sunlight.
Summary of Reflecting Sunlight
The summary emphasizes that climate change is causing widespread, severe, and often irreversible impacts globally. To limit warming to well below 2°C, dramatic reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are necessary, with carbon dioxide emissions needing to reach zero in the latter half of the 21st century. Despite the potential to reduce GHG emissions rapidly, progress has been insufficient, and emissions remain high.
The report advocates for a multifaceted approach to address climate change, emphasizing GHG emissions reduction, carbon removal and sequestration, and adaptation to climate change impacts. Given the urgency and the insufficient pace of current efforts, the report suggests considering additional strategies like solar geoengineering (SG).
SG aims to moderate warming by increasing the atmosphere's reflectivity or reducing the trapping of outgoing thermal radiation. This includes methods like Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI), Marine Cloud Brightening (MCB), and Cirrus Cloud Thinning (CCT). While SG could potentially reduce surface temperatures and mitigate some climate change risks, it also introduces new risks and uncertainties, such as impacts on atmospheric chemistry, regional climate changes, and complex socio-political consequences.
The report stresses that SG is not a substitute for GHG emissions reduction, as it doesn't address the root cause of climate change or issues like ocean acidification. It also raises concerns about new risks and cannot restore global or regional climate to a previous state.
A comprehensive research program on SG is recommended, focusing on policy-relevant knowledge rather than deployment pathways. This program should be transparent, diverse, and involve public and stakeholder engagement, with international coordination and cooperation.
For solar geoengineering research, the report suggests a transdisciplinary approach integrating physical, social, and ethical dimensions, with robust public engagement and diverse perspectives. This research should be governed by strong, transparent, and inclusive mechanisms, both nationally and internationally.
The report outlines an integrated research agenda under three categories: Context and Goals for SG Research, Impacts and Technical Dimensions, and Social Dimensions. It recommends funding of $100–200 million over 5 years for SG research, ensuring it doesn't detract from other vital climate research and includes governance and public engagement efforts.
In conclusion, while SG has potential for cooling the Earth's surface, it also carries risks and uncertainties. A balanced, comprehensive research program is essential to understand its full implications and should proceed with caution, prioritizing emissions reduction and adaptation strategies.
Fine-Tuning
They are starting to normalize it in the public domain. Here is a documentary framing it as “fine-tuning”.
Slowing Climate Change
A very common framing is that it is necessary to “slow climate change”.
Accident
Here they are using the idea of "accident" to try and rationalize this becoming a regular use case that we should do intentionally to save the earth from climate change.
We’ve Been Accidentally Geoengineering the Earth for Decades (yahoo.com)
"These findings—along with a number of other studies conducted examining the loss of high-sulfur ship tracks over the ocean—may help bolster the case for geoengineering, a term to describe the technologies that can be used to artificially alter the Earth’s climate. While it’s a controversial and potentially dangerous strategy, proponents say that it’s rapidly becoming one of the few options we have to stave off the worst impacts of climate change. It’s really only natural to ask the question of should we be doing this deliberately to buy us time for decarbonization or to scale up carbon renewal technologies, Diamond said."
Profit
There is also definitely a profit motive in play.
Big names behind US push for geoengineering | Geoengineering | The Guardian
The Guardian article by John Vidal, dated October 6, 2011, discusses the increasing involvement of a significant US coalition in geoengineering. This group, comprising leaders from academia, the military, science, and business, is motivated by potential profits from geoengineering technologies. The article contrasts the UK's cautious approach to geoengineering with the more aggressive stance of the US, particularly highlighted by the Bipartisan Policy Center's advocacy for large-scale climate change experiments. The BPC, influenced by various corporate sectors, promotes US dominance in military and corporate arenas. Key figures in this movement include David Whelan from Boeing and scientists like Ken Caldeira and David Keith, who are involved in geoengineering research funded by Bill Gates. The article warns of potential conflicts, termed "climate wars," arising from these geoengineering pursuits.
“New” Clouds
Here they are normalizing “new” cloud shapes.
Mt Shasta and Aluminum
"Since 2006, the snow on Mt Shasta has 5x more aluminum. 61,000 mcg per L, than the soil underneath it"
So how can the white snow have more aluminum than mud below it?
Simple. They're spraying it above you constantly in geoengineering and solar radiation management programs to block sunlight and "stop climate change".
The aluminum content of rain should also be zero with a ph of 5.5, but yet we are also finding significant amounts of it with a test back in 2013 showing 13,000 mcg per L. This is making the rain way more alkaline, which has hugely impactful downstream effects on soil quality and the capacity to grow healthy food with proper mineral content and balance.
This is one of the contributing factors to why everyone is so deficient in magnesium and why you can't get enough from food anymore, which means we are all required to supplement it. - Inversionism
China
It’s strange that countries like China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, and others are openly acknowledging their use of geoengineering for various purposes, yet when it's suggested that the US military might be doing the same, there's a stark contrast in reaction, with people resorting to denial and “conspiracy” slander?
China plans rapid expansion of 'weather modification' efforts | China | The Guardian
For six decades, the communist nation has deployed military aircraft and anti-aircraft guns to lace clouds with silver iodide or liquid nitrogen to thicken water droplets to the point where they fall as snow or rain. The technology has mostly been used at a local level to alleviate droughts or clear skies ahead of major events, such as the 2008 Olympics or last October’s 70th anniversary of the People’s Republic of China.
NOAA
Here are reports on the NOAA website.
Currently, the most common form of weather modification is cloud seeding, which increases rain or snow, usually for the purpose of increasing the local water supply. Weather modification can also have the goal of preventing damaging weather, such as hail or hurricanes, from occurring.
Kristen Meghan
Whistleblower Kristen Meghan (former Air Force Senior Industrial Hygienist & Environmental Specialist) confirmed geoengineering chemtrails in Hauppauge, New York, January 18, 2014 during a live presentation.
She served nice years active duty and her official Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) was 4BOX1 (Bioenvironmental Engineer). She audited chemicals as part of her duties and when she heard about the chemtrails conspiracy she wanted to debunk it, but instead the opposite happened. She paid a heavy price, explaining her military command demonized her, threatened to lock her up for mental examination and have her daughter taken away if she didn’t quit investigating government funded military geoengineering.
John Brennan
In the following speech at The Council of Foreign Relations on June 29, 2016, CIA Director John Brennan advertises openly about geoengineering, which implies the government (whether military or CIA) has always been involved in geoengineering programs and as of 2016 have gone public about doing so:
Another example is the array of technologies (often referred to collectively as geoengineering) that potentially could help reverse the warming effects of global climate change. One that has gained my personal attention is stratospheric aerosol injection, or SAI, a method of seeding the stratosphere with particles that can help reflect the sun’s heat...
Some History
This technology has been around for a very long time. This PDF from 50 years ago.
Here is a concise overview of the history of weather modification and geoengineering experiments.
Project Cirrus7
Project Cumulus8
Project Skyfire9
Project Skywater10
Operation Ranch Hand11
Project Popeye12
Considering the extent of their technology and experiments in the 1950s and 60s, we can only wonder what they can do today.
Air Traffic Controller
Air Traffic Tower radios Southwest pilot "You Have a CHEMTRAIL Off Your Left Wing"
Who wants to bet that air traffic controller lost their job over saying the unspeakable word "chemtrail" on the transmission open to the public? They sign very strict NDAs about this and cannot disclose anything about the programs under any circumstances, on purpose or by accident. You suspend all constitutional rights and will get fined and jailed for breaking it. - @Inversionism
Data Tampering
There are many aspects to the whole charade, which includes a long history of data tampering by NASA and others. I’ll leave that for another day and maybe its own stack.
The modelers fabricated fake historical temperature data to match their failed models. - Tony Heller
In Conclusion
I have covered before Empire’s need to create globalising doctrines that were seeded [pardon the pun] in the early 1990s into the global mind via supranational organizations.
The geopolitical objectives of this “global threat”, should be obvious by now; I will not rehash it here.
As you can see now, the technology to influence the climate was well and truly developed by the 1990s. There is no doubt in my mind, that the climate “crisis” that Empire has been “warning” about is pushed along and regularly “false flagged” to keep the story going and believable.
They need regular “evidence”, and they have the technology to create it. To “plant” it. Like the crooked cop they are.
They can create and shift rain patterns. They can also create draughts. Imagine this power in a geopolitical sense. Nations can be brought to their knees by tampering with their ability to farm their own food.
This is why I consider this to be Empire’s most prized technology. The fact that they are talking about it publicly now means they need to create a limited hangout to protect the most important parts of it that need to remain secret.
It’s important to make one final comment before we wrap up. The vast majority of honest climate change scientists and activists do not discuss geoengineering. Even within the honest, dissident space, this subject is verboten. I don’t have a good explanation as to why this is.
Every box we need to tick to prove that the government, military, and big corporations are messing with the environment through geoengineering; is ticked.
Patents, declassified Projects, video evidence, chemicals in the environment that match the patents, public admissions on government and university websites, plus Presidents, heads of CIA and whistleblowers all tell us the same thing.
It’s real. They do it. They lie about doing it.
Final Short Compilation
After all that, you will better understand this short 23-minute collage and compilation. Some of the material we have already covered.
Resources:
Geoengineering Watch | Exposing the climate engineering cover-up
Inversionism (@Inversionism) / X (twitter.com)
Geoengineering - Weather Modification & Manipulation (@slovakia_geo.engineering)
Further Research
I am looking for good source material and subject matter experts on HAARP.
I am also looking for quality information on Australia’s involvement in Empire’s geoengineering project.
There is also the connection with earthquakes. I’m looking for especially high-quality information on this subject too.
unbekoming@outlook.com
Thanks for being here.
Please consider a paid subscription.
You will get nothing more for your support, as everything is made freely available. The money simply goes towards recovering some of the cost of this work.
I am always looking for good, personal GMC, covid and childhood vaccination stories. You can write to me privately: unbekoming@outlook.com
If you are Covid vaccine injured, consider the FLCCC Post-Vaccine Treatment
If you want to understand and “see” what baseline human health looks like, watch (and share) this 21 minutes
If you want to help someone, give them a book. Official Stories by Liam Scheff. Point them to a “safe” chapter (here and here), and they will find their way to vaccination.
Here are all eBooks and Summaries produced so far:
FREE Book Summary: The HPV Vaccine on Trial by Holland et al.
FREE Book Summary: Bitten by Kris Newby (Lyme Disease)
FREE Book Summary: The Great Cholesterol Con by Dr Malcolm Kendrick
FREE Book Summary: Propaganda by Edward Bernays
FREE Book Summary: Toxic Legacy by Stephanie Seneff (Glyphosate)
FREE Book Summary: The Measles Book by CHD
FREE Book Summary: The Deep Hot Biosphere by Thomas Gold (Abiogenic Oil)
FREE Book Summary: The Peanut Allergy Epidemic by Heather Fraser
FREE eBook: What is a woman? - “We don’t know yet.”
FREE eBook: A letter to my two adult kids - Vaccines and the free spike protein
Dr. David Walker, who was the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Science, Technology and Engineering, played a significant role during the Murkowski Committee discussions on the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP). During the Senate hearing, he provided insights into the Air Force's perspective on HAARP, particularly regarding its future and potential applications.
Dr. Walker's comments during the hearing emphasized that the Air Force no longer had a need for the HAARP facility in the future and that they were moving on to other ways of managing the ionosphere, a key area of focus for HAARP. He mentioned that HAARP was designed to inject energy into the ionosphere to control it.
The ionosphere is a significant part of Earth's upper atmosphere that extends from about 48 km (30 miles) to 965 km (600 miles) above sea level. This region includes parts of the mesosphere, thermosphere, and exosphere. The ionosphere is characterized by its ionization, primarily caused by solar radiation. This ionization plays a crucial role in atmospheric electricity and forms the inner edge of the magnetosphere. It is particularly important for the propagation of radio waves across long distances on Earth and also affects GPS signals traveling through this layer.
The ionosphere is very dynamic and changes in response to the varying inputs of energy from the Sun. During the daytime, it is denser due to the ionization caused by the sun's rays. At night, this layer thins out as the ionized particles recombine into neutral particles. However, these changes are not just diurnal but also respond to other factors, including weather conditions on Earth and space weather linked to solar activity.
The ionosphere, which is the part of Earth's upper atmosphere ionized by solar radiation, plays a significant role in influencing both weather and climate.
One of the key ways the ionosphere influences weather and climate is through its interaction with Earth’s weather systems. Weather phenomena such as hurricanes and large thunderstorm systems can create pressure waves that propagate upwards into the ionosphere, causing changes in this region. These changes can, in turn, affect the density and composition of the ionosphere.
Additionally, the ionosphere is influenced by space weather, which includes changing magnetic and electric conditions in space, usually connected to solar activity. The ionosphere's composition of charged particles makes it particularly reactive to these conditions. Such space weather events can have various impacts on the ionosphere, including the creation of auroras, disruptions in communication signals, and sometimes causing issues for satellites.
Furthermore, scientists from NASA and various universities have been studying how heat and energy move within the ionosphere, and how these dynamics affect both the ionosphere itself and the regions of space and atmosphere it interacts with.
The Ionospheric Connection Explorer (ICON) is a NASA mission launched on October 10, 2019, to study the ionosphere, a dynamic zone in Earth's upper atmosphere where terrestrial and space weather meet. The mission involves a satellite carrying four instruments to image the ionosphere and measure characteristics of the space environment. ICON's instruments include the Michelson Interferometer for Global High-resolution Thermospheric Imaging (MIGHTI), the Ion Velocity Meter (IVM), the Extreme Ultra-Violet instrument (EUV), and the Far Ultra-Violet instrument (FUV). These instruments collectively provide a comprehensive view of the ionosphere, aiding in understanding its variability and its response to weather and space weather phenomena.
GOLD, which stands for Global-scale Observations of the Limb and Disk, is a NASA mission that focuses on studying the ionosphere, a vital layer of Earth's atmosphere where terrestrial weather and space weather interact. The mission aims to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the ionosphere's dynamics and its influence on communication and navigation systems.
Key aspects of the GOLD mission include:
Observational Scope: GOLD observes the Earth’s ionosphere and thermosphere from a geostationary orbit, providing a broad and continuous view of these atmospheric layers. This vantage point allows for the monitoring of the effects of solar and geomagnetic activity on the upper atmosphere.
Instrumentation: The mission is equipped with an ultraviolet imaging spectrograph that measures temperatures and compositions in the Earth's thermosphere and ionosphere. This instrument helps to detect changes in this region caused by various factors, including solar radiation and atmospheric conditions.
Research Goals: GOLD aims to investigate how the upper atmosphere reacts to geomagnetic storms, solar radiation, and other influences. It seeks to understand the impacts of these factors on the ionosphere's temperature, composition, and structure.
Applications: The data gathered by GOLD helps in understanding disruptions in communication and navigation signals, which are crucial for both civilian and military purposes. It also contributes to the study of space weather and its impacts on Earth.
Barium is a chemical element with the symbol "Ba" and atomic number 56. It's a soft, silvery alkaline earth metal. Because of its high chemical reactivity, barium is never found in nature as a free element. Its hydroxide, known as baryta, was identified in 1774 by Carl Wilhelm Scheele and extracted in 1808 by Sir Humphry Davy in England.
Key characteristics and uses of barium include:
Physical Properties: Barium is a relatively dense metal. It's softer than most metals and can be cut with a knife.
Chemical Reactivity: Barium reacts with water to produce barium hydroxide and hydrogen gas. It also reacts with air, and it's typically stored under oil or in an inert atmosphere to prevent it from reacting with air.
Compounds and Uses:
Barium Sulfate (BaSO4): This compound is used in medical imaging to improve the contrast of X-ray images, particularly for the gastrointestinal tract. It's known as a radiocontrast agent.
Barium Nitrate (Ba(NO3)2) and Barium Chlorate (Ba(ClO3)2): These are used in green firework formulations.
Barium Titanate (BaTiO3): A ferroelectric material, used in capacitors, electromechanical transducers and nonlinear optics.
Barium Oxide (BaO): Used in the coating of hot cathodes, for example in cathode ray tubes.
Safety and Health Concerns: Some barium compounds, if not handled properly, can be toxic. Barium sulfate, however, is not toxic due to its insolubility.
Occurrence: Barium is typically found in ores like barite (barium sulfate) and witherite (barium carbonate). These ores are the major sources of barium and its compounds and are mined commercially in many countries.
Barium has a wide range of applications, from industrial and manufacturing uses to important roles in medical diagnostics.
Strontium is a chemical element with the symbol "Sr" and atomic number 38. It is a soft, silver-white, alkaline earth metal that has physical and chemical properties similar to its two vertical neighbors in the periodic table, calcium and barium. Strontium is naturally present in the earth's crust and occurs in various minerals, most notably celestite (strontium sulfate) and strontianite (strontium carbonate).
Key aspects of strontium include:
Physical Properties: Strontium is softer than calcium and decomposes in water more vigorously. It is also denser than both calcium and barium.
Chemical Reactivity: Like other alkaline earth metals, strontium is highly reactive chemically and forms compounds with a variety of elements. In the presence of air, strontium reacts with oxygen to form strontium oxide and will ignite spontaneously at high temperatures to produce both strontium oxide and strontium nitride.
Isotopes and Radioactivity: Natural strontium is a mix of four stable isotopes. However, several radioactive isotopes of strontium exist, including strontium-90, a byproduct of nuclear fission with a half-life of about 29 years. Strontium-90 is of particular concern due to its potential health risks and its role as a nuclear fallout product.
Applications:
Metal Alloys: Strontium is used to refine zinc and is added to casting alloys to improve mechanical properties.
Electronics and Magnets: Certain strontium compounds have electrical properties useful in electronics. Strontium ferrite magnets are fairly common.
Fireworks and Flares: Strontium compounds, especially strontium carbonate (SrCO3) and strontium nitrate (Sr(NO3)2), impart a bright red color to flames and are used in fireworks and signal flares.
Medical Uses: Strontium ranelate was used in the treatment of osteoporosis and strontium chloride hexahydrate is in toothpaste for sensitive teeth.
Health and Safety: While the stable isotopes of strontium are not a major health hazard, the radioactive strontium-90 can be dangerous. It behaves like calcium and is deposited in the bones of humans and animals, where it continues to emit beta particles, increasing the risk of bone cancer and leukemia.
Occurrence: Strontium is not found as a free element due to its high reactivity with water and air. It's extracted from its ores, mainly celestite and strontianite, through a series of chemical processes.
Project Cirrus was a pioneering weather modification project in the United States, primarily conducted between 1947 and 1952. It was the first significant, systematic attempt to modify weather and was a collaboration between the U.S. Army Signal Corps, the U.S. Air Force, the Office of Naval Research, and the General Electric Corporation.
Key Aspects of Project Cirrus:
Initial Focus: The project initially focused on understanding and controlling hurricanes. This was an ambitious and complex goal, given the scale and unpredictability of these natural phenomena.
Notable Experiments: One of the most famous experiments involved seeding a hurricane with dry ice. In October 1947, a team led by scientist Irving Langmuir dropped dry ice into a hurricane in the Atlantic Ocean. The hurricane changed course and made landfall near Savannah, Georgia. Although there was no conclusive evidence that the seeding caused the change in the hurricane's path, the coincidence led to controversy and public concern.
Research and Techniques: The project employed various cloud seeding techniques, including the use of silver iodide and dry ice. These substances were intended to encourage ice formation in clouds, which could potentially lead to precipitation.
Outcomes and Controversy: Project Cirrus faced significant challenges and controversies. The difficulty in predicting and controlling weather, especially large systems like hurricanes, raised questions about the viability and safety of such interventions. The project was eventually discontinued, partly due to the controversy surrounding the 1947 hurricane seeding experiment.
Legacy: Project Cirrus laid the groundwork for subsequent research in cloud physics and weather modification. It highlighted both the potential and the limitations of human attempts to alter weather systems. The project also contributed to the development of cloud seeding technologies, which have been used for purposes like increasing precipitation, mitigating hail damage, and clearing fog in various regions.
Project Cumulus, often referred to colloquially as "Operation Cumulus," was a UK government-sponsored scientific project in the 1950s focused on weather modification, particularly through cloud seeding. This project is a notable early example of geoengineering efforts.
Key Points about Project Cumulus:
Timeframe and Objective: Conducted during the early 1950s, the primary goal of Project Cumulus was to explore and possibly manipulate weather patterns through cloud seeding. The project was part of a broader set of research initiatives exploring weather manipulation, which were of particular interest during the Cold War era for their potential military applications.
Cloud Seeding Techniques: The experiments involved dispersing substances like silver iodide, salt, and dry ice into the atmosphere. These particles were intended to act as cloud condensation nuclei, promoting cloud formation and potentially leading to precipitation.
Controversy and the Lynmouth Flood: Project Cumulus gained infamy due to its alleged connection with the severe flooding in Lynmouth, North Devon, in August 1952. This disastrous event led to the loss of 34 lives and the destruction of numerous homes and buildings. There were claims, though not conclusively proven, that the cloud seeding experiments contributed to the excessive rainfall that caused the flood.
Secrecy and Subsequent Disclosure: Initially, the details of Project Cumulus were kept confidential, and it was only in later years that information about the project became public. This disclosure led to considerable public debate and scrutiny regarding the ethics and safety of weather modification experiments.
Legacy and Impact: The project is often cited in discussions about the risks and ethical considerations of weather modification and geoengineering. It serves as a historical example of the potential unintended consequences of human attempts to manipulate natural weather patterns.
Project Skyfire was a research program initiated by the United States Forest Service in the late 1950s aimed at understanding and potentially mitigating the occurrence of lightning-caused forest fires. The project was part of a broader set of efforts during this time to explore weather modification for various practical applications.
Key Aspects of Project Skyfire:
Focus on Lightning and Forest Fires: The primary goal of Project Skyfire was to understand the mechanisms of lightning in order to reduce the incidence of forest fires caused by it. This was particularly important in the western United States, where lightning-induced fires are a significant concern.
Research and Experiments: The project involved extensive research into the nature of thunderstorms and lightning. Scientists conducted field experiments to study the electrical properties of storms and attempted to develop methods to alter lightning patterns or reduce its occurrence.
Cloud Seeding Experiments: One of the techniques explored in Project Skyfire was cloud seeding. The idea was to influence the formation and behavior of thunderstorms through the introduction of various substances (such as silver iodide) into the atmosphere that could potentially reduce the likelihood of lightning strikes leading to fires.
Collaboration and Funding: The project involved collaboration between various government agencies, including the U.S. Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management. It was also supported by other scientific organizations engaged in atmospheric research.
Legacy and Impact: While Project Skyfire provided valuable insights into thunderstorm dynamics and lightning behavior, its success in actually preventing forest fires was limited. However, the research contributed to a better understanding of weather phenomena and laid the groundwork for future studies in meteorology and fire prevention strategies.
Project Skywater was a U.S. government-funded research program initiated in the 1960s by the Bureau of Reclamation, part of the Department of the Interior. The program was designed to explore the feasibility and effectiveness of cloud seeding as a method for increasing precipitation, with the ultimate goal of managing water resources more effectively.
Key Aspects of Project Skywater:
Objective: The main aim of Project Skywater was to investigate whether cloud seeding could be a viable technique to increase rainfall and snowfall in areas facing water scarcity. This was seen as a potential solution to water supply issues, especially in the arid western United States.
Research and Techniques: The project involved extensive atmospheric research, including the development and testing of various cloud seeding materials and methods. Substances like silver iodide and dry ice were used to encourage cloud condensation and precipitation.
Experimental Operations: Project Skywater conducted several operational experiments in different locations, such as the Colorado River Basin and the High Plains. These experiments aimed to gather data on the effectiveness of cloud seeding in different climatic and geographical conditions.
Collaboration: The program involved collaboration with various state governments, universities, and scientific organizations. It was one of the largest and most comprehensive efforts in the field of weather modification research at the time.
Controversy and Challenges: Like many weather modification projects, Skywater faced skepticism and controversy. Critics questioned the effectiveness and environmental impact of cloud seeding, as well as the ethical implications of artificially altering weather patterns. There were also concerns about the legal and economic ramifications, particularly regarding water rights and the potential for inter-state conflicts.
Legacy and Impact: Project Skywater contributed significantly to the scientific understanding of cloud physics and weather modification. Although the project was eventually phased out in the early 1980s, its findings have influenced ongoing research and debates in the field of weather modification and water resource management.
Operation Ranch Hand was a U.S. military operation during the Vietnam War, lasting from 1962 to 1971. Unlike the weather modification projects like Project Skyfire or Skywater, Operation Ranch Hand was a herbicidal warfare program. Its primary purpose was to defoliate forested and rural land, depriving guerrillas of food and cover and clearing sensitive areas such as military bases and supply routes.
Key Aspects of Operation Ranch Hand:
Use of Herbicides: The operation is most notorious for its use of Agent Orange, a powerful herbicide and defoliant. Agent Orange, along with other herbicides like Agents Blue, White, and Purple, were used extensively. These chemicals were named for the colored bands on the storage drums.
Scale of Operation: Over the course of the operation, U.S. forces sprayed millions of gallons of herbicides over rural areas of South Vietnam and parts of Laos and Cambodia. The operation significantly altered the environmental and agricultural landscape of these regions.
Health and Environmental Impact: The chemicals used, particularly Agent Orange, had a dioxin component, which has been linked to serious health issues, including cancer, birth defects, and other chronic diseases. The impact was felt not only by the Vietnamese population but also by U.S. veterans who were exposed to these chemicals.
Controversy and Legacy: Operation Ranch Hand remains one of the most controversial aspects of the Vietnam War. The use of chemical agents for warfare raised significant ethical and legal questions. The operation led to widespread ecological damage and long-term health effects for millions of people.
Legal and Compensation Efforts: There have been numerous efforts to seek compensation for the victims of Agent Orange exposure. Both Vietnamese civilians and U.S. veterans have sought recognition and reparations for the health effects suffered due to the operation.
Ongoing Effects: Decades after the end of the operation, the effects of these chemicals continue to be felt in Vietnam and among veterans. Efforts to remediate contaminated areas and support affected individuals are ongoing.
Project Popeye, also known as Operation Popeye, was a highly classified weather modification program carried out by the United States military during the Vietnam War. The operation ran from 1967 to 1972 and was primarily focused on artificially extending the monsoon season over specific areas of the Ho Chi Minh Trail, a critical supply route for the North Vietnamese forces.
Key Aspects of Project Popeye:
Objective: The main goal of Project Popeye was to increase rainfall in strategically targeted areas to hinder the movement of enemy troops and supplies. By artificially extending the monsoon season, the U.S. military aimed to create logistical problems for the North Vietnamese and Viet Cong forces.
Technique Used: The method employed for inducing rain was cloud seeding. The U.S. Air Force planes dispersed silver iodide into the clouds, which acted as a nucleating agent, encouraging the formation of ice crystals that led to increased precipitation.
Operational Areas: The operations were mainly concentrated along the Ho Chi Minh Trail, which passed through Laos and Cambodia, along with parts of North Vietnam. These areas were key supply routes for enemy forces, and the U.S. military aimed to disrupt them through increased rainfall.
Secrecy and Discovery: Project Popeye was a top-secret mission and remained classified until its existence was revealed in U.S. Senate hearings in 1974. The revelation of the operation led to a significant public and international outcry.
Environmental and Ecological Impact: Like Operation Ranch Hand, Project Popeye raised concerns about the environmental and ecological impacts of military-led weather modification. While the immediate effects were primarily on weather patterns, there were concerns about the long-term impacts on the environment and local populations.
Legal and Ethical Implications: The operation sparked debate over the legality and ethics of weather modification for military purposes. It played a significant role in the development of international laws regarding environmental warfare, leading to the Environmental Modification Treaty (ENMOD) in 1977, which prohibited the use of environmental modification techniques for hostile purposes.
Holy cow (fart). I'm setting aside time later today to go through everything and watch the videos.
Unbekoming -- you write the BEST consolidations of complex topics that I've yet seen! I mean that truly. The way you provide overviews, summations, and deep-dives with links, and get straight to the point is beyond excellent. Your work helps immensely in that it can be easily shared, and get others to consume the information. THANK YOU!
A little tip from James Corbett. Use the 'magic words' when researching this topic. A search for "chemtrails" will get you Snopes, FactCheck, Reuters and other Ministry of Truth falsehoods. A search for "stratospheric aerosols" or similar will unlock patents, papers, military regimens, stratospheric spraying companies, chemicals and an inexhaustible rabbit hole.