On contamination, monkey viruses and their parts
Excluding key context from a news story is one of the simplest and most effective ways that lackey reporters use to mislead the public. In fact, I'd say that it is probably the key method that the establishment media uses to misinform their audience. Yes, sometimes the mockingbird repeaters of the MSM simply lie about matters of fact, but more often these presstitutes do not write factual lies; they lie by omission. – James Corbett
Seeing that SV40 is in the “news”, well at least the “underground free press”, I thought it would be a good idea to talk about it a bit and also do a bit of history.
First let’s start with what we know today. This from Dr. Byram Bridle.
RNA comes from DNA. So, for Pfizer to manufacture their modRNA, they used a form of DNA that comes from bacteria. It is called bacterial plasmid DNA. This is used to make many copies of the modRNA that then get packaged into the lipid nanoparticles.
The bacterial plasmid DNA is then supposed to be removed from the material that gets injected into people. Unfortunately, it turns out that this was not done properly. It appears that most, if not all of the batches of Pfizer’s COVID-19 shots were contaminated with excessive amounts of fragmented bacterial DNA. A few of the problems is that this DNA:
can be very long-lasting
can be a source of proteins that are encoded in the DNA
has the potential to be incorporated into a person’s chromosomes
can cause inflammation in the body
was not disclosed to anyone receiving the shots
It begs the obvious questions, at least for me: What is Bacterial Plasmid DNA?
A bacterial plasmid is a small circle of DNA that's separate from the main DNA in a bacterial cell. Unlike the main DNA, it can make copies of itself.
What It Does:
Carries special genes that might make the bacteria resistant to antibiotics.
Can be passed from one bacterial cell to another, spreading these special traits.
Why It's Important:
Used in labs to study genes and create new medicines.
Helps scientists modify genes for research.
In short, a bacterial plasmid is a tiny circle of extra DNA in bacteria that can carry special traits and is useful for scientific research.
It’s worth noting that Sasha Latypova first reported on DNA contamination as far back as June 2022.
And finally, look at this!!! I reported on DNA in the vials based on a report I received from a German scientist (who wished to stay anonymous) in June 2022:
Here is a recent summary from Kirsch:
Kevin McKernan is a friend of mine and his work is unimpeachable. His results have been replicated by others all over the world. He found that the COVID vaccines contain therapeutic levels of plasmid DNA. DNA lasts forever, and if it integrates into your genome, you will produce its product forever.
The main takeaways are:
1. The mRNA vaccines are contaminated with SV40 and who knows what else. This should never have been allowed.
3. The discovery was confirmed by Health Canada.
4. The FDA and CDC are remaining silent. As far as anyone knows, they are no doing anything to assess the implications of the finding. I presume that they must believe that by not knowing the implications, they won’t have to disclose them so they are better protecting themselves against the public who might be very upset to learn they were guinea pigs. But that’s just an educated guess.
5. We don’t know what the implications are. Experts disagree. Some claim the contamination is meaningless. Others say it could be very serious.
6. The experts who claim there is no risk of harm have NO EVIDENCE to back up their claims. So that’s really comforting, isn’t it? Trust the experts :). Don’t worry.
7. We don’t fully know the ramifications of the contamination, but they probably aren’t good, and they could be devastating and irreversible. We don’t know yet because nobody has done the necessary studies.
8. The SV40 promoter contamination has been known since April 9, 2023 when McKernan published a paper on it. But the CDC and FDA have remained silent on this issue. That’s comforting, isn’t it? <sarcasm off>
More from Bridle:
Now, here is one of the biggest shockers about this contaminating bacterial DNA:
The bacterial DNA contains a genetic sequence called the ‘SV40 enhancer’ (‘SV40’ because it comes from ‘Simian Virus 40’). The virus from which this genetic sequence is derived has been implicated in causing cancers in people. It was odd that this was put into the bacterial DNA because its intended function is duplicated by another non-controversial sequence. Here is where things get really ugly. Pfizer was required to disclose to health regulatory agencies all of the bioactive sequences in the bacterial plasmid DNA that they used to manufacture their shots. Pfizer DID NOT DISCLOSE the presence of the genetic sequence from SV40 !!!
The results of Dr. Speicher’s research are profound. He generated the largest data set to date on this topic, using vials from multiple Canadian batches of both the Pfizer and Moderna shots. Every single one was contaminated with bacterial DNA. He also confirmed the presence of the SV40 enhancer sequence in the contaminating DNA in Pfizer’s Canadian vials. And this is hot off the press: he is the first to test a batch of Moderna’s newest booster COVID-19 shot; it was also contaminated, although Moderna’s bacterial DNA does not contain the genetic sequence from SV40.
So, let’s catch our breath for a moment, and summarize, specifically in relation to Pfizer.
They used DNA to make RNA.
The DNA has a part of SV40 in it.
The DNA was meant to be removed from the final product.
It wasn’t, so the final product is contaminated.
They covered it up.
Pretty standard stock behaviour from a criminal enterprise really. Frankly I expect nothing less.
But I think we need to clear up some language. I’ve read a few articles on this, and people are using the following three terms, at times interchangeably:
They are not the same thing at all.
SV40: Simian Virus 40
SV40 (Simian Virus 40) is a polyomavirus originally found in monkeys, and it is known to infect humans as well. It was discovered in 1960 and is part of the Polyomaviridae family.
SV40 is a non-enveloped, icosahedral virus containing a double-stranded DNA genome.
SV40 gained notoriety when it was discovered that early polio vaccines produced between 1955 and 1963 were contaminated with the virus. This happened because the vaccines were developed in monkey kidney cells that were infected with SV40.
The virus has been studied extensively for its ability to transform cells and induce tumours in laboratory settings.
How SV40 Changes Cells: Simplified Explanation
What it Does:
SV40 is a virus that can change the normal behaviour of cells, causing them to grow and divide in an uncontrolled way. This change is what scientists call "transformation," and it's similar to what happens in cancer.
1. Large T-antigen: A protein from the virus that does most of the work in changing the cell.
2. Small t-antigen: Another protein from the virus that helps a little.
What the Virus Targets in the Cell:
1. Rb Protein: A cell's natural brake that stops it from growing too fast. The virus messes with it.
2. p53 Protein: A cell's "quality control" that fixes mistakes or stops bad cells from growing. The virus turns it off.
Steps of How it Happens:
1. Entry: The virus gets into the cell and moves its DNA into the cell's control centre, called the nucleus.
2. Making Virus Parts: The cell reads the virus DNA and starts making virus proteins.
3. Stopping the Brake (Rb): The Large T-antigen sticks to Rb, effectively turning off the cell's natural brake.
4. Turning Off Quality Control (p53): The Large T-antigen also sticks to p53, so the cell can't fix mistakes or stop itself from growing.
5. Speeding Up Growth: The cell starts to grow and divide more because its controls are turned off.
6. Additional Changes: Over time, more mistakes might happen in the cell, making it fully transformed and similar to a cancer cell.
What Happens to the Cell:
1. Grows Too Fast: With Rb and p53 turned off, the cell grows and divides more than it should.
2. Doesn't Stop or Fix Mistakes: The cell doesn't die when it should or fix errors, making it more likely to become like a cancer cell.
Why Scientists Care:
Researchers often use SV40 to study how cells become like cancer cells, which helps them understand cancer better.
SV40 in Animal and Human Cells
SV40 was initially discovered in monkeys, and it is widely used as a model system in animal research. Many studies employ mouse cells to investigate how SV40 transforms cells and contributes to tumour formation.
SV40 also has the capability to infect human cells. The basic mechanisms of cellular transformation—such as the inactivation of Rb and p53 proteins—are generally consistent across both animal and human cells.
Both animal and human cells have the key proteins (like Rb and p53) that SV40 targets. Therefore, the fundamental steps involved in cell transformation are similar in both cases:
1. Inactivation of Growth Control (Rb)
2. Disabling of Quality Control (p53)
3. Uncontrolled Cell Growth
SV40 serves as an essential tool in research for understanding the general principles of cell transformation that could apply to both animal and human biology.
Yes, SV40 can transform both animal and human cells. The essential mechanisms of how it changes cell behavior are generally the same in both. Researchers use this virus to understand how cells might become cancerous, both in animals and potentially in humans.
But the SV40 Enhancer and the SV40 Promoter are not the same thing.
SV40 Enhancer vs. SV40 Promoter: Key Differences
1. What It Is: A special part of the SV40 virus DNA that makes nearby genes more active.
2. What It Does: Helps increase the activity of genes close to it.
3. Where It Is: Can be found at different places near the genes it helps.
4. How It Works: It can work in both directions and can affect more than one gene at the same time.
5. Specificity: Usually works better in specific types of tissues or under certain conditions.
6. Research Use: Often used in labs to make certain genes more active for experiments.
In short, the SV40 Enhancer is a specific part of the SV40 virus that boosts the activity of nearby genes. It's widely used in research.
1. What It Is: A part of the SV40 virus DNA that acts like a 'start button' for turning on specific genes.
2. What It Does: Gets gene activity started but doesn't make it stronger like an enhancer does.
3. Where It Is: Located right next to the gene it controls.
4. How It Works: Works in one direction and controls only the gene it's next to.
5. Specificity: Less picky about where it works compared to an enhancer.
6. Research Use: Used in labs to turn on specific genes for study or therapy.
Simply put, the SV40 promoter is a 'start button' in the SV40 virus DNA that turns on specific genes. It's commonly used in scientific research.
While both are regulatory elements within the SV40 genome, they serve different functions. The promoter is where transcription begins, whereas the enhancer serves to boost the activity of a promoter, thereby increasing the expression of the gene under its control.
SV40 enhancer and SV40 promoter are not the same. The enhancer amplifies gene expression, while the promoter initiates it. They often work in concert but have distinct roles and properties.
So, just to be clear, it is the Enhancer they found in the DNA that should have been extracted from the vaccines.
Which leaves me with the question.
Is SV40 Enhancer Dangerous to Humans?
(This is the “Official” line)
The SV40 enhancer on its own is not inherently dangerous to humans as it lacks the transformative proteins like Large T-antigen that are responsible for cellular transformation. The enhancer is a regulatory element that increases gene activity but does not have the capability to induce uncontrolled cell growth by itself.
However, in the full context of the SV40 genome, where it can enhance the expression of transformative viral proteins, it contributes indirectly to the potential for cellular transformation and could therefore be considered hazardous.
In biotechnology and research, SV40 enhancers are often used to increase gene expression, usually in a controlled setting, where the risk to humans is minimized.
The SV40 enhancer alone is not dangerous to humans. Its risk is contextual and arises when it is part of the full SV40 genome, which has transformative capabilities. In controlled research settings, its use is generally considered safe.
I personally doubt the “not dangerous to humans” line. We are not meant to have parts of monkey virus in us. But I don’t have anything to suggest otherwise at the moment (it most likely has “not been researched”).
It’s possible that the SV40 storyline is a nothing burger in terms of its risk to humans, but I believe it is significant in relationship to their coverup of its existence.
What is more likely to be significant to human health is the DNA contamination (of which the SV40 Enhancer is a, possibly not dangerous, component part).
The second purpose of this article, beyond trying to clear up the language confusion above is just to remind anyone that doesn’t know of the history of SV40.
Contamination of what they have been injecting into us, from childhood, is as old as vaccination itself. It is simply part for the course.
Let’s go to Dissolving Illusions and have Suzanne Humphries tell us about SV40.
Monkey virus contamination
Vaccines manufactured using monkey kidneys up into the 1980s have been definitively noted to contain a carcinogenic monkey virus that some medical researchers believe can result in cancer in a portion of the millions who were given them. Simian virus number 40 (SV40) is a monkey virus that has been found in several types of human cancers, including lung mesotheliomas, several types of brain tumors, and bone, breast, colon, and kidney tumors. Unfortunately, the controversy over the percentage of tumor specimens containing SV40 DNA and proteins has paralyzed the research field. Because of financial and political conflicts of interest, the research necessary to firmly validate the vaccine-virus association will probably never be done.
This controversy was magnified by the legal implications of associating the production and distribution of contaminated polio vaccines to the development of human mesotheliomas and brain tumors. Study sections reviewers have been unwilling to support SV40 research citing the need to first address the “controversy,” yet without funding it is impossible to conduct studies to address controversial findings.
SV40 is known to exist in cancerous tissue, but not in surrounding healthy tissue, to cause extensive genetic damage in vitro (cell cultures) and to induce tumors when injected into volunteers and rodents. However, it is not considered scientifically valid to implicate the contaminating SV40 viruses with these human tumors.
An association has been found between SV40 and certain types of cancer in humans. However, though the virus or its DNA have been found in certain types of cancer, it has not been determined that SV40 causes these cancers. Finding that two events are “associated” is not the same as establishing that one event caused the other.
Certain scientists who have had careers in polio and SV40 research know firsthand that inconvenient scientific truths can be abrogated by industry and politics. Two of the world’s most respected scientists in the SV40 realm, Dr. Harvey Pass and Dr. Michele Carbone, commented on how science was censored.
I [Michele Carbone] wanted to have a press statement… and to be able to talk to the media if contacted by them. I also believe that the public and the media have the right to ask us any question they wish once our work has been accepted by a peer-review journal and that scientists should not decide what the media should or should not know… [Dr. Levine] told me that if I, or Harvey, talked to the press, against his wishes, we would be “punished.”… Pass was shocked at the uproar, particularly the threat. “I didn’t think you got punished for science.”
There are still the rare truth seekers, like attorney Stanley Kops, who continue to voice opposition to the claims that SV40 is no longer an issue with vaccines.
The news article by Nancy J. Nelson repeats the current scientific dogma that simian virus 40 (SV40) was removed from all oral polio vaccine sold and administered in the United States. In a recent article, however, I have challenged this accepted “fact” based on legal documents and the absence of test results from at least one of the principal vaccine manufacturers, Lederle. As noted in that article, internal Lederle documents indicate that the company has not been able to document that it tested all vaccine seeds to confirm the absence of SV40 contamination.
Every scientist who is attempting to determine the role of SV40 as a cause of cancer in humans and every news reporter who is interested in this issue should demand all of the records of both the government and the vaccine manufacturer so that there can be a full scientific and independent investigation as to whether there was full compliance with the removal of SV40 from all oral polio vaccine used in the United States from 1962 until 2000.
How a virus dubbed “the perfect war machine” by Dr. Carbone because it affects at least four major cellular mechanisms that either promote cancer or interfere with cancer-fighting defenses, could be impacting countries that continue using oral polio vaccines by the ton today, is anyone’s guess. How much of the abrupt rise in human cancer rates since the introduction of monkey products into the human population is due to SV40 will also remain uncertain due to a lack of precise research.
Monkeys are still used in polio vaccine production today. According to Stanley Kops’ allegations, SV40 was and still is a potential risk in both the OPV and the inactivated polio vaccine (IPV). The IPV used in the developed world is still treated with formaldehyde, but SV40 has been known since 1961 to survive formaldehyde beyond the usual 12-day minimum. Vaccine manufacturers today cite a minimum of 12 days of formaldehyde treatment.
This from Liam Scheff’s Official Stories:
But it was Jonas Salk and his injectable wonder which won the field. He ordered monkeys from India, Asia and Africa - 17,000 of them - to be run out of the jungle, bagged, caged, caught and shipped to the United States. The monkeys were killed, their organs ripped out and used to grow…something. Albert Sabin, who produced the live oral vaccine, would mash up the kidneys of 9,000 monkeys and chimpanzees to grow his “polio” bug.
They decided that polio was caused by an ordinary stomach bug and they decided to grow “it” to turn into vaccines for all American children. And they needed living tissue to do it. This is the legacy of Pasteur, Jenner, Landsteiner and Popper. Modern medicine loves to chop up animals, leach something out of the mashed pieces and shove it into your body.
Which raises a funny question: why did the purveyors of the anti-religious, Western scientific method so deeply embrace something that even more brutally recapitulates the animal sacrifice of the ancient civilizations and is less medically-sound than voodoo? (And no, the ASPCA has no position on vaccination. Neither does PETA.)
Salk's vaccine was released for massive public trials in 1954 and to the general public in ’55. It contained the material that he drained or siphoned out of these monkey kidney mixtures. It was filled with other chemicals (like formaldehyde), to stun or “attenuate” the virus. Or, whatever was in those brews. It was injected into hundreds of thousands of kids. And it was a great success and polio went away.
Or, that's the picture-book version. But even the mainstream will tell you a version of the truth.
First, the polio rate exploded, especially the number of paralyzed children. Polio rates doubled, tripled and quadrupled - dozens became hundreds, following vaccination. States that had done the widest vaccination had the most cases. Massachusetts went from 273 to 2,027, after injecting 130,000 kids. The state banned the vaccine (for a moment). Numbers went up around the country: Wisconsin; 326 to 1655. Maryland; 134 to 189. New York State; 469 to 764.
The press jumped on it. What was wrong with the Salk Vaccine? The Roosevelt administration panicked. Harper's magazine asked, “What the @#$# is going on here?” The medical authorities found a scapegoat - it wasn't the vaccine itself. No, it was the fault of “bad batches.” The mainstream calls it “the Cutter incident.” But the program was damaged and they decided to switch to the live polio vaccine, given on a sugar cube, rather than injected directly into the blood.
This from The Real Anthony Fauci
The same weapons that NIH used to silence Dr. Morris— enforced isolation, disgrace, prohibiting him from publishing papers, presenting at conferences, or talking to the press, changing his laboratory locks to prevent further research—were already pieces of an established Soviet-style template for silencing dissident scientists at NIH. The agency first unsheathed those weapons in the 1950s to destroy the career of its award-winning virologist, Dr. Bernice Eddy, the discoverer of the poliomyelitis virus - who later found a cancer-causing monkey virus in the Salk and Sabin polio vaccines.
When her research disclosed problems with vaccine safety, NIH officials banned Dr. Eddy from her lab, changed her office locks, and ordered her to refrain from interviews and speeches. After silencing Eddy, NIH gave the contaminated vaccine to 99 million baby boomers, who suffered a tenfold increase in soft tissue cancers, resulting in a public health disaster that dwarfs the harms of polio. Dr. Fauci and government health regulators later used these same techniques to muzzle a parade of in-house scientists, including Dr. Judy Mikovits, NIH contract researcher Dr. Bart Classen, and CDC’s varicella (chicken pox) vaccine researcher Dr. Gary Goldman, who dared to tell hard truths about vaccine safety and efficacy.
How many cancers over the last 70 years have been caused by these criminal sociopathic cartels?
This also from 180 Degrees.
In the 1950s and 60s millions of healthy people were injected with the SV40 virus (simian virus) when they received early versions of the polio vaccine. Based on the work of Bernice E. Eddy in 1961, SV-40 was shown to cause cancer in rodents. There has been some dispute over whether this can cause cancer in humans but at least one 21st century study indicates that may be the case:
"Mounting evidence indicates that SV40 is a human pathogen, and current molecular biology, pathology, and clinical data, taken together, show that SV40 is significantly associated with and may be functionally important in the development of some human malignancies." - Regis A. Vilchez and Janet S. Butel, researchers at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
I think it’s worth tipping our hat to Dr. Bernice Eddy:
Dr. Bernice Eddy (1903–1989) was an American microbiologist renowned for her work in virology. She is particularly known for her research on the polio vaccine. Eddy discovered that some batches of the vaccine were not completely inactivated, which led to some recipients contracting polio. Her work was instrumental in improving the safety standards for vaccine development and production.
Early Life and Education
Born in 1903, Bernice Eddy earned her Ph.D. in Microbiology from the University of Cincinnati. She went on to work at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in the United States.
1. SV40 Discovery: Eddy discovered Simian Virus 40 (SV40) in contaminated polio vaccines. This discovery raised concerns about the potential of the virus to induce cancer, though these concerns were not immediately acted upon.
2. Polio Vaccine Safety: She found that some batches of the Salk polio vaccine contained live poliovirus, even after the inactivation process. This led to increased safety standards and stricter regulation for vaccine production.
3. Whistleblower: Despite facing setbacks in her career due to her outspoken nature about the safety issues she discovered, Eddy is often seen as a whistleblower who prioritised public health.
4. Later Work: In the later years of her career, Eddy worked on various other research projects, including studying the effects of environmental toxins.
Eddy's work has had a long-lasting impact on the fields of virology and public health. Her rigorous scientific approach has served as an inspiration for improved vaccine safety and regulation.
She was not widely recognised during her lifetime for her pioneering work, but posthumously, her contributions have been acknowledged more widely.
Bookchin, Debbie, and Schumacher, Jim. "The Virus and the Vaccine: Contaminated Vaccine, Deadly Cancers, and Government Neglect." St. Martin's Press, 2004.
Let’s look at a couple of studies.
Regis A. Vilchez et al, “Simian virus 40 in human cancers,”
Simple Abstract Explanation
The text talks about a virus called SV40, which is known to cause various types of cancer in lab animals like brain and bone cancers, as well as lymphomas. There's growing evidence to suggest that this virus is also affecting humans and may be linked to similar kinds of cancers in people.
A big study that looked at data from nearly 1,800 cancer patients found that there's a higher risk of certain types of cancer (like brain, bone, and lymphoma) if SV40 is present. The types of cancers that SV40 causes in animals are similar to the cancers found in humans who also show signs of this virus.
The Institute of Medicine has said that there's a moderate level of evidence to think that SV40 might lead to cancer in humans. The text suggests that more research is needed to understand how SV40 is affecting humans.
In summary, SV40 is a virus that we know causes cancer in animals and there's growing evidence that it might be doing the same in humans. Future research will help us know for sure.
Regis Vilchez and Janet Butel, “Emergent Human Pathogen Simian Virus 40 and Its Role in Cancer,”
Clinical Microbiology Reviews (Jul. 17, 2004), Emergent Human Pathogen Simian Virus 40 and Its Role in Cancer - PMC (nih.gov)
The text is about a study looking into how a virus called SV40 might be linked to certain types of cancer in humans like brain tumors, bone cancers, and two kinds of lymph cancers. Previous smaller studies had suggested this link, but they were not very reliable because they had small sample sizes and sometimes lacked comparison groups.
To get a better understanding, the researchers collected data from multiple studies published between 1975 and 2002. These studies had to meet specific criteria, like having a proper control group for comparison and using the same testing methods for everyone.
The findings showed that people with these types of cancer were more likely to also have signs of SV40 infection compared to people without cancer. For example, people with brain tumors were nearly 4 times more likely to show signs of SV40. The likelihood was even higher for people with mesothelioma and bone cancers.
In summary, this research strongly suggests that SV40 is linked to these kinds of cancers in humans. The text ends by saying more studies are needed to understand how common SV40 infections are nowadays.
I’ll give the final words to Toby Rogers and CJ Hopkins:
As CJ Hopkins points out, the Leviathan we are fighting does not have an ideology. It’s fascism, but with no racial animus, driven entirely by an unquenchable hunger for power and profit. There’s no goose stepping, no brown shirts, no snarling SS officers, no military parades, no military presence at all really. Because it’s not tied to any one nation-state it can be implemented under various guises in many countries all at once. The current crisis has all of the aspects of fascism — genocide, the quest for global domination, the goal of total control of society — with almost none of the offensive pageantry that could be used by the opposition. It’s completely horrifying and also very clever. It’s like they asked an artificial intelligence program, “How can the Third Reich succeed this time, correcting for all of the vulnerabilities and weaknesses of National Socialism?” and this is the plan that came back.
Thanks for being here.
Please consider a paid subscription. You will get nothing more for your support, as everything is made freely available. The money goes towards covering the costs of this work, medical freedom causes and support for the vaccine injured.
If you are Covid vaccine injured, consider the FLCCC Post-Vaccine Treatment
If you want to understand and “see” what baseline human health looks like, watch (and share) this 21 minutes
Here are all eBooks and Summaries produced so far: