I am interested in a particular section of it, where he summarises “What we know”, these “lego bits”, are really important in drawing the map that we use to navigate the territory. The only thing that is true is the territory, the map in our hand will either “map” over it or not.
We are map makers after all.
He acknowledges infectious clones, which is really important I think, and in so doing his work and Couey’s converge.
I don’t agree with the “CCP did it” line. As you know I’ve tabled the Joint Venture hypothesis. There are simply far too many data points (“lego bits”) that simply don’t fit into the CCP is to blame model. I’m hoping to publish something soon (written by a reader) that does a deep dive into, among other things, the global financial backdrop to the GMC.
Anyway, with all that said, I want to focus on 3 things.
The “what we know” list, which is important to amplify and circulate.
The withholding of antibiotics. This is an important point I want to highlight and reflect on.
The Bermuda Triangle trap that has been setup.
But first, the truthy “lego bits”, with thanks to Dr. Syed.
What we know:
1. More people died in April 2020 and January 2021 than would normally have died
2. In some countries the overall death rate was normal for 2020 which means the impact of the “pandemic” was either minor or a “pull forward” effect
3. Labs performed PCR tests for a strand of RNA, and in some people that was positive
4. These PCR tests were more likely to be positive at the time that there were deaths
5. The primers for these PCR tests were commercial (except in NSW, Australia, in 2020) and therefore we do not know what they were testing
6. The primers for the first PCR tests in China were wrong and therefore could not have tested for “SARS-CoV-2”:
Forward primer: 5′-TCAGAATGCCAATCTCCCCAAC-3′
Reverse primer: 5′-AAAGGTCCACCCGATACATTGA-3′
Probe: 5′ CY5-CTAGTTACACTAGCCATCCTTACTGC-3′
7. The protocols for managing post-viral pneumonia were changed in April 2020 to remove antibiotics
8. If you are an elderly person with a post-viral pneumonia and you are denied antibiotics, you will most likely die
9. The overwhelming majority of deaths in China were patients who were treated in Wuhan under Wuhan protocols. Mainland China had a near zero fatality rate from a disease that was supposedly novel and supposedly originated there.
10. The same disease outside of Wuhan (Hubei) had a 7.5x lower risk of death than the disease occurring in Wuhan (Hubei). This is not possible by chance
11. China - the supposed epicentre of the “novel untreatable coronavirus” had the lowest COVID mortality rate per million population in the world in 2020 and 2021. This is not possible with the story as presented.
12. On the basis of the “novel coronavirus pandemic with a high fatality rate” the whole world (everywhere but China) was subjected to:
13. On the basis of the “pandemic” arising from China, which did not affect China in any appreciable way, the world’s economies were shut down and you are still living with the consequences.
14. For some people the forced vaccine mandates and government interference with medical treatment resulted in death. That is the reality. The removal of antibiotics from standard post-viral pneumonia was done in lockstep around the world. How could this have happened? By MAGIC: A consortium driven by the University of Liverpool and WHO.
15. Those COVID deaths did not need to happen. The people affiliated with Andrew Owen of MAGIC were exposed by Tess Lawrie as admitting to undue financial influence in rejecting ivermectin as a therapeutic. But ivermectin was just a part of the problem, because the ivermectin protocols came with antibiotics (doxycycline or azithromycin) which is what prevented the bacterial pneumonia.
Following are excerpts from the “What actually happened” section of the stack:
There was never a pandemic of any lethal virus. The sequences made by Baric, Daszak, Shi and their buddies in virology labs around the world are viral sequences of RNA, but they are synthetic. They can be effectively distributed via clones4 (lab based production of RNA sequences) rather than letting an unstable real-life RNA coronavirus loose on the world, which would likely regress and flop as a bioweapon. What they proposed (a scary novel lethal coronavirus causing a pandemic) is nigh on impossible, but the scare was real.
--
In doing so, the world fell in line with the global dictats supplied via the MAGIC app protocols which told doctors not to use antibiotics in post-COVID pneumonia. And in doing that, the world’s doctors collaborated - knowingly or unknowingly - in a worldwide Iatrocide that was likely entirely preventable.
--
The hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin may not even have been that important. Most likely, all it needed was the “3tablets” of azithromycin which represents a course of treatment for community acquired pneumonia. Less than a dollar in many countries. If you had a negative “COVID test” you would be given those tablets. If you had a positive test, you weren’t allowed them. An elderly person with an untreated post-COVID pneumonia was set on a pathway to death.
So, I’d like to summarise use the antibiotic bits:
The protocols for managing post-viral pneumonia were changed in April 2020 to remove antibiotics
If you are an elderly person with a post-viral pneumonia and you are denied antibiotics, you will most likely die
The removal of antibiotics from standard post-viral pneumonia was done in lockstep around the world.
But ivermectin was just a part of the problem, because the ivermectin protocols came with antibiotics (doxycycline or azithromycin) which is what prevented the bacterial pneumonia.
In doing so, the world fell in line with the global dictats supplied via the MAGIC app protocols which told doctors not to use antibiotics in post-COVID pneumonia. And in doing that, the world’s doctors collaborated - knowingly or unknowingly - in a worldwide Iatrocide that was likely entirely preventable.
Most likely, all it needed was the “3tablets” of azithromycin which represents a course of treatment for community acquired pneumonia. Less than a dollar in many countries. If you had a negative “COVID test” you would be given those tablets. If you had a positive test, you weren’t allowed them. An elderly person with an untreated post-COVID pneumonia was set on a pathway to death.
I’m surprised that this withholding of anti-biotics didn’t get more dissident coverage as it was happening. Seem quite obvious after the fact.
Now we look at some of Couey’s work.
This slide shows the first spike (blue) of pneumonia deaths in early April 2020 and then the much bigger one in January 2021.
To date, the prevailing idea has been that withholding Ivermectin (and HCQ) caused death.
But I’m now thinking it’s more nuanced than that.
Ivermectin (and its protocols), whether prophylactic or early (out-patient) treatment use either prevented symptoms or got on top of early symptoms, which meant it kept you out of the hospital. So withholding that fast-tracked your trip to the hospital. It was in the hospital where the withholding of anti-biotics for post-viral pneumonia finished of the job. Let’s not forget ventilation, and their darling Remdesivir.
You had to first get to the hospital to be killed by the hospital.
Withholding of ivermectin got you to the hospital.
Withholding of antibiotics finished off the job.
I very effective 1-2.
Just before we look at Couey’s work, I am reminded by something that McCollough said that I wrote about in Sept 22.
I genuinely think global pandemics worth getting concerned about CANNOT HAPPEN. It’s not luck. It’s the way infectious agents & animals like humans have co-evolved. Had this not been so, we’d have been wiped out on any of several occasions in the past.
As for the concept that “increases in human travel is what produces the uniquely vulnerable position”, that’s complete bull. It’s the exact opposite. Frequent travel to every corner of the globe is what endures we never now have populations with no exposure & thus little immunity to novel pathogens.
Now let’s look at the complete Couey Hypothesis. It needs to be read very slowly as there are a lot of ideas within it. To make the most sense of it I encourage you to watch his latest Immunomythology Update.
Here is a summary of the TV narrative (all slides are Couey’s). We’ll call this Narrative One.
Here is a summary of what Couey calls the Scooby Doo Narrative. The fall-back narrative. The one they wanted us to “discover”. The Gotcha narrative. We’ll call this Narrative Two.
And then there is the no virus narrative. That the whole thing is a fiction. Let’s call that Narrative Three.
So, let’s pause and catch our breath. What we have are not 1 but 3 narratives, none of which, in their entirety and the main thrust of their argument, are true.
All three form a Bermuda Triangle in which the whole world has gotten lost. As Couey puts it, a Cognitive Trap.
So, what are we left with. What is there outside this Bermuda Triangle?
Couey put’s forward 9 points as part of a Clone + PCR + Background hypothesis.
With some variations.
Or
Or
To get an understanding of “background” release, you can listen to the analysis of this Giordano presentation.
Dr. James Giordano Bio: Professor in the Departments of Neurology and Biochemistry at Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington D.C., Chief of Neuroethics Studies Program and Co-Director, O’Neil Pelligrino Center of Brain Science, has served on Joint Staff of the Pentagon, and is Head of the European Union Human Brain Project.
Coming out of the GMC, it’s important that we believe:
In the dangers of viruses and gain of function research.
In the ability of these Frankenstein viruses to sweep the world, and cause a pandemic.
In the inability of our own immunity to deal with this threat.
In the need for THEIR help in protecting us.
In the need to invest in pandemic preparedness, including, and especially, vaccines.
In the need to have centralised power to co-ordinate countries against this threat.
That people died because we didn’t do enough.
That next time we need to do more with quicker and better coordination.
That if there were problems with these vaccines, we will make much better one’s next time.
If anyone wittingly or unwittingly believes any of these things, then THEY are winning.
Plenty of good people, including well known dissidents on our side, believe in some of these things.
Plenty of good people are useful idiots.
Plenty of good people, have good intentions.
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
May we keep our good intentions under strict supervision and control.
Lies are Unbekoming is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Share this post