The GMC has made me question everything also. I've been reading Darwin Retried (1971 - Norman Macbeth), my path is similar to yours I think. Darwinism is a social engineering psyop, clearly. Next you need to look at Einstein, I've just started here. Maybe examine Tavistock and the manufacture of the Beatles and youth culture in the 60's. I found a very interesting and succinct book, "Instincts of the Herd in Peace and War" (1916 - Wilfred Trotter), I've been trying to examine the foundations of the social engineering efforts the serf populations have been subjected to. And often times there is far greater clarity in these older works, although I believe many of the methods are far far older, and have a metaphysical and occult foundation at their root. Great work!
The crack of the dawn of my awakening came with the thought that every actual must have sprung from a potential. For example, the statement that “nothing existed before the ‘Big Bang’” seems to ignore the fact that the *potential* for the ‘Big Bang’ must have preceded the actual event. To deny that the potential existed is to deny the event itself.
For intelligent life to exist, its potential must have existed prior. Again, to say that there was no potential for intelligent life is to deny intelligent life itself.
Antecedent causation must therefore act on a foundation of potential. Nothing can cause an event that doesn’t exist in potential.
Serious and sincere contemplation of this necessarily universal, infinite and eternal well of potential, the processes by which it is gradually released to become reality, and how the ensuing reality is ultimately integrated into a meaningful whole, can be very rewarding (and it has been for me), the discussion of which rewards are outside the scope of what is practical in a comment on a blog.
I'm sorry to comment whilst saving this to read later - the audacity!- but wondering if you have read much about the relatively new science of epigenetics? And also the latest book "The Myth of Normal" by Gabor Mate. ( He is not on board re. vax scandal stuff but that is not his bag, at least i don't think so- so sorry again) It's an in depth look into his specialist subject of trauma, and in the latest book he lays out in detail the damage done by modern science in ignoring the mind and emotions, and particularly early trauma, in the role of disease, addiction and illness. Apologies once more for the sketchy ( but it is there!) link to your article., but I'm not often on the internet and you are such an expansive thinker that I wanted to put you onto this, if you didn't know.
Jan 28, 2023·edited Jan 28, 2023Liked by Unbekoming
Survival of the Fittest is a mistake because its 'death of the weakest and unlucky'
what i read so far fails to acknowledge the fundamental problem of where did the intelligence to create us/the universe come from?
epigenetics is both fast and slow, i dont think people get the time scales involved in both rapid change and long term. what would a computer program that could make rapid adaptations and long term changes to itself look like in a billion years?
i 'believe' we will never know how it all began, just enjoy it while you can
You definitely sparked my interest! Thank you very much. I ordered the Liam Scheff book before I had even read the chapter because I just knew I had to buy it. What a writer! In the last few years I read "Human By Design" by Gregg Braden which is on the same subject but hadn't really followed it up. Also really enjoyed Stephen Meyer's presentation, he is an excellent speaker. The thing about intelligent design is that it is so uplifting. In the early days of the GMC I was watching a lot of Dr Zach Bush videos about the Virome and toxic load. Listening to him one day I had a kind of epiphany as he was talking about our relationship with viruses. We are made up as much by the Virome and Microbiome as we are by what might be called human. It's the dance of life and as I sat there on a sunny day looking out at the trees I had the experience of seeing and feeling that dance in my own body. It's not easy to describe but it is perhaps a bit like shifting into a dimension where you are actually seeing the microscopic world. Like watching dancing particles of sunlight. Then there is Bruce Lipton the microbiologist who talks about the complex community of trillions of cells that comprises our bodies. When properly supported this community of cells is a model of co operation and efficiency. Like the underground networks in the soil that are like smart cities without the corruption and lack of safety testing. Nature already does it better and it is so complex and beautiful in that complexity. Fantastic Fungi is a documentary that shows this in the most gorgeous cinematography. https://watch.fantasticfungi.com/ As we begin to have a deeper understanding of Nature it becomes clearer and clearer that the main operating principle of life is co operation. Not competition as Darwin surmised. Survival of the fittest really is a fluffy term isn't it? Until I read the Gregg Braden book I hadn't really thought about it much. If I did I assumed that the theory of evolution was correct, of that I am quite sure. Now I can see what a convenient theory it is for the totalitarian narrative to keep onboard, helping to justify dehumanising practices which are then adopted as the (so called) norm and backed by The Science. As you can tell from my response I found this article particularly stimulating, thank you so much for your sharing. (-:
Yes he does convey a lot of dense info doesn't he. I had watched quite a few videos before I understood enough to have that moment. And I haven't had any time to look for more info on that subject.
I just found out about a new documentary about the loss of the human microbiome called The Invisible Extinction. Don't know if they talk about viruses but might be worth checking out.
I haven't read the whole work. It is obvious you spent a lot of time writing down the emotional, cognitive and biological experience, your experience of a life time. I didn't read it all because I never thought like that. So a few replies to your thoughts.
> absolutely rock-solid science of evolutionary theory.
No scientific theory is rock solid. Why? Humans created it. And human points of view change, so our view of reality changes. No one view is absolute. My skepticism is so deep that I remain skeptical of everything. That doesn't mean I don't use science ( I worked in Surveying and with GPS when GPS was the bleeding edge not the highly evolved positioning and timing system in your phone). But all the folks I met that were developing this technology only took it as an approximation, not absolute. That is my take too.
> If at the end of this you, like me, come to see and think ...
Honestly I never understood why intelligence wasn't integral to all that exists called the multiverse. Why man felt the need to stand outside and certainly this is what religion did. Religion kept God outside of creation. And man a little lower than the angels also outside creation. Why? I have no idea.
But I never ever embraced the idea. I have always sense in a very visceral way that intelligence is another aspect of reality. Color it "intelligent design" or "evolution" or any other myth you wish. I see it all like a clouds in the sky or waves at the beach or the wind in my hair and many other innumerable ways that express the inexpressible phenomena of being.
Intelligence or consciousness IS reality as I understand it. We see some of that expressed as material reality, some we think of as emotion, some as thought. That the western mind wishes to apportion these forms into separate categories creates so many problems; the 'hard question' of consciousness, and the debate between two nonsensical ideas of evolution vs intelligent design another.
Thank you for reminding me about Scheff's book. Just bought it.
What I find 𝒔𝒐 𝒊𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒏𝒈 -- and it actually made me stop reading -- is Scheff's reference to another story rife with absurdities, which he seems to believe fully despite its absurdities. We see this phenomenon everywhere about this one story.
We know questions about the story can result in jail time in some countries. How can this be? How can questions about any topic be verboten? If any story permits no questions -- including 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 one -- then it has become a type of religion, yes? How does Scheff miss this?
I wish more people recognised Liam Scheff's work. I'm so please that you are doing your bit to raise his profile. I haven't finished reading your article yet but will get round to it. I'm currently listening to a James Delingpole podcast interviewing John Hamer who I hadn't heard of before. They discuss several rabbit holes including evolutionary theory. I thought it might be of interest to you.
The GMC has made me question everything also. I've been reading Darwin Retried (1971 - Norman Macbeth), my path is similar to yours I think. Darwinism is a social engineering psyop, clearly. Next you need to look at Einstein, I've just started here. Maybe examine Tavistock and the manufacture of the Beatles and youth culture in the 60's. I found a very interesting and succinct book, "Instincts of the Herd in Peace and War" (1916 - Wilfred Trotter), I've been trying to examine the foundations of the social engineering efforts the serf populations have been subjected to. And often times there is far greater clarity in these older works, although I believe many of the methods are far far older, and have a metaphysical and occult foundation at their root. Great work!
The crack of the dawn of my awakening came with the thought that every actual must have sprung from a potential. For example, the statement that “nothing existed before the ‘Big Bang’” seems to ignore the fact that the *potential* for the ‘Big Bang’ must have preceded the actual event. To deny that the potential existed is to deny the event itself.
For intelligent life to exist, its potential must have existed prior. Again, to say that there was no potential for intelligent life is to deny intelligent life itself.
Antecedent causation must therefore act on a foundation of potential. Nothing can cause an event that doesn’t exist in potential.
Serious and sincere contemplation of this necessarily universal, infinite and eternal well of potential, the processes by which it is gradually released to become reality, and how the ensuing reality is ultimately integrated into a meaningful whole, can be very rewarding (and it has been for me), the discussion of which rewards are outside the scope of what is practical in a comment on a blog.
I'm sorry to comment whilst saving this to read later - the audacity!- but wondering if you have read much about the relatively new science of epigenetics? And also the latest book "The Myth of Normal" by Gabor Mate. ( He is not on board re. vax scandal stuff but that is not his bag, at least i don't think so- so sorry again) It's an in depth look into his specialist subject of trauma, and in the latest book he lays out in detail the damage done by modern science in ignoring the mind and emotions, and particularly early trauma, in the role of disease, addiction and illness. Apologies once more for the sketchy ( but it is there!) link to your article., but I'm not often on the internet and you are such an expansive thinker that I wanted to put you onto this, if you didn't know.
No haven't spent time with Mate and his work yet.
Survival of the Fittest is a mistake because its 'death of the weakest and unlucky'
what i read so far fails to acknowledge the fundamental problem of where did the intelligence to create us/the universe come from?
epigenetics is both fast and slow, i dont think people get the time scales involved in both rapid change and long term. what would a computer program that could make rapid adaptations and long term changes to itself look like in a billion years?
i 'believe' we will never know how it all began, just enjoy it while you can
You definitely sparked my interest! Thank you very much. I ordered the Liam Scheff book before I had even read the chapter because I just knew I had to buy it. What a writer! In the last few years I read "Human By Design" by Gregg Braden which is on the same subject but hadn't really followed it up. Also really enjoyed Stephen Meyer's presentation, he is an excellent speaker. The thing about intelligent design is that it is so uplifting. In the early days of the GMC I was watching a lot of Dr Zach Bush videos about the Virome and toxic load. Listening to him one day I had a kind of epiphany as he was talking about our relationship with viruses. We are made up as much by the Virome and Microbiome as we are by what might be called human. It's the dance of life and as I sat there on a sunny day looking out at the trees I had the experience of seeing and feeling that dance in my own body. It's not easy to describe but it is perhaps a bit like shifting into a dimension where you are actually seeing the microscopic world. Like watching dancing particles of sunlight. Then there is Bruce Lipton the microbiologist who talks about the complex community of trillions of cells that comprises our bodies. When properly supported this community of cells is a model of co operation and efficiency. Like the underground networks in the soil that are like smart cities without the corruption and lack of safety testing. Nature already does it better and it is so complex and beautiful in that complexity. Fantastic Fungi is a documentary that shows this in the most gorgeous cinematography. https://watch.fantasticfungi.com/ As we begin to have a deeper understanding of Nature it becomes clearer and clearer that the main operating principle of life is co operation. Not competition as Darwin surmised. Survival of the fittest really is a fluffy term isn't it? Until I read the Gregg Braden book I hadn't really thought about it much. If I did I assumed that the theory of evolution was correct, of that I am quite sure. Now I can see what a convenient theory it is for the totalitarian narrative to keep onboard, helping to justify dehumanising practices which are then adopted as the (so called) norm and backed by The Science. As you can tell from my response I found this article particularly stimulating, thank you so much for your sharing. (-:
Thank you Kerry. Yes it is uplifting isn't it! So much of The Science kills wonder and optimism, it's almost "by design" :)
I had the exact same "Zach Bush" moment as you! But,
a) he talks so quick and the information he dispenses is very dense, and
b) I've seen nothing else about the exchange of genetic information between humans and viruses to further explain the concept...
Yes he does convey a lot of dense info doesn't he. I had watched quite a few videos before I understood enough to have that moment. And I haven't had any time to look for more info on that subject.
I just found out about a new documentary about the loss of the human microbiome called The Invisible Extinction. Don't know if they talk about viruses but might be worth checking out.
Good day,
I haven't read the whole work. It is obvious you spent a lot of time writing down the emotional, cognitive and biological experience, your experience of a life time. I didn't read it all because I never thought like that. So a few replies to your thoughts.
> absolutely rock-solid science of evolutionary theory.
No scientific theory is rock solid. Why? Humans created it. And human points of view change, so our view of reality changes. No one view is absolute. My skepticism is so deep that I remain skeptical of everything. That doesn't mean I don't use science ( I worked in Surveying and with GPS when GPS was the bleeding edge not the highly evolved positioning and timing system in your phone). But all the folks I met that were developing this technology only took it as an approximation, not absolute. That is my take too.
> If at the end of this you, like me, come to see and think ...
Honestly I never understood why intelligence wasn't integral to all that exists called the multiverse. Why man felt the need to stand outside and certainly this is what religion did. Religion kept God outside of creation. And man a little lower than the angels also outside creation. Why? I have no idea.
But I never ever embraced the idea. I have always sense in a very visceral way that intelligence is another aspect of reality. Color it "intelligent design" or "evolution" or any other myth you wish. I see it all like a clouds in the sky or waves at the beach or the wind in my hair and many other innumerable ways that express the inexpressible phenomena of being.
Intelligence or consciousness IS reality as I understand it. We see some of that expressed as material reality, some we think of as emotion, some as thought. That the western mind wishes to apportion these forms into separate categories creates so many problems; the 'hard question' of consciousness, and the debate between two nonsensical ideas of evolution vs intelligent design another.
Damn you and your meticulous research casting all my long-held beliefs into turmoil ;-)
🤣👍
👍😊
Thank you for reminding me about Scheff's book. Just bought it.
What I find 𝒔𝒐 𝒊𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒏𝒈 -- and it actually made me stop reading -- is Scheff's reference to another story rife with absurdities, which he seems to believe fully despite its absurdities. We see this phenomenon everywhere about this one story.
We know questions about the story can result in jail time in some countries. How can this be? How can questions about any topic be verboten? If any story permits no questions -- including 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 one -- then it has become a type of religion, yes? How does Scheff miss this?
On the topic of "origin of the species," my friend, Jim Perloff, has written a book called "Tornado in a Junkyard." It might interest you: https://www.amazon.com/Tornado-Junkyard-Relentless-Myth-Darwinism/dp/0966816005/ref=sr_1_1?crid=19AFWEBAK3W88&keywords=tornado+in+a+junkyard&qid=1675008420&sprefix=tornado+in%2Caps%2C111&sr=8-1
I wish more people recognised Liam Scheff's work. I'm so please that you are doing your bit to raise his profile. I haven't finished reading your article yet but will get round to it. I'm currently listening to a James Delingpole podcast interviewing John Hamer who I hadn't heard of before. They discuss several rabbit holes including evolutionary theory. I thought it might be of interest to you.
Thank you!