Dinosaurs
An Essay
In April 2024, an independent researcher publishing under the name Agent131711 released a five-part investigation into the dinosaur narrative. The work spans the history of paleontological discoveries, the institutional players involved, the physical evidence presented to the public, and the financial structures sustaining the enterprise. What emerges is not simply a critique of museum exhibits or dating methods, but a structural question: What work does this narrative perform? Who benefits from its maintenance? And what larger stories does it prop up?
This essay summarizes and extends agent131711’s findings. The extension concerns two global meta-narratives that dinosaurs anchor in public consciousness: the origin of petroleum (the “fossil fuel” story) and the origin of species (the evolution story). Both carry immense economic and ideological weight. Both require dinosaurs—or something like them—to exist in the public imagination. The question is not necessarily whether prehistoric creatures roamed the earth, but whether the specific narrative we’ve been handed serves purposes beyond historical accuracy.
I have written previously about both pillars. In “Fossil Fuel,” I examined the abiogenic petroleum theory—the substantial body of evidence, particularly from Russian and Ukrainian geologists, that oil is not the compressed remains of ancient organic matter but a continuously manufactured planetary resource bubbling up from deep within the earth. In “Intelligence,” I examined the problems with Darwinian evolution—the information problem, the Cambrian explosion, the absence of transitional fossils, the probability calculations that make spontaneous protein formation effectively impossible, and the circular dating methods that underpin the geological column.
What I had not fully appreciated until encountering agent131711’s research was how dinosaurs function as the imaginative glue holding both narratives together. Remove dinosaurs from public consciousness, and the “fossil” in fossil fuel loses its anchor. Remove dinosaurs from museum displays, and evolution loses its most dramatic evidence. The giant reptiles that allegedly ruled the earth for 160 million years perform crucial narrative work for both stories—and agent131711’s investigation raises serious questions about the foundations of that narrative.
Please support this work with the following 3 payment options:
Upgrade to a Paid Subscription
Bitcoin: 3Q6BK8x8zjoPaXykQggzvoJxg5FiEbkb3U
Ethereum: 0x4CB0d39d8466a34609318FC1B003B745893788b3
All Essays, Interviews and Book Summaries are free.
But the Deep Dive Conversation Library is a bonus only for Paid Subscribers.
Part One: The Anomalies
The Foundation: A Royal Society Determination
The story begins where the story itself begins: the late 1700s and the Royal Society. Georges Cuvier, a member of this institution, possessed what contemporaries called an “uncanny ability” to identify species from fragmentary remains. From a few random bones brought to him, Cuvier determined they belonged to extinct creatures—species that no longer walked the earth. This determination became foundational for everything that followed.
The implications were immediately theological. If species could go extinct, the Biblical narrative of creation faced complications. If creatures had existed before recorded history and disappeared, the timeline of Genesis required reconsideration. The bones became evidence not merely of prehistoric life but of a history longer and stranger than scripture described.
As agent131711 frames it: “These prehistoric creatures would become the proof needed for evolution theory, therefore disproving God, or, at a minimum, proving that God did not first make man in his own image, instead, God toyed with huge beasts for a while (160 million years, to be precise), then decided to slaughter them all; either way, the Bible is wrong and Science is right.”
The Two Discoverers
Within decades of Cuvier’s determination, two men discovered the bulk of what we now call dinosaurs: Edward Drinker Cope and Othniel Charles Marsh. The concentration of discoveries between these two individuals is itself remarkable.
Cope was an heir to the Quaker Oats fortune—the same Quaker Oats company that would later conduct radiation experiments on mentally challenged and orphaned children. He claimed discovery of nearly 1,000 extinct species, including over 130 dinosaurs, and authored 1,400 scientific papers that were “logged in history as fact.” The volume alone invites scrutiny: one man discovering a thousand species and generating fourteen hundred scientific papers establishing their reality.
Marsh’s uncle, George Peabody, possessed $20 million in 1800s currency—equivalent to over $500 million today. Peabody funded Marsh’s expeditions and established the Peabody Museum at Yale, libraries and museums at Harvard, and a natural history museum bearing his name. The city of Peabody, Massachusetts was named after him. As agent131711 observes: when you control the museums, you control the content, and therefore you control history.
Marsh became chief paleontologist of the U.S. Geological Survey—a government position. The federal government began funding both men’s expeditions. The dinosaur enterprise was now intertwined with state institutions and private wealth from its inception.
Between them, Cope and Marsh discovered virtually every famous dinosaur of their era. At one point, Marsh found 31 Triceratops skulls in less than 24 months. The probability of two financially interested individuals making this volume of discoveries invites consideration.
The Oil Spy Who Found T-Rex
The pattern of interested discoverers extends beyond Cope and Marsh. Barnum Brown discovered the first documented T-Rex remains and the Ankylosaurus. His biography contains a striking detail: during World War I and World War II, Brown worked as an intelligence asset—not for the military, but for oil companies. He was a corporate spy for the Rockefeller fossil fuel industry.
Brown was simultaneously assistant curator of the American Museum of Natural History. He found the partial T-Rex skeleton in 1900, found another in 1902, and the president of his employer museum “confirmed” the bones and named the species. The institutional loop was complete: discovery, authentication, and display all occurred within the same organizational structure.
Brown was nicknamed “Mr. Bones” and became one of the most famous fossil hunters in history. His dual role—espionage for the oil industry, paleontological discovery for the museum industry—encapsulates the intertwining of interests that runs throughout this story.
The Bones We Cannot See
Museum visitors believe they are viewing dinosaur fossils. They are not.
The bones shown to the public are replicas. Museum professionals explain this through several rationales: the real bones are radioactive, too rare, too valuable, and too heavy (they would “bust through the floor”). These explanations, agent131711 observes, sound like the excuses one makes to avoid an unwanted family vacation.
What visitors see are replicas made from chicken bones, frog bones, horse bones, plaster, and plastic—what the industry calls “real bone material.” The term is technically accurate: these are real bones, from real animals. They are simply not dinosaur bones.
Even professionals are barred from examining original specimens. One case involved a researcher who gained rare access to “authentic” fossils, subjected them to CAT scan analysis, and discovered they were fabricated—assembled from fragments of small animal bones, metal, and glue. National Geographic reportedly published the story as real regardless. This incident helps explain why access to original specimens is now completely restricted.
The replicas themselves are constructed from minimal source material. Complete skeletons are rarely, if ever, found. Artists and fabricators work from fragments—sometimes a single tooth, sometimes scattered bone pieces found in different locations at different times—to create the full displays.
The Gap Between Discovery and Display
The specimen codes assigned to famous discoveries allow comparison between what was actually excavated and what appears in museums.
The first Diplodocus discovery (#YPM VP 1920) consisted of a handful of random bones—fragmentary remains that look nothing like the massive reconstructions displayed worldwide. Additional bones were found in different years and different locations, all determined to belong to the same dinosaur. The process resembles assembling a Lego creation by combining pieces found in different stores, different cities, and different years, declaring the result to be the “original” set.
The Ankylosaurus was first identified by Marsh in 1892 based on a single tooth. The first actual bones weren’t found until 1906—fourteen years later.
The Pterodactyl’s origins involve a copper engraving. The bones were allegedly unearthed in Germany at an unknown date. The discovery was never logged into the collection catalog. A drawing of a copper engraving was sent to Cuvier, who determined from the artwork that this was a reptile and named it. Art became species.
The Stegosaurus was identified from bone fragments that look like random rocks when displayed alongside the museum reconstructions. The reconstructions look like creatures from children’s imagination.
The Velociraptor skulls, when displayed alongside alligator skulls, invite uncomfortable questions about distinguishability.
Discovery Patterns and Controlled Sites
Ordinary people do not find dinosaur skeletons. Searching for documentation of amateur discoveries at Kimmeridge Bay—a famous fossil-hunting location in England—turns up no evidence of non-professionals finding dinosaur bones. Reviewing 240 images posted by visitors on TripAdvisor, 38 reviews on AllTrails, and YouTube videos: zero dinosaur bones. Visitors find shell impressions, leaf imprints, the kinds of fossils anyone might find at beaches and lakeshores worldwide.
Agent131711 contrasts this with his own fossil-hunting in Michigan’s Great Lakes region. He finds fossils constantly—brachiopods, crinoids, bryozoans. These are genuine fossils of genuine ancient creatures. He has never found anything resembling a dinosaur bone. Neither, apparently, has anyone else who isn’t affiliated with museums, universities, or government agencies.
The locations where dinosaur discoveries occur are themselves controlled. Kimmeridge Bay is designated an SSSI (Site of Special Scientific Interest) and a UNESCO World Heritage Site. Access is restricted. No digging is allowed. No hammers permitted. Visitors can only collect fossils that wash up on the shore.
Yet Steve Etches, a museum owner with seven dinosaurs named after him and nearly a dozen new-species discoveries, claims to have extracted nearly 3,000 fossils from this location, including one of the most complete Pliosaur skulls ever found. According to news reports, he spotted the snout sticking out of a cliff, flew a drone to evaluate it, rigged a rope system, scaled down the cliff, and extracted the skull from United Nations protected heritage property.
No arrest. No investigation. No mention of his museum ownership or previous discoveries in the news coverage.
The Texas Footprints
The famous dinosaur footprints in Texas, presented for decades in documentaries as evidence of dinosaur presence, were admitted by the man who created them to be fabrications. He proceeded to make money from them anyway. Video documentation of this admission exists.
The documentaries presenting these footprints as authentic aired on The History Channel, BBC, and National Geographic. The footage was not labeled as reenactment. Viewers were expected to believe they were seeing evidence.
NASA and the Dinosaur Business
The institutional connections extend further than museums. NASA is involved in dinosaur hunting—a connection that might seem puzzling until one examines the overlapping interests.
NASA uses satellite imagery to locate fossil deposits, claiming to identify dinosaur bones from space through rock formations and soil color variations. The paleontologists, apparently, are also aerial photography analysis experts. They look at satellite images of deserts—images that look like any other satellite images of deserts—and determine where dinosaur bones lie buried.
The logic is curious: dinosaur bones allegedly became fossils because they were buried so deep, with so much soil pressure over so much time, that they transformed to stone. Yet these deeply buried stone bones can be spotted from space through soil color variations.
Ray Stanford, presented in media as a “self-taught fossil hunter,” made remarkable discoveries at NASA facilities. In 2012, he found 70+ dinosaur prints in a single slab at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center—the building where his wife worked. The story goes that he arrived to drop her off, somehow ended up on the grass, and stumbled across paleontological history. A massive footprint. Seventy-plus additional prints. All in one small area. At a government space facility.
He found the first-ever baby Ankylosaur in Maryland—where NASA is located. He found a “trove” of dinosaur prints in Washington DC. Lots of troves in government locations discovered by the same self-taught enthusiast.
His employer is listed as Science Systems and Applications, Inc. (SSAI), a defense contractor. SSAI’s clients include NASA, the World Bank, the NIH, the U.S. Postal Service, the Department of Agriculture, NOAA, the Naval Research Laboratory, Northrop Grumman, and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Stanford’s NASA profile lists a mailing address at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center—the exact location of his dinosaur discoveries.
The FOIA implications are worth noting: you can FOIA a government agency, but you can’t FOIA a private contractor. Stanford’s employment through SSAI rather than direct NASA employment creates an information barrier.
Stanford also founded Project Starlight International in the 1960s—a UFO research organization funded by anonymous wealthy patrons. The organization’s PO Box address was less than seven miles from the NASA facilities where Stanford made his dinosaur discoveries. The proximity to government space facilities is consistent across Stanford’s various activities.
The slab containing the 70+ prints cannot be publicly viewed. A replica is available instead. The pattern repeats: discoveries at controlled locations, by connected individuals, with original specimens unavailable and replicas offered as substitutes.
The Smithsonian Network
The Smithsonian Institution operates as the central node in American dinosaur presentation. It receives taxpayer funding and donations from entities including the Gates Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, Boeing, Northrop Grumman, Fox News, Bank of America, and the Smithsonian itself (donating to itself).
Examining donation records for just one Smithsonian entity—the National Museum of African American History and Culture—reveals contributions of $10-20 million from major corporate and foundation donors, with the pattern repeating across the institution’s many tentacles.
The same network funds, discovers, authenticates, displays, and reports on dinosaur history. At no point does independent verification enter the process.
The Auction Market
The financial incentives became explicit when dinosaur specimens began selling at auction.
Stan the T-Rex sold in October 2020 for $31.8 million. The specimen was discovered by paleontologist Stan Sacrison at the Hell Creek Formation—the same location where nearly everything is found. Sacrison spotted bone fragments in a cliff while “looking for plants” in an area with minimal vegetation.
Stan’s skeleton was later revealed to contain replicas copied from other T-Rex skeletons, including one named Sue. The fabricated parts were copies of fabricated parts from other fabricated reconstructions. Black Hills Institute, which employed Sacrison, subsequently sold and rented additional copies of Stan—skeleton, skull, teeth, and claws.
Stan now resides in a natural history museum in the United Arab Emirates.
Shen the T-Rex, priced at $25 million, was pulled from auction after it was revealed that its fabricated parts were copied from Stan’s fabricated parts—which had themselves been copied from other reconstructions. Copies of copies of guesswork.
Trinity the T-Rex, sold for $6.1 million, was composed of 293 bones from three different locations. 147 of those bones were “real bone material” (chicken bones, horse bones). The toes were reproduced from plastic because “dinosaur toes are rarely found.”
Big John the Triceratops sold for $7.7 million. Discovered by paleontologist Walter W. Stein after only “10-15 minutes of searching,” the bones were scattered over 100 square meters. Stein has found “well over 30 important dinosaur skeletons” including new species.
The auction market trades in fabrications. The fabrications are copied from other fabrications. The copies command millions of dollars. The copies then become the authentic specimens displayed as history.
Part Two: The First Pillar — Fossil Fuels
The linguistic construction “fossil fuel” performs specific ideological work. It anchors petroleum to biological origin—specifically, to the decomposition of ancient organic matter under geological pressure over millions of years. Dinosaurs are the imaginative anchor of this story. They died, they decomposed, they became the oil we extract.
A 1960s Sinclair Oil advertisement made the connection explicit, showing dinosaurs transforming into the oil that powers automobiles. The company’s logo remains a green Brontosaurus to this day. Children absorb this image before they can evaluate its accuracy.
This framing establishes petroleum as finite—a resource that can be exhausted because it required millions of years of organic accumulation to form. We are burning through ancient death. When it’s gone, it’s gone. Scarcity justifies price. Scarcity justifies geopolitical arrangements. Scarcity justifies wars.
The story also positions extraction as harvesting the past rather than tapping an ongoing planetary process. Oil companies become miners of prehistory rather than drillers into a continuously replenishing resource.
The Abiogenic Alternative
The alternative theory—abiogenic petroleum origin—proposes that hydrocarbons are continuously manufactured deep within the earth through geological processes entirely unrelated to biological decomposition. No dinosaurs required. No ancient biomass required. No scarcity required.
This theory has substantial support among Russian and Ukrainian geologists, who developed it extensively following World War II as part of Stalin’s drive for Soviet oil self-sufficiency. Their research led to the Russian-Ukrainian Theory of Deep, Abiotic Petroleum Origins—the conclusion that oil is a natural product of planetary processes, not decomposed biology.
Thomas Gold, a Cornell astronomer, brought the theory to Western attention in his 1998 book The Deep Hot Biosphere: The Myth of Fossil Fuels. Freeman Dyson wrote the foreword. Gold’s argument: hydrocarbons are fundamental building blocks of Earth as it formed and continues to develop. Go deep enough into the mantle, and you will find abundant oil everywhere. The reason we find oil in sedimentary rock is not that sedimentary rock contains decomposed organisms, but that sedimentary rock is porous enough for upward-migrating oil to pool in.
Gold also explained the biological material found in petroleum deposits—the supposed evidence of organic origin—as microbes picked up by oil as it moves through rock layers. Life doesn’t create oil; oil supports life in the deep biosphere.
The Evidence
Evidence for abiogenic oil includes several anomalous observations:
Eugene Island in the Gulf of Mexico: depleted oil wells refilled from below, suggesting a deep source continuously replenishing surface deposits. The oil reservoir was “rapidly refilling itself from some continuous source miles below the Earth’s surface.”
The Middle East has doubled its proven reserves over recent decades despite continuous extraction and relatively few new discoveries. Where does the new oil come from?
Oil and gas appear in locations with no apparent fossil deposits. There is no evidence of dinosaurs or massive biological accumulation at many petroleum sites.
Hydrocarbons exist throughout the solar system on bodies where biological processes never occurred. Saturn’s moon Titan has hydrocarbon lakes. If hydrocarbons require biology, these observations require explanation.
The Fischer-Tropsch process demonstrates that hydrogen and carbon can combine to form oil synthetically. Nazi Germany used this process to meet up to 75% of its wartime fuel demand, producing synthetic oil from coal. If oil can be manufactured, its origins are not necessarily biological.
L. Fletcher Prouty’s Testimony
L. Fletcher Prouty served as chief of special operations for the Joint Chiefs of Staff during the Kennedy administration. He spent nine years in the Pentagon—two with the Secretary of Defense, two with the Joint Chiefs, five with Air Force Headquarters. He was the first “Focal Point” officer between the CIA and Air Force for clandestine operations.
Prouty stated directly that the framing of petroleum as “fossil fuel” was a deliberate decision by industry and government actors who knew better. In his words: “These are not accidental things. There is a dollar sign behind almost everything.”
They knew oil didn’t come from dinosaurs. They knew it was naturally occurring and renewable. But framing it as organic in origin would make it finite, create scarcity, and create upward pressure on price. They also influenced what geologists came to know as true.
Geologists, Prouty’s testimony suggests, were the first industrially captured academy. The medical profession followed with the Flexner Report. The pattern repeats across disciplines: funding shapes conclusions, conclusions become curriculum, curriculum becomes consensus, consensus becomes unquestionable.
The 1892 Geneva Convention
The 1892 Geneva Convention saw international representatives agree on nomenclature and classification for petroleum products. The participating nations collectively accepted the “fossil fuel” designation. The story became global by institutional agreement, not scientific discovery.
As agent131711 puts it: all nations were “like, ‘Yeah, ok, Fossil Fuels sounds good to us, let’s roll with that.’”
Jerome Corsi’s Assessment
Jerome Corsi, in The Great Oil Conspiracy, traces the intellectual desperation of the organic-origin camp: “First it was dinosaurs, then it got down to plankton, now they’re down to bacteria and microbes. They’re just desperate to continue to find a biological link, because if oil is a natural process of the Earth, and it can be produced naturally, it can be produced synthetically, and we’re not running out of it.”
The link between dinosaurs and gasoline was established through advertising and education. Sinclair’s green Brontosaurus taught children the connection. Textbooks reinforced it. Museums displayed the dead creatures whose bodies became our transportation. The story is vivid, memorable, and foundational to how we understand energy economics.
If that story is wrong—if petroleum is abiogenic—then the dinosaur-to-oil narrative becomes not merely inaccurate but a deliberate mechanism for controlling resource economics through manufactured scarcity.
Part Three: The Second Pillar — Evolution
Agent131711 opens his series with a direct claim: dinosaur discoveries emerged precisely when the Theory of Evolution needed physical evidence.
In the late 1700s, religious populations—which constituted the vast majority—weren’t accepting purely theoretical arguments for evolution. The Bible described creation. Science offered speculation. Something material was needed to tip the balance.
Then bones appeared. A Royal Society member examined them and declared them evidence of extinct species. The Biblical creation account suddenly faced material contradiction.
Darwin’s On the Origin of Species appeared in 1859. Cope and Marsh were making their discoveries in the same period. The theory required evidence; evidence appeared. The theory required deep time; the bones were dated to deep time. The theory required extinction as a mechanism; the bones belonged to creatures that no longer existed. The theory required common descent; paleontologists arranged their bone fragments into ancestral sequences.
Darwin’s Own Doubt
Darwin himself acknowledged the fossil record as “the most obvious and gravest objection” to his theory. His mechanism—gradual modification through natural selection acting on random variation—predicted countless transitional forms. Every major group should connect to every other through innumerable intermediate species, each slightly different from its neighbors.
These intermediates weren’t appearing in the rocks. Darwin hoped future discoveries would fill the gaps.
After 150 years of intensive searching, this problem has grown worse, not better. The fossil record shows species appearing suddenly, fully formed, remaining unchanged throughout their existence (stasis), then disappearing abruptly. There are no gradual transitions between major groups.
As paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould admitted: “The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology.”
The Cambrian Problem
The Cambrian Explosion presents Darwin’s doubt in its most acute form. Nearly all animal phyla appear simultaneously in the geological record—fully formed, without precursors, in a geological instant. This is not gradual modification. This is sudden appearance of fundamentally different body plans.
Stephen Meyer’s Darwin’s Doubt examines this problem in detail. The explosion represents not merely new forms but an “information revolution”—the sudden appearance of the genetic instructions required to build fundamentally different body architectures. Body plans require coordinated genetic information specifying structure, development, and integration. No known mechanism explains how unguided processes generate specified complex information of this magnitude.
The probability calculations are prohibitive. Hubert Yockey calculated the odds of a single 100-amino-acid protein forming spontaneously at 1 in 10^65—comparable to winning the lottery every week for a thousand years with the same numbers. Robert Sauer’s team at MIT confirmed experimentally that proteins aren’t arbitrary collections of chemicals but extraordinarily rare and precise combinations where most positions are completely intolerant of substitution.
The simplest self-replicating cell requires not one but hundreds of different proteins, plus DNA, RNA, and complex metabolic systems all working together. The probability of all these components arising simultaneously by chance is effectively zero regardless of time available.
Francis Crick—co-discoverer of DNA’s structure—acknowledged that life’s origin appears “almost a miracle, so many are the conditions which would have had to be satisfied to get it going.”
Circular Dating
Richard Milton’s investigation, summarized in Shattering the Myths of Darwinism, reveals the circular reasoning underlying paleontological dating. Rocks are dated by the fossils they contain. Fossils are dated by the rocks they’re found in. Neither discipline possesses independent verification methods.
The Institute of Geological Sciences admits that isotopic ages are “unlikely to rival or replace fossils as the most important means of correlation.” The dates assigned to the geological column are based on conjecture about evolution rates and sedimentation rates—not empirical measurement.
Radiocarbon dating has revealed unexpected results. Coal and oil deposits supposedly millions of years old consistently yield radiocarbon dates of only thousands of years. Volcanic rocks known to have formed recently give potassium-argon ages of millions or billions of years due to excess argon contamination. Multiple dating methods applied to the same samples routinely produce wildly divergent ages.
The KBS Tuff in Kenya, crucial for dating human ancestors, yielded ages ranging from 0.52 to 220 million years from the same rock formation.
The Ideological Function
Why does Darwinism persist as orthodoxy despite its problems?
Liam Scheff’s assessment, which I cited in “Intelligence”: “Darwinism was never really a scientific theory at all—it was an anti-religion, born from Victorian intellectuals’ desperate need to escape the suffocating grip of church authority.” The project was about “destroying the Christian ‘Yahweh-driven’ model, replacing one kind of god with another they called ‘Nature,’ which somehow ‘selects’ the ‘fit’ to ‘survive’ through processes no one can actually define or measure.”
The theory served cultural and political purposes beyond explaining biological origins. It provided scientific authority for eugenics programs and forced sterilizations. It positioned humans as accidents of chemistry rather than products of purpose. It transferred ultimate explanatory authority from religious institutions to scientific ones.
When science becomes dogma, when questioning is forbidden, when careers are destroyed for publishing contradictory evidence, we’re no longer doing science. We’re enforcing a state religion wearing a lab coat.
Dinosaurs as Anchors
Dinosaurs anchor the evolutionary transfer of authority. They populate the museums where children learn human origins. They star in documentaries explaining deep time. They appear in textbooks demonstrating extinction and adaptation. They fill children’s imaginations with creatures that lived millions of years ago and died in catastrophes beyond human memory.
The drama of dinosaurs—their size, their strangeness, their violent end—makes evolution vivid. Abstract concepts like “natural selection” and “millions of years” become concrete through T-Rex skeletons and extinction asteroids. Children accept the timeline before they can evaluate the evidence.
Without dinosaurs—or the specific narrative constructed around them—evolution’s public acceptance might require different supports. The fossil record’s actual content—sudden appearance, stasis, disappearance—does not obviously suggest gradual modification. The dinosaur narrative provides the imaginative scaffolding that makes Darwinism feel intuitively true despite its evidentiary problems.
Part Four: Synthesis
Two stories. Two pillars. One imaginative anchor.
The fossil fuel story says: petroleum is finite because it comes from dead organisms compressed over millions of years. This scarcity justifies extraction economics, price structures, and geopolitical arrangements. The story positions certain regions as blessed with ancient death and others as dependent on their bounty. Entire economies have been structured around this resource distribution. Wars have been fought. Alliances have been formed. Carbon taxes have been proposed. The climate change narrative builds on the fossil fuel foundation—we are burning through irreplaceable ancient biomass and must transition to alternatives.
If petroleum is abiogenic—continuously replenished from deep planetary processes—the entire economic and political architecture built on scarcity assumptions requires reconsideration.
The evolution story says: life is accidental because it arose through purposeless mechanisms acting over deep time. This removes humans from special status and transfers explanatory authority from religious institutions to scientific ones. It positions the Bible as mythology and positions laboratories as temples. Funding structures, academic careers, and cultural prestige flow through this transfer. Questions about human purpose, meaning, and origin are delegated to those credentialed by secular institutions.
If evolution’s mechanism cannot account for the information required to build life, the entire ideological architecture built on materialist assumptions requires reconsideration.
Dinosaurs support both pillars simultaneously.
They provide the imaginative anchor for “fossil” in fossil fuel. They died, their bodies compressed, and we burn the results. Sinclair’s green Brontosaurus teaches children this connection. The image is vivid, memorable, and foundational.
They provide the dramatic evidence for evolution’s deep time. They ruled the earth for 160 million years, then disappeared catastrophically, demonstrating that existence is precarious and that nature discards even the mighty. The extinction narrative shows evolution working through death—species die, new species arise, the unfit disappear. The image is vivid, memorable, and foundational.
The Institutional Convergence
The institutional web documented here—the Smithsonian, the Rockefeller foundations, NASA, the defense contractors, the media outlets—benefits from both stories. The same funding networks support dinosaur research, petroleum geology education, and evolutionary biology departments. The same museum infrastructure displays dinosaur bones, explains fossil fuel formation, and teaches human origins.
Finite resources justify extraction monopolies. The Rockefeller fortune was built on oil. The foundation bearing that name funds the museums displaying the dinosaurs that anchor the fossil fuel narrative. The Standard Oil empire required the public to believe that petroleum was scarce—a limited resource requiring controlled extraction by responsible parties. If oil bubbles up endlessly from planetary processes, the entire monopoly structure loses its justification.
Materialist frameworks justify secular authority structures. Scientific institutions derive legitimacy from their explanatory power. The theory that science explains everything—including life’s origin and the ultimate questions of existence—positions those institutions as the proper authorities for all fundamental questions. Religious institutions once held this authority. The transfer occurred through scientific triumph: showing that material processes, not divine intention, explain the world. Evolution is the cornerstone of this transfer in the biological realm.
Both stories together create a world where the past is very long, purpose is absent, resources are scarce, and the institutions interpreting these truths deserve deference and funding. Citizens in this world appropriately defer to experts on questions of origins. They appropriately accept resource scarcity as natural. They appropriately fund the institutions that maintain the explanatory frameworks.
The resistance to questioning dinosaurs is not primarily scientific. It’s structural. The questions threaten not merely museum displays but the architectural supports of modern consciousness—the legitimacy structures that determine who speaks authoritatively about fundamental questions.
The Psychology of Acceptance
Agent131711 notes the psychological dimension: “I know people really want to believe in dinosaurs, and so did I. When I was a kid, I had all of the Dinobot Transformers!”
Dinosaurs are introduced in early childhood through toys, cartoons, museum visits, and picture books. They become part of imaginative life before children can evaluate evidence. By adulthood, dinosaurs feel self-evidently real—as real as elephants or tigers—despite the fact that no living person has seen one.
The emotional investment in dinosaurs makes questioning feel not like intellectual inquiry but like threatening something beloved. This emotional defense mechanism protects the narrative more effectively than any scientific argument.
Television documentaries reinforce the narrative through visual suggestion. They show artists’ reconstructions as if they were observations. They show fabricated footprints as if they were discoveries. They show museum displays as if they were exhumed specimens. The gap between what is shown and what exists is obscured by confident narration and dramatic music.
Disney is listed as a Military PSYOP Unit Partner in authentic U.S. military documents. Disney operates dinosaur attractions at theme parks. The same psychological operation infrastructure that shapes public opinion on other matters shapes the dinosaur narrative.
The Mechanics of Stability
Why does this narrative persist? The anomalies documented here are not hidden. The gap between excavated fragments and museum displays is acknowledged in paleontological literature. The replica nature of exhibits is stated on plaques, if you look closely. The concentration of discoveries among interested parties is a matter of historical record. Yet the narrative continues, unchallenged in mainstream discourse, taught to children as settled fact.
In “The Mechanics of Stable Falsehood,” I examined how complete inversions find their own equilibrium. A partial lie—a pole tilted twenty degrees from vertical—requires constant energy to maintain. Struts, supports, continuous adjustment against the pull of reality. But a complete inversion—the pole flipped 180 degrees—balances on its own. It does not argue with reality; it replaces it. The internal coherence becomes its own stability.
The dinosaur narrative operates as a complete inversion. It does not claim that some prehistoric creatures existed while others didn’t. It does not hedge on timelines or question dating methods. It presents a comprehensive alternative history: 160 million years of reptilian dominance, catastrophic extinction, fossilization into the oil we burn, evolution through deep time into the present. Every element supports every other element. The internal logic is consistent, even if disconnected from verifiable reality.
Once trillions of dollars of infrastructure are built around an inverted pole—careers, institutions, industries, identities—the structure can stand for generations.
The components interlock:
A founding lie: Cuvier’s determination that random bones belonged to extinct species. Cope and Marsh’s discoveries that populated the prehistoric world. Brown’s T-Rex that gave the narrative its icon. These founding moments were not inevitable interpretations of evidence. They were choices—choices made by individuals with institutional positions and financial interests. The founding lie need not be elaborate. It needs only to anchor a heuristic and form a coherent alternative.
Epistemic capture: The Smithsonian, the natural history museums, the paleontology departments, the journals that publish findings, the funding agencies that support research. When these institutions are captured, the inversion gains legitimacy. It becomes “the science” rather than a story being told. Modern societies have outsourced judgment to institutions. The individual cannot personally examine dinosaur bones—they’re not allowed to. They trust the system that credentials experts and validates findings. Capture this system and you capture the epistemology of the entire society.
The herd-mind limitation: Collective cognition cannot perform slow thinking. It holds only simple heuristics—two-variable formulas compressing reality into actionable shortcuts. “Dinosaurs lived millions of years ago.” “Oil comes from fossils.” “Evolution is settled science.” These formulas cannot be audited by the collective mind. They can only be accepted or rejected wholesale. Whoever controls the anchor points controls collective understanding.
Convergent opportunism: The original architects—Cuvier, Cope, Marsh—are long dead. The narrative no longer requires their maintenance. Oil companies benefit from the fossil fuel framing. Museums benefit from ticket sales and donations. Academics benefit from grants and career advancement. Textbook publishers benefit from curriculum requirements. Disney benefits from theme park attractions. Documentary producers benefit from dramatic content. None of these actors need coordination. Each independently discovers that the structure serves them. Their interests converge like iron filings around a magnet. The structure maintains itself through distributed self-interest.
The streetlight effect: Research funding concentrates in the illuminated zone defined by captured institutions. Questions that would destabilize the narrative lie in darkness—not forbidden, merely unrewarded. The paleontologist who questions dating methods doesn’t get funded. The geologist who investigates abiogenic oil doesn’t get published in major journals. The biologist who challenges Darwinian mechanisms doesn’t get tenure. Scientists go where the light is. The ignorance is architecturally produced.
The complicity of comfort: The narrative succeeds not only because institutions enforce it but because populations prefer it. Dinosaurs are beloved. Children adore them. Adults remember that childhood wonder. The story connects us to deep time, makes us participants in an epic history, provides meaning through scientific mythology. The comfortable lie offers belonging—shared knowledge, museum visits with family, documentaries watched together. The uncomfortable truth offers exile—separation from the herd, no more innocent wonder at T-Rex skeletons, the lonely position of the questioner. Given the choice, most people choose comfort.
The corruption of feedback: Markets should correct error—bad products fail because consumers learn they are bad. But when capital captures the means of knowing, the feedback loop severs. Museums that display fabrications don’t lose visitors; they gain them. Textbooks that teach questionable history don’t get rejected; they get adopted. Documentaries that show artists’ reconstructions as discoveries don’t get criticized; they win awards. The invisible hand optimizes for the wrong thing. It becomes an engine of inversion.
The modelling clearing house: In “The Architecture of Control,” drawing on the research of esc, I examined how the 19th-century London clearing house became a template for control—local banks maintained apparent independence while relying on clearing banks, which in turn depended on the Bank of England. Knowledge moves through the system without anyone touching the raw material. Total control through voluntary participation.
The same architecture applies to temporal inaccessibility. The distant future cannot be directly experienced. Climate models process raw data that laypeople cannot examine and output conclusions that laypeople must accept. The models function as clearing houses—intermediaries that stand between reality and public understanding, translating inputs into narratives. The individual cannot audit the model any more than the 19th-century depositor could audit the clearing house.
The deep past operates identically. No one can visit the Jurassic. The bones—to whatever extent they exist—are inaccessible. What reaches the public passes through institutional modellers: paleontologists who reconstruct creatures from fragments, artists who render flesh onto fabricated skeletons, documentary producers who animate the renderings into moving images, museum designers who arrange the displays. Each layer is a clearing house, processing inputs from the previous layer and outputting conclusions for the next.
The symmetry is precise. Climate science says: trust our models about the future you cannot visit. Paleontology says: trust our models about the past you cannot visit. Both directions of time are behind a wall. The only access is through credentialed intermediaries who translate raw data into narrative. The public participates voluntarily—we want to understand the future climate, we want to know about dinosaurs—and through that voluntary participation, we surrender epistemic independence to the clearing house.
Just as the financial clearing house created the appearance of decentralized banking while concentrating control at the apex, the modelling clearing house creates the appearance of objective science while concentrating narrative authority in captured institutions. The depositor thought he was dealing with his local bank. The museum visitor thinks she is encountering prehistoric reality. Both are encountering the output of a system designed to process their trust into someone else’s control.
These components do not merely coexist. They interlock. Epistemic capture makes heuristic installation possible—the anchor points are certified as “settled science.” The herd-mind limitation makes capture effective—the collective cannot audit the institutions it trusts. The complicity of comfort ensures the collective does not want to audit them. Convergent opportunism maintains the streetlight. The streetlight produces the ignorance that protects the founding lie from scrutiny. The corruption of feedback ensures that market forces reinforce rather than correct the inversion.
The machine is self-sustaining not because it is centrally controlled but because each component creates the conditions for the others to function.
The Convergence
Agent131711 identifies the convergence directly: “The information is pushed because it is a pillar to The Theory of Evolution, which disproves the Bible (they hate God because they believe in Scientism), and yes, it creates Fossil Fuel hysteria, thus driving the price of a natural resource.”
The two pillars reinforce each other. Deep time makes oil from dinosaurs plausible. Oil from dinosaurs makes deep time feel relevant to daily life. Evolution makes extinction meaningful. Extinction makes evolution dramatic. The narratives interlock.
Children learn the twin stories together: life evolved over millions of years, dinosaurs ruled and died, their bodies became the oil we burn. The timeline of earth history and the energy economy merge into a single coherent worldview. Questioning one element raises questions about the others.
What Would Remain?
Consider what happens to each pillar if dinosaurs—specifically, the narrative as constructed—falls apart.
The fossil fuel story would need new anchoring. Petroleum might still be positioned as finite, but the imaginative link to prehistoric creatures would be severed. Children couldn’t visualize decomposing dinosaurs when they see gas pumps. The Sinclair Brontosaurus would become nonsensical rather than explanatory.
The evolution story would lose its most dramatic evidence. The transitional fossil problem would become more acute without dinosaur lineages to point at (however problematic those lineages are under examination). The deep time framework would lose its most memorable inhabitants. Museums would need different centerpieces.
Neither pillar would necessarily collapse. But both would be weakened. And the questioning this research invites would extend to other elements of both narratives.
Closing
Agent131711’s work doesn’t claim certainty about what dinosaurs were or weren’t. It documents anomalies: the concentration of discoveries among interested parties, the inaccessibility of original specimens, the gap between excavated fragments and museum reconstructions, the institutional interconnections, the financial incentives, the controlled access to discovery sites, the fabricated evidence presented as authentic.
The five-part series represents substantial investigative work—examining specimen codes, tracking institutional connections, documenting the gap between what’s shown and what’s claimed, identifying the funding streams and professional networks. This is the kind of work that professional journalists once did before the profession was captured by the same institutional interests it was meant to scrutinize.
The question the research raises is not “Did dinosaurs exist?” but “Why does this specific narrative exist in this specific form, and who benefits from its maintenance?”
The fossil fuel connection and the evolution connection suggest answers. Both stories serve interests beyond historical accuracy. Both stories require public acceptance of claims that cannot be independently verified by ordinary people. Both stories channel enormous economic and ideological resources through institutions that control the narrative. Both stories position their maintainers as authorities on fundamental questions—energy futures and human origins.
This doesn’t make the narrative false. It makes the narrative worth examining with the same skepticism we would apply to any claim made by interested parties about matters where independent verification is impossible.
The resistance to examination—the social costs of asking questions, the professional consequences of skepticism, the reflexive dismissal of inquiry as “conspiracy theory”—itself suggests something worth protecting. Science invites falsification. Ideology resists it. The scientific method welcomes attempts to disprove theories; the stronger a theory survives attack, the more confidence we can place in it. What pattern does the dinosaur narrative follow? Are questioners welcomed and their objections addressed? Or are they marginalized and their questions dismissed?
When questions are forbidden, the answers being protected are worth identifying.
What if petroleum is abiogenic? What if evolution’s mechanism cannot generate specified complex information? What if the dinosaur narrative serves purposes its maintainers prefer not to discuss?
These questions don’t require answers to be worth asking. They require only the recognition that official stories serve interests, that institutions protecting stories deserve scrutiny, and that the work of narrative maintenance is never neutral. Every story has tellers. Every teller has interests. The tellers of the dinosaur narrative include some of the most powerful institutions on earth.
Agent131711 has done substantial work documenting the anomalies. This essay has attempted to identify the larger structures those anomalies illuminate—the two pillars that dinosaurs support in our collective imagination and our institutional arrangements. What readers do with this information—whether they investigate further, dismiss it, or simply hold the questions open while remaining appropriately uncertain—remains their own responsibility.
The dinosaurs in the museums will continue drawing crowds. The gas pumps will continue dispensing fossil fuels. The textbooks will continue teaching evolution. The question is only whether we understand what work these stories perform, who benefits from their maintenance, and what it might mean if the foundation is less solid than we’ve been taught to believe.
Acknowledgment: This essay builds on the five-part investigation published by agent131711 in April 2024, integrating it with previous work on fossil fuel origins (”Fossil Fuel”), evolutionary theory (”Intelligence”), the mechanics of narrative persistence (”The Mechanics of Stable Falsehood”), and the clearing house model of institutional control (”The Architecture of Control,” based on the research of esc). The synthesis—connecting dinosaurs to these meta-narratives and explaining the architecture of their stability—is the contribution here. The primary research on dinosaur anomalies belongs to agent131711.
References
Primary Source on Dinosaur Anomalies
agent131711, “The Dinosaur HOAX” series (Parts 1-5), April 2024.
Fossil Fuel Origins
L. Fletcher Prouty, interview on the origin of the term “fossil fuel” and the 1892 Geneva Convention.
Thomas Gold, The Deep Hot Biosphere: The Myth of Fossil Fuels, Springer, 1998.
Jerome R. Corsi, The Great Oil Conspiracy: How the U.S. Government Hid the Nazi Discovery of Abiotic Oil from the American People, Skyhorse Publishing, 2012.
J.F. Kenney et al., “The evolution of multicomponent systems at high pressures: VI. The thermodynamic stability of the hydrogen–carbon system: The genesis of hydrocarbons and the origin of petroleum,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2002.
F. William Engdahl, A Century of War: Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order, Pluto Press, 2004.
Evolution and Deep Time
Stephen C. Meyer, Darwin’s Doubt: The Explosive Origin of Animal Life and the Case for Intelligent Design, HarperOne, 2013.
Richard Milton, Shattering the Myths of Darwinism, Park Street Press, 1997.
Michael Behe, Darwin’s Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution, Free Press, 1996.
Stephen Jay Gould, “Evolution’s Erratic Pace,” Natural History, May 1977. (Source of “trade secret of paleontology” acknowledgment.)
Hubert P. Yockey, Information Theory, Evolution, and the Origin of Life, Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Charles Darwin, On the Origin of Species, 1859. (Acknowledgment of fossil record as “most obvious and gravest objection.”)
The Mechanics of Stable Falsehood
Malcolm Kendrick, Doctoring Data: How to Sort Out Medical Advice from Medical Nonsense, Columbus Publishing, 2014.
Malcolm Kendrick, The Great Cholesterol Con, John Blake Publishing, 2008.
Malcolm Kendrick, interview with Ivor Cummins (Episode 102) on fast thinking and slow thinking.
Paul Collits, on convergent opportunism.
Hill & Knowlton strategy documents, 1953–1954. “Doubt is our product” internal tobacco industry memoranda.
Upton Sinclair, “It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it.”
The Architecture of Control
esc, research on global governance systems, clearing house architecture, and institutional control mechanisms. Available at escapekey.substack.com.
Unbekoming, “The Architecture of Control: How Humanity Built Its Own Prison,” based on the research of esc, July 2025.
Julius Wolf, Sozialismus und kapitalistische Gesellschaftsordnung, 1892. (Source of the international clearing house model.)
Institutional History
Abraham Flexner, Medical Education in the United States and Canada (The Flexner Report), Carnegie Foundation, 1910.
E. Richard Brown, Rockefeller Medicine Men: Medicine and Capitalism in America, University of California Press, 1979.
Paleontological Sources Referenced
Edward Drinker Cope, scientific papers (1,400 papers establishing dinosaur species).
Othniel Charles Marsh, discoveries and Yale Peabody Museum collections.
Barnum Brown, American Museum of Natural History records on T-Rex discovery.
Georges Cuvier, Royal Society determinations on extinct species.
Media and Documentary Sources
Various documentaries aired on The History Channel, BBC, and National Geographic, as analyzed in agent131711’s research.
Sinclair Oil Corporation advertising materials featuring the Brontosaurus logo.
For readers wishing to verify claims in this essay: the specimen codes referenced (such as #YPM VP 1920 for Diplodocus) can be searched in paleontological databases. The gap between what these codes represent and what museums display is the central empirical observation of agent131711’s research.
New Biology Clinic
For those of you looking for practitioners who actually understand terrain medicine and the principles we explore here, I want to share something valuable. Dr. Tom Cowan—whose books and podcasts have shaped much of my own thinking about health—has created the New Biology Clinic, a virtual practice staffed by wellness specialists who operate from the same foundational understanding. This isn’t about symptom suppression or the conventional model. It’s about personalized guidance rooted in how living systems actually work. The clinic offers individual and family memberships that include not just private consults, but group sessions covering movement, nutrition, breathwork, biofield tuning, and more. Everything is virtual, making it accessible wherever you are. If you’ve been searching for practitioners who won’t look at you blankly when you mention structured water or the importance of the extracellular matrix, this is worth exploring. Use discount code “Unbekoming” to get $100 off the member activation fee. You can learn more and sign up at newbiologyclinic.com.
I appreciate you being here.
If you’ve found the content interesting, useful and maybe even helpful, please consider supporting it through a small paid subscription. While 99% of everything here is free, your paid subscription is important as it helps in covering some of the operational costs and supports the continuation of this independent research and journalism work. It also helps keep it free for those that cannot afford to pay.
Please make full use of the Free Libraries.
Unbekoming Interview Library: Great interviews across a spectrum of important topics.
Unbekoming Book Summary Library: Concise summaries of important books.
Stories
I’m always in search of good stories, people with valuable expertise and helpful books. Please don’t hesitate to get in touch at unbekoming@outlook.com
Baseline Human Health
Watch and share this profound 21-minute video to understand and appreciate what health looks like without vaccination.
I smell the sulfur all over this one.
What lands hardest isn’t any single anomaly, but the pattern: never a straight answer, always a proxy, a replica, a reconstruction, a credentialed interpreter standing between the public and anything verifiable. Especially NASA. When the same institution that can’t give a clean answer about the present is confidently narrating the deep past from satellite imagery, the nose knows something’s off.
The dinosaur narrative reads less like discovery and more like scaffolding. It props up the peak-oil fraud (scarcity by story, not geology) and the evolution deep-time mythos at the same time. Fossil fuel needs fossils. Evolution needs spectacle. Dinosaurs do double duty. That’s efficient mythology.
And the peak oil angle is the tell. Scarcity justifies price, control, war, and “responsible management” by the same actors who benefit most. If oil is abiogenic and replenishing, the whole moral architecture collapses. No wonder the Brontosaurus is still smiling at the gas pump.
What this essay does well is refuse the cheap binary (“dinosaurs real / dinosaurs fake”) and instead asks the only question that matters: what work does this story perform, and who profits from its maintenance? The defensive reflex, the ridicule, the refusal to allow scrutiny — that’s ideology, not science.
When answers curve, access closes, and replicas replace originals, the sulfur smell gets stronger. Not proof. But a signal.
Hoaxasaurus!