Playback speed
Share post
Share post at current time

Vaccination: The Hidden Truth

An Australian Documentary (1998)

This journey I’m on just keeps getting more and more interesting.

Amelia pointed me towards Dr. Viera Scheibner and Bronwyn Hancock, two ladies that I hadn’t come across before, but who fought the good fight in the 1980s and 1990s. They were two of the early Australians trying to warn the public against the dangers of vaccination and joint state-industry malfeasance.


Viera is now 87 and lives in regional NSW, I’ll probably not get the chance to meet her.

But, lucky me, it turns out Bronwyn lives in the neighbouring suburb to me. I got in touch with her, and we went for a wonderful lunch and chat last weekend.

It turns out that Bronwyn produced a pivotal Australian documentary released in 1998 titled Vaccination: The Hidden Truth.

At great expense, she travelled the country capturing interviews from a great variety of people including researchers, doctors, and parents.

I’ve uploaded the documentary above, as although it’s still on YouTube, I suspect it will eventually be scrubbed and memory holed.

This from a review of the documentary at the time.

In this extremely informative video, fifteen people, including Dr. Viera Scheibner (a PhD researcher), five medical doctors, other researchers, reveal what is really going on in relation to illness and vaccines. Ironically, the important facts come from the orthodox medicine's own peer-reviewed research.

With so much government and medical promotion of vaccination for prevention of disease, the video is clearly devoted to presenting the other side of the issue that parents and others are not being told. The result is a damning account of the ineffectiveness of vaccines and their often harmful effects. It declares that parents are not being told the truth by the media, the Health Department and the medical establishment, with a medical doctor, Dr. Mark Donohoe, confessing that "It is a problem for me that I am part of a profession that is systematically lying to people..."

The video presents well documented answers to questions like:

  • Was it really vaccines that saved us?

  • Why are they only counterproductive?

  • How are many statistics misleading?

  • What do vaccines contain?

  • What are they doing to our organs, immune systems, even our genes?

  • Are childhood diseases really dangerous to healthy children?

  • Why does vaccination continue?

  • What are our rights?

  • Can vaccine damage be evaluated and countered?

  • What is the true key to immunity?

The video raises the fundamental question of whether we should be trying to prevent childhood diseases anyway, in that they contribute to the development of a healthy immune system. If what the video says is true, why is vaccination pushed so heavily by the government authorities?

In the video, Dr. Viera Scheibner, who has studied almost 100,000 pages of orthodox medical research on vaccination, warns:

"It took almost three years of research before we looked at each other and said 'Vaccines are killing babies'... It is a well documented fact that the incidence and mortality from infectious diseases fell by 90% well before any vaccine was even introduced."

And this from Dr. Archie Kalokerinos, author of the book "Every Second Child":

"So it was obvious that I, and every other doctor for that matter, had been grossly misled... It was clearly shown that the only people who got smallpox twice were the vaccinated."

If you are in the frustrating position of wanting to inform your spouse, friends and/or relatives about vaccination, but they won't read appropriate literature, then this video is ideal. It is clear and logical and an eye-opener. Every doctor should see and respond to it.

~New Dawn magazine review, by Mary Ellen Wheeler

A short bio of all the participants can be found here.

Video Speaker Profiles (

Having watched the doco, the thing that stands out for me is that it could have been made today. The points being made in 1998, when our first daughter was born and we began her journey as a pin cushion, are the same points being made today. The logic has not changed, the junk science has not been “fixed” if anything it’s become more sophisticated and “junkier”, the dangers known then are far better understood now, and have all continued and played out and predicted. This was all known in 1998, and was kept from me by hospitals, gynecologists, pediatricians, obstetricians, GPs, nurses, midwifes, who didn’t know, or didn’t want to know or knew and ploughed ahead anyway…pick you narrative poison.

I am in awe of Bronwyn and everyone in the documentary.

The guts to do what they did is breathtaking. I’m sure if you asked them why they did it, they would say that they had no choice but to do it, to try to inform people and to try to save some people and their kids. Little did they know the future that was to come, but they knew that what was being done then was wrong and someone should try to stop it and try they did.

Frankly, anyone can watch this anywhere. It is not an Australia story, but a story of people fighting for personal sovereignty. It looks like a medical fight, it still looks like a medical fight, but it’s not, and frankly I don’t think it ever was. It’s a political fight disguised as a medical fight.

It’s the individual vs the collective.

Mao coined: Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.

Well, I think that the Americans figured that there is even more political power that grows out of the needle of a syringe.

I want to say, before I do my comments below, that Dr. Viera Scheibner, who features prominently in this documentary, and who is one of the earliest vaccine injury specialist’s and campaigners in Australia is an incredible, awe-inspiring woman. The amount of work that she did in the 1980s to figure it out, is simply breathtaking.

In Feb 1999 she wrote this public letter and challenge to Simon Chapman:

This letter by Dr Viera Scheibner, Principle Research Scientist (Rtd) and now prominent public campaigner, was sent to and published in the Medical Observer, an Australian medical newspaper, in February 1999.

1999 Medical Observer Pty Ltd

Level 2, 100 Bay Road,

Waverton NSW 2060

19 February 1999

Dear Editor,


On February 19, 1999, the Medical Observer published an article by Simon Chapman, in which he issued a challenge to the anti-vaccination movement in Australia.

My response to his provocative article is as follows:

If vaccines are such a blessing, I challenge Simon Chapman to appear on television and allow himself to be injected with all baby vaccines, adjusted to his body weight by a doctor of my choice and in my presence.

The vaccines to be administered to Simon are as follows:

DtaP: 3 doses within 4 months

Hib (any conjugates): 3 doses within 4 months

OPV or IPV: 3 doses within 4 months

Hep B: 3 doses within 1 month of each other.

The time of the first dose represents month 0.

There isn't a better way to demonstrate to us that vaccines are safe and effective than by Simon taking his own medicine.

After every lot of vaccines an independent medical doctor and myself would assess Simon's reactions and the general state of health. Long-term reactions will be followed up for 3 years.

If you do not publish my letter and/or Simon does not agree to this easy and safe demonstration, then it will show us all that vaccinators are dishonest and are afraid of their own medicine. In other words: put up or shut up.

I will publicise this proposition and your response on the Internet to ensure that my response to Simon's challenge is widely known.

Yours very sincerely,

Viera Scheibner Ph.D

Simon Chapman has been pretty quiet since this challenge and still is at the end of 2003.

We issue the same challenge to all others in trusted positions of "authority" who actively promote the injection of these substances into humans, or indeed any other living creature.

As for the documentary, here are some moments I found especially interesting and worthy of a comment.

Circa minute 4.00

Isaac Golden talks about a pertussis chart (whooping cough) that the establishment used to “show” that vaccines rid us of pertussis. It starts in 1949. He then shows us the chart 40 years prior, and you see the full context of the story. Very simple, very effective.

In the financial services space, we call this trick “start date bias”. It’s the oldest trick in the book, because it is so bloody simple and so bloody effective, and because hardly anyone knows enough to question it, they get away with it.

If you want to show an investment in a good light, or at least a light much better than reality, just pick the start date that helps your story.

Circa 17.00

David Ritchie talks about how playing with definitions alone “reduced polio by 80%”.

I remember reading about that in Maready’s book The Moth in the Iron Lung, but it was good to hear someone else explain it also.

Circa 23.00

Archie Kalokerinos makes a very interesting point about the narrative on anti-bodies and how AIDS was going to challenge that narrative, and force them to change their story. He was right.

Circa 37.14

Bronwyn Hancock covers some very interesting ground on cot-death in Japan in 1975.

Circa 1.05.00

Listen to Greg Beattie talk for a couple of minutes about the “cultural trance” that we are still in. I am in complete awe of this man. An everyday Aussie dad that figures it all out and goes to war with the system. Here is his bio:

Father of seven children, and author of "Vaccination - A Parent's Dilemma"

Greg Beattie is the father of seven children. His extensive research into vaccination began after his first child was almost hospitalised with measles 3 weeks after the measles vaccine. In 1994, he founded the Vaccination Information Network Qld. Inc, (which later became the Australian Vaccination Network Inc.) and was editor of "The Vine" for its first 2 ½ years. In 1996, he received national media attention when he initiated a formal hearing of the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission over the discrimination against unvaccinated children in child care. The presiding commissioner, William Carter Q.C., described him as having "almost an encyclopaedic knowledge of the literature." This hearing is summarised on the video and described in detail in his book ("Vaccination - A Parent's Dilemma")

Circa 1.03.00

Viera makes a very interesting point I hadn’t heard before, that as far back as 1966 they knew that having mumps protected in later years against ovarian cancer.

This theme is covered a few times in the doco, that these early “infant diseases” of measles, mumps, rubella, and chickenpox, if allowed to progress naturally, were very rarely harmful to the child, but instead triggered a developmental gain and conferred long term health benefits through a seeming “upgrade” of the immune system.

Circa 1.10.00

Dr. Archie Kalokerinos has a very interesting swine flu and Gambino mafia boss story.

At the very end carefully read the pages of text put up on screen about UK and Australian vaccine campaigns in the 1990s.

Put simply. They lie, and they lie all the time.

Lies are Unbekoming is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.


Thank you for reading this Substack.

Please consider a small paid subscription (donation). The money goes to a good cause.

I am always looking for good, personal GMC (pandemic and jab) or childhood vaccination stories. Shared stories are remembered and help others.

In the comments, please let me know what’s on your mind.

You can write to me privately:

If you are Covid-jab injured, consider the FLCCC Post-Vaccine Treatment

Here are three eBooks I have produced so far:

FREE eBook: A letter to my two adult kids - Vaccines and the free spike protein

FREE eBook: The Climate™

FREE eBook: What is a woman? - “We don’t know yet.”

Lies are Unbekoming
Lies are Unbekoming