The Venetians

Lecture by Gerry Rose - 53 Questions & Answers

I’m curious about how we got here. I want to understand the power structure that rules this world. I want to understand “what” the power structure was that chased me with a needle.

It’s certainly not governments that rule, as we don’t have sovereign nations anymore. We have administered territories. “Government” is now just an administrative structure implementing orders from above.

Above governments are corporations. They are powerful but it’s not them either.

There’s something above them still that is all powerful and very old.

The modern manifestation is what Parvani calls The Regime, conceptualized as The Octopus.

The Octopus - Lies are Unbekoming

Question 2: How does the "Octopus" model conceptualize modern power structures?

The Octopus model consists of eight tentacles with the financial system (the chest) and NGO network at the top. The model places the media and academia lower in the hierarchy, contrary to other theories. The tentacles aren't equal, with the chest (financial system, central banks, investment banks, and asset management firms) representing the beating heart of power.

Jeff Steinberg framed it this way.

The Invisible Empire - Lies are Unbekoming

Question 6: What is the Club of the Isles and who are its members?

The Club of the Isles is described as the modern incarnation of the British East India Company, representing the "invisible empire." According to the lecture, it consists of 3-5,000 oligarchs from powerful families, some tracing their lineage back to the Venetian oligarchy or Roman Empire.

Members are said to include top officials from major financial institutions like the Bank of England, Barclays Bank, and N.M. Rothschild, as well as corporations such as Royal Dutch Shell, Imperial Chemical Industries, and Rio Tinto. Steinberg describes this group as controlling vast amounts of the world's strategic raw materials, financial structures, and food supplies.

I like the following lecture by Gerry Rose as it sheds light on the “age” of this power structure:

How did the oligarchic power centers shift from ancient Greece through to modern European financial centers?

The lecture traces a historical path of oligarchic power from ancient Greece to modern European financial centers. It begins with the Cult of Apollo at Delphi in Greece, which was both a religious and financial center. When Greece fell, this power moved to Rome, where it influenced the Roman military and introduced various cults. As Rome declined, the center shifted to Constantinople. From there, it moved to Venice, which became a key power in manipulating European politics and religion. Finally, as Venice's direct power waned, its methods and wealth were transferred to Amsterdam and London, which became the new centers of oligarchic financial power. This movement represents the continuity of oligarchic methods and wealth across different historical periods and locations.

An old power has been snowballing for hundreds, in fact thousands of years. It’s been collecting resources, oligarchs and families along the way and weaving them into a singular power network. To the extent that there are competing “factions”, it seems to me that they are competing within an approved and organised framework. The way that siblings might compete within a family.

This power manifests as Empire.

Some of the interesting and standout points for me from this lecture are:

Question 9: What is the British Israel doctrine and its significance?

British Israel doctrine is a belief system that claims the British (and often by extension, Americans) are descendants of the lost tribes of Israel. It was influential in shaping ideas of racial and cultural superiority in the English-speaking world. The doctrine played a role in justifying imperialism and racial hierarchies, as it suggested that certain peoples were "elect" or chosen by God for leadership roles in the world.

Question 10: How did John Milton influence the spread of certain ideas?

John Milton, author of "Paradise Lost," was influential in spreading ideas related to British Israel and certain Gnostic beliefs. His work, shaped by his interactions with Venetian figures during his travels, played a significant role in disseminating concepts such as the doctrine of the elect and the inherent evil of the physical universe. These ideas had lasting effects on Western civilization and contributed to religious and racial divisions.

Question 12: How did Venetian methods impact Western civilization?

Venetian methods had a profound impact on Western civilization through their manipulation of religious and political spheres. They fostered division by supporting both the Reformation and Counter-Reformation, leading to religious wars. Their approach of playing different factions against each other became a model for political manipulation. The Venetian influence spread to other European powers, shaping diplomatic strategies and contributing to the development of modern banking and financial systems.

Question 35: What is the significance of "The Ghost Seers" by Friedrich Schiller?

"The Ghost Seers" by Friedrich Schiller is presented as a key work for understanding the Venetian mindset and methods. The book illustrates how Venetians operated by manipulating appearances and perceptions rather than adhering to any fixed principles. It demonstrates their ability to play multiple sides of a conflict and their skill in deception. The work is significant because it provides insight into the complex and often hidden ways in which Venetian influence shaped European history and thought.

Question 38: What is the concept of "fundi" or funds in relation to oligarchic families?

The concept of "fundi" or funds refers to the financial resources controlled by oligarchic families. These funds are described as often outliving the families themselves, becoming institutions that perpetuate oligarchic power across generations. The fundi are associated with politicians and lawyers who defend the interests of these funds, even at the expense of national development. This system is presented as a key mechanism by which oligarchic power maintains itself over time, prioritizing the preservation of wealth over the welfare of nations or peoples.

Question 39: How did wealth transfer from Venice to Amsterdam and Britain?

The transfer of wealth from Venice to Amsterdam and Britain occurred as Venetian influence waned. The lecture describes this process as involving the movement of both financial resources and methods of control. Jewish bankers, who had been confined to the Venetian ghetto, played a significant role in this transfer. The shift represents the continuation of oligarchic power structures, adapting to new centers of economic and political influence while maintaining their core strategies of manipulation and control.

Question 41: What is the concept of "delic" in Venetian methods?

The concept of "delic" in Venetian methods refers to their ability to be chameleon-like or adaptable in their approach. It describes the Venetians' capacity to play multiple sides of a conflict or situation, constantly shifting their allegiances and methods to maintain power. This flexibility allowed them to manipulate various factions and adapt to changing circumstances without being tied to any fixed ideology or principle. The "delic" nature of Venetian tactics made them particularly effective in navigating complex political and religious landscapes.

With thanks to Gerry Rose.

---

---

12-point summary

For those that don’t want to read the longer Q&A.

1.    Venetian Influence on Western Civilization: The Venetians significantly impacted European politics and religion by manipulating religious and political spheres to maintain their power. They employed strategies of divide and conquer, influencing both the Reformation and Counter-Reformation, which led to prolonged religious wars. Their methods included playing different factions against each other and fostering divisions to weaken centralized authorities. This approach became a model for political manipulation and influenced diplomatic strategies across Europe.

2.    British Israel Doctrine and Its Impact: This belief system posited that the British, and by extension Americans, are descendants of the lost tribes of Israel. It contributed to notions of racial and cultural superiority in the English-speaking world. By suggesting that certain peoples were divinely chosen or "elect," it justified imperialism and established racial hierarchies. The doctrine played a role in reinforcing nationalistic ideologies and influenced policies that prioritized certain groups over others.

3.    John Milton's Role in Spreading Ideas: John Milton, the author of Paradise Lost, was instrumental in disseminating ideas related to the British Israel doctrine and certain philosophical beliefs. Influenced by his interactions during travels arranged by figures like Henry Wotton, Milton incorporated concepts such as the doctrine of the elect and the inherent flaws of the physical universe into his works. His writings helped spread these ideas, which had lasting effects on Western thought and contributed to religious and cultural divisions.

4.    Manipulation of Religion by Elites: Throughout history, elites have manipulated religious doctrines to serve their interests. By fostering divisions and promoting the idea of an "elect," they justified hierarchies and maintained control over populations. This strategy is evident in the proliferation of various religious sects during periods of upheaval, such as the Reformation, where conflicting doctrines were used to divide societies and consolidate power.

5.    Populism versus Natural Law in Governance: Populism appeals to emotions, prejudices, and opinions rather than reason or universal principles. It often relies on rhetoric to sway public sentiment without aligning with higher laws or principles. In contrast, Natural Law is based on universal, intelligible principles governing the universe and human behavior, discoverable through reason. The American Republic was founded on Natural Law, emphasizing that all men are created equal with inalienable rights, rejecting rule by kings or oligarchs.

6.    The Role of Education in a Republic: Education is crucial for maintaining a republic because it enables citizens to understand and communicate the principles of Natural Law. An educated populace can reason, understand causality, and engage in informed debate about governance and the nature of humanity. Without such education, a republic cannot function effectively, as citizens would be unable to participate meaningfully in governance based on universal principles.

7.    Philosophical Foundations: Aristotle versus Plato: Aristotelian philosophy focuses on sense perception and correlations, suggesting humans cannot comprehend universal laws due to their finite nature. This perspective leads to reliance on an "elect" few to interpret divine will. Platonic philosophy, on the other hand, emphasizes the ability to understand universal principles through reason. It supports the idea that humans can grasp and align themselves with Natural Law, fostering egalitarian governance and society.

8.    Cultural Impact of Pessimism and Nihilism: The devastation of events like World War I led to widespread cultural pessimism and nihilism. Movements proclaiming "God is dead" reflected a loss of faith in traditional institutions and questioned the existence of a benevolent deity amidst massive suffering. This environment made societies more susceptible to populist movements that relied on emotional appeals and offered simplistic solutions to complex problems.

9.    Religious Divisions as Tools for Control: The proliferation of religious sects and doctrines served as a tool for political control by creating divisions within societies. For example, during Oliver Cromwell's rule in England, numerous religious cults emerged, which fragmented the populace. Elites manipulated these divisions to weaken centralized authority and maintain power, as divided populations were more manageable and susceptible to influence.

10.  Justification of Racial Hierarchies through Doctrine: Religious doctrines like the concept of the "elect" were used to justify racial hierarchies and oppression. By claiming that certain groups were divinely chosen for leadership or superiority, these beliefs supported practices like slavery and imperialism. Such doctrines reinforced systemic inequalities by presenting them as ordained by a higher power.

11.  Human Potential and Alignment with Natural Law: Humans have the unique capacity to continually improve and align more closely with Natural Law through reason, education, and moral development. Unlike animals bound by instinct, humans can become "ever less imperfect" by pursuing knowledge and understanding universal principles. This capacity forms the basis for a republic grounded in the noble qualities of the individual soul, emphasizing human dignity and potential.

12.  The Noble Qualities as the Foundation of a Republic: A true republic is founded on recognizing and nurturing the noble qualities inherent in each individual. This concept is rooted in the belief of universal human dignity and the ability of every person to contribute meaningfully to society. Governance should be based on these principles rather than on emotional appeals or manipulation, ensuring that the republic serves the true interests of its people by aligning with universal laws and promoting equality.

In this February 21, 1993 lecture, Gerry Rose delivered a comprehensive analysis of the historical and philosophical foundations of populism. His exploration of the deep conflict between Natural Law and Populism and his argument that a true republic must be anchored in natural law rather than driven by emotion and prejudice provide a unique perspective. Rose's tracing of the Historical Roots of populism back to Aristotle and his contrast with Plato's rationalism offers a rich understanding of this complex topic.

Rose highlights the Venetian Influence on the spread of populist ideas, demonstrating how Venetian oligarchs manipulated religious and political spheres to foster division and maintain control. He emphasizes the Foundations of the American Republic as a deliberate attempt to establish governance based on natural law, contrasting sharply with populist methods.

Rose's lecture also underscores the crucial Role of Education in maintaining a republic. His critique of Modern Politics for neglecting to uphold and communicate these foundational principles, thereby contributing to the rise of populism, is a key aspect of his analysis. Rose further explores Religious Manipulation, where elites use sectarianism to consolidate power, and examines the Cultural Impact of post-World War I pessimism and nihilism, which have exacerbated populist movements. He warns against the dangers of relying on Rhetoric vs. Reason in governance, stressing the importance of reasoned debate and factual understanding over emotional appeals.

With an in-depth analysis of British Israel, Rose delves into its key doctrines, including the Gnostic belief that the physical universe is inherently evil and the **doctrine of the elect**, both of which have fueled religious and racial divisions throughout history. He examines the influence of John Milton, whose works, shaped by his interactions with Venetian figures, played a significant role in spreading these divisive ideologies. Additionally, Rose discusses the broader impact of these ideas during the English Civil War, the rise of Oliver Cromwell, and their lasting effects on Western Civilization. This lecture is essential for anyone interested in understanding the intricate connections between natural law, religious sects, populism, and the ongoing struggle against elitist control throughout history.

53 Questions & Answers

Question 1: What is the fundamental difference between Natural Law and Populism?

Natural Law is based on the idea that there are universal, intelligible principles governing the universe and human behavior that can be discovered through reason. It emphasizes the importance of understanding these laws as a basis for governance and human action. Populism, on the other hand, appeals to emotion, prejudice, and opinion rather than reason or universal principles. It often relies on rhetoric to sway public sentiment and does not necessarily seek to align with any higher law or principle.

Question 2: How were the foundations of the American Republic laid?

The American Republic was founded on the principle of natural law, as expressed in the Declaration of Independence. It stated that all men are created equal and endowed by their Creator with inalienable rights, including life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. This foundation rejected the idea of rule by kings or oligarchs, instead basing governance on the understanding and implementation of natural law principles.

Question 3: How are the historical roots of populism traced back to Aristotle?

Aristotle's philosophy is presented as the historical root of populism. His ideas suggested that while God exists, humans, being finite, cannot understand the infinite nature of God or the universe's laws. This led to a focus on sense perception and correlations rather than causality. Consequently, this perspective gave rise to the notion that only an elect few could interpret the will of the gods, laying the groundwork for populist appeals to emotion and opinion rather than reason.

Question 4: What was the Venetian influence on the spread of populist ideas?

Venice played a crucial role in spreading populist ideas throughout Europe. The Venetian oligarchs manipulated both religious and political spheres to foster division and maintain control. They were involved in creating and influencing both the Reformation and Counter-Reformation, which led to religious wars and the proliferation of various sects. This division and manipulation of public opinion through religious means was a key strategy in spreading populist ideas.

Question 5: Why is education crucial in maintaining a republic?

Education is crucial in maintaining a republic because it enables citizens to understand and communicate the principles of natural law. Without a populace that comprehends these fundamental principles, a true republic cannot exist. Education in this context goes beyond mere factual knowledge, encompassing the ability to reason, understand causality, and engage in literate discourse about the nature of man and the universe.

Question 6: How have elites manipulated religion for their own purposes?

Elites have manipulated religion by fostering divisions and controlling religious narratives. They created and influenced both the Reformation and Counter-Reformation, leading to religious wars and the proliferation of various sects. This strategy allowed them to maintain power by keeping populations divided. They also promoted the idea of an "elect" who could interpret divine will, justifying their own authority and creating hierarchies within religious communities.

Question 7: What was the cultural impact of post-World War I pessimism and nihilism?

The devastation of World War I led to widespread cultural pessimism and nihilism. This manifested in the "God is dead" movement, where people questioned the existence of a benevolent deity in the face of such massive suffering. This pessimism contributed to the rise of populist movements, as people lost faith in traditional institutions and became more susceptible to emotional appeals and simplistic solutions to complex problems.

Question 8: How do rhetoric and reason contrast in governance?

Rhetoric in governance relies on emotional appeals, prejudices, and opinions to sway public sentiment, often disregarding facts or logical arguments. It is associated with populism and can lead to decisions based on popular will rather than sound principles. Reason, conversely, emphasizes the use of logic, evidence, and understanding of natural law to make decisions. It seeks to align governance with universal principles and encourages informed debate rather than emotional manipulation.

Question 11: What are Gnostic beliefs and the doctrine of the elect?

Gnostic beliefs include the idea that the physical universe is inherently evil and that only certain individuals possess special knowledge or enlightenment. The doctrine of the elect suggests that only a chosen few are predestined for salvation or have the ability to interpret divine will. These beliefs have been used to justify religious and racial divisions throughout history, creating hierarchies and excluding certain groups from spiritual or social privileges.

Question 13: What was the importance of the Renaissance?

The Renaissance represented a high point in European culture, emphasizing the ennoblement of humanity and celebrating the difference between humans and animals. It promoted a clear conception of how humans think and the implications of that thinking. The Renaissance was based on a Christian Platonic idea that threatened the power of European oligarchies, as it emphasized the importance of natural law and human dignity, potentially undermining traditional power structures.

Question 14: How did Venice influence the Reformation and Counter-Reformation?

Venice played a pivotal role in both the Reformation and Counter-Reformation. Venetian oligarchs manipulated both movements to create division and maintain their own power. They supported reformers in challenging the Catholic Church while simultaneously backing Catholic efforts to counter the Reformation. This strategy of playing both sides allowed Venice to weaken centralized religious authority and create a more fractured religious landscape that was easier to manipulate.

Question 15: What role did Venice play in European politics and religion?

Venice was a central player in European politics and religion, often operating behind the scenes to manipulate events. The city-state used its wealth and strategic position to influence both political and religious affairs across the continent. Venetian diplomats and intellectuals were involved in shaping religious debates, supporting various factions, and spreading ideas that served Venetian interests. Their methods of divide-and-conquer became a model for political manipulation throughout Europe.

Question 16: How do Aristotelian and Platonic philosophy compare?

Aristotelian philosophy is presented as focusing on sense perception and correlations rather than causality. It suggests that humans, being finite, cannot understand the infinite nature of God or the universe's laws. This leads to a reliance on an elect few to interpret divine will. Platonic philosophy, in contrast, emphasizes the ability to understand universal principles through reason. It supports the idea that humans can grasp and align themselves with natural law, forming the basis for more egalitarian and reason-based approaches to governance and society.

Question 17: What is the concept of relative potential population density?

Relative potential population density is a measure of humanity's ability to support an increasing population through advancements in knowledge and technology. It's presented as evidence of human progress and our ability to affect the laws of the universe positively. This concept is used to argue that human knowledge, while not absolute, is coherent with the laws of the universe. Our ability to increase population density through technological and social advancements demonstrates our growing understanding of natural law.

Question 18: How did European oligarchies react to the Italian Renaissance?

European oligarchies viewed the Italian Renaissance as a threat to their power. The Renaissance's emphasis on human dignity, reason, and natural law challenged the traditional bases of oligarchic rule. In response, these power structures sought to undermine and destroy the Renaissance ideals. They deployed various strategies, including manipulating religious conflicts and promoting philosophies that emphasized human limitations rather than potential, in an effort to maintain their control and prevent the spread of ideas that could empower the general population.

Question 19: What was the 30 Years War and its significance?

The 30 Years War was a devastating conflict in 17th century Europe, primarily fought over religious differences between Protestants and Catholics. However, it's presented as being manipulated by Venetian interests to weaken central religious authority and create a more fractured religious landscape. The war is significant because it represents the culmination of Venetian strategies to divide and conquer, using religious differences to foster conflict and maintain their own power. It led to widespread devastation and significantly altered the religious and political landscape of Europe.

Question 20: What was Oliver Cromwell's role in the proliferation of religious cults in England?

Oliver Cromwell's rule in England from the 1640s to 1660s saw a proliferation of various religious cults and sects. During this period, England experienced a surge in diverse religious beliefs, including Socinians, Millenarians, Quakers, and many others. Cromwell's regime, which came to power through religious and political upheaval, created an environment where these various religious groups could flourish. This proliferation of religious beliefs is presented as an example of how religious division can be used as a tool for political control and manipulation.

Question 21: How were racial divisions justified using religious doctrines?

Racial divisions were often justified using religious doctrines, particularly the concept of the "elect" or chosen people. The idea that only certain groups were God's children was used to argue for the superiority of some races over others. This thinking was especially prevalent in British Israel doctrine, which claimed that Anglo-Saxons were descendants of the lost tribes of Israel. Such beliefs were used to justify slavery, imperialism, and other forms of racial oppression by presenting certain races as divinely chosen for leadership or dominion over others.

Question 22: What is the significance of Lincoln's Gettysburg Address in the context of the lecture?

Lincoln's Gettysburg Address is presented as a powerful articulation of the principles of a true republic. It reaffirms the founding ideals of the United States, emphasizing that the nation was "conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal." The address is significant because it reasserts the importance of natural law and human equality in governance, standing in stark contrast to populist or oligarchic models of rule. It represents a recommitment to the noble idea of government "of the people, by the people, for the people" based on universal principles rather than prejudice or self-interest.

Question 23: How does the American Civil War relate to the themes discussed?

The American Civil War is presented as a test of whether a nation "conceived in liberty" and dedicated to equality could endure. It represents a struggle between the principles of natural law, as embodied in the founding documents of the United States, and the forces of prejudice and self-interest that sought to maintain systems of inequality like slavery. The war thus becomes a pivotal moment in the ongoing conflict between republican ideals based on natural law and oligarchic or populist models of governance.

Question 24: How is usury related to Aristotelian beliefs?

Usury is presented as a consistent feature of Aristotelian-influenced systems. The lecture suggests that wherever Aristotelian philosophy is prevalent, usury tends to follow. This is because Aristotelian thought, by rejecting the idea that humans can understand universal laws, creates a system where manipulation for personal gain becomes more acceptable. The focus on immediate, observable effects rather than underlying principles can lead to economic practices that prioritize short-term profit over long-term societal benefit.

Question 25: What was the role of the Catholic Church and why did it need reformation?

The Catholic Church is presented as an institution that, by the time of the Reformation, had strayed from its original principles and was in need of reform. However, the lecture argues that the way this reformation occurred was problematic. Instead of reforming the Church based on higher principles, as figures like Nicholas of Cusa attempted, the Reformation and Counter-Reformation became tools for Venetian manipulation. The Church's need for reform became an opportunity for various factions to promote division and undermine centralized religious authority, ultimately serving the interests of oligarchic powers.

Question 26: Who was Nicholas of Cusa and what were his attempts at church reform?

Nicholas of Cusa was a 15th-century cardinal and philosopher who attempted to reform the Catholic Church based on higher principles. He promoted the concept of "concordantia catholica" or universal harmony. Cusa sought to reform the Church from a higher standpoint, emphasizing the use of reason and the pursuit of universal truths. His approach contrasted with later reformers who, according to the lecture, often based their efforts on lower, Aristotelian principles that led to division rather than unity.

Question 27: What was the Anglican Reformation and how was Henry VIII involved?

The Anglican Reformation refers to the separation of the Church of England from the authority of the Pope and the Roman Catholic Church. Henry VIII played a central role in this process, primarily motivated by his desire to annul his marriage to Catherine of Aragon. The lecture presents this as an example of reform based on personal interests rather than higher principles. It suggests that forming a church on such a basis was problematic and opened the door for further manipulation and division within Christianity.

Question 28: How is Milton's "Paradise Lost" interpreted in relation to Dante's "Divine Comedy"?

"Paradise Lost" is presented as a refutation of Dante's "Divine Comedy." While Dante's work, rooted in the traditions that led to the Italian Renaissance, presented a view of the universe as fundamentally good despite human weakness, Milton's epic is interpreted as promoting a more Gnostic worldview. "Paradise Lost" is seen as emphasizing the evil nature of the physical universe, aligning with Aristotelian and Gnostic beliefs that the lecture criticizes. This contrast highlights the shift in philosophical and religious thought that occurred between the Italian Renaissance and Milton's time.

Question 29: How did religious cults proliferate in English colonies?

Religious cults proliferated in English colonies as a result of religious conflicts and persecution in England. After the Restoration, many religious groups were told to practice their faiths in the colonies. This exodus of various religious sects to the New World led to a diverse religious landscape in the colonies. The lecture suggests that this proliferation of cults, based on differing interpretations and beliefs, made the population more susceptible to populist ideas and less grounded in principles of natural law.

Question 30: How is the concept of the "elect" presented in various religious traditions?

The concept of the "elect" is presented as a common feature in various religious traditions, particularly those influenced by Aristotelian thought. It suggests that only certain individuals or groups are chosen by God for salvation or special knowledge. This idea is found in some interpretations of Calvinism, British Israel doctrine, and certain Jewish traditions. The lecture critiques this concept, arguing that it has been used to justify racial and religious divisions, and stands in opposition to the idea of universal human dignity and equality before natural law.

Question 31: Why is challenging prejudices important in organizing?

Challenging prejudices is crucial in organizing because prejudices often stem from manipulated opinions rather than reasoned understanding. The lecture argues that effective organizing involves helping people recognize and overcome their prejudices, which are often instilled by media and cultural influences. By challenging these preconceived notions, organizers can guide people towards a more rational understanding of issues based on natural law principles. This approach is seen as essential for creating meaningful change and establishing a society based on reason rather than emotion or manipulated beliefs.

Question 32: How are hedonism and populism related?

Hedonism and populism are related in that both reduce human beings to their base emotions and immediate sensations. Populism appeals to people's feelings and prejudices rather than their reason, while hedonism focuses solely on pleasure and pain. The lecture suggests that when people are denied access to higher principles and natural law, they are left only with their feelings as a guide. This makes them more susceptible to populist appeals and hedonistic pursuits, as they lack a more elevated basis for decision-making and self-understanding.

Question 33: What is the fundamental difference between humans and animals in terms of purpose?

According to the lecture, the fundamental difference between humans and animals lies in humanity's capacity to understand and align with natural law. Humans are seen as having the unique ability to become "ever less imperfect" through the pursuit of knowledge, science, and art. This capacity allows humans to affect positive change in the universe, as evidenced by increases in relative potential population density. Animals, in contrast, are bound by instinct and cannot engage in this process of continual improvement and alignment with universal principles.

Question 34: How did Venice manipulate European politics and religion?

Venice manipulated European politics and religion through a strategy of divide and conquer. They supported both the Reformation and Counter-Reformation, fostering religious conflicts that weakened centralized authority. Venetian oligarchs used their wealth and diplomatic skills to influence various factions, playing them against each other. They also spread ideas that served their interests, often through sponsored intellectuals and diplomats. This manipulation allowed Venice to maintain its power and influence despite its relatively small size, by keeping other European powers divided and focused on religious conflicts.

Question 36: How are Shakespeare's "Othello" and "Merchant of Venice" relevant to the discussion?

Shakespeare's "Othello" and "Merchant of Venice" are mentioned as works that provide insight into Venetian methods and society. These plays likely illustrate the complex political and social dynamics of Venice, including themes of manipulation, prejudice, and the interplay between different cultural and religious groups. While not explicitly detailed in the lecture, these works are referenced as sources that can help understand the nature of Venetian influence and tactics in European affairs.

Question 37: What is the relevance of Christopher Marlowe's "The Jew of Malta"?

Christopher Marlowe's "The Jew of Malta" is described as one of the most devastating critiques of Venice. While the specific details aren't provided in the lecture, the play likely exposes and criticizes Venetian methods of manipulation, possibly focusing on themes of religious conflict, economic exploitation, and political intrigue. The work is presented as a valuable source for understanding the negative aspects of Venetian influence on European society and politics.

Question 40: What role did Jewish bankers play in spreading Venetian influence?

Jewish bankers, particularly those from the Venetian ghetto, played a crucial role in spreading Venetian influence to Amsterdam and Britain. Due to restrictions on Christians engaging in usury, Jewish bankers were often used to manage and transfer wealth. The Venetian oligarchs utilized these bankers to move their financial operations to new centers of power, effectively transplanting their economic influence and methods to Northern Europe. This process helped to spread Venetian financial and political strategies beyond the confines of Venice itself.

Question 42: What was the Council of 10 in Venice and what power did it hold?

The Council of 10 was a powerful governing body in Venice that held absolute authority. It had the power to issue death warrants for any reason, and these warrants were beyond the scope of prosecution by any Venetian court. This concentration of power in a small group was seen as necessary to maintain order among the competing powerful families in Venice. The Council of 10's authority allowed it to keep the oligarchic families in check and prevent open warfare among them, thus preserving the Venetian system of governance.

Question 43: How is the creation of Islam presented?

The lecture presents a controversial claim that Islam was created by Aristotelians. It states that the prophet Muhammad was trained as an Aristotelian and was initially a Nestorian Christian. This perspective suggests that Islamic thought was influenced by Aristotelian philosophy from its inception. However, the lecture also acknowledges that there were Islamic traditions based on Platonic ideas, particularly in the great caliphates of Baghdad, which stood in opposition to Aristotelian thought.

Question 44: What were the Platonic traditions in the caliphates of Baghdad?

The lecture mentions that there were significant Platonic traditions within the Islamic world, particularly in the caliphates of Baghdad. These traditions stood in opposition to Aristotelian thought and were more aligned with the idea of universal principles and the intelligibility of the universe. While not elaborated upon in detail, the existence of these Platonic traditions is presented as evidence that not all Islamic thought was Aristotelian in nature, and that there were intellectual currents within Islam that were more compatible with the concept of natural law.

Question 45: What religious sects proliferated during Cromwell's rule in England?

During Oliver Cromwell's rule in England (1640s to 1660s), a wide variety of religious sects flourished. The lecture mentions Socinians, Millenarians, Quakers, Anglicans, and Catholics among others. This period saw an explosion of diverse religious beliefs and practices, with some sources suggesting up to 20 to 30 different religions existing at the time. This proliferation of sects is presented as an example of how religious division can be used as a tool for political control and manipulation.

Question 46: How is the concept of pluralism in religion and its manipulation presented?

Religious pluralism is presented as a tool for manipulation by oligarchic powers, particularly Venice. By encouraging the proliferation of various religious sects and interpretations, Venice and other manipulative forces could create division and weaken centralized authority. This pluralism is not viewed positively in the lecture, but rather as a strategy of "divide and conquer." The multiplication of religious opinions is seen as making populations more susceptible to manipulation, as it moves away from universal principles and towards a relativism where any opinion can be valid.

Question 47: What was Henry Wotton's role in Milton's education and travels?

Henry Wotton was the British ambassador to Venice who played a significant role in John Milton's education and travels. In 1620, Wotton arranged for Milton to tour from England to Geneva, where he met with Venetian oligarchs. From there, Milton was taken to Venice to meet with Paolo Sarpi. These encounters are presented as crucial in shaping Milton's ideas and introducing him to Venetian methods of thought and manipulation. This experience is suggested to have influenced Milton's later works and ideas, particularly those related to British Israel doctrine.

Question 48: Who were the Diodati family and what was their influence in Geneva?

The Diodati family is mentioned in the context of Geneva after the death of John Calvin. They are described as Venetian oligarchs who took control of Geneva following Calvin's death. While the lecture doesn't provide extensive details about the family, their presence in Geneva is presented as an example of how Venetian influence spread throughout Europe, even in centers of Protestant reformation. Their control of Geneva suggests that they played a role in shaping and potentially manipulating the development of Calvinist thought and its spread.

Question 49: Who was Paolo Sarpi and what was his role in Venetian politics and religion?

Paolo Sarpi is described as a Venetian Servite monk who played a significant role in Venetian politics and religious manipulation. He is presented as working with German princes to foster the Thirty Years' War and break up the Catholic Church. Despite being nominally Catholic, Sarpi's actions are portrayed as serving Venetian interests by promoting religious conflict and division. His involvement with both Catholic and Protestant factions exemplifies the Venetian method of playing multiple sides to maintain power and influence.

Question 50: What was the Hanoverian succession in England (the "Glorious Revolution")?

The Hanoverian succession, also known as the "Glorious Revolution," is briefly mentioned in the context of changes in English religious landscape. While not extensively discussed, it's presented as a period when many religious groups were told to practice their faiths in the English colonies. This event led to a significant shift in the religious composition of England and its colonies, contributing to the proliferation of various religious sects in the New World. The lecture suggests that this religious diversification made populations more susceptible to populist ideas.

Question 51: How were arguments for slavery presented in the United States?

Arguments for slavery in the United States were often based on religious doctrines, particularly the concept of the "elect" or chosen people. The lecture mentions that proponents of slavery would argue that the Bible supported their position. They used the idea that certain groups were God's chosen people to justify the subjugation of others, particularly African slaves. This reasoning was an extension of the doctrine of the elect, which was used to create hierarchies and justify racial divisions. The lecture presents this as an example of how religious ideas can be manipulated to support oppressive systems.

Question 52: What is said about humans becoming "ever less imperfect"?

The concept of humans becoming "ever less imperfect" is presented as a fundamental purpose of human existence. Unlike animals, humans have the capacity to continually improve their understanding of the universe and align themselves more closely with natural law. This process of becoming less imperfect is achieved through education, science, and art, which bring humans closer to knowledge of the true nature of the universe God created. This idea is contrasted with belief systems that view humans as inherently sinful or incapable of improvement, and is presented as a more optimistic and empowering view of human potential.

Question 53: How are the noble qualities of the individual soul presented as the basis for a republic?

The noble qualities of the individual soul are presented as the essential foundation for a true republic. This concept is based on the Christian idea of the inherent dignity and value of each individual. A republic, according to this view, should be founded on the recognition of these noble qualities in all citizens, rather than on populist appeals or oligarchic control. This approach emphasizes the importance of education and the development of reason in citizens, enabling them to understand and participate in governance based on natural law principles. The lecture argues that only by recognizing and nurturing these noble qualities can a society create a genuine republic that serves the true interests of its people.

---

---

I appreciate you being here.

If you've found the content interesting, useful and maybe even helpful, please consider supporting it through a small paid subscription. While everything here is free, your paid subscription is important as it helps in covering some of the operational costs and supports the continuation of this independent research and journalism work. It also helps keep it free for those that cannot afford to pay.

Please make full use of the Free Libraries.

Unbekoming Interview Library: Great interviews across a spectrum of important topics.

Unbekoming Book Summary Library: Concise summaries of important books.

Stories

I'm always in search of good stories, people with valuable expertise and helpful books. Please don't hesitate to get in touch at unbekoming@outlook.com

For COVID vaccine injury

Consider the FLCCC Post-Vaccine Treatment as a resource.

Baseline Human Health

Watch and share this profound 21-minute video to understand and appreciate what health looks like without vaccination.