Red Symphony
On International Finance, International Communism and a FREE Book Summary
The first time I came across Red Symphony was when reading 180 Degrees.
When buried history is rediscovered, it is often ugly. For those wanting to know more about what really happened during the Bolshevik Revolution there are six books that are worth reading:
Under the Sign of the Scorpion: The Rise and Fall of the Soviet Empire by Juri Lina
Red Symphony by J. Landowski
Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution by Antony Cyril Sutton
Among the Red Autocrats: My Experience in the Service of the Soviets by George Solomon
The Red Terror In Russia by Sergey Petrovich Melgounov
The Gulag Archipelago by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
I’ve been reading Red Symphony.
It’s one of those little books that hardly anyone has heard about, and fewer read.
It’s a sluggish read, but that doesn’t change the fact that it’s an important book.
Here is the full text.
And here is my Unbekoming Summary.
Its translator said this about it:
Translator’s note: It would be quite superfluous to write a long commentary on this remarkable material. It should suffice to say the obvious— this is one of the most important political documents of the century.
Many of us have known the facts here brought out for decades, but for the first time we get a brilliant, detailed statement from an insider. Obviously Rakovsky was one of “Them.”
Both the internal evidence of this document, as well as the circumstance that all subsequent events went exactly according to the formulae indicated, proves the truth of the story.
This book should be essential reading for all who wish to know what is happening and why, throughout the world, and also what alone can be done to stop the conquests of the revolution: the power of monetary emission must be returned to the States everywhere. If that is not done in time, Communism will win. - George Knupffer
Greenwood, in 180 Degrees goes on to explain, drawing on Red Symphony:
The real problem here is the underlying model. It's not only the false choices of left vs. right, or nationalism vs. globalism, but the false choice of Capitalism vs. Communism. Because modern Capitalism is anything but capitalist. It is actually a form of Socialism/ Communism. But don't just take my word for it.
"The real capitalistic system is not big corporations - that's an oligarchy. And the oligarchy we have is because of Socialism." - Martin Armstrong, macro-economic and cycle specialist
You can count on two fingers the number of economists that would actually admit to this point. Are we merely being presented with a thesis and antithesis (the dialectic) in order to achieve an end goal? The most insightful piece of information on this was from Christian Rakovsky, (born Chaim Rakover), a former Soviet ambassador to France, and top level Trotskyite insider who told us exactly how the system really operates. And that was back in 1938:
"Do you not see that already? In Moscow there is Communism: in New York Capitalism. It is all the same as thesis and antithesis. Analyze both. Moscow is subjective Communism but [objectively] state Capitalism. New York: Capitalism subjective, but Communism objective. A personal synthesis, truth: the Financial International, the capitalist-communist one. And, above all, 'They."' - Christian Rakovsky, Red Symphony, 1938
The capitalist-communist system is in fact just an oligarchical one under the banner of two opposites. Capitalism and Communism are, in fact, two sides of the same collectivist coin. Complete opposites in terms of academic theory, productivity and veneer (public face) but not in terms of outcome (concentration of wealth in the same few hands}. Here is someone else who gets it.
"The deep state is Communism. But the deep state isn't just the government. The deep state is also your corporations, billionaires [and] private capital ... [We are] living under the soviet system redux. The matrix revisited. And that's where we are today- Communism. We have the same elements of the communist system [just] with a few twists." - Warren Pollock, geopolitical and financial analyst.
As I was reading Red Symphony, this line jumped out at me:
Power, if in reality it is absolute, can be only one. The idea of the absolute excludes multiplicity. For that reason the power sought by the Comintern and “Comintern,” which are things of the same order, being absolute, must also in politics be unique and identical: Absolute power has a purpose in itself, otherwise it is not absolute.
And until the present day there has not yet been invented another machine of total power except the Communist State. Capitalistic bourgeois power, even on its highest rung of the ladder, the power of Caesar, is limited power since if, in theory, it was the personification of the deity in the Pharaohs and Caesars in ancient times, then nevertheless, thanks to the economic character of life in those primitive States and owing to the technical underdevelopment of the State apparatus, there was always room for individual freedom. Do you understand that those who already partially rule over nations and worldly governments have pretensions to absolute domination? Understand that that is the only thing which they have not yet reached.
It may seem obvious to some, but it wasn’t to me until I read that line.
Off course!
Communism is a power harvesting system, or “machine” as Rakovsky put it.
It is the best machine there is.
Who would want such a machine?
Well, once you see Empire, and who runs it, Oligarchy, well then, I think that it’s easy to see that Oligarchy wants just such a machine. Oligarchy prefers Communism. In fact, it needs it the way that Gollum needs My Precious.
Red Symphony explains that The Communist International (Comintern) and The Financial International (global, borderless finance and “money power”) are in fact one and the same.
The Comintern (led by Trotsky, more on him future articles) in fact is a tool of The Financial International.
Stalin took out Trotsky and took over Soviet Communism and made it National.
Trotsky and his International Finance backers had bigger ideas.
It seems to me at least that Stalin was an interruption of the bigger plan, and that the Soviet experiment was collapsed in favor of a second and rather more successful attempt, China.
Maoism is actually Chinese Trotskyism.
And that Neo Maoism, the Western variant of the virus, is simply Western Trotskyism.
Trotskyism is Communism with borderless International aims.
Trotskyism opposes the Nation State and Nationalism.
Trotskyism is Mercantile.
Trotskyism opposes Religion and Faith.
Trotskyism opposes Family.
Trotskyism opposes Personal Property.
Trotskyism opposes Individual Sovereignty.
Trotskyism is a specifically pure variant of the Communist virus.
It is an International power harvesting ideological framework for Oligarchical Empire.
Anyway, I digress, let’s get back to Red Symphony.
Thesis of Red Symphony
The thesis of the dialogue captured in "The Red Symphony" revolves around the intricate interplay of political ideologies, geopolitical strategies, and the shadowy influence of a global financial elite over the course of history, particularly in the lead-up to and during World War II. It suggests that major historical events, such as the rise of fascism in Europe, the non-aggression pact between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union, and the onset of World War II, are not merely the result of visible political and military actions but are also deeply influenced by covert agreements and manipulations by powerful, unseen financial forces aiming to reshape the world order in favor of a communist future.
Key Quotes Supporting the Thesis:
On the Influence of a Global Financial Elite:
"The only guarantee of their execution is rooted in the circumstance that the carrying out of that which has been agreed is profitable for the parties to the pact, this guarantee is the sole reality in the pact, however great may be its importance." - This quote highlights the central role of mutual benefit and profit, even among ideologically opposed parties, as a driving force behind historical events, underscoring the thesis that financial interests, rather than ideological commitments, often dictate global politics.
On the Strategic Manipulations Leading to World War II:
"In that year 1929, the first year of the American revolution... The financing of Hitler is agreed in July, 1929... You think that all this was by chance? The four years of the rule of Hoover were used for the preparation of the seizure of power in the United States and the USSR; there by means of a financial revolution, and here with the help of war and the defeat which was to follow." - This quote illustrates the calculated orchestration behind significant historical developments, suggesting that the rise of totalitarian regimes and the subsequent global conflict were part of a larger, orchestrated plan facilitated by financial elites aiming to destabilize the current world order to pave the way for a new political and economic system.
Analogy
Imagine a grand chessboard, where each piece represents a different nation or political ideology, from democracies and fascisms to communism. The players moving these pieces appear to be national leaders, military generals, or political ideologues, engaged in a visible struggle for power and influence on the world stage. This game is complex, with moves and counter-moves, alliances formed and broken, and battles won and lost, all under the watchful eyes of the public, who believe they understand the rules and objectives.
However, unbeknownst to the spectators and even some of the pieces themselves, there's another layer to this game. Beneath the board is a hidden mechanism, controlled by a group of unseen players. These shadowy figures have no loyalty to any specific piece or section of the board. Instead, their goal is to manipulate the game from below, influencing the movements of the pieces in such a way that, regardless of who seems to win or lose on the surface, the outcome aligns with their interests.
The pieces on the board, representing countries and governments, believe they're acting of their own accord, making strategic decisions based on their national interests, ideologies, and the will of their people. Yet, their most critical moves have been influenced, if not predetermined, by the hidden players, who orchestrate crises, engineer economic collapses, and even incite wars to reshape the board to their advantage.
This grand chess game continues, with the visible players unaware or unwilling to acknowledge the forces at play beneath the surface. The ultimate objective of the hidden players isn't to see a particular king checkmated but to rearrange the board itself, ensuring that no matter how the visible game plays out, the final arrangement suits their vision for a new world order.
There are two points that I feel warrant highlighting.
One is about Christianity (Faith/Religion) and the other is about the Middle Class.
Here is Rakovsky on Christianity. Remember that Rakovsky is an elite Trotsky insider.
"In reality Christianity is our only real enemy."
That is easy to guess. We have yet another reason, a religious one. Communism cannot be the victor if it will not have suppressed the still living Christianity. History speaks very clearly about this: the permanent revolution required seventeen centuries in order to achieve its first partial victory— by means of the creation of the first split in Christendom. In reality Christianity is our only real enemy, since all the political and economic phenomena in the bourgeois States are only its consequences. Christianity, controlling the individual, is capable of annulling the revolutionary projection of the neutral Soviet or atheistic State by choking it and, as we see it in Russia, things have reached the point of the creation of that spiritual nihilism which is dominant in the ruling masses, which have, nevertheless, remained Christian: this obstacle has not yet been removed during twenty years of Marxism. Let us admit in relation to Stalin that towards religion he was not Bonapartistic. We would not have done more than he and would have acted in the same way. And if Stalin had dared, like Napoleon, to cross the Rubicon of Christianity, then his nationalism and counter-revolutionary power would have been increased a thousand-fold. In addition, if this had happened then so radical a difference would have made quite impossible any collaboration in anything between us and him, even if this were to be only temporary and objective… like the one you can see becoming apparent to us.
Here is a good passage from Lindsay on Rogan (more on this later) discussing this point.
And secondly, here is Rakovsky on the Middle Class.
And, after all, can the proletariat believe that it is the cause of this inflation, growing in geometric progression, this devaluation, the constant acquisition of surplus values and the accumulation of financial capital, but not usury capital, and that as the result of the fact that it cannot prevent the constant lowering of its purchasing power, there takes place the proletarization of the middle classes, who are the true opponents of revolution?
It has only hit me very recently, from my recent readings of Antony Sutton, that when Marx talks about the Bourgeoisie, what he means is the Middle Class. I will admit I never understood Bourgeoisie until now. I thought it meant “the evil capitalists”, but I now realize he meant the Middle Class.
As they are the “true opponent of revolution.”
Red Symphony - By J. Landowski
Overview and Summary
"Red Symphony," by Josif Maksimovitch Landowsky and translated by George Knupffer, is a profound exploration into the geopolitical and socio-economic maneuvers that shaped the early 20th century, particularly focusing on the intricate relationship between capitalism, communism, and the shadowy forces operating behind these ideologies. The book is based on a purported secret interrogation of Christian Rakovsky, a former high-ranking Soviet official, by a Stalinist agent named Gavriil Gavriilovitch Kus'min, with the presence of a doctor to administer drugs to Rakovsky to make him more talkative. The conversation delves into Rakovsky's insights into the international financial elite's role in global politics, the nature of power, and the strategic use of communism and capitalism by these elites to further their goals of world domination.
Rakovsky, a former Soviet ambassador, claims that the Communist revolution is not what it appears to be and that it is controlled by a powerful group of individuals he refers to as "Them." He suggests that this group is made up of wealthy financiers, politicians, and other influential figures who operate behind the scenes to manipulate world events.
Throughout the conversation, Rakovsky argues that "They" have been instrumental in financing and supporting various political movements and regimes, including the Bolsheviks in Russia and Hitler's rise to power in Germany. He asserts that these actions are part of a larger plan to create a global Communist revolution, which will ultimately lead to the establishment of a world government controlled by "Them."
Rakovsky also delves into the role of international finance in shaping world events, stating that "money is power" and that those who control the financial system wield immense influence over governments and societies. He claims that the Rothschild family and other prominent bankers are among "Them" and that they use their wealth and power to further their agenda.
One of the key arguments Rakovsky makes is that the apparent conflict between Capitalism and Communism is an illusion and that both systems are ultimately controlled by the same group of individuals. He suggests that "They" manipulate these ideologies to create chaos and conflict, which allows them to consolidate their power and control over nations.
Rakovsky also discusses the role of Stalin and Trotsky in the Soviet Union, claiming that Stalin's rise to power was not what "They" had intended and that Trotsky was their preferred choice to lead the Communist revolution. He argues that Stalin's nationalism and "Bonapartism" are obstacles to the internationalist goals of "Them" and that a global war may be necessary to remove him from power.
Throughout the conversation, Rakovsky provides numerous examples and anecdotes to support his claims, including references to historical events, political figures, and economic theories. He also offers predictions about future events, such as the potential for a pact between Hitler and Stalin and the outbreak of World War II.
The conversation ends with Gabriel expressing skepticism about some of Rakovsky's claims but acknowledging the potential importance of the information he has shared. The epilogue suggests that Stalin may have followed Rakovsky's advice and that World War II served the interests of the Communist revolution.
In conclusion, the "Red Symphony" document presents a controversial and thought-provoking perspective on the nature of the Communist revolution and the forces that allegedly control it. While the claims made by Rakovsky are largely unverified and may be met with skepticism, the conversation raises important questions about the role of international finance, political manipulation, and the true motives behind major world events. The document provides a unique insight into the conspiratorial thinking that existed during the early 20th century and the complex geopolitical landscape of the time.
Key Takeaways
Introduction to the Complexity of Global Power: Rakovsky introduces a narrative that diverges from traditional historical accounts, suggesting a hidden interplay between financial elites, communism, and capitalism. This challenges readers to reconsider known historical events and the forces behind them.
The Manipulation by the Financial Elite: "The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes." This quote encapsulates the central thesis of the book, highlighting the clandestine influence of financial elites on global politics.
Rakovsky's Background and Intellectual Journey: Rakovsky's rich intellectual and political background provides a unique perspective on the ideological and practical workings of communism and capitalism. His disillusionment with the revolution's outcomes and his insights into the mechanisms of power manipulation are enlightening for understanding the complexities of 20th-century political ideologies.
The Role of Ideology and Power: Rakovsky discusses how both communism and capitalism serve the purposes of a global elite, suggesting that ideological battles may be facades for deeper power struggles. This viewpoint challenges conventional interpretations of political and historical narratives.
Interrogation and Psychological Insight: The interrogation setting, enhanced by the use of drugs to elicit more open communication, offers a vivid example of the lengths to which Stalin's regime would go to extract information and maintain control. This context provides a stark backdrop for Rakovsky's revelations.
Historical and Cultural Context: The book situates its narrative within a broader historical and cultural context, providing insights into the interwar period, the rise of totalitarian regimes, and the shifting allegiances and ideologies of the time.
The Global Struggle for Power: Rakovsky's account goes beyond the Soviet Union, touching on global struggles for power and the role of financial manipulation in shaping world events. This global perspective is crucial for understanding the interconnectedness of national and international politics.
Interrogation Reveals Deep Conspiracies: Rakovsky discusses his involvement in the revolutionary movements and his insights into the financial powers that influenced these upheavals. He sheds light on the hidden mechanisms through which financial elites contributed to the success of revolutions, highlighting the role of bankers like Jacob Schiff in financing the Bolshevik revolution and other movements across Europe.
The Financial International and Its Influence: Rakovsky introduces the concept of the "Financial International," a powerful and secretive group that manipulates global finance to serve its own interests. He suggests that this group has been instrumental in shaping the outcomes of revolutions, wars, and political changes, using their control over money to create conditions favorable to their objectives.
This communistic super-state, which we are creating already during a whole century, and the scheme of which is the International of Marx. Analyze it and you will see its essence. The scheme of the International and its prototype of the USSR— that is also pure power. The basic similarity between the two creations is absolute. It is something fatalistic, inevitable, since the personalities of the authors of both was identical. The financier is just as international as the Communist. Both, with the help of differing pretexts and differing means, struggle with the national bourgeois State and deny it. Marxism in order to change it into a Communist State; from this comes that the Marxist must be an internationalist: the financier denies the bourgeois national State and his denial ends in itself; in fact he does not manifest himself as an internationalist, but as a cosmopolitan anarchist… That is his appearance at the given stage, but let us see what he really is and what he wants to be. As you see, in rejection there is a clear similarity individually between Communist-internationalists and financial-cosmopolitans; as a natural result there is the same similarity between the Communist International and the financial International... - Red Symphony
The Complex Relationship Between Finance and Revolution: The dialogue explores the paradoxical relationship between the capitalist financial system and revolutionary movements. Rakovsky argues that the financial elites, despite being part of the capitalist system, have used their influence to foster social and political revolutions that seemingly oppose their own interests. This is portrayed as a strategic move to consolidate their control over the global political and economic order.
The Role of Freemasonry and Secret Societies: Rakovsky touches on the involvement of Freemasonry and other secret societies in the revolutionary movements. He suggests that these groups have been manipulated by the Financial International to advance the cause of revolution, often without the members' full awareness of the ultimate objectives of their patrons.
Trotsky's Role and the Betrayal of the Revolution: The discussion provides a critical view of Leon Trotsky's role in the Russian Revolution and the subsequent power struggles within the Soviet Union. Rakovsky portrays Trotsky as a key figure who was both a beneficiary and a victim of the machinations of the Financial International. He implies that Trotsky's ambitions and actions were influenced by his connections with these financial powers.
The Financial Influence on Political Movements: Rakovsky discusses how the financial backing from Wall Street and prominent bankers played a crucial role in the rise of the Nazi movement in Germany, emphasizing the manipulation of economic crises and political upheavals to serve broader objectives.
The Strategy to Avoid Direct Conflict Between the USSR and Nazi Germany: He elaborates on a proposed pact between Stalin and Hitler to divide Poland, aiming to prevent a direct war between the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany. This strategy intends to protect the USSR from a two-front war while also facilitating the broader goal of weakening capitalist nations.
The Role of Western Democracies in the Plan: The dialogue suggests that Western democracies, unaware of the larger scheme, could be maneuvered into a position where their actions inadvertently support the overarching goals of the secret financial elite and the communist revolution.
Rakovsky’s Critique of Stalin and Soviet Policies: Throughout the conversation, Rakovsky critiques Stalin’s policies and approach, contrasting them with what he perceives as the original goals of the communist revolution. He views Stalin’s nationalism and pragmatic foreign policy decisions as betrayals of the revolution’s internationalist ideals.
The Secret Financial Elite: Rakovsky hints at the existence of a powerful, secretive financial elite ("Them") orchestrating global events to eventually pave the way for the victory of communism. He suggests that this group has the capability to influence decisions at the highest levels of government, including in the United States and the Soviet Union.
Exactly, but just the reverse: the Capitalistic system of production is determined by finance. The fact that Engels states the opposite and even tries to prove this, is the most obvious proof that finances rule bourgeois production. So it is and so it was even before Marx and Engels, that finances were the most powerful instrument of revolution and the Comintern was nothing but a toy in their hands. But neither Marx nor Engels will disclose or explain this. On the contrary, making use of their talent as scientists, they had to camouflage truth for a second time in the interests of the revolution. And that both of them did. – Red Symphony
Rakovsky's Proposal and Its Implications: Rakovsky suggests a pact between Stalin and Hitler to divide Poland to avoid a direct conflict between the USSR and Nazi Germany, aiming to turn the fascist and capitalist states against each other. This strategy, he argues, would weaken capitalist nations through mutual destruction, paving the way for the spread of communism.
The Role of Financial Elites: Rakovsky introduces the idea of a secretive global financial elite ("Them") orchestrating political events to ensure the triumph of communism. This elite is said to manipulate economic crises, finance political movements like the Nazis, and steer global policies through their influence over key political figures, including allegedly Franklin Roosevelt.
Strategic Neutrality and Provoking Conflict: The dialogue suggests a strategy where the USSR and the USA would adopt a stance of neutrality in the expected conflict in Europe, theoretically to prevent direct aggression towards themselves while secretly hoping to provoke a clash between imperialist powers to exhaust them economically and militarily.
The Ambiguous Nature of Communism and Capitalism: Rakovsky elaborates on the ideological and economic parallels between the USSR's state communism and the USA's capitalist system, suggesting that both serve the interests of the financial elite in their objective forms, albeit in different subjective guises.
There is only one aim, one single aim: the triumph of Communism; it is not Moscow which will impose its will on the democracies, but New York, not the “Comintern,” but the “Capintern” on Wall Street. Who other that he could have been able to impose on Europe such an obvious and absolute contradiction? What force can lead it towards complete suicide? Only one force is able to do this: money. Money is power and the sole power. – Red Symphony
The Subsequent Historical Events: The conversation foreshadows the non-aggression pact between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union (Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact) and the outbreak of World War II, implying these events were part of the broader plan discussed by Rakovsky.
Let’s start to wrap this up.
James Lindsay just went on Rogan and is starting to talk more about Oligarchy and Power.
He Tweeted this rather long and intricate take on what is happening, but I think it’s easier to understand what he is trying to say through the Red Symphony lens.
First his Tweet.
As you know, I talked about the Cloward-Piven strategy right out of the gate on my new appearance on Rogan. I also mentioned that part of what's going on is the program architected by Kissinger, Brzezinski, Deng, Chan, and Rockefeller to build up China, leading us into "the trap of Thucydides' Trap." The question is WHY they would do that.
The answer: Money, power, and ideology, in some combination, likely to work out to benefit them in all three ways.
Let's say they wanted a system change to unaccountable monopoly neoliberalism. To get that and make it global with themselves on top, they had to make conditions for it. Due to China's dire straits after Mao and desperate need, they could beta test the model in China, which had the motive (extreme poverty, devastated economy, no face internationally) and infrastructure (CCP autocratic leadership). If the model worked, it would create conditions where the West has to copy to compete to keep up with the monster the State Department and Rockefeller Foundation was creating in the East. Deng's (and Chan's) motivations aren't complicated here, but CCP global dominance with a modified "productive socialism" model remained at their heart.
Why would the others do that, though? Money, power, and ideology, just like their CCP comrades.
Rockefeller's known socialist sympathies aside, he and Harvard Man Kissinger, with protege Klaus Schwab in tow, are best thought of as (Platonic) OLIGARCHISTS. They don't particularly care what the system should be as long as their council rules it. Communism is extremely effective for creating oligarchical conditions, so why not, of that's what China has? Communism is, in fact, an oligarchical model pretending not to be! So that's ideology. They are the rulers because they want to rule. Simple as. Power follows directly from that model.
Money turns out to be a major bonus. They can flip the world into a system under their control and get crazy rich in the process by manipulating the environment in which major multinational corporations act. There are certain benefits for the Western population, so they'll go along with it for cheaper goods, but at the same time the huge corporations, especially the ones moving into the captured Potemkin market environment of Neoliberal CCP Communism, are going to make crazy money over that time. It's kind of a no-brainer if they have very little loyalty to their countries and very much loyalty to the growing council they're a key part of.
The mix they're using is basically multinational "national" socialism running Western neoliberal software as an economic apparatus and CCP-style (Communist) social control and "benefits" (read: dependency) for their willing and unwilling subjects. Social credit and controlled digital currency are the main tools, but these double as both Communist AND corporatist remolding devices for the underlying population. This is being implemented through a new Potemkin market called "stakeholder capitalism," which is the model Kissinger handed off to Schwab at Harvard and the model the CCP runs, with itself as sole stakeholder.
Why the Cloward-Piven strategy and so much ESG-driven Degrowth? Well, I explained it on the show, but the short answer is to break the West and all of its free, capitalist "shitheads" who don't want their tyranny. Once the American repubic and constitution fall, they can get away with anything and put the whole world in this system, under their control and to their enrichment. If they're ideologically Communist, as some surely are, they can run the tools to try to remake man, as their religion demands.
The tweet describes a strategic manipulation of global dynamics for the purpose of achieving a shift towards a system of unaccountable monopoly neoliberalism, with the ultimate goal of placing the architects of this strategy—figures like Kissinger, Brzezinski, Deng, Chan, and Rockefeller—at the apex of global power. This strategy involves exploiting China's post-Mao desperation to beta-test a model of governance and economic development that could then set a standard for the rest of the world, compelling other nations to adopt similar systems to remain competitive. This move towards a global oligarchy is facilitated by leveraging ideological commitments, economic incentives, and power dynamics to reshape the world according to their vision.
Using Red Symphony to understand the Lindsay thesis
Understanding this tweet in the context of the dialogue in "Red Symphony" draws a parallel between the hidden manipulations of global events and ideologies as discussed in the text and the contemporary application of such strategies. In "Red Symphony," the conversation with Rakovsky unfolds a narrative where behind-the-scenes players manipulate communism and capitalism to serve their ends, suggesting that the real power lies not with the ostensible ideologies or their proponents but with those who can control the economic and political levers behind the scenes.
The tweet and "Red Symphony" both suggest that the ultimate goal of these manipulations is not merely ideological dominance but the consolidation of power and wealth in the hands of a few, creating a global oligarchy. The strategies mentioned—whether through the Cloward-Piven strategy, ESG-driven Degrowth, social credit systems, or stakeholder capitalism—serve to undermine traditional democratic institutions and market economies, replacing them with systems that can be more easily controlled by the elite.
This strategy is reflective of the broader theme in "Red Symphony" of ideological and economic systems being used as tools by a powerful elite to reshape global order in their image. Just as Rakovsky describes a complex orchestration of events and ideologies to facilitate the rise of a new world order under the guise of communism, the tweet outlines a contemporary strategy where various forms of social, economic, and political control are deployed to consolidate power and reshape global governance under a new form of oligarchy.
In essence, both narratives reveal a world where the true battleground is not between competing ideologies like communism and capitalism, but between the masses and a global elite that seeks to use these ideologies as vehicles for their own power and profit.
Thank You for Being Part of Our Community
Your presence here is greatly valued. If you've found the content interesting and useful, please consider supporting it through a paid subscription. While all our resources are freely available, your subscription plays a vital role. It helps in covering some of the operational costs and supports the continuation of this independent research and journalism work. Please make full use of our Free Libraries.
Discover Our Free Libraries:
Unbekoming Interview Library: Dive into a world of thought-provoking interviews across a spectrum of fascinating topics.
Unbekoming Book Summary Library: Explore concise summaries of groundbreaking books, distilled for efficient understanding.
Hear From Our Subscribers: Check out the [Subscriber Testimonials] to see the impact of this Substack on our readers.
Share Your Story or Nominate Someone to Interview:
I'm always in search of compelling narratives and insightful individuals to feature. Whether it's personal experiences with the vaccination or other medical interventions, or if you know someone whose story and expertise could enlighten our community, I'd love to hear from you. If you have a story to share, insights to offer, or wish to suggest an interviewee who can add significant value to our discussions, please don't hesitate to get in touch at unbekoming@outlook.com. Your contributions and suggestions are invaluable in enriching our understanding and conversation.
Resources for the Community:
For those affected by COVID vaccine injury, consider the FLCCC Post-Vaccine Treatment as a resource.
Discover 'Baseline Human Health': Watch and share this insightful 21-minute video to understand and appreciate the foundations of health without vaccination.
Books as Tools: Consider recommending 'Official Stories' by Liam Scheff to someone seeking understanding. Start with a “safe” chapter such as Electricity and Shakespeare and they might find their way to vaccination.
Your support, whether through subscriptions, sharing stories, or spreading knowledge, is what keeps this community thriving. Thank you for being an integral part of this journey.
As the old Soviet joke goes: “Capitalism is the exploitation of man by man. Communism is the other way around”.
In a time and place of debased morality, power will be usurped by the vicious, the ruthless. The “-ism” is merely window dressing for the intended slaves.
Handy link and book reference! Thank you, saved it and forwarded it!