Share this comment
People die in wars and in the case of Japan many more people would have died by conventional bombing than the alleged atomic bombs although - in reality - it was all conventional bombing. This is an interesting video pointing out the massive bombing of the rest of Japan. youtube.com/watch?v=PRy…
I don't know whether anyone dies in a "fals…
People die in wars and in the case of Japan many more people would have died by conventional bombing than the alleged atomic bombs although - in reality - it was all conventional bombing. This is an interesting video pointing out the massive bombing of the rest of Japan. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PRyt2vJraic
I don't know whether anyone dies in a "false flag" though. I haven't seen one where there's any convincing sign that anyone died, only clear signs of fakery. I think "false flag" is a propaganda term for the anticipated disbelievers of the story so they also get it wrong.
Psyops are about making us believe things that aren't true so unless they WANT to kill people there's no reason to - killing people when they don't want to makes no sense for a psyop, it's against psyop principles in fact. They're killing people now by the thousands, millions? but that's surely only because they want to kill them. I really don't understand it, I can't really buy the depopulation agenda but it's not accidental or simply collateral damage. Makes no sense to me.
They don't care if people die in false flags. It would take a lot of effort to organize a false flag like 911 where everyone was safely elsewhere when the event occurred and that would be very difficult to keep secret over the long haul with so many varied kinds of people (civilians) that would have been kept from the buildings on that day in such numbers. It would have involved people and logistics within corporations to notify and prevent their large staffs of employees from going to work that day.
It would be much simpler to kill them and safer for the perps. Why the perps would go to such extremes to "save lives" of people they have no connection to or regard for is mind boggling to me, but to each his or her own.,
I'm not saying some weren't warned. I'm saying they don't care if some are murdered. I've seen this kind of thing on a small scale and most times it's desirable to insure the success of the false flag if people do die.
We are seeing this right now with the injections and the false flag of covid. Millions are not dying by accident. The numbers confirm and details of many effects repeated in many victims of the injections confirm this. They simply don't care.
I agree sometimes it's likely no victims are murdered, but that would vary according to the most likely success of the plan.
People are being killed now because they WANT to kill them, however, for 9/11 and other events that are referred to as “false flags” they don’t kill them.
If I had a dollar for every time someone said to me “they don’t care about the people” …
Of course, I’d never argue in a million years that they didn’t kill people because they cared about them. That is sooooooo not the reason as we see so clearly now. They don’t kill them primarily for two reasons:
—- They really love - absolutely adore and get such a kick out of - controlling our minds. Psyops are are all about MIND CONTROL. If they kill people for real, where’s the mind control? There isn’t any.
—- It’s often not practicable to kill the people for real considering the people they need to involve. Sure, they can propagandise and coerce tens of thousands of health professionals to inject people with jabs whose ill-effects extend way, way beyond merely “harmful” on the back of centuries of fraudulent science but you can’t propagandise demolition professionals to leave people behind in buildings … especially not for a terror story where only belief in their deaths is desired … not the reality. And they obviously involved a lot more people than just the demolition professionals - we see clear evidence of media personnel knowing exactly what was going on.
In the film that first woke me up to how power rules us, JFK to 9/11 Everything is a Rich Man’s Trick, the filmmaker says “All terror is fake”. It seemed a big call at the time … but now I see it’s true. Terror is not about doing things for real, it’s all smoke’n’mirrors make believe.
From my post which I invite you to read:
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/psyops-nobody-dies-nobody-gets-hurt
What is standard practice in demolitions?
Standard practice is to FULLY evacuate the buildings and surrounding areas, not partly evacuate them.
Disbelievers mock the notion that high rise steel frame buildings came down by fire on the only day in history on 9/11. However, how about the notion that on the only day in history, demolition crews agreed to leave people in buildings and surrounding areas for the sake of a terror story … when the evidence clearly shows that people don’t need to be killed in order that we believe they were?
We’re told that Controlled Demolition Inc (CDI), a company proud of its four world records in large building demolition projects - three occurring in the three years before 9/11, https://www.controlled-demolition.com/explosives-demolition/projects/villa-panamericana-las-orquideas/, Puerto Rico (1998), https://www.controlled-demolition.com/explosives-demolition/projects/jl-hudson-department-store/, Chicago (1998) and the https://www.controlled-demolition.com/explosives-demolition/projects/the-seattle-kingdome/ (2000) - and its safety culture https://www.controlled-demolition.com/about-us-explosives-controlled-demolition-implosion/safety/, presented a https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controlled_Demolition,_Inc. after the fateful day (note we’re told 11 days https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/14utv0/911_was_an_occult_megaritual_the_numbers_of_the_4/, not the date). You don’t think CDI might have played a major role in the demolitions themselves, do you?