Child Prophets
This is a small renovation of a chapter from:
This wonderful essay by Andrew West outlines our fascination with Child Prophets, especially little girls.
Child prophets and proselytizers of climate catastrophe | Climate Etc. (judithcurry.com)
Here he tells the South African story of Nongqawuse:
In 1856 the Xhosa nation in South Africa, whose lifestyle and economy were largely based on keeping cattle, was under pressure. From a century of serious colonial encroachment, from a fatal lung disease (brought out of Europe) afflicting many of their cattle, and from internal political rivalries as the nation struggled to deal with their difficult situation.
In April 1856 a young girl, Nongqawuse, the niece and adopted daughter of a councilor of the overall king, Sarhili, brought a prophecy of salvation to the Xhosa leadership (Sarhili and tribal chiefs). The prophecy was communicated to Nongqawuse, who is variously described as 14 to 16 at the time, by ‘the spirits of two ancestors’.
To achieve salvation, she said, all of the Xhosa’s cattle must be killed, grain destroyed and cultivation cease. Plus, new houses / enclosures must be built; essentially nothing ‘contaminated’ must remain. Upon full compliance, new unsullied cattle would be resurrected from the dead, (new) granaries replenished and the European settlers swept away. In time, albeit not across the entire nation as some chiefs resisted, the prophecy gained majority adoption.
So, several hundred thousand cattle were killed (of which the meat couldn’t be eaten) and much food was destroyed. The nation soon descended into famine and chaos. The Xhosa homeland population dropped by three quarters (~78,000), from a combination of starvation (~40,000) and withdrawal for colonial wage labor or slavery16. Xhosa independence, already weak, was lost.
West even creates us a table outline the construct of the phenomenon and its repetition in history.
A recent tweet by Lomborg makes a point about how this movement and these prophets are tools of meta pessimism for our kids. Of all that bugs about the climate supra-narrative, it’s weaponizing of pessimism is what I hate the most.
Cory Morningstar in his stunning book The Manufacturing of Greta Thunberg opens with this:
The Manufacturing of Greta Thunberg : Forkel, Boris, Morningstar, Cory
“What’s infuriating about manipulations by the Non Profit Industrial Complex is that they harvest good will of the people, especially young people. They target those who were not given the skills and knowledge to truly think for themselves by institutions which are designed to serve the ruling class. Capitalism operates systematically and structurally like a cage to raise domesticated animals. Those organizations and their projects which operate under false slogans of humanity in order to prop up the hierarchy of money and violence are fast becoming some of the most crucial elements of the invisible cage of corporatism, colonialism and militarism.” Hiroyuki Hamada, artist
Morningstar goes into great depth, as only a top notch investigative journalist can, into the “non-profit industrial complex” and Greta’s part within it.
Here is the Amazon synopsis:
The manufacturing of Greta Thunberg - for consent: the political economy of the non-profit industrial complex We are introduced to the not-so accidental phenomena of Greta Thunberg, the current child prodigy and face of the youth climate change movement.
The "climate change is real" message is reframed for public consumption and rolled out at an international level, using Greta and her global platform to "sound the alarm" on climate change. This climate emergency is likened to a "house on fire", while urging the public to be serious, patriotic, empathetic and, of course, nonviolent. Not one sentence of the new strategy mentions the horrific impact militarism has on climate change.
The New Climate Economy being pushed by groups like Extinction Rebellion merely repackage our oppression into emergency mode. This urgency becomes global so that governments, NGOs and corporations will all direct immediate funding towards unlocking trillions of capital needed to save capitalism by further funding the new green imperialism.
Today's youth are used and molded into market solutions to insulate a global elite. Celebrity-sponsored activism seeks to build a new industry in which NGOs, the media and corporate powers collude to get people to support the very industries we should be erasing from the planet. The planet's most powerful capitalists lie behind these "youth-led" movements for climate change, helping to manufacture consent for the "fourth industrial revolution" in an attempt to quell resistance to industrial civilisation.
Here are the 6 Acts of the book. The titles are self-explanatory:
ACT I
THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF THE NON-PROFIT INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX
ACT II
THE INCONVENIENT TRUTH BEHIND YOUTH CO-OPTATION
ACT III
THE MOST INCONVENIENT TRUTH: “CAPITALISM IS IN DANGER OF FALLING APART”
ACT IV
THE HOUSE IS ON FIRE! & THE 100 TRILLION DOLLAR RESCUE
ACT V
THE NEW GREEN DEAL IS THE TROJAN HORSE FOR THE FINANCIALIZATION OF NATURE
ACT VI
A DECADE OF SOCIAL MANIPULATION FOR THE CORPORATE CAPTURE OF NATURE [CRESCENDO]
A useful synopsis of each Act:
In ACT I, I disclose that Greta Thunberg, the current child prodigy and face of the youth movement to combat climate change, serves as special youth advisor and trustee to the burgeoning mainstream tech start-up, We Don’t Have Time. I then explore the ambitions behind We Don’t Have Time.
In ACT II, I illustrate how today’s youth are the sacrificial lambs for the ruling elite. Also in this act, I introduce the board members and advisors to We Don’t Have Time. I explore the leadership in the nascent We Don’t Have Time and the partnerships between the well-established corporate environmental entities: Al Gore’s Climate Reality Project, 350.org, Avaaz, Global Utmaning (Global Challenge), the World Bank, and the World Economic Forum (WEF).
In ACT III, I deconstruct how Al Gore and the planet’s most powerful capitalists are behind today’s manufactured youth movements and why. I explore the We Don’t Have Time/Thunberg connections to Our Revolution, the Sanders Institute, This Is Zero Hour, the Sunrise Movement and the Green New Deal. I also touch upon Thunberg’s famous family. In particular, Thunberg’s celebrity mother, Malena Ernman (WWF Environmental Hero of the Year 2017) and her August 2018 book launch. I then explore the generous media attention afforded to Thunberg in both May and April of 2018 by SvD, one of Sweden’s largest newspapers.
In ACT IV, I examine the current campaign, now unfolding, in “leading the public into emergency mode”. More importantly, I summarize who and what this mode is to serve.
In ACT V, I take a closer look at the Green New Deal. I explore Data for Progress and the targeting of female youth as a key “femographic”. I
Most, if not all the content seems to be posted here:
The Climate™ is an industrial complex on a scale possibly never seen before extracting volumes of money and political power never seen before either.
The very least we can do as individuals is to understand its existence, become aware of its call to belief and worship, of its siren call, and to build and fortify our mental defences so as to not fall back into a hypnotized state.
I think that the idea of a Supranational Narrative is hard for some to understand and come to terms with. It certainly was for me. So, forgive me if you’ve read this already, but this from my Nuclear Ivermectin stack:
In Arendt’s The Origins of Totalitarianism, she explains antisemitism, and it’s very long European history like no other book I’ve ever read. It has a history of several hundred years preceding the Nazi’s, and it’s not what I thought it was. One aspect of it that Arendt taught me was that it was used as a “supranational” organising narrative. National sovereignty has been a problem for those wanting to maximally aggregate and concentrate power, and you need “narratives” to get as many people as possible on board to help you achieve it.
Antisemitism was that sovereignty busting narrative that was no longer useable after the Nazis took it to its literal and final conclusion.
Here is Hannah explaining its supranational utility:
The second highly significant characteristic of the new antisemitic parties was that they started at once a supranational organization of all antisemitic groups in Europe, in open contrast to, and in defiance of, current nationalistic slogans. By introducing this supranational element, they clearly indicated that they aimed not only at political rule over the nation but had already planned a step further for an inter-European government "above all nations."
This second revolutionary element meant the fundamental break with the status quo; it has been frequently overlooked because the antisemites themselves, partly because of traditional habits and partly because they consciously lied, used the language of the reactionary parties in their propaganda.
The intimate relationship between the peculiar conditions of Jewish existence and the ideology of such groups is even more evident in the organization of a group beyond nations than in the creation of a party beyond parties. The Jews very clearly were the only inter-European element in a nationalized Europe. It seemed only logical that their enemies had to organize on the same principle, if they were to fight those who were supposed to be the secret manipulators of the political destiny of all nations.
While this argument was sure to be convincing as propaganda, the success of supranational antisemitism depended upon more general considerations. Even at the end of the last century, and especially since the Franco-Prussian War, more and more people felt that the national organization of Europe was antiquated because it could no longer adequately respond to new economic challenges. This feeling had been a powerful supporting argument for the international organization of socialism and had, in turn, been strengthened by it. The conviction that identical interests existed all over Europe was spreading through the masses.'' Whereas the international socialist organizations remained passive and uninterested in all foreign policy issues (that is in precisely those questions where their internationalism might have been tested), the antisemites started with problems of foreign policy and even promised solution of domestic problems on a supranational basis. To take ideologies less at their face value and to look more closely at the actual programs of the respective parties is to discover that the socialists, who were more concerned with domestic issues, fitted much better into the nation-state than the antisemites.
Climate change, or specifically The Climate™ is the new supranational, sovereignty dissolving, narrative.
Climate change is the new antisemitism.
I cannot end with at least one Heller clip:
Thank you for reading this Substack.
Please consider a small paid subscription (donation). The money goes to a good cause.
I am always looking for good, personal GMC (pandemic and jab) or childhood vaccination stories. Shared stories are remembered and help others.
In the comments, please let me know what’s on your mind.
You can write to me privately: unbekoming@outlook.com
If you are Covid-jab injured, consider the FLCCC Post-Vaccine Treatment
Here are three eBooks I have produced so far:
FREE eBook: A letter to my two adult kids - Vaccines and the free spike protein
Hello, Unbekoming.
This excellent information. The idea that the supranation as an ideology needing a focus describes the narrative well. Have you looked at the role of the Fabians, Eugenics movements and the Pilgrim Society of Britain?
On the eugenics movement and reference to the Fabians, see Alex Story with Jordan Peterson.
https://youtu.be/ZAaY0gbis4s
On the Pilgrim Society and the use of usury since Mesopotamia to manage societies via money:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/CugJgvCWSrGC/
Cory Morningstar is a woman not a man.