Sep 27, 2022·edited Sep 27, 2022Liked by Unbekoming
It makes zero sense, other than as a sterilization/ depopulation tool.
I have 4 daughters and never let any of them take it. If they did it later behind my back, I have no idea, but they all knew how I felt about it.
I am so sorry your son was injured and for all the young people that were injured whose parents haven't made the connection, as well as all those that will be injured by this criminal medical intervention!
I had no idea Guardasil was developed in Australia. I read about many girls in the Netherlands being paralyzed, severely injured or killed by them when researching it years ago.https://sanevax.org/hpv-vaccines-a-danish-documentary/
"..An armed population wouldn’t have this done to them. This is actually part of Howard’s legacy..."
How would the ownership of higher powered guns..reversed/stopped etc etc a govt mandated, industry supported,science supported piece of quackery like this vaccine?
That's a fair point, it wouldn't. Mandates still came in everywhere. The "this" I am referring to is the footage of brazen firing at a peaceful and unarmed population. It might still have happened, although I think unlikely. The posture of the police towards the citizenry would certainly be very different. Police violence in Australia has been unimaginably brazen, there is ample footage that proves the point. Anyway, I could be wrong, but having the police even slightly afraid of the people is not a bad thing I am starting to think.
Thanks for responding..I am well aware of the footage which was disgusting.I was also aware at the time that the Liberal party opposition in Victoria only appeared once to complain about rubbish left around the cenotaph..and nothing else..how our Bogan Prime minister at the time..said nothing..how the civil liberties organisations etc said nothing..and how recent early polling suggests Dictator Dan will be re-elected with an even greater majority...the police here would never be afraid of the public even if we were heavily armed..because if that even happened..their response to a violent resistance would be savage..and the extreme left would rub their hands in glee as they tightened the screws on our liberties even further...the sad thing is..the majority of Victorians have now been brainwashed so badly that they think its okay to rubber bullet and baton charge peaceful protestors..and will show their contempt of normalcy at the ballot box...
Most Australians have sunk to a new spiritual low because of what we were all subjected to. I disagree with practically all the politicians, along with their endless supply of newly minted draconian and dystopian legislature. Speak to anyone about it in real life and none knows what to do or what could be done or how to take a first step towards regaining the nation. It's horrible, dispiriting stuff.
I'm reeling from realizing that receiving MMR vaccine during primary school is what caused me to horrible eczema, dermatitis and asthma for over a decade. It really affected my childhood and adolescence negatively.
HPV and now the same scenario is playing out again. I'm aghast...
Waking up to Covid lies is one thing, then waking up to Covid jab lies is another (you can have someone believe that masks are BS but that the jabs basically work, for example), but then waking up to the lies of childhood vaccination, now that's another ballgame entirely. It's a subgroup, of a subgroup of a subgroup.
It's a painful realization especially if you connect the dots to your own injury or those of your kids.
Thanks for the welcome which I'll get back to you on as to whether it's welcoming or unwelcoming. :-)
The lies of childhood vaccination, as perpetrated upon me, didn't click after I watched Vaxx'd and Vaxx'd 2. I knew my mysterious afflictions were related to environmental pollution, internal hormone and histimanine levels but I didn't know just to what extent the MMR stabs played in catalysing those afflictions to my environment.
I've learnt a lot of scientific and biological terminologies through the last 2 1/2 years. It was this paper that caused me the greatest painful awakening and as I read it yet again, i'm left wondering why all the paeditricians, doctors and nurses throughout my childhood did not read it too. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448377/
I will put the paper on my to read list, but can you please tell me what part of the paper struck you. The last sentence of the paper is a whitewash, possibly them taking the knee to The Church so that they could get published:
"These data, together with other published evidence, suggest that current vaccination practices do not have an adverse effect on the incidence of allergic disease."
But I suspect the real gold is hidden in the data itself, can you please point me to the section that woke you up?
The conclusion reached by the researchers was that unvaccinated infants who had less doctor visits than vaccinated infants, were statistically associated in having less recorded diagnoses of Asthma or Eczema.
I can't wrap my head around how 'ascertainment bias' explains away an association of increased statistical probability between vaxxd infants and their diagnoses of allergic diseases. Am I missing a crucial point here or am I being bamboozled?
I have to keep rereading sections of this paper and they still seem illogical to me. Would love to have any assistance in translating parts or elucidating what statements such as "We calculated rates of disease from the end of the exposure period, which we defined *arbitrarily*" or "this limited association is more likely to be the result of bias (What Bias?!?!) than a biological effect" or finally
"because most children are vaccinated, and therefore do not develop allergic disease, it is difficult to obtain numbers adequate to examine the vaccination-allergic disease relationship."
Table 2 and 3 directly contradict this statement??!?!
It was screenshots of table 2 and 3 that struck me. All the adjustments the researchers added as their calculations do not make logical sense to me when I can see differences in the data showing a clear association between MMR and/or DPPT vaxxd infants having more allergic diseases.
I think Jon Rappoport broke it down in a substack podcast much better than this, i'll have to find it again.
Thank you. I did not buy into the Covid hysteria because of the people I followed. I watched Plandemic the documentary, mid 2020.
I awakened to the harms of childhood vaccines 30 years ago, but I am even more horrified/traumatized now, learning that the much of the medical community knows what's been happening to infants and children and have not spoken up about it! I watched a Children's Health Defense TV segment this weekend where I learned that.
I did everything within my power to educate myself and protect my children from the medical mafia. After we divorced, my former husband, who aligned with how I was raising our children, went behind my back and took the two youngest, who were born at home, not vaccinated, to get several vaccines. One has serious health issues. One almost didn't finish high school because she became so ill. I am sure it was from the shots.
I also read The Forgotten Side of Medicine by A Midwestern Doctor here on Substack and she is exposing a great deal of information I did not know. Enlightening but so heartbreaking.
It's been painful learning about all the ways we have been lied to on so many fronts. I feel I/we are living in an alternate reality. I just learned about pervasive medical kidnapping of children taking place at a hospital in the midwest. Do you follow Children's Health Defense and JFK Jr.?
The Idealist in me, has been shattered into a million pieces. Everything I was ever taught or told, is a lie. It's going to take a lot for me to regain my faith in life. Were it not for the many good people on this platform speaking up and sharing life experiences, I might have given up.
I'm so sorry to hear about what your ex did and i'm sorry for all who had the same occur in their families. I've heard too many similar stories: If it wasn't behind the back vaxxing of children, it was the threatening of divorce or destroying families in over how the other partner perceived COVID-19 risk (and covid-19 jab safety).
Big Hug!
I follow Children Health's Defense intermittently and RFK Jnr. They are committed and tenacious - great examples for anyone else who needs to fight.
The idealist may be shattered in me too but the pragmatist and anti-terrorist in me will endure. Come what may, I am here to stay and devise a way to ruin those ruining the planet. Bless!
It was not the Covid shots he had them get, but the childhood vaccines I chose not to give them. The last two were born at home and I was not about to put their health at risk in any way. I already knew the harms of childhood vaccines when my 2nd daughter was born. They are all adults now and 3 of the 4 took it, 2 because of work, but I know they were influenced by their "highly educated" attorney father, not their mother who grew them inside her and nursed them for 3 and 3.5 years. Just writing this brings me to tears. God's will be done. Thank you. Sending you hug in return. <3
I was also a very sick child, with chronic upper respiratory infections, warts, chronic digestive issues and compromised immunity, tonsillitis until they cut out my tonsils, which is not a good solution to anything. My mother said I reacted very badly to the childhood vaccines. My three older siblings did not have the same experience.
I am also aghast at how they so willingly harm and continue to try to destroy the newborn’s immune system. 😢It is a Satanic system in my view. Apparently, MDs in many fields know this is the case but remain silent. This system must be taken down!!
So if Duesberg was right about HIV aids, then why did every hemophiliac and blood transfusion victim they got tainted blood died in the late 80s? We lost a whole generation of hemophiliacs.
Fair question, and I strongly recommend his book for the whole picture. But the answer, as I understand it, is that the transfusion would have led to the positive HIV case/diagnosis. Then the AZT (chemo) is what killed them.
Joel, I looked up your Substack, clearly you are awake to a whole heap of issues. So industrial scale structural malfeasance is something you are at peace with.
All I ask is that you read Inventing the AIDS Virus, and if after that you still believe that HIV causes AIDS, then we can talk. I cannot make Duesberg's better than he can. If blood "tainted" with HIV caused AIDS then the whole HIV causes AIDS theory is correct and Duesberg is wrong.
What we know, and the data is in the book, is that people PCR diagnosed with HIV, with no previous history of drug use/abuse (that would have damaged their natural immunity) and that did NOT go onto AZT (repurposed chemo), lived long and normal lives.
Whichever way you slice and dice it, these people did die of a damaged immune system, the question is WHAT damaged it. Was it a retro virus (Fauci et al want us to believe that) or was it popper abuse within the gay community (self-inflicted) of AZT "cure" industry inflicted? All the honest, data points to the retro virus being a patsy.
The Real Anthony Fauci is the shorthand to the subject. Here is a link to the pdf
It makes zero sense, other than as a sterilization/ depopulation tool.
I have 4 daughters and never let any of them take it. If they did it later behind my back, I have no idea, but they all knew how I felt about it.
I am so sorry your son was injured and for all the young people that were injured whose parents haven't made the connection, as well as all those that will be injured by this criminal medical intervention!
I had no idea Guardasil was developed in Australia. I read about many girls in the Netherlands being paralyzed, severely injured or killed by them when researching it years ago.https://sanevax.org/hpv-vaccines-a-danish-documentary/
Thanks, will add the Danish doco to my watch list.
Excellent write up. Thank you for the work you put into this post!
Thank you!
"..An armed population wouldn’t have this done to them. This is actually part of Howard’s legacy..."
How would the ownership of higher powered guns..reversed/stopped etc etc a govt mandated, industry supported,science supported piece of quackery like this vaccine?
That's a fair point, it wouldn't. Mandates still came in everywhere. The "this" I am referring to is the footage of brazen firing at a peaceful and unarmed population. It might still have happened, although I think unlikely. The posture of the police towards the citizenry would certainly be very different. Police violence in Australia has been unimaginably brazen, there is ample footage that proves the point. Anyway, I could be wrong, but having the police even slightly afraid of the people is not a bad thing I am starting to think.
Thanks for responding..I am well aware of the footage which was disgusting.I was also aware at the time that the Liberal party opposition in Victoria only appeared once to complain about rubbish left around the cenotaph..and nothing else..how our Bogan Prime minister at the time..said nothing..how the civil liberties organisations etc said nothing..and how recent early polling suggests Dictator Dan will be re-elected with an even greater majority...the police here would never be afraid of the public even if we were heavily armed..because if that even happened..their response to a violent resistance would be savage..and the extreme left would rub their hands in glee as they tightened the screws on our liberties even further...the sad thing is..the majority of Victorians have now been brainwashed so badly that they think its okay to rubber bullet and baton charge peaceful protestors..and will show their contempt of normalcy at the ballot box...
Most Australians have sunk to a new spiritual low because of what we were all subjected to. I disagree with practically all the politicians, along with their endless supply of newly minted draconian and dystopian legislature. Speak to anyone about it in real life and none knows what to do or what could be done or how to take a first step towards regaining the nation. It's horrible, dispiriting stuff.
Hey this is fantastic. Very valuable historical info written in a way a no vaxx novice like me can really fill gaps in knowledge.
I'm reeling from realizing that receiving MMR vaccine during primary school is what caused me to horrible eczema, dermatitis and asthma for over a decade. It really affected my childhood and adolescence negatively.
HPV and now the same scenario is playing out again. I'm aghast...
Waking up to Covid lies is one thing, then waking up to Covid jab lies is another (you can have someone believe that masks are BS but that the jabs basically work, for example), but then waking up to the lies of childhood vaccination, now that's another ballgame entirely. It's a subgroup, of a subgroup of a subgroup.
It's a painful realization especially if you connect the dots to your own injury or those of your kids.
Anyway, welcome to this new, painful, awakening.
Thanks for the welcome which I'll get back to you on as to whether it's welcoming or unwelcoming. :-)
The lies of childhood vaccination, as perpetrated upon me, didn't click after I watched Vaxx'd and Vaxx'd 2. I knew my mysterious afflictions were related to environmental pollution, internal hormone and histimanine levels but I didn't know just to what extent the MMR stabs played in catalysing those afflictions to my environment.
I've learnt a lot of scientific and biological terminologies through the last 2 1/2 years. It was this paper that caused me the greatest painful awakening and as I read it yet again, i'm left wondering why all the paeditricians, doctors and nurses throughout my childhood did not read it too. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448377/
I will put the paper on my to read list, but can you please tell me what part of the paper struck you. The last sentence of the paper is a whitewash, possibly them taking the knee to The Church so that they could get published:
"These data, together with other published evidence, suggest that current vaccination practices do not have an adverse effect on the incidence of allergic disease."
But I suspect the real gold is hidden in the data itself, can you please point me to the section that woke you up?
The conclusion reached by the researchers was that unvaccinated infants who had less doctor visits than vaccinated infants, were statistically associated in having less recorded diagnoses of Asthma or Eczema.
I can't wrap my head around how 'ascertainment bias' explains away an association of increased statistical probability between vaxxd infants and their diagnoses of allergic diseases. Am I missing a crucial point here or am I being bamboozled?
I have to keep rereading sections of this paper and they still seem illogical to me. Would love to have any assistance in translating parts or elucidating what statements such as "We calculated rates of disease from the end of the exposure period, which we defined *arbitrarily*" or "this limited association is more likely to be the result of bias (What Bias?!?!) than a biological effect" or finally
"because most children are vaccinated, and therefore do not develop allergic disease, it is difficult to obtain numbers adequate to examine the vaccination-allergic disease relationship."
Table 2 and 3 directly contradict this statement??!?!
It was screenshots of table 2 and 3 that struck me. All the adjustments the researchers added as their calculations do not make logical sense to me when I can see differences in the data showing a clear association between MMR and/or DPPT vaxxd infants having more allergic diseases.
I think Jon Rappoport broke it down in a substack podcast much better than this, i'll have to find it again.
Thank you. I did not buy into the Covid hysteria because of the people I followed. I watched Plandemic the documentary, mid 2020.
I awakened to the harms of childhood vaccines 30 years ago, but I am even more horrified/traumatized now, learning that the much of the medical community knows what's been happening to infants and children and have not spoken up about it! I watched a Children's Health Defense TV segment this weekend where I learned that.
I did everything within my power to educate myself and protect my children from the medical mafia. After we divorced, my former husband, who aligned with how I was raising our children, went behind my back and took the two youngest, who were born at home, not vaccinated, to get several vaccines. One has serious health issues. One almost didn't finish high school because she became so ill. I am sure it was from the shots.
I also read The Forgotten Side of Medicine by A Midwestern Doctor here on Substack and she is exposing a great deal of information I did not know. Enlightening but so heartbreaking.
It's been painful learning about all the ways we have been lied to on so many fronts. I feel I/we are living in an alternate reality. I just learned about pervasive medical kidnapping of children taking place at a hospital in the midwest. Do you follow Children's Health Defense and JFK Jr.?
The Idealist in me, has been shattered into a million pieces. Everything I was ever taught or told, is a lie. It's going to take a lot for me to regain my faith in life. Were it not for the many good people on this platform speaking up and sharing life experiences, I might have given up.
I'm so sorry to hear about what your ex did and i'm sorry for all who had the same occur in their families. I've heard too many similar stories: If it wasn't behind the back vaxxing of children, it was the threatening of divorce or destroying families in over how the other partner perceived COVID-19 risk (and covid-19 jab safety).
Big Hug!
I follow Children Health's Defense intermittently and RFK Jnr. They are committed and tenacious - great examples for anyone else who needs to fight.
The idealist may be shattered in me too but the pragmatist and anti-terrorist in me will endure. Come what may, I am here to stay and devise a way to ruin those ruining the planet. Bless!
It was not the Covid shots he had them get, but the childhood vaccines I chose not to give them. The last two were born at home and I was not about to put their health at risk in any way. I already knew the harms of childhood vaccines when my 2nd daughter was born. They are all adults now and 3 of the 4 took it, 2 because of work, but I know they were influenced by their "highly educated" attorney father, not their mother who grew them inside her and nursed them for 3 and 3.5 years. Just writing this brings me to tears. God's will be done. Thank you. Sending you hug in return. <3
❤💙💚
I was also a very sick child, with chronic upper respiratory infections, warts, chronic digestive issues and compromised immunity, tonsillitis until they cut out my tonsils, which is not a good solution to anything. My mother said I reacted very badly to the childhood vaccines. My three older siblings did not have the same experience.
I am also aghast at how they so willingly harm and continue to try to destroy the newborn’s immune system. 😢It is a Satanic system in my view. Apparently, MDs in many fields know this is the case but remain silent. This system must be taken down!!
Thank you.
So if Duesberg was right about HIV aids, then why did every hemophiliac and blood transfusion victim they got tainted blood died in the late 80s? We lost a whole generation of hemophiliacs.
Fair question, and I strongly recommend his book for the whole picture. But the answer, as I understand it, is that the transfusion would have led to the positive HIV case/diagnosis. Then the AZT (chemo) is what killed them.
I think they were dying long before azt
Joel, I looked up your Substack, clearly you are awake to a whole heap of issues. So industrial scale structural malfeasance is something you are at peace with.
All I ask is that you read Inventing the AIDS Virus, and if after that you still believe that HIV causes AIDS, then we can talk. I cannot make Duesberg's better than he can. If blood "tainted" with HIV caused AIDS then the whole HIV causes AIDS theory is correct and Duesberg is wrong.
What we know, and the data is in the book, is that people PCR diagnosed with HIV, with no previous history of drug use/abuse (that would have damaged their natural immunity) and that did NOT go onto AZT (repurposed chemo), lived long and normal lives.
Whichever way you slice and dice it, these people did die of a damaged immune system, the question is WHAT damaged it. Was it a retro virus (Fauci et al want us to believe that) or was it popper abuse within the gay community (self-inflicted) of AZT "cure" industry inflicted? All the honest, data points to the retro virus being a patsy.
The Real Anthony Fauci is the shorthand to the subject. Here is a link to the pdf
https://1drv.ms/b/s!AlBmJY-fbVChh50EEcx_9BgKM4dhoQ?e=gi9CHB
If you search the pdf for Transfusion, you will get 13 hits, read through them.
Also search for Hemophiliac (6 hits) and read through them.
Page 475 of the pdf especially will give you a lead to follow.
OK, while we are on the subject, here is the link to Inventing the AIDS Virus
https://1drv.ms/b/s!AlBmJY-fbVChh50FBs4LsZndQRt2Wg?e=2IjqKI
You will find Transfusion 84 times
But especially you can read the Conclusions and Discussion from page 488
Hope this helps.
Some more resources I'm working through;
Do antibody tests prove a HIV infection? A Blood Curdling Interview with Dr Valendar Turner = http://theperthgroup.com/INTERVIEWS/VFTHuwCInterview.pdf
March 2001 South African Presidential AIDS Advisory Panel report. Chapter goes into detail on HIV Tests and Their Accuracy. http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/panel/aidsreport.pdf
What did they pass from? tainted blood or AIDS?
See my reply to Joel.
Aids from the tainted blood
Apparently something they’ve been doing for decades!
Welcome to the Great Awakening. May it continue to shed light on the darkness and deceptions humanity has been living under!!