Joel, I looked up your Substack, clearly you are awake to a whole heap of issues. So industrial scale structural malfeasance is something you are at peace with.
All I ask is that you read Inventing the AIDS Virus, and if after that you still believe that HIV causes AIDS, then we can talk. I cannot make Duesberg's better than he can. If bl…
Joel, I looked up your Substack, clearly you are awake to a whole heap of issues. So industrial scale structural malfeasance is something you are at peace with.
All I ask is that you read Inventing the AIDS Virus, and if after that you still believe that HIV causes AIDS, then we can talk. I cannot make Duesberg's better than he can. If blood "tainted" with HIV caused AIDS then the whole HIV causes AIDS theory is correct and Duesberg is wrong.
What we know, and the data is in the book, is that people PCR diagnosed with HIV, with no previous history of drug use/abuse (that would have damaged their natural immunity) and that did NOT go onto AZT (repurposed chemo), lived long and normal lives.
Whichever way you slice and dice it, these people did die of a damaged immune system, the question is WHAT damaged it. Was it a retro virus (Fauci et al want us to believe that) or was it popper abuse within the gay community (self-inflicted) of AZT "cure" industry inflicted? All the honest, data points to the retro virus being a patsy.
The Real Anthony Fauci is the shorthand to the subject. Here is a link to the pdf
Joel, I looked up your Substack, clearly you are awake to a whole heap of issues. So industrial scale structural malfeasance is something you are at peace with.
All I ask is that you read Inventing the AIDS Virus, and if after that you still believe that HIV causes AIDS, then we can talk. I cannot make Duesberg's better than he can. If blood "tainted" with HIV caused AIDS then the whole HIV causes AIDS theory is correct and Duesberg is wrong.
What we know, and the data is in the book, is that people PCR diagnosed with HIV, with no previous history of drug use/abuse (that would have damaged their natural immunity) and that did NOT go onto AZT (repurposed chemo), lived long and normal lives.
Whichever way you slice and dice it, these people did die of a damaged immune system, the question is WHAT damaged it. Was it a retro virus (Fauci et al want us to believe that) or was it popper abuse within the gay community (self-inflicted) of AZT "cure" industry inflicted? All the honest, data points to the retro virus being a patsy.
The Real Anthony Fauci is the shorthand to the subject. Here is a link to the pdf
https://1drv.ms/b/s!AlBmJY-fbVChh50EEcx_9BgKM4dhoQ?e=gi9CHB
If you search the pdf for Transfusion, you will get 13 hits, read through them.
Also search for Hemophiliac (6 hits) and read through them.
Page 475 of the pdf especially will give you a lead to follow.
OK, while we are on the subject, here is the link to Inventing the AIDS Virus
https://1drv.ms/b/s!AlBmJY-fbVChh50FBs4LsZndQRt2Wg?e=2IjqKI
You will find Transfusion 84 times
But especially you can read the Conclusions and Discussion from page 488
Hope this helps.
Some more resources I'm working through;
Do antibody tests prove a HIV infection? A Blood Curdling Interview with Dr Valendar Turner = http://theperthgroup.com/INTERVIEWS/VFTHuwCInterview.pdf
March 2001 South African Presidential AIDS Advisory Panel report. Chapter goes into detail on HIV Tests and Their Accuracy. http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/panel/aidsreport.pdf