👏👏👏👏👏👏 Most excellent piece on Vit K. I would like to see every single shot created examined like this. As far as I can find, there is not one scrap of evidence, for a single "vaccination" to occur. They are point blank garbage, based on an archaic, flawed hypothesis, from an egotistical, sociopathic, fame-hunting, authoritarian.
Thanks for bringing Candace's show to attention. It was good and I'm looking forward to watching others. Circumcision is genital mutilation, period, end of story. There is no other way to put it. And when guys read about and figure out what was done to them, believe me, they get PISSED. It should be as much of an issue for women as men, as it directly affects relationships. Edit (adding more): Sorry to veer off subject, but the circumcision thing, as you can maybe imagine, hits a nerve. If you do any reading about it you come to understand it actually ties into the entire WEF/UN etc., agenda, insofar as it's another tool they use to try to keep people from forming strong bonds and families.
I agree 💯. I just posted a bunch of information I gathered during my deep dive into this issue some ten years ago... See my comment and replies in the main thread.
Friends of my husband almost lost their baby boy from circumcision to match his Dad. Hemorrhage wouldn’t stop. The parents had no regret on choosing to circumcise, it was just one of those things, tiny risk for most. Glossed over.
I was more upset hearing the story.
Very sad to know it’s still practiced with impunity
Another one size fits all solution of an invented malady
I’d never thought of circumcision plus vit K to counter the haemorrhaging
So it's not ok to assign gender at birth because that's making an assumption but it's ok to remove part of their body without their consent? Is everything these people do so hypocritical?
I questioned the vaccines, the syntocin & the vit k when my boys were born. Especially the syntocin. The answers were largely about monkeys & bananas in a cage. It didn't seem to be an adequate answer (a little like the story about grandma's roast being cooked in a round dish to make it taste better) but I didn't have the confidence to question the rhetoric. Fortunately, I stood my ground with circumcision: both of my boys are intact & I've yet to meet another boy who is so fortunate.
Being fairly young, well before the internet, not nearly as educated as
I'm now, when I had my two boys my reasoning was: why? apart from the religious consideration I was told it will prevent serious STDs and other
such infections. Firstly, I thought it (foreskin) is there for a reason and secondly that I have to be mindful of emphasising a good hygiene practices in that respect. But I was a simple young woman then.
Now I think of myself as being a smart one as well.
As was my 7yr old. Jaundice, constipation, eczema, reflux, feeding changes and excessive crying.
I was made to feel that was my fault as a first time mum who was told that it must be because I wasn't feeding her properly. Unfortunately, I was too doubtful of my own common sense intellect, and first time motherhood, to challenge the nursing staff. Until she had her first dose mmr at 2mths. The screaming/cries that happened from the moment the shot was given, continuing all night, it gutted me and my husband enough that we never went back. She is perfectly beautiful and very intelligent after we spent the following years detoxing as much garbage they call food, personal hygiene and cleaning products, from our lives as possible (in this highly toxic world). It still haunts me.
What did my ignorance (and the pharma industrial medico complex) unnecessarily take from her?
Thank you for addressing this issue. I started down the genital mutilation rabbit hole almost ten years ago. The word "circumcision" is just as nefarious as using "vaccine" to describe the current CLOT SHOTS.
Too many "benign" sounding associations exist with the word "circumcision", including and ESPECIALLY the notion that it is a "religious" event... "just a little snip"... the removal of a "useless flap of skin".
Nobody should be allowed to carve their religion into a child's body... boy OR girl...
The foreskin serves important sexual and protective functions. It is most definitely NOT "useless". It's removal IS a form of genital mutilation. it is TORTURE. And the age old EXCUSE that "he won't remember it" is an example of grotesque ignorance of what newborns are capable of remembering in IMPLICIT memory. The damage of male genital mutilation is just as permanent as the female versions.
As for the argument that FGM is "so much worse" in every case... FALSE. Male genital mutilation (MGM) is FAR MORE invasive and damaging than the most commonly practiced forms of FGM, ie a "nick" to the clitoral hood.
NO CHILD needs their genitals cut, nicked, or otherwise interfered with... unless there is a genuine medical necessity present.
Here is some information I have collected over the years... I will add some into a reply to this comment...
"I think it would be greatly to our advantage if, instead of calling ourselves Homo sapiens, we called ourselves Homo mutilans, the mutilating species, the species that mutilates both mind and body, often in the name of reason, of religion, tradition, custom, morality, and law. Were we to adopt such a name for our species, it might focus our attention upon what is wrong with us and where we might begin setting ourselves right."
Men and women have enough problems dealing with each other without adding more fuel to the fire.
I have a daughter. I would go so far as to say that if I had any influence on the situation, it would be my wish that she not marry (and thus, why even waste your time dating) any cut male.
It is a perfectly rational, logical position for a woman, once she knows the facts.
Can you imagine, if there was a growing movement of women, who made it known they (and their daughters) would not date/marry cut men, how fast things would change? VERY fast.
For it is a barbarous thing to meet a newly born infant with the knife, with a deliberate mutilation. And the part that is removed is not negligible; it has clear and valuable functions to perform. Not circumcising a boy will not only spare him a brutal violence as he enters life; it will promise him a richer existence. And that not only because the possession of a foreskin will increase his genital sensitivity and make possible more satisfactory and pleasurable sexual activity, but also because of the consideration with which this essay began: that the foreskin is the female element in the male.
To be sure, that is only a primitive insight, and has no standing in science. Yet that is hardly a criticism. What we consider to be male or female is largely cultural in any case; many of our conventional notions in this regard are now in flux and being challenged. This one has more basis in reality than most. Also unlike many unscientific interpretations of reality that are misleading and dehumanizing, this one can sustain, enrich and illuminate. It offers some redress where it is most needed, in a world increasingly devastated and threatened with destruction by a rampant machismo, a mindless exercise of organized aggressive maleness.
...
Just so. Maleness is our problem, excessive maleness. The circumcised organ is only the beginning of it, and kept hidden. What are displayed, like so much male plumage, are the penis surrogates and aggrandizements: the guns; the cars, named for predatory beasts, driven to and from work as though they were PT boats; the flaunting of power and status; the devastation of the earth and the cultivation of a technology of death and destruction beyond any former imagining, all in the pursuit of an obsessive accumulation of wealth far beyond any possibility of use — all the brutal, gaudy, pretentious and infinitely dangerous panoply of male aggression that now envelops and threatens our lives.
This is no time to circumcise males. They need all the female element they can get.
For every child is born into the world with much of one sex and a little of the other. The mistake is by a mutilation to take that little of the other sex away. It should be left as nature evolved it, as in the child, so that all our lives we can go on being much of one sex, and always a little of the other.
The frenar band is a group of soft ridges near the junction of the inner and outer foreskin. This region is the primary erogenous zone of the intact male body. Loss of this delicate belt of densely innervated, sexually responsive tissue reduces the fullness and intensity of sexual response. [Source: Taylor, J. R. et al., "The Prepuce: Specialized Mucosa of the Penis and Its Loss to Circumcision," British Journal of Urology 77 (1996): 291-295.]
2. Mechanical Gliding Action
The foreskin's gliding action is a hallmark feature of the normal, natural, intact penis. This non-abrasive gliding of the penis in and out of its own shaft skin facilitates smooth, comfortable, pleasurable intercourse for both partners. Without this gliding action, the corona of the circumcised penis can function as a one-way valve, making artificial lubricants necessary for comfortable intercourse. [Source: P. M. Fleiss, MD, MPH, "The Case Against Circumcision," Mothering: The Magazine of Natural Family Living (Winter 1997): 36-45.]
3. Meissner's Corpuscles
Circumcision removes the most important sensory component of the foreskin - thousands of coiled fine-touch receptors called Meissner's corpuscles. Also lost are branches of the dorsal nerve, and between 10,000 and 20,000 specialized erotogenic nerve endings of several types. Together these detect subtle changes in motion and temperature, as well as fine gradations in texture. [Sources: 1. R. K. Winkelmann, "The Erogenous Zones: Their Nerve Supply and Its Significance," Proceedings of the Staff Meetings of the Mayo Clinic 34 (1959): 39-47. 2. R. K. Winkelmann, "The Cutaneous Innervation of Human Newborn Prepuce," Journal of Investigative Dermatology 26 (1956): 53-67.]
4. Frenulum
The frenulum is a highly erogenous V-shaped structure on the underside of the glans that tethers the foreskin. During circumcision it is frequently either amputated with the foreskin or severed, which destroys or diminishes its sexual and physiological functions. [Sources: 1. Cold, C, Taylor, J, "The Prepuce," BJU International 83, Suppl. 1, (1999): 34-44. 2. Kaplan, G.W., "Complications of Circumcision," Urologic Clinics of North America 10, 1983.]
5. Dartos Fascia
Circumcision removes approximately half of this temperature-sensitive smooth muscle sheath which lies between the outer layer of skin and the corpus cavernosa. [Source: Netter, F.H., "Atlas of Human Anatomy," Second Edition (Novartis, 1997): Plates 234, 329, 338, 354, 355.]
6. Immunological System
The soft mucosa (inner foreskin) contains its own immunological defense system which produces plasma cells. These cells secrete immunoglobulin antibodies as well as antibacterial and antiviral proteins, including the pathogen killing enzyme lysozyme. [Sources: 1. A. Ahmed and A. W. Jones, "Apocrine Cystadenoma: A Report of Two Cases Occurring on the Prepuce," British Journal of Dermatology 81 (1969): 899-901. 2. P. J. Flower et al., "An Immunopathologic Study of the Bovine Prepuce," Veterinary Pathology 20 (1983):189-202.]
7. Lymphatic Vessels
The loss of these vessels due to circumcision reduces the lymph flow within that part of the body's immune system. [Source: Netter, F.H., "Atlas of Human Anatomy," Second Edition (Novartis, 1997): plate 379.]
8. Estrogen Receptors
The presence of estrogen receptors within the foreskin has only recently been discovered. Their purpose is not yet understood and needs further study. [Source: R. Hausmann et al., "The Forensic Value of the Immunohistochemical Detection of Oestrogen Receptors in Vaginal Epithelium," International Journal of Legal Medicine 109 (1996): 10-30.]
9. Apocrine Glands
These glands of the inner foreskin produce pheromones - nature's powerful, silent, invisible behavioral signals to potential sexual partners. The effect of their absence on human sexuality has never been studied. [Source: A. Ahmed and A. W. Jones, "Apocrine Cystadenoma: A Report of Two Cases Occurring on the Prepuce," British Journal of Dermatology 81 (1969): 899-901.]
10. Sebaceous Glands
The sebaceous glands may lubricate and moisturize the foreskin and glans, which is normally a protected internal organ. Not all men have sebaceous glands on their inner foreskin. [Source: A. B. Hyman and M. H. Brownstein, "Tyson's Glands: Ectopic Sebaceous Glands and Papillomatosis Penis," Archives of Dermatology 99 (1969): 31-37.]
11. Langerhans Cells
These specialized epithelial cells are a component of the immune system in the penis. [Source: G. N. Weiss et al., "The Distribution and Density of Langerhans Cells in the Human Prepuce: Site of a Diminished Immune Response?" Israel Journal of Medical Sciences 29 (1993): 42-43.]
12. Natural Glans Coloration
The natural coloration of the glans and inner foreskin (usually hidden and only visible to others when sexually aroused) is considerably more intense than the permanently exposed and keratinized coloration of a circumcised penis. The socio-biological function of this visual stimulus has never been studied.
The glans ranges from pink to red to dark purple among intact men of Northern European ancestry, and from pinkish to mahagony to dark brown among intact men of Color. If circumcision is performed on an infant or young boy, the connective tissue which protectively fuses the foreskin and glans together is ripped apart. This leaves the glans raw and subject to infection, scarring, pitting, shrinkage, and eventual discoloration. Over a period of years the glans becomes keratinized, adding additional layers of tissue in order to adequately protect itself, which further contributes to discoloration. Many restoring men report dramatic changes in glans color and appearance, and that these changes closely mirror the natural coloration and smooth, glossy appearance of the glans seen in intact men.
[Source: P. M. Fleiss, MD, MPH, "The Case Against Circumcision," Mothering: The Magazine of Natural Family Living (Winter 1997): 36-45.]
13. Length and Circumference
Circumcision removes some of the length and girth of the penis - its double-layered wrapping of loose and usually overhanging foreskin is removed. A circumcised penis is truncated and thinner than it would have been if left intact. [Source: R. D. Talarico and J. E. Jasaitis, "Concealed Penis: A Complication of Neonatal Circumcision," Journal of Urology 110 (1973): 732-733.]
14. Blood Vessels
Several feet of blood vessels, including the frenular artery and branches of the dorsal artery, are removed in circumcision. The loss of this rich vascularization interrupts normal blood flow to the shaft and glans of the penis, damaging the natural function of the penis and altering its development. [Sources: 1. H. C. Bazett et al., "Depth, Distribution and Probable Identification in the Prepuce of Sensory End-Organs Concerned in Sensations of Temperature and Touch; Thermometric Conductivity," Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry 27 (1932): 489-517. 2. Netter, F.H., "Atlas of Human Anatomy," Second Edition (Novartis, 1997): plates 238, 239.]
15. Dorsal Nerves
The terminal branch of the pudendal nerve connects to the skin of the penis, the prepuce, the corpora cavernosa, and the glans. Destruction of these nerves is a rare but devastating complication of circumcision. If cut during circumcision, the top two-thirds of the penis will be almost completely without sensation. [Sources: 1. Agur, A.M.R. ed., "Grant's Atlas of Anatomy," Ninth Edition (Williams and Wilkins, 1991): 188-190. 2. Netter, F.H., "Atlas of Human Anatomy," Second Edition (Novartis, 1997): plate 380, 387.]
Enzymes and immune components are secreted by the foreskin’s mucous membranes, fighting off pathogens and disease. According to a report on the Immunological functions of the human prepuce, these immune components include:
cathepsin B
lysozyme
chymotrypsin
neutrophil elastase
cytokine
These components, like the secretions from vaginal mucosa in a female, are important for protecting the penis from infection.
My son is unvaxxed, but unfortunately I was not able to stop him being injected with vitamin K at birth. He now suffers with eczema. I'm looking for information on whether this is caused by the shot and how to heal him. If anyone can point me in the right direction, I would be grateful"!
I was pressed by a paed to give my first vit K, very aggressive man and I had made the no decision, but after a 22hr labour I couldn’t think of the reasons for my objection and gave in
My content baby came back irritated and became jaundice
I so regretted that moment of weakness
Mother’s are so vulnerable in hospital and they take advantage
The schooled daze to submit to author-elites or white coats is the other hurdle we all have to grow out of, even if it means we get psychologically hosed with cold water.
👏👏👏👏👏👏 Most excellent piece on Vit K. I would like to see every single shot created examined like this. As far as I can find, there is not one scrap of evidence, for a single "vaccination" to occur. They are point blank garbage, based on an archaic, flawed hypothesis, from an egotistical, sociopathic, fame-hunting, authoritarian.
#stoptheshots #flawedscience #nomore
Thank you. Agree, I don't think there is a single shot that passes the necessity, safety and effectiveness trifecta test. Yes, it's all garbage.
Thanks for bringing Candace's show to attention. It was good and I'm looking forward to watching others. Circumcision is genital mutilation, period, end of story. There is no other way to put it. And when guys read about and figure out what was done to them, believe me, they get PISSED. It should be as much of an issue for women as men, as it directly affects relationships. Edit (adding more): Sorry to veer off subject, but the circumcision thing, as you can maybe imagine, hits a nerve. If you do any reading about it you come to understand it actually ties into the entire WEF/UN etc., agenda, insofar as it's another tool they use to try to keep people from forming strong bonds and families.
I agree 💯. I just posted a bunch of information I gathered during my deep dive into this issue some ten years ago... See my comment and replies in the main thread.
I've been doing my research as well, trying to help my daughter with her decision. Where is the main thread to see the information you posted?
Friends of my husband almost lost their baby boy from circumcision to match his Dad. Hemorrhage wouldn’t stop. The parents had no regret on choosing to circumcise, it was just one of those things, tiny risk for most. Glossed over.
I was more upset hearing the story.
Very sad to know it’s still practiced with impunity
Another one size fits all solution of an invented malady
I’d never thought of circumcision plus vit K to counter the haemorrhaging
Makes perfect sense
So it's not ok to assign gender at birth because that's making an assumption but it's ok to remove part of their body without their consent? Is everything these people do so hypocritical?
I questioned the vaccines, the syntocin & the vit k when my boys were born. Especially the syntocin. The answers were largely about monkeys & bananas in a cage. It didn't seem to be an adequate answer (a little like the story about grandma's roast being cooked in a round dish to make it taste better) but I didn't have the confidence to question the rhetoric. Fortunately, I stood my ground with circumcision: both of my boys are intact & I've yet to meet another boy who is so fortunate.
Being fairly young, well before the internet, not nearly as educated as
I'm now, when I had my two boys my reasoning was: why? apart from the religious consideration I was told it will prevent serious STDs and other
such infections. Firstly, I thought it (foreskin) is there for a reason and secondly that I have to be mindful of emphasising a good hygiene practices in that respect. But I was a simple young woman then.
Now I think of myself as being a smart one as well.
Just now realizing my 18 yo was possibly vax injured...jaundice. Constipation. Eczema...let the ‘Great Awakening’ proceed apace.
As was my 7yr old. Jaundice, constipation, eczema, reflux, feeding changes and excessive crying.
I was made to feel that was my fault as a first time mum who was told that it must be because I wasn't feeding her properly. Unfortunately, I was too doubtful of my own common sense intellect, and first time motherhood, to challenge the nursing staff. Until she had her first dose mmr at 2mths. The screaming/cries that happened from the moment the shot was given, continuing all night, it gutted me and my husband enough that we never went back. She is perfectly beautiful and very intelligent after we spent the following years detoxing as much garbage they call food, personal hygiene and cleaning products, from our lives as possible (in this highly toxic world). It still haunts me.
What did my ignorance (and the pharma industrial medico complex) unnecessarily take from her?
Thank you for addressing this issue. I started down the genital mutilation rabbit hole almost ten years ago. The word "circumcision" is just as nefarious as using "vaccine" to describe the current CLOT SHOTS.
Too many "benign" sounding associations exist with the word "circumcision", including and ESPECIALLY the notion that it is a "religious" event... "just a little snip"... the removal of a "useless flap of skin".
Nobody should be allowed to carve their religion into a child's body... boy OR girl...
The foreskin serves important sexual and protective functions. It is most definitely NOT "useless". It's removal IS a form of genital mutilation. it is TORTURE. And the age old EXCUSE that "he won't remember it" is an example of grotesque ignorance of what newborns are capable of remembering in IMPLICIT memory. The damage of male genital mutilation is just as permanent as the female versions.
As for the argument that FGM is "so much worse" in every case... FALSE. Male genital mutilation (MGM) is FAR MORE invasive and damaging than the most commonly practiced forms of FGM, ie a "nick" to the clitoral hood.
NO CHILD needs their genitals cut, nicked, or otherwise interfered with... unless there is a genuine medical necessity present.
Here is some information I have collected over the years... I will add some into a reply to this comment...
Mutilated Humanity
http://www.whale.to/a/mutilated.html
"I think it would be greatly to our advantage if, instead of calling ourselves Homo sapiens, we called ourselves Homo mutilans, the mutilating species, the species that mutilates both mind and body, often in the name of reason, of religion, tradition, custom, morality, and law. Were we to adopt such a name for our species, it might focus our attention upon what is wrong with us and where we might begin setting ourselves right."
~ Ashley Montagu
Men and women have enough problems dealing with each other without adding more fuel to the fire.
I have a daughter. I would go so far as to say that if I had any influence on the situation, it would be my wish that she not marry (and thus, why even waste your time dating) any cut male.
It is a perfectly rational, logical position for a woman, once she knows the facts.
Can you imagine, if there was a growing movement of women, who made it known they (and their daughters) would not date/marry cut men, how fast things would change? VERY fast.
Oh, I agree completely! 👍🏼
George Wald on Circumcision
For it is a barbarous thing to meet a newly born infant with the knife, with a deliberate mutilation. And the part that is removed is not negligible; it has clear and valuable functions to perform. Not circumcising a boy will not only spare him a brutal violence as he enters life; it will promise him a richer existence. And that not only because the possession of a foreskin will increase his genital sensitivity and make possible more satisfactory and pleasurable sexual activity, but also because of the consideration with which this essay began: that the foreskin is the female element in the male.
To be sure, that is only a primitive insight, and has no standing in science. Yet that is hardly a criticism. What we consider to be male or female is largely cultural in any case; many of our conventional notions in this regard are now in flux and being challenged. This one has more basis in reality than most. Also unlike many unscientific interpretations of reality that are misleading and dehumanizing, this one can sustain, enrich and illuminate. It offers some redress where it is most needed, in a world increasingly devastated and threatened with destruction by a rampant machismo, a mindless exercise of organized aggressive maleness.
...
Just so. Maleness is our problem, excessive maleness. The circumcised organ is only the beginning of it, and kept hidden. What are displayed, like so much male plumage, are the penis surrogates and aggrandizements: the guns; the cars, named for predatory beasts, driven to and from work as though they were PT boats; the flaunting of power and status; the devastation of the earth and the cultivation of a technology of death and destruction beyond any former imagining, all in the pursuit of an obsessive accumulation of wealth far beyond any possibility of use — all the brutal, gaudy, pretentious and infinitely dangerous panoply of male aggression that now envelops and threatens our lives.
This is no time to circumcise males. They need all the female element they can get.
For every child is born into the world with much of one sex and a little of the other. The mistake is by a mutilation to take that little of the other sex away. It should be left as nature evolved it, as in the child, so that all our lives we can go on being much of one sex, and always a little of the other.
https://www.mendocomplain.com/references/1153-2/
☆
“Little flap of useless/extra skin”
1. Frenar Band, or Ridged Band
The frenar band is a group of soft ridges near the junction of the inner and outer foreskin. This region is the primary erogenous zone of the intact male body. Loss of this delicate belt of densely innervated, sexually responsive tissue reduces the fullness and intensity of sexual response. [Source: Taylor, J. R. et al., "The Prepuce: Specialized Mucosa of the Penis and Its Loss to Circumcision," British Journal of Urology 77 (1996): 291-295.]
2. Mechanical Gliding Action
The foreskin's gliding action is a hallmark feature of the normal, natural, intact penis. This non-abrasive gliding of the penis in and out of its own shaft skin facilitates smooth, comfortable, pleasurable intercourse for both partners. Without this gliding action, the corona of the circumcised penis can function as a one-way valve, making artificial lubricants necessary for comfortable intercourse. [Source: P. M. Fleiss, MD, MPH, "The Case Against Circumcision," Mothering: The Magazine of Natural Family Living (Winter 1997): 36-45.]
3. Meissner's Corpuscles
Circumcision removes the most important sensory component of the foreskin - thousands of coiled fine-touch receptors called Meissner's corpuscles. Also lost are branches of the dorsal nerve, and between 10,000 and 20,000 specialized erotogenic nerve endings of several types. Together these detect subtle changes in motion and temperature, as well as fine gradations in texture. [Sources: 1. R. K. Winkelmann, "The Erogenous Zones: Their Nerve Supply and Its Significance," Proceedings of the Staff Meetings of the Mayo Clinic 34 (1959): 39-47. 2. R. K. Winkelmann, "The Cutaneous Innervation of Human Newborn Prepuce," Journal of Investigative Dermatology 26 (1956): 53-67.]
4. Frenulum
The frenulum is a highly erogenous V-shaped structure on the underside of the glans that tethers the foreskin. During circumcision it is frequently either amputated with the foreskin or severed, which destroys or diminishes its sexual and physiological functions. [Sources: 1. Cold, C, Taylor, J, "The Prepuce," BJU International 83, Suppl. 1, (1999): 34-44. 2. Kaplan, G.W., "Complications of Circumcision," Urologic Clinics of North America 10, 1983.]
5. Dartos Fascia
Circumcision removes approximately half of this temperature-sensitive smooth muscle sheath which lies between the outer layer of skin and the corpus cavernosa. [Source: Netter, F.H., "Atlas of Human Anatomy," Second Edition (Novartis, 1997): Plates 234, 329, 338, 354, 355.]
6. Immunological System
The soft mucosa (inner foreskin) contains its own immunological defense system which produces plasma cells. These cells secrete immunoglobulin antibodies as well as antibacterial and antiviral proteins, including the pathogen killing enzyme lysozyme. [Sources: 1. A. Ahmed and A. W. Jones, "Apocrine Cystadenoma: A Report of Two Cases Occurring on the Prepuce," British Journal of Dermatology 81 (1969): 899-901. 2. P. J. Flower et al., "An Immunopathologic Study of the Bovine Prepuce," Veterinary Pathology 20 (1983):189-202.]
7. Lymphatic Vessels
The loss of these vessels due to circumcision reduces the lymph flow within that part of the body's immune system. [Source: Netter, F.H., "Atlas of Human Anatomy," Second Edition (Novartis, 1997): plate 379.]
8. Estrogen Receptors
The presence of estrogen receptors within the foreskin has only recently been discovered. Their purpose is not yet understood and needs further study. [Source: R. Hausmann et al., "The Forensic Value of the Immunohistochemical Detection of Oestrogen Receptors in Vaginal Epithelium," International Journal of Legal Medicine 109 (1996): 10-30.]
9. Apocrine Glands
These glands of the inner foreskin produce pheromones - nature's powerful, silent, invisible behavioral signals to potential sexual partners. The effect of their absence on human sexuality has never been studied. [Source: A. Ahmed and A. W. Jones, "Apocrine Cystadenoma: A Report of Two Cases Occurring on the Prepuce," British Journal of Dermatology 81 (1969): 899-901.]
10. Sebaceous Glands
The sebaceous glands may lubricate and moisturize the foreskin and glans, which is normally a protected internal organ. Not all men have sebaceous glands on their inner foreskin. [Source: A. B. Hyman and M. H. Brownstein, "Tyson's Glands: Ectopic Sebaceous Glands and Papillomatosis Penis," Archives of Dermatology 99 (1969): 31-37.]
11. Langerhans Cells
These specialized epithelial cells are a component of the immune system in the penis. [Source: G. N. Weiss et al., "The Distribution and Density of Langerhans Cells in the Human Prepuce: Site of a Diminished Immune Response?" Israel Journal of Medical Sciences 29 (1993): 42-43.]
12. Natural Glans Coloration
The natural coloration of the glans and inner foreskin (usually hidden and only visible to others when sexually aroused) is considerably more intense than the permanently exposed and keratinized coloration of a circumcised penis. The socio-biological function of this visual stimulus has never been studied.
The glans ranges from pink to red to dark purple among intact men of Northern European ancestry, and from pinkish to mahagony to dark brown among intact men of Color. If circumcision is performed on an infant or young boy, the connective tissue which protectively fuses the foreskin and glans together is ripped apart. This leaves the glans raw and subject to infection, scarring, pitting, shrinkage, and eventual discoloration. Over a period of years the glans becomes keratinized, adding additional layers of tissue in order to adequately protect itself, which further contributes to discoloration. Many restoring men report dramatic changes in glans color and appearance, and that these changes closely mirror the natural coloration and smooth, glossy appearance of the glans seen in intact men.
[Source: P. M. Fleiss, MD, MPH, "The Case Against Circumcision," Mothering: The Magazine of Natural Family Living (Winter 1997): 36-45.]
13. Length and Circumference
Circumcision removes some of the length and girth of the penis - its double-layered wrapping of loose and usually overhanging foreskin is removed. A circumcised penis is truncated and thinner than it would have been if left intact. [Source: R. D. Talarico and J. E. Jasaitis, "Concealed Penis: A Complication of Neonatal Circumcision," Journal of Urology 110 (1973): 732-733.]
14. Blood Vessels
Several feet of blood vessels, including the frenular artery and branches of the dorsal artery, are removed in circumcision. The loss of this rich vascularization interrupts normal blood flow to the shaft and glans of the penis, damaging the natural function of the penis and altering its development. [Sources: 1. H. C. Bazett et al., "Depth, Distribution and Probable Identification in the Prepuce of Sensory End-Organs Concerned in Sensations of Temperature and Touch; Thermometric Conductivity," Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry 27 (1932): 489-517. 2. Netter, F.H., "Atlas of Human Anatomy," Second Edition (Novartis, 1997): plates 238, 239.]
15. Dorsal Nerves
The terminal branch of the pudendal nerve connects to the skin of the penis, the prepuce, the corpora cavernosa, and the glans. Destruction of these nerves is a rare but devastating complication of circumcision. If cut during circumcision, the top two-thirds of the penis will be almost completely without sensation. [Sources: 1. Agur, A.M.R. ed., "Grant's Atlas of Anatomy," Ninth Edition (Williams and Wilkins, 1991): 188-190. 2. Netter, F.H., "Atlas of Human Anatomy," Second Edition (Novartis, 1997): plate 380, 387.]
The Immunological #Functions of #Foreskin
Enzymes and immune components are secreted by the foreskin’s mucous membranes, fighting off pathogens and disease. According to a report on the Immunological functions of the human prepuce, these immune components include:
cathepsin B
lysozyme
chymotrypsin
neutrophil elastase
cytokine
These components, like the secretions from vaginal mucosa in a female, are important for protecting the penis from infection.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1758142/pdf/v074p00364.pdf
~*~
they cut the placenta too soon too, this is an important phase in transferring vitamins and minerals to the baby
When is the proper time?
about an hour after birth
My son is unvaxxed, but unfortunately I was not able to stop him being injected with vitamin K at birth. He now suffers with eczema. I'm looking for information on whether this is caused by the shot and how to heal him. If anyone can point me in the right direction, I would be grateful"!
Hi Katherine
there is quite a bit on the Vit K shot and eczema in this book, that you might find useful
The Peanut Allergy Epidemic - Heather Fraser
Thank you!
I was pressed by a paed to give my first vit K, very aggressive man and I had made the no decision, but after a 22hr labour I couldn’t think of the reasons for my objection and gave in
My content baby came back irritated and became jaundice
I so regretted that moment of weakness
Mother’s are so vulnerable in hospital and they take advantage
The schooled daze to submit to author-elites or white coats is the other hurdle we all have to grow out of, even if it means we get psychologically hosed with cold water.
Than you. An amazing resource. Foreskin as money making product for beauty products. Wow!