“I don’t believe you can have an honest discussion of British Empire without discussing and understanding The Rothschilds.”
This quote captures everything! You can’t understand the world unless you understand the British Empire and you can’t understand the British Empire unless you understand the Rothschilds
Along with the British Empire, we should know who actually came up with that term and that’s the man known as John Dee.
What ever happened to the US debt free silver dollar? In 1963 the US treasury was responsible for issuing the silver dollar and also Secretary Service ID credentials. After 1963 there was no more silver dollar, but plenty of Secret Service ID’s. Go figure!
"Under the guise of conservation, the GEF has been instrumental in establishing "protected areas" that often result in displacing indigenous populations, particularly African pastoralists, from their traditional lands."
This is happening with the Maasai people in Tanzania today.
There are many elements here that could be considered antisemitic, particularly due to its use of classic tropes often associated with conspiracy theories surrounding the Rothschild family. Here’s a breakdown of elements that are especially concerning and can signal antisemitic undertones:
1. Overemphasis on “Hidden” or “Invisible” Power
Referring to the Rothschild family as a “force” with secretive and “invisible” influence over global affairs resembles the antisemitic trope of a Jewish family or group covertly manipulating world events. This narrative implies that the Rothschilds operate in shadows, hidden from the public eye, and exert near-total control over global systems, which mirrors themes in traditional antisemitic propaganda.
2. Comparison to Supervillains
The line likening the Rothschilds to Voldemort, or a “he who must not be named” figure, demonizes the family as an omnipotent, malevolent presence, a narrative often used in antisemitic rhetoric to dehumanize Jewish individuals and depict them as threats to society.
3. References to Political Manipulation and Financial Control
Claims about grooming political leaders, controlling global institutions, and orchestrating financial crises for their gain align closely with antisemitic stereotypes about Jewish people exerting undue influence over politics and finance. These claims often echo older tropes about Jewish bankers or financiers, fostering harmful stereotypes.
4. Comparisons to Spiders in a Web
The analogy describing the Rothschilds as spiders controlling webs in a garden recalls language historically used to dehumanize Jewish individuals and depict them as schemers who entrap others. Associating Jewish people with spiders or webs has a long history in antisemitic propaganda, and the image of webs extending covertly through society furthers this harmful stereotype.
5. Depiction as Controllers of Global Crises
The idea that the Rothschilds thrive off wars and crises, orchestrating destruction to rebuild “stronger networks,” implies that they intentionally exploit or create human suffering for profit. This paints the family as not only opportunistic but fundamentally evil, which reinforces antisemitic notions of Jewish people as puppeteers of global conflict.
6. Generalization of Influence Across History and Industry
The article implies that the Rothschilds alone have maintained control over international finance, politics, and technology for centuries, which exaggerates their real influence and reduces complex historical developments to the actions of a single family. This simplification is often a hallmark of conspiracy theories, which unjustly attribute significant societal changes or conflicts to Jewish individuals or families.
7. Implication of Dual Loyalties and Collusion with Elite Groups
Phrases like “invisible empire” and the “Club of the Isles” evoke an image of secretive Jewish networks working within and across elite circles, an antisemitic trope suggesting that Jewish people have hidden loyalties or engage in exclusive alliances with powerful entities to control societies.
In Summary
While some valid historical criticisms could be made about wealth accumulation and influence, the article employs rhetoric and imagery commonly associated with antisemitic conspiracy theories. These elements combine to paint a picture of the Rothschilds that aligns more with long-standing prejudices and stereotypes than with objective critique. Such language risks reinforcing harmful narratives rather than offering a balanced or factual account of the Rothschilds’ historical role in finance and industry.
If you do a real serious deep dive into the rothchild linage, going back further than even the name Rothchild you will come across things that will change the way you think. There is a lot of documentation that suggests they are not Jewish but of Turkish descent. They have been implicated in horrible things, and if you follow the money, it becomes undeniable that that they have been in some very dark and dishonest situations. It also becomes very apparent that that would stand to gain from a lot of traffic events. Calling a duck a duck and not a cow isn’t very antisemitic.
Predictable comment, it had to come from someone. Nothing to do with antisemitism, all to do with what the Rothschilds have done are doing. Except that there are examples of their own antisemitism, unless it's good old-fashioned class and money snobbery.
Great article. I wonder what piqued my interest in the Rothschilds? The History of Money?
Eustace Mullins, most definitely. Later Dean Henderson's Big Oil. But one summer day, I was about 10, I laid under a low hanging limb of a lilac tree in my back yard. There was a massive spider web between the low limb and a much higher one. I took a closer look and found numerous fruit flies, mosquitos and one large fly. I wanted to rescue the fly. I stayed there for some time.
The spider moved painfully slow to a bug, laid atop it and bug-be-gone. Had a siesta and moved onto the next. I waited. Then I went inside to bring some lemonade outside with me and again, took up my viewing position. After quite a long time, only the fly remained on the web and the spider was back to it's original position before it began it's repast.
Was the spider waiting till it knew no resistance would be encountered not knowing if the fly was dead? Was the spider just full and saved the fly for his last tasty meal? I left and came back. I saw the spider quickly race to the fly and squirt some nasty fluid onto the fly, that it had awakened and tried to free itself, to no avail. I turned away. This play was not so entertaining after all. It had distressed me greatly. Sixty years later I remember it clearly. No better analogy of power than the fly in the spider web.
The cross-temporal currency conversions are way out. For instance 450 million loaned would translate to a number vastly higher than the 13 billion shown.
“I don’t believe you can have an honest discussion of British Empire without discussing and understanding The Rothschilds.”
This quote captures everything! You can’t understand the world unless you understand the British Empire and you can’t understand the British Empire unless you understand the Rothschilds
Along with the British Empire, we should know who actually came up with that term and that’s the man known as John Dee.
He’s the magician who created the world that we have today and his tinkering of dark focuses could very well explain why would world is the way it is: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/the-man-behind-the-british-empire
And here’s an article on how the Rothschilds created the modern “Pro-Israel/Zionist” movement: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/the-polarizing-complexity-of-the-f06
What ever happened to the US debt free silver dollar? In 1963 the US treasury was responsible for issuing the silver dollar and also Secretary Service ID credentials. After 1963 there was no more silver dollar, but plenty of Secret Service ID’s. Go figure!
Question 26, 41
"Under the guise of conservation, the GEF has been instrumental in establishing "protected areas" that often result in displacing indigenous populations, particularly African pastoralists, from their traditional lands."
This is happening with the Maasai people in Tanzania today.
Very good..
There are many elements here that could be considered antisemitic, particularly due to its use of classic tropes often associated with conspiracy theories surrounding the Rothschild family. Here’s a breakdown of elements that are especially concerning and can signal antisemitic undertones:
1. Overemphasis on “Hidden” or “Invisible” Power
Referring to the Rothschild family as a “force” with secretive and “invisible” influence over global affairs resembles the antisemitic trope of a Jewish family or group covertly manipulating world events. This narrative implies that the Rothschilds operate in shadows, hidden from the public eye, and exert near-total control over global systems, which mirrors themes in traditional antisemitic propaganda.
2. Comparison to Supervillains
The line likening the Rothschilds to Voldemort, or a “he who must not be named” figure, demonizes the family as an omnipotent, malevolent presence, a narrative often used in antisemitic rhetoric to dehumanize Jewish individuals and depict them as threats to society.
3. References to Political Manipulation and Financial Control
Claims about grooming political leaders, controlling global institutions, and orchestrating financial crises for their gain align closely with antisemitic stereotypes about Jewish people exerting undue influence over politics and finance. These claims often echo older tropes about Jewish bankers or financiers, fostering harmful stereotypes.
4. Comparisons to Spiders in a Web
The analogy describing the Rothschilds as spiders controlling webs in a garden recalls language historically used to dehumanize Jewish individuals and depict them as schemers who entrap others. Associating Jewish people with spiders or webs has a long history in antisemitic propaganda, and the image of webs extending covertly through society furthers this harmful stereotype.
5. Depiction as Controllers of Global Crises
The idea that the Rothschilds thrive off wars and crises, orchestrating destruction to rebuild “stronger networks,” implies that they intentionally exploit or create human suffering for profit. This paints the family as not only opportunistic but fundamentally evil, which reinforces antisemitic notions of Jewish people as puppeteers of global conflict.
6. Generalization of Influence Across History and Industry
The article implies that the Rothschilds alone have maintained control over international finance, politics, and technology for centuries, which exaggerates their real influence and reduces complex historical developments to the actions of a single family. This simplification is often a hallmark of conspiracy theories, which unjustly attribute significant societal changes or conflicts to Jewish individuals or families.
7. Implication of Dual Loyalties and Collusion with Elite Groups
Phrases like “invisible empire” and the “Club of the Isles” evoke an image of secretive Jewish networks working within and across elite circles, an antisemitic trope suggesting that Jewish people have hidden loyalties or engage in exclusive alliances with powerful entities to control societies.
In Summary
While some valid historical criticisms could be made about wealth accumulation and influence, the article employs rhetoric and imagery commonly associated with antisemitic conspiracy theories. These elements combine to paint a picture of the Rothschilds that aligns more with long-standing prejudices and stereotypes than with objective critique. Such language risks reinforcing harmful narratives rather than offering a balanced or factual account of the Rothschilds’ historical role in finance and industry.
If you do a real serious deep dive into the rothchild linage, going back further than even the name Rothchild you will come across things that will change the way you think. There is a lot of documentation that suggests they are not Jewish but of Turkish descent. They have been implicated in horrible things, and if you follow the money, it becomes undeniable that that they have been in some very dark and dishonest situations. It also becomes very apparent that that would stand to gain from a lot of traffic events. Calling a duck a duck and not a cow isn’t very antisemitic.
Predictable comment, it had to come from someone. Nothing to do with antisemitism, all to do with what the Rothschilds have done are doing. Except that there are examples of their own antisemitism, unless it's good old-fashioned class and money snobbery.
pffffft.
Great article. I wonder what piqued my interest in the Rothschilds? The History of Money?
Eustace Mullins, most definitely. Later Dean Henderson's Big Oil. But one summer day, I was about 10, I laid under a low hanging limb of a lilac tree in my back yard. There was a massive spider web between the low limb and a much higher one. I took a closer look and found numerous fruit flies, mosquitos and one large fly. I wanted to rescue the fly. I stayed there for some time.
The spider moved painfully slow to a bug, laid atop it and bug-be-gone. Had a siesta and moved onto the next. I waited. Then I went inside to bring some lemonade outside with me and again, took up my viewing position. After quite a long time, only the fly remained on the web and the spider was back to it's original position before it began it's repast.
Was the spider waiting till it knew no resistance would be encountered not knowing if the fly was dead? Was the spider just full and saved the fly for his last tasty meal? I left and came back. I saw the spider quickly race to the fly and squirt some nasty fluid onto the fly, that it had awakened and tried to free itself, to no avail. I turned away. This play was not so entertaining after all. It had distressed me greatly. Sixty years later I remember it clearly. No better analogy of power than the fly in the spider web.
Spiders need to eat too:).
Yikes!
Fantastic as always.!
"while carefully stressing that this is being done despite rather than because of their Jewish identity"
Haha, yeah right. That's why otherwise Jews play such positive roles in their host societies. 109 and counting.
Great work. It’s quite hard, as stated in the article, to evaluate their contemporary influence owing to their obscurant financial practices.
What can we do about it? I think you’ll find that 8 billion people can do quite a lot about it. If they are pointed in the right direction.
The cross-temporal currency conversions are way out. For instance 450 million loaned would translate to a number vastly higher than the 13 billion shown.
And they own the C19 vac patent. In 2015, 4 years before the …
Dear Unbekoming
David Irving was a guest at my home in 2012 for a couple of days...
I will publish on EarthNewspaper.com on Monday.
For Fear Of The Jews.
Love Is The Answer
Mark R. Elsis
The Fugitive Wants Your I.D.
...one MOSIP o'you
https://tomg2021.substack.com/p/the-fugitive-wants-your-id