GENETICS: Junk science? {Latypova (2024)}: DNA helix is a mathematical model and has never been observed in the wild by anyone, as it is not possible to observe. The Watson-Crick Nobel prize was given for a 1-page theoretical paper, where a salt of DNA was imaged (not at all the same as DNA) and a lot of assumptions, assertions and hand waving was made. Isolation of DNA from nucleus of cells is just as hocus-pocus as isolation of viruses from samples. Despite several decades after the hyped-up “human genome sequencing” project completion, which promised (yet again) to cure cancer and all diseases, none of that happened. Nothing really useful came out of those billions invested into the pipe dream of cracking the genetic “code of life”. At the completion of the human genome project, Svante Paabo could not coherently explain the difference between a chimpanzee and a human, while any 5 year old will have no difficulty explaining it.
Well, maybe monkeys are genetically too close. Oh, look! DNA testing can’t differentiate between a dog and a human. Jamie Andrews is doing an excellent job of debunking fake science. As part of a 3 part series CBS NEWS (yes! Mainstream NEWS) sent in Human samples into Dog DNA sampling companies. All the companies they checked either came back registering the Human samples as Dogs or “unreadable”. Not a single one came back identifying it as human.
What about “ethnically targeted bioweapons”? Despite spy novels and Netflix shows like “Blacklist” advertising this alleged existing technical capability, they can’t target “bioengineered viruses” to your ethnic genome or your unique genome either. The bogus narrative about “COVID virus” being optimized to kill black people and protect Jewish people was based on myth and tiny statistical effects. The study showed very weak ethnic differences in susceptibility to COVID illness and its severity (whatever the true cause of it). Any ethnic based “risk” identified was much weaker than the risk associated with, for example, male gender. Thus having more ACE2 receptors overall was a larger risk than a particular configuration of them that a university lab can measure and call a “genetic subtype”. Gender is frequently a much better predictor of risk than “genes”. A Jewish man was at a greater risk than a black woman from whatever was called “COVID” illness.
I criticize the belief that whatever the science literature claims about mRNA/ saRNA is an accurate representation of what they contain and how they work - i.e. self-replicate or self-amplify. Experience over the past 4 years tells us that nothing in the vials is what it’s claimed to be in the science paper cartoons! The manufacturers demonstrably are unable to manufacture a single mRNA sequence to specification.
The featured video of Dr Cowan (A Look at the Human Genome Project 10/9/24) is well worth watching. It starts slowly and there is a sound issue at the beginning but stick it out because it is very interesting regarding DNA and (by association) viruses.
Dr Cowan spoke at the Wise Traditions Conference in October on this topic. He’s very funny for your listening pleasure and I suggest following him. This topic is one of the myths he has been pursuing and the reason he has established The New Biology Clinic. I am now questioning everything “scientifically based.”
I just read a book on Rosalind Franklin and her research on the structure of DNA. Apparently, her research data was stolen by Crick and Watson who couldn't hold a candle to her.
At 10:33 minutes in, the key to this endeavor was mentioned.
Circular reasoning can not get to sound theory.
I guess the 2 miscreants had a hole in their reasoning and fell back on basing it on a false assumption?
Just like all the rest of the misguided 'theories' virology is based on.
Great piece. Love Dr. Cowan. I don't follow him regularly, so I did not know he questions DNA. I do agree, trillions are spent/wasted on research. Also, one of my friends (C vax injured) was told that her myocarditis and POTS were all "genetic". So convenient!
My only question is 23 and me. I did mine, despite my reservarions as I was bullied by an elderly cousin. It "found" my estrangled mother and sister. Not lost but hiding. They had done their testing 10 sooner and never told me. The testing also correctly identified relatives of both sides of my family. I used my married name and provided no details except my spit. So what were they analyzing?
Wow, just wow. I’ll have to reread this article because there was a lot to digest. The world of inferences, suppositions and lies continues to unravel. Seems like there’s a long and winding road to the truth about everything. Thank for yet another insightful article!
"Without DNA Theory you don’t have Evolution Theory either. You can read THIS to see the gaping holes in the evolution story" - I went to your link "https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/intelligence". I read Behe's "Darwin's Black Box" years ago. Haven't kept up to date on the Intelligent Design Science movement because as a Christian, I realize that while it is on the right track, it doesn't go far enough. It's too vague in its conclusions. It's like "The Force" in Star Wars - it just raises more questions. What exactly is "The Force"? What is this Intelligence"? It does take a leap of faith to believe in the Gospel, the Bible, Jesus Christ as God and as Creator. But it takes even more faith to believe in evolution, which is why the Gospel is "Good News". Your post in the link makes clear, especially with the 47 minute video, that Darwin is indeed dead. Faith in Jesus is the obvious alternative. Thanks for posting it.
Evolution theory had full acceptance before DNA discovery so that statement is false! How much else could you trust of what they write after such a false statement?
ID science can only deal with the physical evidence. And I believe they show quite well that there has to be a Creator. Who that creator is, biological science can never tell us.
Yes, I remember something about the spotted moths, Haeckel's embryos, and Darwin's finches in H.S. in 1958, close to the time of Watson and Crick, but already established in the textbooks.
The Who of creation, of course, is revealed in Genesis and John 1:1-14, for example.
8% human genome is viral, along with LINE-1 transposons and retro-transposons. What is human and what is viral is indistinguishable between causes and effects. For example, we are all connected to dinosaurs through the ARC-1 thinking gene, that they infected us with, without which we could not think! We have placental birth because of a RSV infection in mammals 150,000 years after the Dino 🦕 extinction! So what exactly are we?
Here's the thing for me. Look at the amount of money spent on proving a theory. Incalculable. And of course, proving a theory will improve understanding to benefit mankind.
Since whence has Rockefeller medicine improved our lives? Show me an instance where any disease has been cured. Show me the instances where man has cured and improved the lives of humans and I will show you a defeated, erased and most likely killed healer.
There is no greater example of bullshit science than Darwin, Pasteur, genetics and virology and what we have been subjected to for over 100 years, yet people are still discussing this?
Give me a break!! Are people that stupid to even consider the validity of all this fake science, dissecting every morsel of data to prove what? That these sickos, really care about us?
No independent scientist is ever allowed into The Holy of Holies, another scientists lab to observe. What does that tell you? I read all the comments here. All I can say is when are y'all gonna wake up and smell the coffee? Do these fake PhD scientists really want to help us? NO. Do they want to make our lives better? No. Do they want to cure cancer? No. Do they want the prestige and salaries? Yes. Are they getting high on their own supply? Absolutely drunk as a skunk.
I got to the statement that 'without DNA theory you don't have evolution theory.' That's totally false! Evolution theory had full acceptance before the discovery of DNA molecules. How seriously can you take a person when they trot out falsehoods like this?
I know what cowan means but I assumed somewhere his family changed the spelling of his name, as was done more times than not to obscure heritage, as it is pronounced exactly as Cohen.
GENETICS: Junk science? {Latypova (2024)}: DNA helix is a mathematical model and has never been observed in the wild by anyone, as it is not possible to observe. The Watson-Crick Nobel prize was given for a 1-page theoretical paper, where a salt of DNA was imaged (not at all the same as DNA) and a lot of assumptions, assertions and hand waving was made. Isolation of DNA from nucleus of cells is just as hocus-pocus as isolation of viruses from samples. Despite several decades after the hyped-up “human genome sequencing” project completion, which promised (yet again) to cure cancer and all diseases, none of that happened. Nothing really useful came out of those billions invested into the pipe dream of cracking the genetic “code of life”. At the completion of the human genome project, Svante Paabo could not coherently explain the difference between a chimpanzee and a human, while any 5 year old will have no difficulty explaining it.
Well, maybe monkeys are genetically too close. Oh, look! DNA testing can’t differentiate between a dog and a human. Jamie Andrews is doing an excellent job of debunking fake science. As part of a 3 part series CBS NEWS (yes! Mainstream NEWS) sent in Human samples into Dog DNA sampling companies. All the companies they checked either came back registering the Human samples as Dogs or “unreadable”. Not a single one came back identifying it as human.
What about “ethnically targeted bioweapons”? Despite spy novels and Netflix shows like “Blacklist” advertising this alleged existing technical capability, they can’t target “bioengineered viruses” to your ethnic genome or your unique genome either. The bogus narrative about “COVID virus” being optimized to kill black people and protect Jewish people was based on myth and tiny statistical effects. The study showed very weak ethnic differences in susceptibility to COVID illness and its severity (whatever the true cause of it). Any ethnic based “risk” identified was much weaker than the risk associated with, for example, male gender. Thus having more ACE2 receptors overall was a larger risk than a particular configuration of them that a university lab can measure and call a “genetic subtype”. Gender is frequently a much better predictor of risk than “genes”. A Jewish man was at a greater risk than a black woman from whatever was called “COVID” illness.
I criticize the belief that whatever the science literature claims about mRNA/ saRNA is an accurate representation of what they contain and how they work - i.e. self-replicate or self-amplify. Experience over the past 4 years tells us that nothing in the vials is what it’s claimed to be in the science paper cartoons! The manufacturers demonstrably are unable to manufacture a single mRNA sequence to specification.
Can you drop a link to the Latypova's article?
https://substack.com/@sashalatypova/p-147670281
https://substack.com/@sashalatypova/p-148990061
It's not clickable. Can you DM please?
The featured video of Dr Cowan (A Look at the Human Genome Project 10/9/24) is well worth watching. It starts slowly and there is a sound issue at the beginning but stick it out because it is very interesting regarding DNA and (by association) viruses.
Ha ha ha haaaarh! I got a really good and MUCH needed laugh out of the invisible book that postulates it contains The Science.
I really like this article.
Both thumbs up.
Dr Cowan spoke at the Wise Traditions Conference in October on this topic. He’s very funny for your listening pleasure and I suggest following him. This topic is one of the myths he has been pursuing and the reason he has established The New Biology Clinic. I am now questioning everything “scientifically based.”
I just read a book on Rosalind Franklin and her research on the structure of DNA. Apparently, her research data was stolen by Crick and Watson who couldn't hold a candle to her.
At 10:33 minutes in, the key to this endeavor was mentioned.
Circular reasoning can not get to sound theory.
I guess the 2 miscreants had a hole in their reasoning and fell back on basing it on a false assumption?
Just like all the rest of the misguided 'theories' virology is based on.
Wonderful work here!!!
As an avowed "lay person" I think # 28 on the list--the goat with athletes foot example-- to be Wildly prescient and important.
Great piece. Love Dr. Cowan. I don't follow him regularly, so I did not know he questions DNA. I do agree, trillions are spent/wasted on research. Also, one of my friends (C vax injured) was told that her myocarditis and POTS were all "genetic". So convenient!
My only question is 23 and me. I did mine, despite my reservarions as I was bullied by an elderly cousin. It "found" my estrangled mother and sister. Not lost but hiding. They had done their testing 10 sooner and never told me. The testing also correctly identified relatives of both sides of my family. I used my married name and provided no details except my spit. So what were they analyzing?
Sorry to hear of your estrangled (sic) mother. (Teasing) As I understand, the current tests are finding something but not DNA as we understand it.
Funny how The Science considers evolution while ignoring entropy.
Wow, just wow. I’ll have to reread this article because there was a lot to digest. The world of inferences, suppositions and lies continues to unravel. Seems like there’s a long and winding road to the truth about everything. Thank for yet another insightful article!
"Without DNA Theory you don’t have Evolution Theory either. You can read THIS to see the gaping holes in the evolution story" - I went to your link "https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/intelligence". I read Behe's "Darwin's Black Box" years ago. Haven't kept up to date on the Intelligent Design Science movement because as a Christian, I realize that while it is on the right track, it doesn't go far enough. It's too vague in its conclusions. It's like "The Force" in Star Wars - it just raises more questions. What exactly is "The Force"? What is this Intelligence"? It does take a leap of faith to believe in the Gospel, the Bible, Jesus Christ as God and as Creator. But it takes even more faith to believe in evolution, which is why the Gospel is "Good News". Your post in the link makes clear, especially with the 47 minute video, that Darwin is indeed dead. Faith in Jesus is the obvious alternative. Thanks for posting it.
Evolution theory had full acceptance before DNA discovery so that statement is false! How much else could you trust of what they write after such a false statement?
ID science can only deal with the physical evidence. And I believe they show quite well that there has to be a Creator. Who that creator is, biological science can never tell us.
Yes, I remember something about the spotted moths, Haeckel's embryos, and Darwin's finches in H.S. in 1958, close to the time of Watson and Crick, but already established in the textbooks.
The Who of creation, of course, is revealed in Genesis and John 1:1-14, for example.
The mystery of the creation of life still eludes these freemasonic pointyheads. They would like to reduce everything to binary code.
8% human genome is viral, along with LINE-1 transposons and retro-transposons. What is human and what is viral is indistinguishable between causes and effects. For example, we are all connected to dinosaurs through the ARC-1 thinking gene, that they infected us with, without which we could not think! We have placental birth because of a RSV infection in mammals 150,000 years after the Dino 🦕 extinction! So what exactly are we?
Do you think dinosaurs caught colds, flu and other viruses?
Here's the thing for me. Look at the amount of money spent on proving a theory. Incalculable. And of course, proving a theory will improve understanding to benefit mankind.
Since whence has Rockefeller medicine improved our lives? Show me an instance where any disease has been cured. Show me the instances where man has cured and improved the lives of humans and I will show you a defeated, erased and most likely killed healer.
There is no greater example of bullshit science than Darwin, Pasteur, genetics and virology and what we have been subjected to for over 100 years, yet people are still discussing this?
Give me a break!! Are people that stupid to even consider the validity of all this fake science, dissecting every morsel of data to prove what? That these sickos, really care about us?
No independent scientist is ever allowed into The Holy of Holies, another scientists lab to observe. What does that tell you? I read all the comments here. All I can say is when are y'all gonna wake up and smell the coffee? Do these fake PhD scientists really want to help us? NO. Do they want to make our lives better? No. Do they want to cure cancer? No. Do they want the prestige and salaries? Yes. Are they getting high on their own supply? Absolutely drunk as a skunk.
Another perspective from the Electric Universe.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQ-M_iPMPVk
I got to the statement that 'without DNA theory you don't have evolution theory.' That's totally false! Evolution theory had full acceptance before the discovery of DNA molecules. How seriously can you take a person when they trot out falsehoods like this?
Do you think a new species can be formed from what you understand evolution to be?
Dr. Cowan's thinking is not reality. A thumbs down.
Nor is the pseudo-field of Virology! - No REAL-ity there I'm afraid.
While Cowan may hypothesize, he does not claim to know what IS in absolutes, rather he excels in showing what is NOT, with basic logic.
Agreed
Please elaborate...
Are you for real?
Who is your question directed to? From reading Dr. Cowan's thinking, I doubt if he is "...for real?"
YOU doubt? Heck, seems Dr. Cowan doubts, too. And has arguments. Where are yours?
"Dr Cowan" Look up the meaning of COWAN.
I know what cowan means but I assumed somewhere his family changed the spelling of his name, as was done more times than not to obscure heritage, as it is pronounced exactly as Cohen.