The Body Electric

By Robert Becker and Gary Selden – Unbekoming Book Summary

The Body Electric has been pointed out to me multiple times over the last couple of years. I thought it time to highlight and add it to the collection of stacks paying attention to our electrical universe:

1. Electricity

2. Oxidative Stress

3. Vitamin C

4. Electricity & Disease

5. The Invisible Rainbow

6. Earthing

This recent comment from wm, a long time supporter of this substack, I thought was apt as an opening to the book summary.

The Body Electric: Electromagnetism And The Foundation Of Life Paperback Copyright 1985 by Robert Becker (Author), Gary Selden (Author)

Official Stories by Liam Scheff Copyright Paperback – May 31, 2012

Earthing First edition Clinton Ober, copyright date, Publication date 2014

The Invisible Rainbow By Arthur Firstenberg, copyright date - Publication date. March 9, 2020.

Clint invented these sleep systems and a number of other devices that help us to restore a vital but previously overlooked connection with Mother Earth.

It may have been over looked by modern western science, but the first people knew about it intrinsically. They couldn't talk about it. Didn't need to. As everyone was deeply connected to the Earth. If you garden or farm organically you are profoundly connected to the earth. Your heart and emotions touch it with a loving care. She responds by magic with a bounty unimaginable. The Hopi who seem to live in a most barren location are one with the Earth, Sky and Water. Enough to be peaceful and healthy.

While this may be knew to you. It is ancient intrinsic knowledge. Consider DNA, what our egos’ think to know is a mere speck compared to what remains to be learned. And as is so well pointed out here our body is electric thus DNA is to. DNA connections to the Universe are limitless. Our chance of ever being able to know it with our egos is slim to none.

We can and the First people do know it in their hearts, in their beings, which is beyond words.

Note the date of publication - The Body Electric: Electromagnetism And The Foundation Of Life Paperback Copyright 1985 by Robert Becker (Author), Gary Selden (Author)

Gaia hypothesis by James Lovelock and his principal collaborator Lynn Margulis put forward this amazing hypothesis in early 1970s. James Lovelock had been cogitating on the insight since the mid 1960s. There was much push back from main stream science. So James and Lynn began publishing articles to the general public. CoEvolution Quarterly is were I first read about it.

Finally it was accepted as a theory in about 2000 and disappeared from public memory.

With the media paving over these profoundly insightful works of Robert Becker and Gary Selden, James Lovelock and Lynn Margulis, it became possible in 2020 to foist a pandemic that could never have got off the ground in the days of Lynn Margulis and others. Only by forgetting about the work of Francisco Varela etal that the human immune system is a cognative system, James Lovelock and Lynn Margulis “proposals that living organisms interact with their inorganic surroundings on Earth to form a synergistic and self-regulating, complex system that helps to maintain and perpetuate the conditions for life on the planet” (quote from wikipedia).

Recalling that life began on Earth 3+ billion years ago and thrived without vaccines should have given everyone pause. Should have made us all question the need for such interventions. Or wonder what had happened to humanity and farm animals since the industrial revolution that now necessitated vaccines and gene therapy injectables.

I bring this up because we are not learning from the past. At present we discover with our egos' what has always been know intrinsically within our being, the body electric and its’ profound connecting to the Earth and Universe.

Just as the wisdom of the past is willfully hidden, now with the EMF, 5G WiFi etc an attempt to fog and obscure our biological and electrical connections to the Earths gentle rhythms of energy and communion. With the intent that humans cling to the fog of nonsense instead of Earth Sense.

---

---

dralexisjazmyn

A post shared by @dralexisjazmyn

The Body Electric

by Robert O. Becker and Gary Selden

The Body Electric: Electromagnetism and... book by Robert O. Becker (thriftbooks.com)

44 Questions & Answers

Question 1: What is the main premise of the book "The Body Electric" by Robert O. Becker and Gary Selden?

The main premise of "The Body Electric" is that electricity plays a crucial role in biological processes, particularly in the control of growth, healing, and regeneration. The authors present evidence that challenges the conventional view of life as a purely chemical phenomenon and suggest that bioelectricity is a fundamental aspect of living systems.

Question 2: How did Luigi Galvani's discovery of animal electricity contribute to the understanding of bioelectricity?

Luigi Galvani's discovery of animal electricity in the late 18th century was a pivotal moment in the history of bioelectricity. His experiments demonstrated that electrical currents could be generated by living tissues, specifically in the nerves and muscles of frogs. This finding challenged the prevailing notion that electricity was solely a physical phenomenon and opened up new avenues for research into the electrical properties of living organisms.

Question 3: What were the key findings of Harold Saxton Burr and Lev Vladimirovich Polezhaev in their studies on bioelectricity?

Harold Saxton Burr's research in the 1930s and 1940s revealed the presence of electrical fields surrounding living organisms, which he termed "L-fields." He proposed that these fields were responsible for controlling growth and development. Lev Vladimirovich Polezhaev's work in the 1950s demonstrated that the polarity of regeneration in hydras could be controlled and even reversed by applying small electrical currents, supporting the idea that bioelectricity plays a crucial role in the regeneration process.

Question 4: How did Robert O. Becker's experiments on salamanders help in understanding the role of electricity in regeneration?

Robert O. Becker's experiments on salamanders in the 1960s provided strong evidence for the role of electricity in regeneration. By measuring the electrical potentials at the site of limb amputation, he discovered that a negative current of injury preceded the formation of a blastema, the mass of undifferentiated cells responsible for regeneration. He also found that applying electrical currents could enhance or inhibit the regeneration process, depending on the polarity and intensity of the current.

Question 5: What is the significance of the neuroepidermal junction (NEJ) in the process of regeneration?

The neuroepidermal junction (NEJ) is a key structure in the process of regeneration, formed by the interaction of nerve fibers and epidermal cells at the site of injury. Becker's research demonstrated that the NEJ was essential for the formation of a blastema and the initiation of regeneration. The electrical activity associated with the NEJ was found to be crucial for the dedifferentiation of cells and their subsequent redifferentiation into the specialized cell types needed for regeneration.

Question 6: How did Becker's experiments with applied currents influence regeneration in frogs and salamanders?

Becker's experiments with applied currents in frogs and salamanders showed that the regeneration process could be modulated by external electrical stimulation. By applying negative currents to the site of injury, he was able to enhance the regenerative response, leading to faster and more complete regeneration of limbs. Conversely, positive currents were found to inhibit regeneration. These findings provided strong evidence for the role of bioelectricity in controlling the regeneration process.

Question 7: What is the role of direct current (DC) electrical fields in the regeneration process?

Direct current (DC) electrical fields play a crucial role in the regeneration process by guiding the growth and differentiation of cells. Becker's research demonstrated that the presence of a negative DC field at the site of injury was essential for the formation of a blastema and the initiation of regeneration. The DC field was found to influence the migration and orientation of cells, as well as their gene expression and protein synthesis, ultimately directing the regeneration of lost tissues.

Question 8: How does the concept of morphogenetic fields relate to the process of regeneration?

The concept of morphogenetic fields, proposed by biologists such as Paul Weiss and H. V. Brønsted, suggests that the shape and form of an organism is determined by an underlying field of information that guides the growth and differentiation of cells. In the context of regeneration, morphogenetic fields are thought to provide the blueprint for the restoration of lost tissues, ensuring that the regenerated structure is properly patterned and integrated with the rest of the body. Becker's research on the role of bioelectricity in regeneration supports the idea that electrical fields may be a key component of morphogenetic fields.

Question 9: What is the significance of dedifferentiation in the context of regeneration, and how did Becker's experiments demonstrate this process?

Dedifferentiation is a process by which specialized cells revert to a more primitive, unspecialized state, similar to that of embryonic cells. This process is crucial for regeneration, as it allows cells to regain their developmental plasticity and give rise to the various cell types needed to replace lost tissues. Becker's experiments with frog erythrocytes (red blood cells) provided direct evidence for dedifferentiation. By applying specific electrical currents, he was able to induce frog erythrocytes to dedifferentiate into primitive, blastema-like cells capable of forming new tissues.

Question 10: How did Becker's collaboration with Joseph Spadaro lead to the discovery of the antibacterial properties of silver electrodes?

Becker's collaboration with Joseph Spadaro in the 1970s led to the discovery of the antibacterial properties of silver electrodes. While investigating the use of electrical currents to stimulate bone healing, they found that silver electrodes, when made electrically positive, could kill a wide range of bacteria without harming human cells. This finding opened up new possibilities for the treatment of infections, particularly in cases of osteomyelitis (bone infection) and other difficult-to-treat conditions.

Question 11: What is the piezoelectric property of bone, and how does it relate to Wolffs law of bone remodeling?

The piezoelectric property of bone refers to its ability to generate electrical potentials in response to mechanical stress. When bone is compressed, a negative potential is generated on the concave side, while a positive potential is generated on the convex side. This property is closely related to Wolffs law of bone remodeling, which states that bone adapts its structure in response to the mechanical forces placed upon it. The piezoelectric potentials generated by bone are thought to serve as signals that guide the remodeling process, stimulating bone formation in areas of high stress and bone resorption in areas of low stress.

Question 12: How did Becker's experiments with applied electrical currents on human patients help in the treatment of non-union fractures?

Becker's experiments with applied electrical currents on human patients demonstrated the potential for using bioelectricity to stimulate bone healing in cases of non-union fractures. By implanting electrodes at the site of the fracture and applying a small negative current, Becker was able to induce bone growth and promote the healing of fractures that had failed to unite under conventional treatment. This work laid the foundation for the development of clinical devices that use electrical stimulation to treat non-union fractures and other bone disorders.

Question 13: What is the role of the periosteum and bone marrow in the process of fracture healing?

The periosteum and bone marrow play crucial roles in the process of fracture healing. The periosteum, a thin layer of connective tissue that covers the outer surface of bone, contains osteogenic cells called osteoblasts, which are responsible for forming new bone tissue. In response to a fracture, the cells of the periosteum proliferate and differentiate into osteoblasts, contributing to the formation of a callus that bridges the fracture gap. The bone marrow, located within the hollow cavities of long bones, contains stem cells that can differentiate into various cell types, including osteoblasts and chondrocytes (cartilage cells). These cells also participate in the fracture healing process, forming a cartilaginous matrix that later undergoes ossification to form new bone tissue.

Question 14: How did Becker's experiments with electrically induced dedifferentiation of red blood cells contribute to the understanding of regeneration in mammals?

Becker's experiments with electrically induced dedifferentiation of red blood cells in frogs provided insights into the potential for regeneration in mammals. By demonstrating that fully differentiated cells could be induced to revert to a primitive, embryonic-like state and subsequently redifferentiate into various cell types, Becker showed that the process of dedifferentiation, a key component of regeneration in lower vertebrates, could also occur in higher vertebrates. Although mammals have a more limited regenerative capacity compared to amphibians, Becker's work suggested that the underlying mechanisms of regeneration may be conserved across species and that manipulating bioelectrical signals could potentially enhance regenerative responses in mammals.

Question 15: What are the differences between the three methods of electrical stimulation used for bone fracture healing: low-current, high-current, and pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF)?

The three main methods of electrical stimulation used for bone fracture healing differ in their approach and mechanisms of action. Low-current stimulation, as used by Becker, involves the application of a small, continuous direct current (in the range of nanoamperes) through electrodes implanted at the fracture site. This method is thought to mimic the natural bioelectrical currents associated with bone healing and may stimulate the differentiation of bone-forming cells. High-current stimulation, such as that used by Brighton and Friedenberg, applies larger currents (in the range of microamperes) through electrodes, which may stimulate bone growth by causing irritation and invoking an inflammatory response. Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) stimulation, as developed by Bassett and Pilla, uses non-invasive, time-varying magnetic fields to induce electrical currents within the fracture site. PEMF is thought to stimulate bone healing by increasing the rate of cell proliferation and differentiation, although the exact mechanisms are still under investigation.

Question 16: How do silver electrodes stimulate bone growth and soft tissue healing when used with positive electrical currents?

Silver electrodes, when used with positive electrical currents, have been found to stimulate bone growth and soft tissue healing through a combination of electrical and chemical effects. The positive current drives silver ions from the electrode into the surrounding tissues, creating an electrically active environment that can stimulate cell proliferation and differentiation. Additionally, the silver ions themselves have been shown to have antimicrobial properties, helping to prevent infection and create a favorable environment for healing. In Becker's experiments, the use of positive silver electrodes led to the formation of a blastema-like structure, containing dedifferentiated cells capable of forming new bone and soft tissues.

Question 17: What are the potential risks associated with the use of high-current electrodes and PEMF in the treatment of fractures, particularly regarding the growth of pre-existing tumors?

The use of high-current electrodes and PEMF in the treatment of fractures may carry potential risks, particularly regarding the growth of pre-existing tumors. High-current stimulation, which relies on irritation and inflammation to stimulate bone growth, may also create an environment that is conducive to the growth of tumors. Similarly, PEMF stimulation, which is thought to work by increasing the rate of cell proliferation, may inadvertently stimulate the growth of any pre-existing tumor cells in the treated area. Becker's research suggested that both high-current stimulation and PEMF could potentially accelerate the growth of cancer cells, highlighting the need for careful patient selection and long-term follow-up when using these methods.

Question 18: How did Becker's experiments with positive silver electrodes demonstrate the dedifferentiation of fibroblasts into primitive, blastema-like cells?

Becker's experiments with positive silver electrodes provided evidence for the dedifferentiation of fibroblasts, a type of connective tissue cell, into primitive, blastema-like cells. By applying a positive electrical current through a silver electrode to cultures of mouse fibroblasts, Becker observed a series of morphological changes in the cells. The fibroblasts first adopted a more rounded, less specialized appearance, and then began to express characteristics of primitive, embryonic-like cells. These dedifferentiated cells were capable of proliferating and forming structures resembling the blastema, a mass of undifferentiated cells responsible for regeneration in lower vertebrates. This finding suggested that the application of specific electrical signals could induce the dedifferentiation of mature cells, a key step in the regeneration process.

Question 19: What is the significance of the discovery that young children's fingertips can regenerate when amputated distal to the outermost crease of the outermost joint?

The discovery that young children's fingertips can regenerate when amputated distal to the outermost crease of the outermost joint is significant because it demonstrates the inherent regenerative potential of human tissues. This finding, reported by Cynthia Illingworth and others, showed that humans, like other vertebrates, possess the ability to regenerate complex structures under certain conditions. The fact that this regenerative capacity is most pronounced in young children suggests that it may be linked to developmental processes and that the ability to regenerate diminishes with age. Understanding the mechanisms underlying fingertip regeneration in children could provide valuable insights into how to stimulate regeneration in adults and could lead to the development of new therapies for tissue repair and regeneration.

Question 20: How did James Cullen's experiments with artificially induced neuroepidermal junctions in rats contribute to the understanding of regeneration in mammals?

James Cullen's experiments with artificially induced neuroepidermal junctions (NEJs) in rats provided further evidence for the role of bioelectricity in mammalian regeneration. By surgically connecting the sciatic nerve to the epidermis at the site of limb amputation in rats, Cullen was able to create an artificial NEJ, similar to the one observed in naturally regenerating salamander limbs. The presence of this artificial NEJ led to partial regeneration of the amputated rat limb, including the formation of new bone, cartilage, and other tissues. This finding demonstrated that the NEJ, and the associated electrical activity, was a key factor in initiating and sustaining the regenerative response in mammals. Cullen's work also suggested that manipulating the electrical environment at the site of injury could potentially enhance regenerative outcomes in mammals, opening up new avenues for research and therapy.

Question 21: What are the implications of Becker's research on the potential for regeneration in human limbs and organs?

Becker's research on the role of bioelectricity in regeneration has significant implications for the potential regeneration of human limbs and organs. By demonstrating that specific electrical signals can induce the dedifferentiation of mature cells and guide the regeneration process in animals, Becker's work suggests that similar mechanisms could be harnessed to stimulate regeneration in humans. The discovery that young children can regenerate amputated fingertips and that electrical stimulation can promote bone and soft tissue healing in adults further supports the idea that humans possess an inherent regenerative capacity that may be enhanced through bioelectrical manipulation. However, translating these findings into clinical therapies will require a deeper understanding of the complex interplay between bioelectrical signals, cell behavior, and tissue patterning, as well as the development of safe and effective methods for delivering regenerative electrical stimuli to the body.

Question 22: How do Becker's findings on the role of bioelectricity in regeneration challenge the conventional view of life as a purely chemical phenomenon?

Becker's findings on the role of bioelectricity in regeneration challenge the conventional view of life as a purely chemical phenomenon by demonstrating that electrical signals play a crucial role in controlling biological processes. The prevailing view in biology has long been that the functions of living organisms can be explained entirely in terms of chemical reactions and molecular interactions. However, Becker's research shows that bioelectrical fields and currents are essential for regulating cell behavior, tissue patterning, and regenerative responses. The ability of specific electrical signals to induce cell dedifferentiation, guide cell migration and differentiation, and orchestrate complex regenerative processes suggests that bioelectricity is a fundamental aspect of living systems, working in concert with chemical and molecular mechanisms to govern biological function. This perspective opens up new avenues for understanding the nature of life and for developing novel approaches to treating disease and promoting healing.

Question 23: What key discovery did Dr. Becker and his team make regarding the regenerative abilities of salamanders?

Dr. Becker and his team discovered that salamanders possess a remarkable ability to regenerate lost or damaged body parts, including limbs, organs, and even portions of the brain and spinal cord. This regenerative capacity was found to be far superior to that of humans and other mammals, making salamanders a valuable model for studying the mechanisms of regeneration.

Question 24: How does the neuroepidermal junction (NEJ) contribute to the regeneration process in salamanders?

The neuroepidermal junction (NEJ) is a critical structure that forms at the site of injury in salamanders. It is composed of nerve fibers that grow into the wound and connect with the epidermis. The NEJ produces specific electrical currents that guide and stimulate the formation of a blastema, a mass of dedifferentiated cells that eventually redifferentiate to form the new tissues and structures needed for regeneration.

Question 25: What role do red blood cells play in the regeneration of a salamander's heart?

In salamanders, red blood cells play a unique and crucial role in the regeneration of the heart. When the heart is damaged, red blood cells near the wound site dedifferentiate into a more primitive state, forming a blastema. These cells then divide rapidly and redifferentiate into the various cell types needed to rebuild the damaged heart tissue, including new cardiomyocytes, blood vessels, and connective tissue.

Question 26: How does the perineural direct current system differ from the nerve impulse system in terms of information transmission?

The perineural direct current system transmits information using steady, slowly varying electrical currents that flow through the perineural cells surrounding nerve fibers. This is in contrast to the nerve impulse system, which transmits information using brief, high-speed electrical impulses that travel along the nerve fibers themselves. The direct current system is thought to be an older, more primitive form of information transmission that operates in parallel with the nerve impulse system.

Question 27: What evidence suggests that the perineural direct current system is responsible for the transmission of pain signals?

Several lines of evidence suggest that the perineural direct current system is responsible for the transmission of pain signals. First, the sensation of pain is often delayed and prolonged, which is more consistent with the slow, steady nature of direct currents than with the rapid, transient nature of nerve impulses. Second, anesthetics that block nerve impulses do not always eliminate pain, suggesting that pain signals may be transmitted by a different mechanism. Finally, experiments have shown that applying direct currents to the skin can produce or modulate sensations of pain, supporting the idea that pain is transmitted by the direct current system.

Question 28: How do electromagnetic fields influence the pineal gland and the production of melatonin and serotonin?

Electromagnetic fields have been shown to influence the functioning of the pineal gland, a small endocrine gland located in the brain that plays a key role in regulating biological rhythms and the production of hormones such as melatonin and serotonin. Exposure to certain frequencies and intensities of electromagnetic fields can suppress the production of melatonin, leading to disruptions in sleep patterns, mood, and other physiological processes. Conversely, some studies suggest that specific electromagnetic frequencies may stimulate the production of serotonin, a neurotransmitter involved in mood regulation and other functions.

Question 29: What is the relationship between the earth's electromagnetic field, the Schumann resonance, and biological cycles in living organisms?

The earth's electromagnetic field, which is generated by the planet's molten core and ionosphere, exhibits a natural resonance frequency known as the Schumann resonance, which occurs at approximately 7.83 Hz. This frequency, along with its harmonics, falls within the range of brain wave frequencies associated with various states of consciousness and biological processes. Many researchers believe that living organisms have evolved to synchronize their biological cycles, such as circadian rhythms, with the Schumann resonance, and that disruptions in this natural electromagnetic environment may have adverse effects on health and well-being.

Question 30: How do artificial electromagnetic fields, such as those produced by power lines and electronic devices, potentially affect human health and biological processes?

Artificial electromagnetic fields, such as those generated by power lines, electronic devices, and wireless communication systems, have the potential to interfere with natural biological processes and pose risks to human health. These fields can induce currents in the body, disrupt ion flow across cell membranes, and alter the production of hormones and neurotransmitters. Some studies have suggested links between exposure to artificial electromagnetic fields and increased risks of cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, reproductive problems, and other health issues, although the evidence is often mixed and controversial.

Question 31: What evidence suggests that humans possess a magnetic sense, and how might this sense function?

Several lines of evidence suggest that humans, like many other animals, possess a magnetic sense that allows them to detect and respond to the earth's magnetic field. Studies have shown that human subjects can unconsciously detect changes in magnetic field direction and intensity, and that this ability may be linked to the presence of magnetite crystals in the ethmoid bone and other tissues. The exact mechanisms of this magnetic sense are still unclear, but it may involve the interaction of magnetite crystals with nerve cells, the influence of magnetic fields on ion channels, or the modulation of chemical reactions in the body.

Question 32: How does the concept of a "morphogenetic field" relate to the process of regeneration and the influence of electromagnetic fields on living organisms?

The concept of a "morphogenetic field" refers to a hypothetical field or template that guides the development and regeneration of organisms, providing a blueprint for the shape and structure of tissues and organs. This field is thought to be influenced by electromagnetic forces, such as those generated by the body's own tissues or by external fields in the environment. In the context of regeneration, the morphogenetic field may play a key role in directing the growth and differentiation of stem cells and blastema cells, ensuring that the regenerated tissues are properly organized and integrated with the rest of the body.

Question 33: What role might semiconduction play in the development of the nervous system and the processing of information in living organisms?

Semiconduction, a process by which materials can conduct electricity under certain conditions, may play a significant role in the development and functioning of the nervous system. Some researchers believe that the proteins and other biomolecules involved in nerve cell communication and information processing may exhibit semiconducting properties, allowing for the rapid and efficient transmission of electrical signals. Additionally, the presence of semiconducting materials such as collagen and apatite in bone and other tissues suggests that semiconduction may be involved in the regulation of growth, healing, and other biological processes.

Question 34: How does the phenomenon of dedifferentiation challenge traditional views on the irreversibility of cellular specialization?

The phenomenon of dedifferentiation, in which mature, specialized cells revert to a more primitive, unspecialized state, challenges the traditional view that cellular specialization is an irreversible process. In animals such as salamanders, dedifferentiation is a key step in the regeneration of lost or damaged tissues, allowing cells to regain their developmental potential and give rise to new, specialized cell types. This suggests that the genetic information needed for cellular specialization is not lost or permanently silenced during development, but rather is actively suppressed and can be reactivated under certain conditions.

Question 35: What evidence suggests a link between electromagnetic field exposure and the development of cancer, birth defects, and other health issues?

Several lines of evidence suggest a link between exposure to electromagnetic fields and the development of cancer, birth defects, and other health issues. Epidemiological studies have found increased rates of leukemia, brain tumors, and other cancers in populations living near high-voltage power lines or working in occupations with high levels of electromagnetic field exposure. Animal studies have shown that exposure to certain frequencies and intensities of electromagnetic fields can cause DNA damage, alter gene expression, and disrupt normal development, leading to birth defects and other abnormalities. However, the evidence is often mixed and controversial, and more research is needed to fully understand the potential health risks of electromagnetic field exposure.

Question 36: How might the regenerative abilities of salamanders and other animals be harnessed to advance human medicine and the treatment of spinal cord injuries or other conditions?

The regenerative abilities of salamanders and other animals offer valuable insights into the mechanisms of tissue repair and regeneration that could be harnessed to advance human medicine. By studying the cellular and molecular processes involved in regeneration, researchers may be able to identify key genes, proteins, and signaling pathways that could be targeted to promote regeneration in humans. For example, the ability to induce dedifferentiation and blastema formation in human cells could potentially allow for the regeneration of lost or damaged tissues, such as in the treatment of spinal cord injuries, traumatic brain injuries, or degenerative diseases. Additionally, understanding the role of electromagnetic fields in regulating regeneration may lead to the development of new therapies that use carefully controlled electromagnetic stimulation to enhance healing and tissue repair.

Question 37: What are some of the proposed mechanisms by which acupuncture may exert its therapeutic effects, and how do these relate to the concept of a direct current electrical system in the body?

Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain the therapeutic effects of acupuncture, many of which relate to the concept of a direct current electrical system in the body. One theory suggests that acupuncture needles may stimulate specific electrical conductance points along the meridians, altering the flow of direct current and modulating the activity of the nervous system. Another theory proposes that acupuncture may influence the release of neurotransmitters, hormones, and other signaling molecules, thereby regulating pain, inflammation, and other physiological processes. Additionally, some researchers believe that acupuncture may work by enhancing the body's own healing and regenerative abilities, possibly by stimulating the formation of a "current of injury" that guides repair processes.

Question 38: How do the electrical properties of bone, such as piezoelectricity and semiconduction, contribute to the process of bone healing and regeneration?

The electrical properties of bone, including piezoelectricity and semiconduction, play a crucial role in the process of bone healing and regeneration. Piezoelectricity refers to the ability of bone to generate electrical currents in response to mechanical stress, such as during weight-bearing exercise. These currents are thought to stimulate the activity of osteoblasts, the cells responsible for forming new bone tissue. Semiconduction, on the other hand, allows bone to conduct electricity and respond to external electromagnetic fields. This property may be involved in the regulation of bone growth and remodeling, as well as in the guidance of stem cells and other repair processes. By understanding these electrical properties of bone, researchers may be able to develop new therapies that use electromagnetic stimulation to enhance bone healing and regeneration.

Question 39: What role might the direct current system play in the functioning of the brain and the generation of consciousness?

The direct current system may play a significant role in the functioning of the brain and the generation of consciousness. Some researchers believe that the steady, slowly oscillating currents generated by the perineural cells and other components of the direct current system may provide a background "carrier wave" that helps to synchronize and coordinate the activity of neurons across different regions of the brain. This synchronization may be essential for the integration of sensory information, the formation of memories, and the emergence of conscious experience. Additionally, the direct current system may be involved in the regulation of sleep, arousal, and other states of consciousness, possibly through its interactions with the thalamus, hypothalamus, and other key brain structures.

Question 40: How do the electrical properties of collagen and its role in the extracellular matrix relate to the process of regeneration and healing?

Collagen, a key component of the extracellular matrix in many tissues, possesses unique electrical properties that may contribute to the process of regeneration and healing. As a semiconductor, collagen can conduct electricity and respond to external electromagnetic fields, potentially allowing it to transmit signals and guide repair processes. Additionally, the piezoelectric properties of collagen may enable it to generate electrical currents in response to mechanical stress, such as during tissue injury or remodeling. These currents may stimulate the activity of cells involved in regeneration, such as fibroblasts and stem cells, and help to coordinate the complex cascade of events required for successful tissue repair. By understanding the electrical properties of collagen and its role in the extracellular matrix, researchers may be able to develop new strategies for promoting regeneration and enhancing wound healing.

Question 41: What are some of the key differences between Western and Soviet views on the biological effects of electromagnetic fields, and how have these differences influenced research and safety standards?

There are several key differences between Western and Soviet views on the biological effects of electromagnetic fields, which have influenced research priorities and safety standards. In general, Soviet scientists have been more willing to accept the idea that low-level, non-thermal electromagnetic fields can have significant biological effects, and have conducted extensive research on the potential health risks of occupational and environmental exposure. In contrast, Western scientists have often been more skeptical of these effects, focusing instead on the thermal hazards of high-level exposures. These differences have led to stricter exposure limits and safety standards in the Soviet Union and other Eastern European countries, compared to the more lenient guidelines adopted in the United States and other Western nations. However, in recent years, there has been growing recognition of the need for more research on the non-thermal effects of electromagnetic fields, and for the harmonization of international safety standards based on a precautionary approach.

Question 42: How might the concept of a "biofield" or "morphogenetic field" be used to explain phenomena such as the aura, psychic abilities, and the interconnectedness of living systems?

The concept of a "biofield" or "morphogenetic field" may provide a framework for understanding a wide range of phenomena that are often considered paranormal or inexplicable by conventional scientific theories. For example, the aura, a purported energy field surrounding living organisms, could be interpreted as a manifestation of the biofield, reflecting the overall state of an individual's health and consciousness. Similarly, psychic abilities such as telepathy, clairvoyance, and precognition might be explained as the ability to perceive and interact with the biofields of other individuals or living systems, possibly through some form of resonance or entanglement. The interconnectedness of living systems, as evidenced by phenomena such as synchronicity, collective behavior, and the "hundredth monkey effect," could also be understood in terms of the morphogenetic field, which may provide a medium for the transfer of information and influences across space and time. While these ideas remain speculative and controversial, they suggest new avenues for research and may ultimately lead to a more holistic and integrative understanding of the nature of life and consciousness.

Question 43: What are some of the proposed mechanisms by which electromagnetic fields may influence the growth and behavior of bacteria and other microorganisms?

Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain how electromagnetic fields may influence the growth and behavior of bacteria and other microorganisms. One theory suggests that electromagnetic fields may alter the permeability of cell membranes, allowing for the uptake or release of ions, nutrients, and other substances that can affect cellular metabolism and growth. Another theory proposes that electromagnetic fields may interact with the electrical charges on the surface of bacterial cells, influencing their ability to adhere to surfaces or form biofilms. Additionally, some researchers believe that electromagnetic fields may induce changes in gene expression or protein synthesis, leading to alterations in bacterial physiology and behavior. These effects may be frequency- and intensity-dependent, with different types of bacteria responding differently to specific electromagnetic field parameters. By understanding these mechanisms, researchers may be able to develop new strategies for controlling bacterial growth and preventing infections, such as through the use of targeted electromagnetic therapies.

Question 44: How do the electrical properties of the cell membrane and the movement of ions across it relate to the processes of cellular communication and regulation?

The electrical properties of the cell membrane and the movement of ions across it play a crucial role in the processes of cellular communication and regulation. The cell membrane is a highly selective barrier that separates the interior of the cell from the extracellular environment, and it is composed of a lipid bilayer with embedded proteins that form channels and pumps for the passage of ions and other molecules. The differential permeability of the membrane to different ions, such as sodium, potassium, and calcium, creates an electrical potential difference across the membrane, known as the membrane potential. This potential can be modulated by the opening and closing of ion channels, which can be triggered by a variety of stimuli, including neurotransmitters, hormones, and electrical signals. The resulting changes in membrane potential can propagate along the cell membrane, allowing for the rapid transmission of signals within and between cells. Additionally, the movement of ions across the membrane can influence a wide range of cellular processes, such as enzyme activity, gene expression, and cell division, by altering the intracellular concentrations of key signaling molecules. Thus, the electrical properties of the cell membrane and the precise regulation of ion flow are essential for the proper functioning and communication of cells in all living organisms.

---

---

I appreciate you being here.

If you've found the content interesting, useful and maybe even helpful, please consider supporting it through a small paid subscription. While everything here is free, your paid subscription is important as it helps in covering some of the operational costs and supports the continuation of this independent research and journalism work. It also helps keep it free for those that cannot afford to pay.

Please make full use of the Free Libraries.

Unbekoming Interview Library: Great interviews across a spectrum of important topics.

Unbekoming Book Summary Library: Concise summaries of important books.

Stories

I'm always in search of good stories, people with valuable expertise and helpful books. Please don't hesitate to get in touch at unbekoming@outlook.com

For COVID vaccine injury

Consider the FLCCC Post-Vaccine Treatment as a resource.

Baseline Human Health

Watch and share this profound 21-minute video to understand and appreciate what health looks like without vaccination.