Same story every time. Create the perception in the public's mind that there is a problem and then offer the solution. The Medical syndicate has been doing this for over a century.
The manufactured stir around RSV (which is a phony descriptor of a non-existent disease- also called the "common cold") was invented whole cloth in order to first sell the fear and then sell the coming onslaught of protein-based RSV vaccines (aka poisons).
"Despite this and other concerns Dr. Phil Dormitzer, chief of vaccine research and development for GSK spoke enthusiastically about this new development, “This is a very exciting time with multiple potential RSV solutions coming out after years of really nothing.”
Following on the heels of GSK in the race for a similar vaccine, Pfizer and Moderna have announced their plans to enter the RSV sweepstakes."
The future that is being ushered in is quite terrifying. Brutal, sterile, clinical efficiency. Medicine by numbers. The word “Remorseless” comes to mind.
I recall looking through TGA approvals for various flu shots post 2021, particularly these new ones, and naturally RSV is a side effect of those 2, with various mentions of elderly test subjects contracting or even dying of RSV during or after the trial.
The RSV “vaccines” rolled out free to infants in WA recently was basically an experimental monoclonal antibody without any shred of efficacy or even clinical necessity … another payday to pharma, sold under the banner of fear to clueless parents … no remorse, no care, no compassion.
Vaccines are POiSON think skull and cross bones - read Sasha Latypova of Due Diligence and Art on substack now. Thx to this substack writer for sharing the truth. Resist, don’t comply, build up your immune system now.
I have white lung disease (well so I am told), what foreign thing causes it. NOTHING - no virus, no infection - NOTHING! What caused it is sitting on your ass in front of a screen and NOT EXERCISING - lung capacity lessened, no use for lungs to be 100% operational as you are a lounge lizard. So it drops of blood supply to the lower lobes and they go white. When you do try to exercise, you pant like a steam train.
If there is an actual rise in respiratory diseases, could it be due to the increase in radiation we are being exposed to? Babies are born in hospitals which are filled with radiation producing technology.
A book i just read and can't recommend enough to this group is "The Sleeper Agent: The Rise of Lyme Disease, chronic illness and the great imitator antigens of biological warfare" By A. W. Finnegan . Adam would be a great person to interview on his research.
RSV showed up on my radar when I was researching measles in the mid-2000's at the same time I was working with the authors of Dissolving Illusions and then again during the H1N1 flu pandemic nonsense that threatened us over 10 years before the COVID coup.
Here are they key points that stuck out at the time:
- RSV would have the symptoms typical of a common cold...
- In the 60's-80's they listed RSV as one of the more prolific killers at 5K - 6K people per annum. This FAR eclipsed the annual deaths from measles pre-vaccination which stood at far less than 400 per year. (all US based stats)
- They tried RSV vaccines many years earlier and during the clinical trial an infant died upon exposure to RSV after having been vaccinated. One of the more tragic infant vaccine failures, and a slam dunk bit of evidence of "original antigenic sin".
- The number of H1N1 flu deaths during the "pandemic" year was actually in the same range as the 5-6K annual deaths from RSV...
That is how I knew about RSV. The common cold was actually a pretty big killer, far more dangerous than measles, and comparable to flu, but NO ONE EVER HEARD ABOUT it, because it was simply a common cold and more importantly, there was no vaccine to sell.
All vaccine attempts had failed miserably, one even tragically.
“during the clinical trial an infant died upon exposure to RSV”
If possible, please post a link to this trial so we can see the details about the “exposure to rsv” and resulting death. I’ll report back with my thoughts after reading. Thank you
Of course we know that Pertussis vaccination has an antigenic sin effect. This is also well written up to the point those vaccinated with aP vaccines are likely more susceptible to Pertussis illnesses for life.
I also read articles in the H1N1 era that talked about the exact same ARDs issue for people who had died from H1N1 despite it being a very mild virus. We also know that there was Antigenic Sin involved there because 4 studies found people who had gotten annual flu vaccination were more likely to contract H1N1. CMAJ published those studies.
I believe Nature published a followup with a lot more detailed examination of the ARS reaction in the H1N1 critical cases, and they did some research and implied that the 1918 flu was similar as well. Previous exposure resulted in antibodies that had a partial match to the flu creating a deadly immune reaction.
“ If possible, please post a link to this trial so we can see the details about the “exposure to rsv” and resulting death. I’ll report back with my thoughts after reading. Thank you”
Thank you for the link. I wish I could read the entire 1969 paper without paying…I can only read the abstract I wanted to investigate the method of exposure to “rsv” and how the death was attributed to this “exposure.” From the abstract, it sounds like an “rsv outbreak” occurred after rsv and flu vaccines, and that rsv recipients were much worse than flu vaccine recipients. I think it’s fair to wonder if “the outbreak” was nothing more than the adverse effects from the vaccines administered in (& outside) this trial. Until we have evidence of “rsv” there’s no reason anyone can logically accept that any symptoms are a result of the “virus” that can’t be found. In other words, it’s not possible to accept that there was exposure to something not proven to be there, ie “virus.”
What we do know was real was the toxic concoction injected into people, and so it’s among the most obvious possible & likely cause of symptoms and death which followed injections.
They tested for different virus' using swabs, cytopathic effects, hemadsorption and complement fixation.
In cases of the seriously ill, they had serious symptoms from RSV many month (up to 11) after inoculation.
I don't think it's logical at all to assume the symptoms were associated with the inoculation itself given the multiple tests to detect pathogenic causes and given that the symptoms occurred long after the inoculation. In fact, this whole study raises far more problems with the "toxin" theory of the different diseases.
LOL,
Mom would call it a:
"Chest cold'"...
QuicK, she would say... "boil some water...
Inhale the steam, coat the chest with Vick's Vapo-Rub, soak in epsom salts, slap the back...NO SWEETS...
....Get the enema bag Sally!"
😱
p.s. - I forgot VICKS vapo-rub slathered on the bottom of my feet with the WHITE crew socks!
Same story every time. Create the perception in the public's mind that there is a problem and then offer the solution. The Medical syndicate has been doing this for over a century.
The manufactured stir around RSV (which is a phony descriptor of a non-existent disease- also called the "common cold") was invented whole cloth in order to first sell the fear and then sell the coming onslaught of protein-based RSV vaccines (aka poisons).
"Despite this and other concerns Dr. Phil Dormitzer, chief of vaccine research and development for GSK spoke enthusiastically about this new development, “This is a very exciting time with multiple potential RSV solutions coming out after years of really nothing.”
Following on the heels of GSK in the race for a similar vaccine, Pfizer and Moderna have announced their plans to enter the RSV sweepstakes."
https://healthfreedomdefense.org/the-race-to-save-the-world-from-the-common-cold/
Money, Gelt, Pesos, Dollars, Euros, Cha-Ching the greatest pharma incentive in the world cause it sure isn’t health.
So many thoughts.
The future that is being ushered in is quite terrifying. Brutal, sterile, clinical efficiency. Medicine by numbers. The word “Remorseless” comes to mind.
I recall looking through TGA approvals for various flu shots post 2021, particularly these new ones, and naturally RSV is a side effect of those 2, with various mentions of elderly test subjects contracting or even dying of RSV during or after the trial.
The RSV “vaccines” rolled out free to infants in WA recently was basically an experimental monoclonal antibody without any shred of efficacy or even clinical necessity … another payday to pharma, sold under the banner of fear to clueless parents … no remorse, no care, no compassion.
Note to reader - any and all mRNA
Vaccines are POiSON think skull and cross bones - read Sasha Latypova of Due Diligence and Art on substack now. Thx to this substack writer for sharing the truth. Resist, don’t comply, build up your immune system now.
I have white lung disease (well so I am told), what foreign thing causes it. NOTHING - no virus, no infection - NOTHING! What caused it is sitting on your ass in front of a screen and NOT EXERCISING - lung capacity lessened, no use for lungs to be 100% operational as you are a lounge lizard. So it drops of blood supply to the lower lobes and they go white. When you do try to exercise, you pant like a steam train.
There's good evidence for breathwork in WLS.😊
If there is an actual rise in respiratory diseases, could it be due to the increase in radiation we are being exposed to? Babies are born in hospitals which are filled with radiation producing technology.
💯👍🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂👏👏"Suck It And See rule of medicine".
Is bad that I so want that phrase on a t-shirt?😉
A book i just read and can't recommend enough to this group is "The Sleeper Agent: The Rise of Lyme Disease, chronic illness and the great imitator antigens of biological warfare" By A. W. Finnegan . Adam would be a great person to interview on his research.
Thanks Mary, will look it up.
Sam made a nice summary video on rsv
https://drsambailey.com/resources/videos/viruses-unplugged/the-rsv-vaccine-up-sell/
RSV showed up on my radar when I was researching measles in the mid-2000's at the same time I was working with the authors of Dissolving Illusions and then again during the H1N1 flu pandemic nonsense that threatened us over 10 years before the COVID coup.
Here are they key points that stuck out at the time:
- RSV would have the symptoms typical of a common cold...
- In the 60's-80's they listed RSV as one of the more prolific killers at 5K - 6K people per annum. This FAR eclipsed the annual deaths from measles pre-vaccination which stood at far less than 400 per year. (all US based stats)
- They tried RSV vaccines many years earlier and during the clinical trial an infant died upon exposure to RSV after having been vaccinated. One of the more tragic infant vaccine failures, and a slam dunk bit of evidence of "original antigenic sin".
- The number of H1N1 flu deaths during the "pandemic" year was actually in the same range as the 5-6K annual deaths from RSV...
That is how I knew about RSV. The common cold was actually a pretty big killer, far more dangerous than measles, and comparable to flu, but NO ONE EVER HEARD ABOUT it, because it was simply a common cold and more importantly, there was no vaccine to sell.
All vaccine attempts had failed miserably, one even tragically.
“during the clinical trial an infant died upon exposure to RSV”
If possible, please post a link to this trial so we can see the details about the “exposure to rsv” and resulting death. I’ll report back with my thoughts after reading. Thank you
Of course we know that Pertussis vaccination has an antigenic sin effect. This is also well written up to the point those vaccinated with aP vaccines are likely more susceptible to Pertussis illnesses for life.
I also read articles in the H1N1 era that talked about the exact same ARDs issue for people who had died from H1N1 despite it being a very mild virus. We also know that there was Antigenic Sin involved there because 4 studies found people who had gotten annual flu vaccination were more likely to contract H1N1. CMAJ published those studies.
I believe Nature published a followup with a lot more detailed examination of the ARS reaction in the H1N1 critical cases, and they did some research and implied that the 1918 flu was similar as well. Previous exposure resulted in antibodies that had a partial match to the flu creating a deadly immune reaction.
Surprise, recent news articles are even referring to it in a tone they've fixed it.
https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE4BM4SH/
Let me repeat my earlier request:
“ If possible, please post a link to this trial so we can see the details about the “exposure to rsv” and resulting death. I’ll report back with my thoughts after reading. Thank you”
https://academic.oup.com/aje/article-abstract/89/4/422/198849?redirectedFrom=fulltext&login=false
Thank you for the link. I wish I could read the entire 1969 paper without paying…I can only read the abstract I wanted to investigate the method of exposure to “rsv” and how the death was attributed to this “exposure.” From the abstract, it sounds like an “rsv outbreak” occurred after rsv and flu vaccines, and that rsv recipients were much worse than flu vaccine recipients. I think it’s fair to wonder if “the outbreak” was nothing more than the adverse effects from the vaccines administered in (& outside) this trial. Until we have evidence of “rsv” there’s no reason anyone can logically accept that any symptoms are a result of the “virus” that can’t be found. In other words, it’s not possible to accept that there was exposure to something not proven to be there, ie “virus.”
What we do know was real was the toxic concoction injected into people, and so it’s among the most obvious possible & likely cause of symptoms and death which followed injections.
Again, I’m limited to only the abstract.
I found the full text here:
https://sci-hub.ru/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a120955
They tested for different virus' using swabs, cytopathic effects, hemadsorption and complement fixation.
In cases of the seriously ill, they had serious symptoms from RSV many month (up to 11) after inoculation.
I don't think it's logical at all to assume the symptoms were associated with the inoculation itself given the multiple tests to detect pathogenic causes and given that the symptoms occurred long after the inoculation. In fact, this whole study raises far more problems with the "toxin" theory of the different diseases.