There is a peer-reviewed paper by Rose, PhD, which supports your numbers . It shows that 44% of deaths reported to the US CDC's VAERS system are within 48 hours of vaccination. Expected deaths would be about 2% per day; in other words, deaths are 11 times higher than expected. This is highly significant -- the vaccines are responsible for more than 40% of post-vaccination deaths.
The same is true for other adverse events: heart and neurologic problems, emergency-room visits, and hospitalization. These vaccines do not meet the normal definition of "safe".
That article was published the "Journal" (and I use the term loosely) of "Science, Public Health Policy & the Law". In 2017 this journal scored a 1.89 impact factor, which is a very low score, usually reserved for journals of questionable integrity and with poor track records. More recently, it seems to be almost exclusively publishing articles full of questionable attacks on vaccinations.
I further note, the author has no publications in any more reputable journals (one similarly titled article was withdrawn from publication at a more reputable journal, likely because it did not pass the peer review test); and almost all of the citations of this article, are in other articles published in the same dodgy journal. There is another author also called Jessica Rose who works in medicine who has plenty of published articles, but they are in a completely different field. Hopefully her reputation doesn't take a beating from this similarly named quack.
That clickbait article has a very misleading title. Peter Schirmacher, isn't the "German Chief Pathologist". He is the Chief Pathologist of one particular university and he is also German. This is like saying "Australian Leader says Australia Day date should be changed" then talking about the views of some random local government Mayor.
Further, his claims have been widely disputed across Germany - and finally even he says vaccinations are "an essential part in the fight against coronavirus".
Lol this is some serious smooth brain analysis right here... Not sure there is a full paragraph in this article that doesn't have a logical fallacy, completely unsourced highly questionable claim and/or flat out falsehood. Given this, I'll just highlight the three biggest problems.
1) We do not need to rely on the word of one Government to understand the safety of the vaccines. COVID vaccinations are occurring everywhere. Every Government in the world is tackling this. Hundreds of medical institutions, science bodies, think tanks, academic researchers, insurance agencies, etc., etc. have been looking at the safety of the vaccines.
Either this is the greatest global conspiracy in the history of humanity, or the vaccines are relatively safe. When the vast majority of credible evidence points to something being true - then it is not up to Joe Average to prove that it is true, it is up to whoever makes the claim that it is not true to prove their case. Something this article utterly fails to do.
and all credible sources point to the vaccines being safe, then it is not up to any random individual to "prove they are safe", it is up to the people making the extraordinary claim that all the other evidence is wrong
2) The safety of the vaccine is predominately relevant against the safety of not receiving the vaccine. Globally there have been approximately 4.2Billion (with a B) people who have received at least one dose of COVID vaccine. Comparatively there have been 259million confirmed COVID-19 infections, i.e. 16x more people globally have now been vaccinated against COVID vs. infected with COVID. So far we have seen 5.17Million COVID related deaths. If the vaccines were killing people at similar rates to COVID itself, 82.72million people would have died from COVID vaccines.
Does the author believe 82.72million deaths have been covered up? Perhaps the 5.17million deaths relating to COVID is the lie? Perhaps a combination of both. In any event, these are extraordinary claims, contrary to all of the credible evidence - and not a lick of credible counter evidence has been presented.
3) In Australia Doctors do not need to believe deaths are 100% linked to a vaccine to report them to the Coroner. They simply must be unsure if there is a link. It is then the Coroners job to investigate further. So every "calculation" after the 612 numbers of coroner referrals is based on a false assumption, and further evidenced with an almost certain lie: "not one autopsy has been performed". Coroners regularly perform autopsies when investigating the cause of death. Where is the evidence none of have occurred in relation to potential vaccine related deaths?
There is a peer-reviewed paper by Rose, PhD, which supports your numbers . It shows that 44% of deaths reported to the US CDC's VAERS system are within 48 hours of vaccination. Expected deaths would be about 2% per day; in other words, deaths are 11 times higher than expected. This is highly significant -- the vaccines are responsible for more than 40% of post-vaccination deaths.
The same is true for other adverse events: heart and neurologic problems, emergency-room visits, and hospitalization. These vaccines do not meet the normal definition of "safe".
https://cf5e727d-d02d-4d71-89ff-9fe2d3ad957f.filesusr.com/ugd/adf864_a6420942982e4d8795949af93e44f57d.pdf
Thank you Tim, much appreciated!
That article was published the "Journal" (and I use the term loosely) of "Science, Public Health Policy & the Law". In 2017 this journal scored a 1.89 impact factor, which is a very low score, usually reserved for journals of questionable integrity and with poor track records. More recently, it seems to be almost exclusively publishing articles full of questionable attacks on vaccinations.
I further note, the author has no publications in any more reputable journals (one similarly titled article was withdrawn from publication at a more reputable journal, likely because it did not pass the peer review test); and almost all of the citations of this article, are in other articles published in the same dodgy journal. There is another author also called Jessica Rose who works in medicine who has plenty of published articles, but they are in a completely different field. Hopefully her reputation doesn't take a beating from this similarly named quack.
I.e. This article isn't a reputable source.
A German pathologist also supports your numbers: "German Chief Pathologist Sounds Alarm on Fatal Covid Vaccine Injuries: “Jab is Cause of Death in 30-40% of Autopsies of Recently Vaccinated” -- https://theexpose.uk/2021/09/13/german-chief-pathologist-sounds-alarm-on-fatal-covid-vaccine-injuries-jab-is-cause-of-death-in-30-40-of-autopsies-of-recently-vaccinated/
That clickbait article has a very misleading title. Peter Schirmacher, isn't the "German Chief Pathologist". He is the Chief Pathologist of one particular university and he is also German. This is like saying "Australian Leader says Australia Day date should be changed" then talking about the views of some random local government Mayor.
Further, his claims have been widely disputed across Germany - and finally even he says vaccinations are "an essential part in the fight against coronavirus".
Suggest saying "you are in the camp of people that can look at the evidence" instead of "can be helped and woken up"
Lol this is some serious smooth brain analysis right here... Not sure there is a full paragraph in this article that doesn't have a logical fallacy, completely unsourced highly questionable claim and/or flat out falsehood. Given this, I'll just highlight the three biggest problems.
1) We do not need to rely on the word of one Government to understand the safety of the vaccines. COVID vaccinations are occurring everywhere. Every Government in the world is tackling this. Hundreds of medical institutions, science bodies, think tanks, academic researchers, insurance agencies, etc., etc. have been looking at the safety of the vaccines.
Either this is the greatest global conspiracy in the history of humanity, or the vaccines are relatively safe. When the vast majority of credible evidence points to something being true - then it is not up to Joe Average to prove that it is true, it is up to whoever makes the claim that it is not true to prove their case. Something this article utterly fails to do.
and all credible sources point to the vaccines being safe, then it is not up to any random individual to "prove they are safe", it is up to the people making the extraordinary claim that all the other evidence is wrong
2) The safety of the vaccine is predominately relevant against the safety of not receiving the vaccine. Globally there have been approximately 4.2Billion (with a B) people who have received at least one dose of COVID vaccine. Comparatively there have been 259million confirmed COVID-19 infections, i.e. 16x more people globally have now been vaccinated against COVID vs. infected with COVID. So far we have seen 5.17Million COVID related deaths. If the vaccines were killing people at similar rates to COVID itself, 82.72million people would have died from COVID vaccines.
Does the author believe 82.72million deaths have been covered up? Perhaps the 5.17million deaths relating to COVID is the lie? Perhaps a combination of both. In any event, these are extraordinary claims, contrary to all of the credible evidence - and not a lick of credible counter evidence has been presented.
3) In Australia Doctors do not need to believe deaths are 100% linked to a vaccine to report them to the Coroner. They simply must be unsure if there is a link. It is then the Coroners job to investigate further. So every "calculation" after the 612 numbers of coroner referrals is based on a false assumption, and further evidenced with an almost certain lie: "not one autopsy has been performed". Coroners regularly perform autopsies when investigating the cause of death. Where is the evidence none of have occurred in relation to potential vaccine related deaths?