I cannot believe this is what our conversations look like these days. Which of the 3 mandated poisons should I take to keep my family from starving? Fucking insane.
This is helpful, though I hope people will fight mandates as much as they can because it's a line in the sand we can't redraw once it's fully crossed.
BTW, I am not sure if immediate adverse reactions are just what we need to be concerned about...possible undetected heart damage, long-term autoimmune issues, nervous system damage, and increased risk of cancer are what concern me, as well as the whole issue of whether the shots block natural immunity and make you more vulnerable to future variants due to "original antigenic sin."
I personally know of a few folks who took Moderna who may not be in the VAERS database but have some potentially serious impacts from the vaccines. It's hard to prove causation sometimes but you gotta wonder.
The other things to look at for relative risk of injury are sex and age. Males have dramatically higher risks of myocarditis that females, and risks depend on age. It could be that for a given person, the vaccine with the least risk of injury depends on these factors (I don't know).
Also, suggest calling it "risk" instead of "safety". People respond unconsciously to the language, they don't hear the negative in "less safe", just the "safe". So calling it "less risky" highlights the "risk".
I don't see a correction for the 2 doses required for the mRNA vaccines. The risk per dose is less, but because you take 2 doses, the net is that AstraZeneca is "safer" that the mRNA doses.
Of course they are not "safe". We personally know of one death (vaccinated so she could help out with her daughter's class), one severe ongoing seizures, one 12-year old boy with seizures, one woman with seizures. For covid, I know one person with long covid (lost sense of smell), no more serious problems.
I cannot believe this is what our conversations look like these days. Which of the 3 mandated poisons should I take to keep my family from starving? Fucking insane.
This is helpful, though I hope people will fight mandates as much as they can because it's a line in the sand we can't redraw once it's fully crossed.
BTW, I am not sure if immediate adverse reactions are just what we need to be concerned about...possible undetected heart damage, long-term autoimmune issues, nervous system damage, and increased risk of cancer are what concern me, as well as the whole issue of whether the shots block natural immunity and make you more vulnerable to future variants due to "original antigenic sin."
I personally know of a few folks who took Moderna who may not be in the VAERS database but have some potentially serious impacts from the vaccines. It's hard to prove causation sometimes but you gotta wonder.
Mate, you are much better off just downloading a fake app and showing that to the ConVid Nazis.
All of these injections are poison and you are playing Russian roulette regardless of whatever precautions you may take.
The other things to look at for relative risk of injury are sex and age. Males have dramatically higher risks of myocarditis that females, and risks depend on age. It could be that for a given person, the vaccine with the least risk of injury depends on these factors (I don't know).
Also, suggest calling it "risk" instead of "safety". People respond unconsciously to the language, they don't hear the negative in "less safe", just the "safe". So calling it "less risky" highlights the "risk".
I don't see a correction for the 2 doses required for the mRNA vaccines. The risk per dose is less, but because you take 2 doses, the net is that AstraZeneca is "safer" that the mRNA doses.
Of course they are not "safe". We personally know of one death (vaccinated so she could help out with her daughter's class), one severe ongoing seizures, one 12-year old boy with seizures, one woman with seizures. For covid, I know one person with long covid (lost sense of smell), no more serious problems.