How badly is this scrutiny needed for every health profession? This short read with a quiz attached and follow up answers is worth saving. I’m going to send it to my daughter when she starts to plan for her family. This quiz should be given in every health care profession.
Good luck, I wish you success. Too often these decisions are made based on emotions. 'I trust my Dr' 'my dad gave my mom hpv so I'm getting my kids the shot (???)' 'I have a feeling that you and I are never going to agree on this'. All 3 of these have actually been said to me. None of then involved references to any real information.
Maybe starting with these damn shots 1 by 1. I will attack the HepB first which is given at birth where no one even bothers to ask. It’s disgusting to give that shot to a newborn when all that needs to be done is test the mother BEFORE she gives birth. Secondly, I had both my girls by c- section so the possibility of them getting Hep B was zero since it can come from passing through the birth canal. They put those sterilizing eye drops on my baby girl after my c-section for no reason. Hepatitis B was common in whores and drug addicts. And in order to protect their babies from catching it they gave this shot within hours of birth. But in order to make sure that every uninsured baby is vaccinated, they put it on the childhood schedule for ALL babies and we just accepted it as if it was necessary. This sickens me. If they are willing to do this, they don’t care about any of us.
One before SIDS was known about, and the other was a Twin, her mom couldn't handle the death and had no idea it was vaccine-caused. And let her sister adopt the twin that lived, Decades apart. Never had another child. Sad.
This is succinct, informative. Thank you for your effort. I am going to print it and give it to the director of the preschool and elementary school where I work. It’s easier than dropping an armload of books on their desks.
I would not imagine bedbugs would be beneficial, for anything. I did not know that they inject a blood thinner, though. I learn something new every day.
The statistical method called RCT was first used in 1747 by a doctor named James Lind (by Wiki). Given the state of medicine at that time, I would like to express my respect to him.
However, in modern times, statistics have evolved and medicine has advanced.
In the first place, the RCT method of clinical trials is based on the statistical assumptions that 1) the target population is homogeneous, 2) it has certain unchanging properties, and 3) there is no interference between samples. What about reality?
① It is said that there are currently 7 trillion people who can be distinguished by differences in their genomes, so they are not a homogeneous population. ②A person's health improves or worsens within a month, so it is not constant sample. ③ In the case of an infectious disease, infection can occur among the sampled people.
④Furthermore, the RCT method does not provide information for a longer period than the measurement period. Therefore, conventional vaccines required approximately 10 years of clinical trials. There may be benefits for people who may die tomorrow even if the long term is unknown. ⑤ If all statistical methods are used to estimate a large population using a small number of samples, it will become a super extrapolation estimation and the error will inevitably become large. For example, in the case of BNT162b2, half of the 20,000 people in the initial trial were vaccinated. If 3 billion people were vaccinated with EUA, then 20,000/3 billion = 0.00067 = 0.067%, and logically it is impossible to accurately estimate the side effects for 3 billion people. In other words, no one can guess 1000 people by looking at one person.
Let’s not forget that it was the The World Health Organisation that removed Death by Vaccination/Immunisation from the International Coroner’s Death Code to protect the manufacturers from liability.
How badly is this scrutiny needed for every health profession? This short read with a quiz attached and follow up answers is worth saving. I’m going to send it to my daughter when she starts to plan for her family. This quiz should be given in every health care profession.
Good luck, I wish you success. Too often these decisions are made based on emotions. 'I trust my Dr' 'my dad gave my mom hpv so I'm getting my kids the shot (???)' 'I have a feeling that you and I are never going to agree on this'. All 3 of these have actually been said to me. None of then involved references to any real information.
Maybe starting with these damn shots 1 by 1. I will attack the HepB first which is given at birth where no one even bothers to ask. It’s disgusting to give that shot to a newborn when all that needs to be done is test the mother BEFORE she gives birth. Secondly, I had both my girls by c- section so the possibility of them getting Hep B was zero since it can come from passing through the birth canal. They put those sterilizing eye drops on my baby girl after my c-section for no reason. Hepatitis B was common in whores and drug addicts. And in order to protect their babies from catching it they gave this shot within hours of birth. But in order to make sure that every uninsured baby is vaccinated, they put it on the childhood schedule for ALL babies and we just accepted it as if it was necessary. This sickens me. If they are willing to do this, they don’t care about any of us.
Heartbreaking, and almost incomprehensible, to see in such black and white manner. Incredible resource to share with family and friends, thank you!
Lost two nieces to SIDS. Both are at about 5 months.
A good piece of proactive news in Tennessee: Sen Nicely is trying to prevent the addition of vaccines into our food. Of course, the Dem poo-pooed it.
‘Sen. Nicely is trying to Prevent vaccines from being put in our food. Vaccine lettuce’ bill, aiming to classify food containing a vaccine as a drug, passes in Tennessee https://www.wsmv.com/video/2024/03/29/vaccine-lettuce-bill-aiming-classify-food-containing-vaccine-drug-passes-tennessee/?outputType=amp
One before SIDS was known about, and the other was a Twin, her mom couldn't handle the death and had no idea it was vaccine-caused. And let her sister adopt the twin that lived, Decades apart. Never had another child. Sad.
This is succinct, informative. Thank you for your effort. I am going to print it and give it to the director of the preschool and elementary school where I work. It’s easier than dropping an armload of books on their desks.
but bedbugs aren't in any way beneficial.
the itching they cause is due to the blood thinner they inject.
I would not imagine bedbugs would be beneficial, for anything. I did not know that they inject a blood thinner, though. I learn something new every day.
I want to know how fact checkers make the opposite claim that sids increased during COVID-19.
Me too! It’s complete BS!
everything is sucking off of everything ie the insipid life of duality
That first paragraph 🤯. Didn't learn that in nursing school.
I know that nowadays still leeches are being used for benefit of the suckee. So maybe that's the one exception?
medical leeches have saved more than one limb when everything else failed.
leeches, like bedbugs do not inject anything into the host bloodstream except for a blood thinner.
The statistical method called RCT was first used in 1747 by a doctor named James Lind (by Wiki). Given the state of medicine at that time, I would like to express my respect to him.
However, in modern times, statistics have evolved and medicine has advanced.
In the first place, the RCT method of clinical trials is based on the statistical assumptions that 1) the target population is homogeneous, 2) it has certain unchanging properties, and 3) there is no interference between samples. What about reality?
① It is said that there are currently 7 trillion people who can be distinguished by differences in their genomes, so they are not a homogeneous population. ②A person's health improves or worsens within a month, so it is not constant sample. ③ In the case of an infectious disease, infection can occur among the sampled people.
④Furthermore, the RCT method does not provide information for a longer period than the measurement period. Therefore, conventional vaccines required approximately 10 years of clinical trials. There may be benefits for people who may die tomorrow even if the long term is unknown. ⑤ If all statistical methods are used to estimate a large population using a small number of samples, it will become a super extrapolation estimation and the error will inevitably become large. For example, in the case of BNT162b2, half of the 20,000 people in the initial trial were vaccinated. If 3 billion people were vaccinated with EUA, then 20,000/3 billion = 0.00067 = 0.067%, and logically it is impossible to accurately estimate the side effects for 3 billion people. In other words, no one can guess 1000 people by looking at one person.
Let’s not forget that it was the The World Health Organisation that removed Death by Vaccination/Immunisation from the International Coroner’s Death Code to protect the manufacturers from liability.
Such an excellent point!