I am so happy to see that many of Pauls ideas align with my own, especially the idea of not identifying with the right or the left. I identify with being humane, not left or right. The lack of humanity in the globalist's agendas, is the most dusturbing thing. As for their attempts to greenwash by saying they are trying to save the planet, oh please, pull the other leg. It's profit without concern for planet, that has driven us to the pollution and deforestation we currently have. Quality of life, is partly based on standard of living. But when standard of living becomes the only concern, quality of life is injured. Thank you for finding this gem of a man and introducing him to us. 🙏🙏🙏
Good one, huge shout out to Cudenec, and to Whitney Webb, as her genius work on rabbit holes has enlightened my understanding of todays world, immeasurably.
Was it Waterloo or before that? Can't recall. A Rothschild kiddie assigned to England sent an envoy to observe the outcome of a battle between Wellington and France, hightailed it back to England and Rothschild sold all his stock. Since he knew Wellington won, but selling indicated that Napoleon was victorious, all other investors sold their stock as well. When word came thru the following day, Rothschild had successfully bought back all the stock for pennies and with that took forever control of England.
100 years later after the Fed creation, didn't we fight a war over King'George's bank, we were essentially taken over by England once again. Nobody noticed. It has alway been England. They personally started 2 world wars. To do what? To crush the competition. No country on earth was as intelligent and strong as Germany. Look at Germany today.
We went into the Middle East. Why? To steal their resources, yes, but most importantly to wipe out enemies of Israel, the original money changers and home to Rothschild. Muslims never charged interest on loans. All countries that did this were targeted as terrorists, everyone believed this. But I remember T.E Lawrence from M.E.fame. Nobody asks if WW1 was fought in Europe, why was England in the M.E.? Stolen assets, death & destruction, control, lies, betrayal of Arabs, colonization of the entire M.E.. It was Tony Blair who arm twisted Bush to go to war. Who suffered the fallout from that debacle of lies? England? Hell no, the US did.
As always, the truth can be found in following the money. It's always there, like cookie crumbs leading to their front doors, if one has a mind to search out the truth. The US has overthrown 54 countries since WW11. We are now going after Russia, China and Iran, all of which have been pummeled mercilessly for 1000 years, yet still standing strong. The war of all wars seems to be upon us, we're being attacked on all fronts. Methinks, time to start reading history, turn off the TV & cell phones, stop buying poison food, let the shit rot on the shelves, stop drugging up your children, the left & right paradigm is bullshit subterfuge. Race, anti semitism, trans, abortion are all issues that would never exist, but for one reason. They talk about it relentlessly. Repetition, repetition, repetition. That's how I know they are lying.
I'm a bit of a fangirl when it comes to Paul Cudenec, embarrassingly. I just have felt like I was flailing for so many years politically, socially. I was already pretty much an organic radical in my outlook when I came upon Winter Oak some time before 2020 and I was just so grateful for Paul's writing during that insane time. He was one of the small group of writers then who helped me not get too insane. Since then I've learnt much from him about the global mafia, about English anarchist history, etc. His Organic Radicals site has enough further reading for the next few decades :)
Paul's work deserves wider recognition; it will help a lot of people to make sense of what may be a pea soup fog.
Love that guy. His style and manner, brings to mind W.C.Fields, how he laughs things off as insignificant, then he comes with the simple zinger. Always truthful, IMO.
So many good links in one interview...excellent! (One of the interesting links is to Pauls book on the Rothschilds but has anyone done similar work on the Rockefellers? It would be interesting to compare the two.)
The second Boer War probably set the template for WWs 1 & 2 and was likely instigated by the same cabal of Rothschild banksters. War memorials state that this event occurred because the nasty Boers had the temerity to "attack" the mighty British Empire. Troops from the entire Commonwealth were shipped to southern Africa to deal with the recalcitrant Boers. The fact that the richest seam of gold on earth had been discovered on Boer-controlled territory near Joburg was conveniently left out of the narrative. The Rothschilds and the City of London bankers lusted for this gold. And so the Boers were defeated and English rule was imposed on South Africa. The Witwatersrand has provided well over 20% of all gold ever mined. But the average modern South African lives in shantytown poverty. Where did the gold go? Ah. That is the question. I suspect our friends the Rothschilds might know the answer:).
What happened to the 200 tons of gold held in the underground vaults of World Trade Center building #7 that belonged to the Bank of Nova Scotia? England again? Ya think.
And the tons of gold in Libya....pfft....gone - to France, but I wouldn't be surprised if GB (and the US?) received some. And Hillary cackled like an evil witch at the sadistic demise of Gaddafi.
Yes, I didn't forget about that. After this so-called dictators horrific death, news abounded about what this man did for his people. Astounding the benefits he gave. Hitler did the same 1933-38, and Putin 2000-2010. For me, it's easy to see why good men are labeled terrorists. Can't let the news of their deeds circulate. Americans might wonder supwitdat.
To articulate some reflections on the prospective trajectory of Western civilization:
In examining the future course of Western civilization, it is imperative to acknowledge that its progression will not merely represent a continuation or a reversal of current trends. Instead, it is likely to manifest as a complex synthesis of both traditional and emerging values, norms, and rights.
The role of technocratic governance appears poised to become increasingly central in this evolution, emphasizing efficiency and data-driven decision-making. Nevertheless, this focus on efficiency carries the inherent risk of undermining democratic processes and individual liberties.
As a social scientist, my responsibility lies in rigorously analyzing these unfolding dynamics and advocating for policies that strike a balance between technological progress and the preservation of human rights, while also promoting social equity. A nuanced understanding of the interplay between technology, governance, and societal values will be crucial for navigating the challenges and opportunities that this new era presents.
My hypothesis that Western civilization is undergoing a transformation characterized by the convergence of emerging values with the remnants of traditional norms aligns closely with global observations. This dynamic perspective recognizes the intricate nature of societal evolution, shaped by a confluence of factors, including technological innovation, political shifts, and cultural transformations.
Such insights provide a valuable framework for anticipating and guiding the future trajectory of Western civilization. The fluid nature of societal change underscores the necessity of a sophisticated understanding of these evolving dynamics.
"The convergence of emerging values with the remnants of traditional norms". What emerging values? The convergence of traditional values with emerging norms would be a more accurate assessment imo. Equity. What's that? I prefer, equality.
Excellent interview , not just because I share these views..they also come from years of observing and researching. Thank you for this introduction to Paul, whose work looks courageous and truthful .
> We need to reconnect with the earth, rediscover lost know-how, grow new roots, create new long-term communities and cultures.
REPLY: Their are viable examples with histories of thriving for 500+ years. These communities need to be studied and understood. One thing clear is their "religious beliefs or world views" do not interfere with their practice of living with and in nature. The Amish are one example.
> you frequently point out connections to the Rothschild family.
Some additional well documented sources related to the connection of wealth and our current circumstance.
> . You use the metaphor of a two-way mirror to describe modern society. Can you elaborate on how this image captures the relationship between the ruling class and the general population?
Paul replies - They see us and spy on us while themselves remaining concealed – hence the two-way mirror metaphor.
REPLY: Paul explanation is more like a one way mirror sadly. There have been extraordinary examples of two way mirrors in the past.
One that lives in my mind is the Iroquois Nation. WEF etal want to have a surveillance grid that reports on every individuals actions and views personal and private. Indigenous communities were already there. The BIG difference was the mirror was two way. These communities were largely egalitarian. Everyone in the community knew pretty much what everyone else in the community thought and was up to.
The book "A Sorrow in Our Heart: The Life of Tecumseh, explains in detail how the whole Shawnee peoples were included in a very large Pow Wow of some 30,000 Shawnee, women, men and children. While the leaders of each Shawnee tribe were deliberating, runners went back a forth among the people to keep them informed and to report back to the Shawnee council so a democratic consensus could be arrived at.
Certainly not the present vision of 24/7 surveillance developing now. It is a one way mirror, they know about you, but you know little or nothing about them. Most people can be bought today. That means if someone sees behind the mirror and publishes on what they sees, they can be bought off or eliminated.
It was rare to non existent that Indians in that bygone era could be bought. Such was their intellectual, emotional and biological integrity. We today can only imagine such integrity.
I am so happy to see that many of Pauls ideas align with my own, especially the idea of not identifying with the right or the left. I identify with being humane, not left or right. The lack of humanity in the globalist's agendas, is the most dusturbing thing. As for their attempts to greenwash by saying they are trying to save the planet, oh please, pull the other leg. It's profit without concern for planet, that has driven us to the pollution and deforestation we currently have. Quality of life, is partly based on standard of living. But when standard of living becomes the only concern, quality of life is injured. Thank you for finding this gem of a man and introducing him to us. 🙏🙏🙏
This interview is so packed with hard truths my head hurts!
Good one, huge shout out to Cudenec, and to Whitney Webb, as her genius work on rabbit holes has enlightened my understanding of todays world, immeasurably.
Was it Waterloo or before that? Can't recall. A Rothschild kiddie assigned to England sent an envoy to observe the outcome of a battle between Wellington and France, hightailed it back to England and Rothschild sold all his stock. Since he knew Wellington won, but selling indicated that Napoleon was victorious, all other investors sold their stock as well. When word came thru the following day, Rothschild had successfully bought back all the stock for pennies and with that took forever control of England.
100 years later after the Fed creation, didn't we fight a war over King'George's bank, we were essentially taken over by England once again. Nobody noticed. It has alway been England. They personally started 2 world wars. To do what? To crush the competition. No country on earth was as intelligent and strong as Germany. Look at Germany today.
We went into the Middle East. Why? To steal their resources, yes, but most importantly to wipe out enemies of Israel, the original money changers and home to Rothschild. Muslims never charged interest on loans. All countries that did this were targeted as terrorists, everyone believed this. But I remember T.E Lawrence from M.E.fame. Nobody asks if WW1 was fought in Europe, why was England in the M.E.? Stolen assets, death & destruction, control, lies, betrayal of Arabs, colonization of the entire M.E.. It was Tony Blair who arm twisted Bush to go to war. Who suffered the fallout from that debacle of lies? England? Hell no, the US did.
As always, the truth can be found in following the money. It's always there, like cookie crumbs leading to their front doors, if one has a mind to search out the truth. The US has overthrown 54 countries since WW11. We are now going after Russia, China and Iran, all of which have been pummeled mercilessly for 1000 years, yet still standing strong. The war of all wars seems to be upon us, we're being attacked on all fronts. Methinks, time to start reading history, turn off the TV & cell phones, stop buying poison food, let the shit rot on the shelves, stop drugging up your children, the left & right paradigm is bullshit subterfuge. Race, anti semitism, trans, abortion are all issues that would never exist, but for one reason. They talk about it relentlessly. Repetition, repetition, repetition. That's how I know they are lying.
"It has always been England" 👍
I'm a bit of a fangirl when it comes to Paul Cudenec, embarrassingly. I just have felt like I was flailing for so many years politically, socially. I was already pretty much an organic radical in my outlook when I came upon Winter Oak some time before 2020 and I was just so grateful for Paul's writing during that insane time. He was one of the small group of writers then who helped me not get too insane. Since then I've learnt much from him about the global mafia, about English anarchist history, etc. His Organic Radicals site has enough further reading for the next few decades :)
Paul's work deserves wider recognition; it will help a lot of people to make sense of what may be a pea soup fog.
Best new term since Paul Craig Roberts coined presstitutes! Gotta get criminocracy into wider circulation w philanthrocapitalism!
Love that guy. His style and manner, brings to mind W.C.Fields, how he laughs things off as insignificant, then he comes with the simple zinger. Always truthful, IMO.
So many good links in one interview...excellent! (One of the interesting links is to Pauls book on the Rothschilds but has anyone done similar work on the Rockefellers? It would be interesting to compare the two.)
Jacob Nordangard has done similar work on the Rockefellers
https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/interview-with-jacob-nordangard
My go-to is Eustace Mullins, "Murder by Injection", all about the Rockefeller scumbags.
I wholeheartedly concur.
Paul is one of the good ones
The second Boer War probably set the template for WWs 1 & 2 and was likely instigated by the same cabal of Rothschild banksters. War memorials state that this event occurred because the nasty Boers had the temerity to "attack" the mighty British Empire. Troops from the entire Commonwealth were shipped to southern Africa to deal with the recalcitrant Boers. The fact that the richest seam of gold on earth had been discovered on Boer-controlled territory near Joburg was conveniently left out of the narrative. The Rothschilds and the City of London bankers lusted for this gold. And so the Boers were defeated and English rule was imposed on South Africa. The Witwatersrand has provided well over 20% of all gold ever mined. But the average modern South African lives in shantytown poverty. Where did the gold go? Ah. That is the question. I suspect our friends the Rothschilds might know the answer:).
What happened to the 200 tons of gold held in the underground vaults of World Trade Center building #7 that belonged to the Bank of Nova Scotia? England again? Ya think.
And the tons of gold in Libya....pfft....gone - to France, but I wouldn't be surprised if GB (and the US?) received some. And Hillary cackled like an evil witch at the sadistic demise of Gaddafi.
Yes, I didn't forget about that. After this so-called dictators horrific death, news abounded about what this man did for his people. Astounding the benefits he gave. Hitler did the same 1933-38, and Putin 2000-2010. For me, it's easy to see why good men are labeled terrorists. Can't let the news of their deeds circulate. Americans might wonder supwitdat.
Perhaps his sodomisation with a bayonet was even more of a delight to her than all the money her and her cronies received.
To articulate some reflections on the prospective trajectory of Western civilization:
In examining the future course of Western civilization, it is imperative to acknowledge that its progression will not merely represent a continuation or a reversal of current trends. Instead, it is likely to manifest as a complex synthesis of both traditional and emerging values, norms, and rights.
The role of technocratic governance appears poised to become increasingly central in this evolution, emphasizing efficiency and data-driven decision-making. Nevertheless, this focus on efficiency carries the inherent risk of undermining democratic processes and individual liberties.
As a social scientist, my responsibility lies in rigorously analyzing these unfolding dynamics and advocating for policies that strike a balance between technological progress and the preservation of human rights, while also promoting social equity. A nuanced understanding of the interplay between technology, governance, and societal values will be crucial for navigating the challenges and opportunities that this new era presents.
My hypothesis that Western civilization is undergoing a transformation characterized by the convergence of emerging values with the remnants of traditional norms aligns closely with global observations. This dynamic perspective recognizes the intricate nature of societal evolution, shaped by a confluence of factors, including technological innovation, political shifts, and cultural transformations.
Such insights provide a valuable framework for anticipating and guiding the future trajectory of Western civilization. The fluid nature of societal change underscores the necessity of a sophisticated understanding of these evolving dynamics.
"The convergence of emerging values with the remnants of traditional norms". What emerging values? The convergence of traditional values with emerging norms would be a more accurate assessment imo. Equity. What's that? I prefer, equality.
Could be.
Are we ready for the red pill? Radical truth or Pleasantville?
Thank you! Off topic yet on have you anything on Patty Greer crop circle films ?
Excellent interview , not just because I share these views..they also come from years of observing and researching. Thank you for this introduction to Paul, whose work looks courageous and truthful .
Thank you Unbecoming and Paul Cudenec,
Lies are Unbekoming
Interview with Paul Cudenec by unbekoming
> We need to reconnect with the earth, rediscover lost know-how, grow new roots, create new long-term communities and cultures.
REPLY: Their are viable examples with histories of thriving for 500+ years. These communities need to be studied and understood. One thing clear is their "religious beliefs or world views" do not interfere with their practice of living with and in nature. The Amish are one example.
> you frequently point out connections to the Rothschild family.
Some additional well documented sources related to the connection of wealth and our current circumstance.
The City of London
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/9358/
and
Richest persons
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/9293/
> . You use the metaphor of a two-way mirror to describe modern society. Can you elaborate on how this image captures the relationship between the ruling class and the general population?
Paul replies - They see us and spy on us while themselves remaining concealed – hence the two-way mirror metaphor.
REPLY: Paul explanation is more like a one way mirror sadly. There have been extraordinary examples of two way mirrors in the past.
One that lives in my mind is the Iroquois Nation. WEF etal want to have a surveillance grid that reports on every individuals actions and views personal and private. Indigenous communities were already there. The BIG difference was the mirror was two way. These communities were largely egalitarian. Everyone in the community knew pretty much what everyone else in the community thought and was up to.
The book "A Sorrow in Our Heart: The Life of Tecumseh, explains in detail how the whole Shawnee peoples were included in a very large Pow Wow of some 30,000 Shawnee, women, men and children. While the leaders of each Shawnee tribe were deliberating, runners went back a forth among the people to keep them informed and to report back to the Shawnee council so a democratic consensus could be arrived at.
Certainly not the present vision of 24/7 surveillance developing now. It is a one way mirror, they know about you, but you know little or nothing about them. Most people can be bought today. That means if someone sees behind the mirror and publishes on what they sees, they can be bought off or eliminated.
It was rare to non existent that Indians in that bygone era could be bought. Such was their intellectual, emotional and biological integrity. We today can only imagine such integrity.