The stupidity of the so-called scientists goes beyond infiniteness. With their minds restricted to small cells, called laboratories, and limited to the miniature images, miniature experiments and miniature theories, they believe to hold the keys to the secrets of the Existence. They even believe that they are right - despite living in their miniature theoretical world and never going out to observe Life.
They even believe that their miniature-term experiments authorize them to impose their pseudo-authority on others and impact real life for years or generations. Their greed is so strong that it limits the vision to miniature “studies”, and they do not even consider testing their theories over three generations as a minimum - which is a common sense expectation that long-term effects may become visible.
They have converted their beliefs into principles of “science”, thus contaminating the true search for life-supporting improvements for as long as they reproduce themselves within the same paradigm. In effect, they have doomed the whole population of the Earth to suffer the burden of their false assumptions, unproven theories, fantasy concepts and profit-driven operating procedures.
This is the real pandemic, uncontainable and self-perpetuating. They have made themselves basically unaccountable and immune to liability in the name of the search for the “science” - for which the whole humanity is paying with their health and life. They have even removed the basic safeguards from their “science” by hiring their own peers to vouch for the legitimacy of their theories. To protect themselves and their peers from any liability, they have further invented the system of publications which refrain from true scientific discussion, thus reinforcing the power grip of profit-driven stakeholders and rejecting any dissenting voices.
In the age of immense technological progress, we have turned from true scientific search of the Middle Ages to perpetuating tested business models which prevent any changes to the status quo. “The science is dead,” as would Nietzsche say.
Excellent comment. Thank you. I hold no hope any of what you've stated will change.
I am thinking of another paradigm of profit. The Ford Motor CO. makes a car called the Explorer. This car has the highest rollover rate of all other cars by any manufacturer combined. It has maimed and killed more people than all other cars combined due to a design flaw that causes rollovers. Instead of making another car since all Ford factories were already set up to manufacture the Explorer, Ford just keeps making them and they just keep rolling over. No laws passed to stop Ford. No curtailing at all. They are allowed to continue making and selling Explorers and killing and maiming people until those proverbial cows come home. Which they won't.
Why? Because to do anything else would be bad for bizness and that is the American way.
Things are as they are. If there exists a higher Intelligence, the concept to which probably all people subscribe, even the most unspeakable things are part of a higher plan.
In a larger plan, business has no flags. Other than digits, perhaps.
I subjectively believe that “American” (or any national adjective for the respective country) should be sacred and beyond any defect or fault, as it is the baseline of our life. When this is removed, we all will become as corrupt (meaning: preferring profits over people) as particular decision makers (known by name and surname) in particular companies or corporations. 2020-2024 is a preview of how it may go down when unchecked.
Faulty designs are everywhere and have always been. Maybe lowering the center of mass is technically impossible or impractical or financially ineffective, and you get a vehicle which is usable under certain conditions only, like no wind :-). Even unsinkable ships go down, of which Unbekoming wrote recently. Or extremely expensive aircraft need special skills under pain of disappearance of the pilot (F-104). The latest airplanes cannot fly at all (F-35), and an on-board computer system is the only way for the pilot to survive. Programmed life span of devices makes even good things crashable or unusable. Maybe all this is only a symptom of a deeper disease: optionability. We do bad things because we can. We do bad law (including insurance, product liability, SOPs, etc.) because we can and there are thousands of professionals who can defend us against liability.
In a larger plan, this may possibly be a part of an even larger plan.
However, a larger plan does not apply to your or mine or their households. Try leaving dripping water for a few days and your spouse or family will make it very clear.
Maybe defective design is possible because designers, manufacturers and sellers do not have such considerate close relatives? :-)
A dripping faucet and knowingly allowing a vehicle to be sold that your company manufacturers and results in more death and disabling injury than all other cars on the road for decades are hardly comparable.
I don't pretend to know why you are doing so, yet I can see it's psychopathic and requires no refined skill of consideration to see.
America is a corporation. The Titanic did not sink due to unforeseen mechanical malfunctions as Unbekcoming's guest clearly proved. The programmed life span of manufactured goods has nothing to do with what I spoke of. If I missed one of your examples that is because none of them hold water.
The Ford Motor CO. has willfully and knowingly manufactured and sold millions of Explorers that had an obvious design flaw from the inception of the vehicle. The Explorer was built on a light truck chassis that their factories were already producing. They then placed a vehicle body on the truck chassis that is much too lightweight to keep the chassis on the road surface. It only takes a ten percent incline or a light patch of gravel for the truck to leave the pavement and rollover. I know this since I was in an Explorer model from 2004 that was in a rollover. I was astounded at the rest of the information I learned after the wreck.
There have been hundreds of thousands of civil cases against Ford involving the Explorer tried in courts in the US for decades. The people involved in these trials know full well the horrific damage the vehicle has perpetrated on buyers who trusted that the vehicle they bought was safe to drive on the road. There is no possibility the people from Ford or their attorneys are unaware of the outcomes of their decisions.
I am not speaking of mechanical malfunction or expected failure. I am speaking of a cold and calculated decision to keep making blood money. It's that simple.
If blood money is considered good business since the numbers look quite nicely in favor of the corporations drawing blood, we are doomed. And this is what our God is watching us do. Misuse our astounding gift of free will to mutilate and destroy. To employ free will to the works of evil. And, yes, it all works to His glory. Because one day we are going to fully understand what it means to live in the godless world we have chosen and when we do, dripping faucets and comfortable American lifestyles on the backs of the rest of the world will come to an end. We will finally know in graphic detail how much we need God's love. To His glory.
Why you are trying and failing, I add, to turn this into some kind of Doris Day "Que Sera Sera" moment, I have no idea.
Obviously I've made a mistake but am grateful to understand what I now I understand sooner rather than later. Que Sera.
What I wrote does not negate or challenges your arguments. It’s clear that you are right, no reason to discuss it at all.
Now, can we do anything about it? Not really. Yes, you can write demands to the board of directors, media, authorities. Maybe it would work. I am going one step further. Trying to see as many angles as possible, to get more insight into the entirety of the factors which affect us.
It is very easy to do this with things and with matters which are not directly related to us. Once you remove judging, negating or anger, you start seeing more interactions, more subtle intertwining games we play.
In my experience, this is a very important training of the mind. It can give you a skill to read situations and people without the cloud of own luggage or with its weight extremely reduced. The net result is the ability to assess your relations with other people as they develop - without stupid mistakes or things which we do not really to say but we do.
It’s like using situations which I can see (read about, watch) to build up more insightful general perception, especially in reference to other people who are important in my life.
I understand what you're saying yet what you describe about sublimating or obliterating or cancelling or negating emotion(s) so as not to be negating is the very definition of psychopathy and what I meant when I used the word.
Psychopathy in a nutshell is the absence of emotion.
I don't think being exclusively ruled by emotion is advisable, but neither is bleeding emotion from the picture and basing actions purely on analytics. Both are flawed models if exclusively used and lead to tragedy because neither is the truth.
We are witnessing this now in the form of the current worldwide genocide or iatrocide. It is a fact (but not the truth) the earth and it's population would benefit from lowering the number of living humans. A decision based purely on the numbers devoid of compassion and horrifically tragic in result. That is my point about the Ford Explorer. In terms of numbers the choice to make the dangerous car is logical yet the result is horrific.
That is why I get angry about it and speak out and even rail at times. So I will say it. To balance pure logic with passion.
I think this is the skill of discernment. Which is beyond judgement. To fully feel emotion while also using reason to inform the next best step.
Seeing things as they are is not equivalent to the absence of emotions. It’s a tool, not a lifestyle.
Paraphrasing: to learn to drive a car, we need to understand a few basics. This is the recognition stage, seeing the manual gear lever as it is. I may like it or not, this is the emotional reaction, but ideally it should not affect my recognition of the nature of the mechanism. We see it so often in long-time drivers. They have a lot of habits which are ineffective and dangerous, but they persist in them because they have not spent some time on understanding why you need to signal the intention to turn before you start the maneuver. “Before” = seeing the turn cycle as it is.
Emotions are a byproduct of our interactions. Even when you are alone, you are constantly interacting, with objects (“Ah, why this knife is so sharp?”) and yourself (tripping, bumping into objects, spilling coffee) or both. They are always there, but their manifestation may be necessary, beneficial or causing harm. Not exhibiting emotions is sometimes the rule of the game (poker face), sometimes is an enforced obedience (the military), sometimes it is a way to harm others. It’s part of our interactions.
Disconnecting from emotions is not a bad thing and may help us to survive in certain situations (school exams, road rage). It is another tool, not a permanent characteristics. And the goal is to be more efficient in whatever you do. I bet you wouldn’t want to fly in an airplane whose pilot welcomes the passengers: “You know, there are so many button there, and all these digits and readings and radio talk, I feel so intimidated every time I am sitting there. I hate it.”
You (the control center) control your emotions. Always. We may have little experience with some emotions, like sadness in the cemetery, then the emotional reaction overrides your control center. But you can get accustomed to it and become an embalmer or a priest or a grave digger. It is only a matter of exposure and learning from this exposure. Does it annihilate the emotion? No, it only helps you to control your behavior in a particular environment.
As I see it, both you and me are on the same page here. We only use different words and different contexts. Still, our conversation is a very important one for me. You are helping me to better clarify what I mean and why. Thank you.
On second thought… we are clearly a defective design. Unable to think, immature till the time of death, incapable of creating purposeful lasting relationships, skillful at destructing and unbalancing, finding enjoyment in forgetting, sleeping, postponing, becoming drugged and unaware as if we were immortal, we are a miracle somehow allowed to exist longer than one day.
However, if we are so defective, we must be integrally unable to create faultless products because we do not have a reference blueprint of absence of defects in our minds. Sounds absurd. Just like most things that we do on a daily basis.
I know this might be new concepts to some, re science is in reality, just perspective- from a certain view/hypothesis/bias/influence. It's a really good idea, whose execution is mostly flawed, biased and bought and paid for. For a very long time.
I also know that for many, the concept of a problem with the childhood vaccination schedule is so uncomfortable, purely because it opens so many "What ifs" for themselves and for their immediate community. It's hard, but those dreadful questions need to be asked.
I'm am sorry, that this is coming at the world all so fast, in the way that it is being revealed. But it has to be this way because it's reached a critical, point of no return. If this programme and it's systematic mRNA and (worse) sRNA inclusions are not stopped in the next 12months, it is literally game over. There will be no one on the planet, within 5 years that has not had sRNA, whether they consent or not.😐
So if you cannot understand why someone would voluntarily choose to NOT shoot their kid or themselves up with these "safe and effective" shots, then, respectfully, you need to sit down and do some homework. Because this has irreversible, global impacts that your actions will impact, and you, your children, and humanity, cannot afford you to take the cliffs notes version, or freaking phone it in.😐
Around here we say "professing to be wise, they became fools". People don't understand how difficult it is to have accomplished what has been accomplished in creation. It was extremely difficult, and such order does not arise spontaneously from lower order -- quite the opposite.
Some people seem to think they can do whatever they want with creation now and it will respond as they say it will. This is delusional.
Modern science and its storytelling have dumbed us down to this low.
But the basis is that first the wolves that used to be in that forest were "bonus" exterminated around the 1900's thanks to the same governments who loves the resent aka all deathvaxxes.
And then somewhere around the 1960 or so they were wondering why the forest was disappearing, and the copycats released the wolves back in it.
Back-padding them selves how great that was.
Sounds familiar huh?
They broke a circle of life and corrected it.
Deathvaxx is not to be corrected. You can try, I hope I am wrong.
Same sh@t, same @sshole. (government)
Yes you interfere with nature you change rivers, victor schauberger can tell you a lot about that.
Not sure I follow the analogy. More like we had a healthy ecosystem (no or few vaccines) then we introduced gazillion vaccines and now we are supposed to just let things be?
We had lots of wolves,we killed them all, and now we are wrong to reintroduce them?
I think we need to cull the "scientists" that work at pharma and their partners in crime government regulators, oh, and the idiot bribed politicians that mandate vaccines. The 4 F's of vaccines - Fauci, Fraud, Folly and Force.
There are two morals to this story.
The stupidity of the so-called scientists goes beyond infiniteness. With their minds restricted to small cells, called laboratories, and limited to the miniature images, miniature experiments and miniature theories, they believe to hold the keys to the secrets of the Existence. They even believe that they are right - despite living in their miniature theoretical world and never going out to observe Life.
They even believe that their miniature-term experiments authorize them to impose their pseudo-authority on others and impact real life for years or generations. Their greed is so strong that it limits the vision to miniature “studies”, and they do not even consider testing their theories over three generations as a minimum - which is a common sense expectation that long-term effects may become visible.
They have converted their beliefs into principles of “science”, thus contaminating the true search for life-supporting improvements for as long as they reproduce themselves within the same paradigm. In effect, they have doomed the whole population of the Earth to suffer the burden of their false assumptions, unproven theories, fantasy concepts and profit-driven operating procedures.
This is the real pandemic, uncontainable and self-perpetuating. They have made themselves basically unaccountable and immune to liability in the name of the search for the “science” - for which the whole humanity is paying with their health and life. They have even removed the basic safeguards from their “science” by hiring their own peers to vouch for the legitimacy of their theories. To protect themselves and their peers from any liability, they have further invented the system of publications which refrain from true scientific discussion, thus reinforcing the power grip of profit-driven stakeholders and rejecting any dissenting voices.
In the age of immense technological progress, we have turned from true scientific search of the Middle Ages to perpetuating tested business models which prevent any changes to the status quo. “The science is dead,” as would Nietzsche say.
Excellent comment. Thank you. I hold no hope any of what you've stated will change.
I am thinking of another paradigm of profit. The Ford Motor CO. makes a car called the Explorer. This car has the highest rollover rate of all other cars by any manufacturer combined. It has maimed and killed more people than all other cars combined due to a design flaw that causes rollovers. Instead of making another car since all Ford factories were already set up to manufacture the Explorer, Ford just keeps making them and they just keep rolling over. No laws passed to stop Ford. No curtailing at all. They are allowed to continue making and selling Explorers and killing and maiming people until those proverbial cows come home. Which they won't.
Why? Because to do anything else would be bad for bizness and that is the American way.
Amen.
Things are as they are. If there exists a higher Intelligence, the concept to which probably all people subscribe, even the most unspeakable things are part of a higher plan.
In a larger plan, business has no flags. Other than digits, perhaps.
I subjectively believe that “American” (or any national adjective for the respective country) should be sacred and beyond any defect or fault, as it is the baseline of our life. When this is removed, we all will become as corrupt (meaning: preferring profits over people) as particular decision makers (known by name and surname) in particular companies or corporations. 2020-2024 is a preview of how it may go down when unchecked.
Faulty designs are everywhere and have always been. Maybe lowering the center of mass is technically impossible or impractical or financially ineffective, and you get a vehicle which is usable under certain conditions only, like no wind :-). Even unsinkable ships go down, of which Unbekoming wrote recently. Or extremely expensive aircraft need special skills under pain of disappearance of the pilot (F-104). The latest airplanes cannot fly at all (F-35), and an on-board computer system is the only way for the pilot to survive. Programmed life span of devices makes even good things crashable or unusable. Maybe all this is only a symptom of a deeper disease: optionability. We do bad things because we can. We do bad law (including insurance, product liability, SOPs, etc.) because we can and there are thousands of professionals who can defend us against liability.
In a larger plan, this may possibly be a part of an even larger plan.
However, a larger plan does not apply to your or mine or their households. Try leaving dripping water for a few days and your spouse or family will make it very clear.
Maybe defective design is possible because designers, manufacturers and sellers do not have such considerate close relatives? :-)
A dripping faucet and knowingly allowing a vehicle to be sold that your company manufacturers and results in more death and disabling injury than all other cars on the road for decades are hardly comparable.
I don't pretend to know why you are doing so, yet I can see it's psychopathic and requires no refined skill of consideration to see.
America is a corporation. The Titanic did not sink due to unforeseen mechanical malfunctions as Unbekcoming's guest clearly proved. The programmed life span of manufactured goods has nothing to do with what I spoke of. If I missed one of your examples that is because none of them hold water.
The Ford Motor CO. has willfully and knowingly manufactured and sold millions of Explorers that had an obvious design flaw from the inception of the vehicle. The Explorer was built on a light truck chassis that their factories were already producing. They then placed a vehicle body on the truck chassis that is much too lightweight to keep the chassis on the road surface. It only takes a ten percent incline or a light patch of gravel for the truck to leave the pavement and rollover. I know this since I was in an Explorer model from 2004 that was in a rollover. I was astounded at the rest of the information I learned after the wreck.
There have been hundreds of thousands of civil cases against Ford involving the Explorer tried in courts in the US for decades. The people involved in these trials know full well the horrific damage the vehicle has perpetrated on buyers who trusted that the vehicle they bought was safe to drive on the road. There is no possibility the people from Ford or their attorneys are unaware of the outcomes of their decisions.
I am not speaking of mechanical malfunction or expected failure. I am speaking of a cold and calculated decision to keep making blood money. It's that simple.
If blood money is considered good business since the numbers look quite nicely in favor of the corporations drawing blood, we are doomed. And this is what our God is watching us do. Misuse our astounding gift of free will to mutilate and destroy. To employ free will to the works of evil. And, yes, it all works to His glory. Because one day we are going to fully understand what it means to live in the godless world we have chosen and when we do, dripping faucets and comfortable American lifestyles on the backs of the rest of the world will come to an end. We will finally know in graphic detail how much we need God's love. To His glory.
Why you are trying and failing, I add, to turn this into some kind of Doris Day "Que Sera Sera" moment, I have no idea.
Obviously I've made a mistake but am grateful to understand what I now I understand sooner rather than later. Que Sera.
What I wrote does not negate or challenges your arguments. It’s clear that you are right, no reason to discuss it at all.
Now, can we do anything about it? Not really. Yes, you can write demands to the board of directors, media, authorities. Maybe it would work. I am going one step further. Trying to see as many angles as possible, to get more insight into the entirety of the factors which affect us.
It is very easy to do this with things and with matters which are not directly related to us. Once you remove judging, negating or anger, you start seeing more interactions, more subtle intertwining games we play.
In my experience, this is a very important training of the mind. It can give you a skill to read situations and people without the cloud of own luggage or with its weight extremely reduced. The net result is the ability to assess your relations with other people as they develop - without stupid mistakes or things which we do not really to say but we do.
It’s like using situations which I can see (read about, watch) to build up more insightful general perception, especially in reference to other people who are important in my life.
I understand what you're saying yet what you describe about sublimating or obliterating or cancelling or negating emotion(s) so as not to be negating is the very definition of psychopathy and what I meant when I used the word.
Psychopathy in a nutshell is the absence of emotion.
I don't think being exclusively ruled by emotion is advisable, but neither is bleeding emotion from the picture and basing actions purely on analytics. Both are flawed models if exclusively used and lead to tragedy because neither is the truth.
We are witnessing this now in the form of the current worldwide genocide or iatrocide. It is a fact (but not the truth) the earth and it's population would benefit from lowering the number of living humans. A decision based purely on the numbers devoid of compassion and horrifically tragic in result. That is my point about the Ford Explorer. In terms of numbers the choice to make the dangerous car is logical yet the result is horrific.
That is why I get angry about it and speak out and even rail at times. So I will say it. To balance pure logic with passion.
I think this is the skill of discernment. Which is beyond judgement. To fully feel emotion while also using reason to inform the next best step.
Seeing things as they are is not equivalent to the absence of emotions. It’s a tool, not a lifestyle.
Paraphrasing: to learn to drive a car, we need to understand a few basics. This is the recognition stage, seeing the manual gear lever as it is. I may like it or not, this is the emotional reaction, but ideally it should not affect my recognition of the nature of the mechanism. We see it so often in long-time drivers. They have a lot of habits which are ineffective and dangerous, but they persist in them because they have not spent some time on understanding why you need to signal the intention to turn before you start the maneuver. “Before” = seeing the turn cycle as it is.
Emotions are a byproduct of our interactions. Even when you are alone, you are constantly interacting, with objects (“Ah, why this knife is so sharp?”) and yourself (tripping, bumping into objects, spilling coffee) or both. They are always there, but their manifestation may be necessary, beneficial or causing harm. Not exhibiting emotions is sometimes the rule of the game (poker face), sometimes is an enforced obedience (the military), sometimes it is a way to harm others. It’s part of our interactions.
Disconnecting from emotions is not a bad thing and may help us to survive in certain situations (school exams, road rage). It is another tool, not a permanent characteristics. And the goal is to be more efficient in whatever you do. I bet you wouldn’t want to fly in an airplane whose pilot welcomes the passengers: “You know, there are so many button there, and all these digits and readings and radio talk, I feel so intimidated every time I am sitting there. I hate it.”
You (the control center) control your emotions. Always. We may have little experience with some emotions, like sadness in the cemetery, then the emotional reaction overrides your control center. But you can get accustomed to it and become an embalmer or a priest or a grave digger. It is only a matter of exposure and learning from this exposure. Does it annihilate the emotion? No, it only helps you to control your behavior in a particular environment.
As I see it, both you and me are on the same page here. We only use different words and different contexts. Still, our conversation is a very important one for me. You are helping me to better clarify what I mean and why. Thank you.
Nailed it.
On second thought… we are clearly a defective design. Unable to think, immature till the time of death, incapable of creating purposeful lasting relationships, skillful at destructing and unbalancing, finding enjoyment in forgetting, sleeping, postponing, becoming drugged and unaware as if we were immortal, we are a miracle somehow allowed to exist longer than one day.
However, if we are so defective, we must be integrally unable to create faultless products because we do not have a reference blueprint of absence of defects in our minds. Sounds absurd. Just like most things that we do on a daily basis.
My bestie has 2 children, the first identified at 4 as Autistic...
Now, the second... at 8 years of age identified on 'the spectrum'
I knew it, but refused to interfere with her life choices
Look at those odds?
BOTH children?!
In 1980's when I was a classroom teacher, we had one Autistic student in the building ( my class)
Today... that same private school has been dedicated solely for ' instruction for Autistic children since 1998...
Thank you for posting, this confirmed what my heart has been aching...
👏👏💯👍
I know this might be new concepts to some, re science is in reality, just perspective- from a certain view/hypothesis/bias/influence. It's a really good idea, whose execution is mostly flawed, biased and bought and paid for. For a very long time.
I also know that for many, the concept of a problem with the childhood vaccination schedule is so uncomfortable, purely because it opens so many "What ifs" for themselves and for their immediate community. It's hard, but those dreadful questions need to be asked.
I'm am sorry, that this is coming at the world all so fast, in the way that it is being revealed. But it has to be this way because it's reached a critical, point of no return. If this programme and it's systematic mRNA and (worse) sRNA inclusions are not stopped in the next 12months, it is literally game over. There will be no one on the planet, within 5 years that has not had sRNA, whether they consent or not.😐
So if you cannot understand why someone would voluntarily choose to NOT shoot their kid or themselves up with these "safe and effective" shots, then, respectfully, you need to sit down and do some homework. Because this has irreversible, global impacts that your actions will impact, and you, your children, and humanity, cannot afford you to take the cliffs notes version, or freaking phone it in.😐
#understandorbeaslave #itsbiggerthanyou #wearemany #wearememory #wewillnotforgive #mistakeswereNOTmade #getlocalised
Around here we say "professing to be wise, they became fools". People don't understand how difficult it is to have accomplished what has been accomplished in creation. It was extremely difficult, and such order does not arise spontaneously from lower order -- quite the opposite.
Some people seem to think they can do whatever they want with creation now and it will respond as they say it will. This is delusional.
Modern science and its storytelling have dumbed us down to this low.
Another good one from you. I live near Yellowstone and it really irks me that these wolves are allowed to be hunted.
Btw that video over the wolves is great and true.
But the basis is that first the wolves that used to be in that forest were "bonus" exterminated around the 1900's thanks to the same governments who loves the resent aka all deathvaxxes.
And then somewhere around the 1960 or so they were wondering why the forest was disappearing, and the copycats released the wolves back in it.
Back-padding them selves how great that was.
Sounds familiar huh?
They broke a circle of life and corrected it.
Deathvaxx is not to be corrected. You can try, I hope I am wrong.
Same sh@t, same @sshole. (government)
Yes you interfere with nature you change rivers, victor schauberger can tell you a lot about that.
Good article!!
Not sure I follow the analogy. More like we had a healthy ecosystem (no or few vaccines) then we introduced gazillion vaccines and now we are supposed to just let things be?
We had lots of wolves,we killed them all, and now we are wrong to reintroduce them?
We had wolves/nature (balance) we removed them (imbalance) we brought them back (balance).
We have baby/health (balance) we add chemicals (imbalance) we remove the chemicals (balance)
It's an analogy of balance, interference and imbalance.
I think we need to cull the "scientists" that work at pharma and their partners in crime government regulators, oh, and the idiot bribed politicians that mandate vaccines. The 4 F's of vaccines - Fauci, Fraud, Folly and Force.
Great article. Thank you.