I came across this video about Grey Wolves recently and it reminded me of Cane Toads.
In Feb 2022 I wrote this about Cane Toads.
Cane Toads: Australia's mRNA
They are arguably the greatest Australian ecological disaster. Basically, poisonous frogs that nothing wants to eat, because they are so poisonous, and that eat and have babies all day.
To add insult to injury, and I quote:
However, the toad was generally unsuccessful in reducing the targeted grey-backed cane beetles…in part because the beetles live at the tops of sugar cane—and cane toads are not good climbers.
There is a wonderful simplicity to why they failed. It’s beautifully poetic. It highlights our readiness to trade tomorrow for today based on the weakest of evidence and the fastest of thinking. Commercial goals run roughshod over the nuance of a few slow thinkers.
-
We all intuitively understand the dangers of feral creatures imported into delicate, complex and balanced eco systems. The average person on the street gets this point. You let loose a foreign, reproducing creature into your natural system and who knows what could happen…all hell could break loose.
-
We understand that you don’t mess about and insert foreign biological agents into balanced complex systems.
Yes, I’m talking about your body, it is the ultimate perfectly balanced and most complex of systems. What do you think happens when we insert a foreign biologic agent that spreads all over your body and turns your cells into production factories for cytotoxic spike proteins?
Watching the Grey Wolves video, I thought it’s time to make the point again.
Here is the article that the video is based on.
Wolf Reintroduction Changes Yellowstone Ecosystem
What happened, said Smith, is that the presence of wolves triggered a still-unfolding cascade effect among animals and plants-one that will take decades of research to understand.
“It is like kicking a pebble down a mountain slope where conditions were just right that a falling pebble could trigger an avalanche of change,” Smith mused.
This story is about Balance and Harmony and what happens when ignorance, hubris and incentive destroy it.
When I wrote about Cane Toads, it was in the context of the genetics.
Now I’m talking about Grey Wolves in the context of Childhood Vaccination.
It’s the same story.
Destroy the balance and reap the whirlwind.
Smith, in the article seems to think that they will need “decades of research” to understand what happened. Really?
When Grey Wolves were there, there was Balance, when they weren’t, there wasn’t, and now that they are back, there is.
How much money and research do you need for that?
Smith, in possibly my favorite line of the article says the “conditions were just right” that the falling pebble, meaning the Grey Wolves, triggered all this change.
What an amazingly inverted view.
That is like saying that the conditions in the baby were just right, after flooding the body with known toxins, that once the toxins were removed, it “triggered an avalanche of change.”
Stupidity indeed comes in many forms. Usually disguised as lettered “intelligence”.
Smith goes on to say: “What we’re finding is that ecosystems are incredibly complex.”
And to that, we Australians would say: “No shit, Sherlock.”
When the Wolves are meant to be there, you have Harmony.
When the Wolves are not meant to be there, you have Chaos. Destruction. Death. Disease.
For example, when these 38 Wolves (Chemicals) are let loose where they shouldn’t be.
How to End the Autism Epidemic
One Vaccine and One Ingredient Studied
The most shocking thing about all these studies that make Drs. Offit and Hotez so exasperated is that for all the griping that vaccines have been studied, in fact only one vaccine and one vaccine ingredient have actually ever been scientifically explored. Let me explain.
Remember that in 1962 the maximum number of vaccines a child would receive by age five was three.4 In 1983 the maximum number of vaccines a child would receive by age five was ten.5 Today that number is thirty-eight, which is nearly quadruple what it was in 1983 and more than twelve times what it was in 1962.
Today by the time a child is five years old, if his parents follow the CDC’s recommended schedule, he will have received the following vaccines, with most being given three to four separate times: (1) hepatitis B, (2) rotavirus, (3) DTP, (4) Hib, (5) pneumococcal, (6) polio, (7) flu, (8) MMR, (9) varicella, (10) hepatitis A, (11) meningococcal (only for certain groups), and (12) HPV (teenagers).6
Today at his two-month-old “well baby” visit, the average American infant will receive six separate vaccines in about fifteen minutes: hepatitis B, rotavirus, DTaP, Hib, pneumococcal, and polio. Two months later, at four months of age, most American children will again receive the same six vaccines, all administered at the same time: hepatitis B, rotavirus, DTaP, Hib, pneumococcal, and polio. Two months later, at six months of age, most American children then receive seven vaccines, all administered at the same time: hepatitis B, rotavirus, DTaP, Hib, pneumococcal, polio, and flu. By six months of age most American children receive nineteen vaccines in three visits to the doctor. Many kids also receive a birth dose of hepatitis B, boosting this number to twenty vaccines.
So of the first twenty vaccines given to American babies, how many have been studied for their relationship to autism? None. That’s right, because only one vaccine, the MMR, has ever been studied for its relationship to autism. The MMR is a vaccine first administered to American children at thirteen months of age. But what about the two-month, four-month, and six-month “well baby” visits during which children receive so many vaccines? The truth is none of those vaccines have ever been studied or considered for their relationship to autism, so no one has any idea. This would be like trying to identify the source of a plane crash, suspecting mechanical failure, solely analyzing one of the wings, and then declaring the entire airplane free of culpability.
Separate from looking at one vaccine (the MMR), studies have also been published looking at a single ingredient within vaccines—thimerosal—a vaccine preservative comprised of ethylmercury. According to the CDC, there are thirty- eight separate ingredients present in two or more vaccines on the American schedule. While it certainly made sense to start the search by looking at thimerosal, given that it contains a known neurotoxin, that still leaves thirty- seven ingredients that have never been analyzed. David Kirby, former New York Times investigative journalist and the award-winning author of Evidence of Harm, is the only journalist I have seen who actually understands the extreme limitations of the completed science, and here’s how he explains it:
To begin with, it is unscientific and perilously misleading for anyone to assert that “vaccines and autism” have been studied and that no link has been found. That’s because the 16 or so studies constantly cited by critics of the hypothesis have examined just one vaccine and one vaccine ingredient.… It is illogical to exonerate all vaccines, all vaccine ingredients, and the total US vaccine program as a whole, based solely on a handful of epidemiological studies of just one vaccine and one vaccine ingredient. It is akin to claiming that every form of animal protein is beneficial to people, when all you have studied is fish.7
Figure 3.1. Vaccine–Autism Science: What’s Been Studied? Data from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Here’s a complete list of every vaccine American children receive. I’ve underlined the one that has been studied for its relationship to autism: hepatitis B, rotavirus, DTaP, Hib, pneumococcal, polio, flu, MMR, varicella, hepatitis A, meningococcal, and HPV (teenagers).
And here are all thirty-eight vaccine ingredients.
Once again I’ve underlined the one that has been studied for its relationship to autism: 2-Phenoxyethanol, albumin, aluminum hydroxide, aluminum potassium sulfate, amino acids, ammonium sulfate, antibiotics, bovine components, bovine serum, chick embryo cell culture, culture, detergent, dextrose, enzymes, formaldehyde, gelatin, glutaraldehyde, human components, human embryonic cells, lactalbumin hydrolysate, medium 199, mineral salts, monosodium l-glutamate, phenol, phosphate, polymixin B sulfate, polysorbate-80, potassium aluminum sulfate, potassium chloride, potassium phosphate monobasic, sodium borate, sodium chloride, sodium phosphate dibasic, sorbitol, soy peptone, sucrose, thimerosal, vero (monkey kidney) cells, and yeast protein.8
Do you think it’s reasonable to say, “Case closed; we’ve studied vaccines and autism”? (See figure 3.1.)
Thank You for Being Part of Our Community
Your presence here is greatly valued. If you've found the content interesting and useful, please consider supporting it through a paid subscription. While all our resources are freely available, your subscription plays a vital role. It helps in covering some of the operational costs and supports the continuation of this independent research and journalism work. Please make full use of our Free Libraries.
Discover Our Free Libraries:
Unbekoming Interview Library: Dive into a world of thought-provoking interviews across a spectrum of fascinating topics.
Unbekoming Book Summary Library: Explore concise summaries of groundbreaking books, distilled for efficient understanding.
Hear From Our Subscribers: Check out the [Subscriber Testimonials] to see the impact of this Substack on our readers.
Share Your Story or Nominate Someone to Interview:
I'm always in search of compelling narratives and insightful individuals to feature. Whether it's personal experiences with the vaccination or other medical interventions, or if you know someone whose story and expertise could enlighten our community, I'd love to hear from you. If you have a story to share, insights to offer, or wish to suggest an interviewee who can add significant value to our discussions, please don't hesitate to get in touch at unbekoming@outlook.com. Your contributions and suggestions are invaluable in enriching our understanding and conversation.
Resources for the Community:
For those affected by COVID vaccine injury, consider the FLCCC Post-Vaccine Treatment as a resource.
Discover 'Baseline Human Health': Watch and share this insightful 21-minute video to understand and appreciate the foundations of health without vaccination.
Books as Tools: Consider recommending 'Official Stories' by Liam Scheff to someone seeking understanding. Start with a “safe” chapter such as Electricity and Shakespeare and they might find their way to vaccination.
Your support, whether through subscriptions, sharing stories, or spreading knowledge, is what keeps this community thriving. Thank you for being an integral part of this journey.
There are two morals to this story.
The stupidity of the so-called scientists goes beyond infiniteness. With their minds restricted to small cells, called laboratories, and limited to the miniature images, miniature experiments and miniature theories, they believe to hold the keys to the secrets of the Existence. They even believe that they are right - despite living in their miniature theoretical world and never going out to observe Life.
They even believe that their miniature-term experiments authorize them to impose their pseudo-authority on others and impact real life for years or generations. Their greed is so strong that it limits the vision to miniature “studies”, and they do not even consider testing their theories over three generations as a minimum - which is a common sense expectation that long-term effects may become visible.
They have converted their beliefs into principles of “science”, thus contaminating the true search for life-supporting improvements for as long as they reproduce themselves within the same paradigm. In effect, they have doomed the whole population of the Earth to suffer the burden of their false assumptions, unproven theories, fantasy concepts and profit-driven operating procedures.
This is the real pandemic, uncontainable and self-perpetuating. They have made themselves basically unaccountable and immune to liability in the name of the search for the “science” - for which the whole humanity is paying with their health and life. They have even removed the basic safeguards from their “science” by hiring their own peers to vouch for the legitimacy of their theories. To protect themselves and their peers from any liability, they have further invented the system of publications which refrain from true scientific discussion, thus reinforcing the power grip of profit-driven stakeholders and rejecting any dissenting voices.
In the age of immense technological progress, we have turned from true scientific search of the Middle Ages to perpetuating tested business models which prevent any changes to the status quo. “The science is dead,” as would Nietzsche say.
My bestie has 2 children, the first identified at 4 as Autistic...
Now, the second... at 8 years of age identified on 'the spectrum'
I knew it, but refused to interfere with her life choices
Look at those odds?
BOTH children?!
In 1980's when I was a classroom teacher, we had one Autistic student in the building ( my class)
Today... that same private school has been dedicated solely for ' instruction for Autistic children since 1998...
Thank you for posting, this confirmed what my heart has been aching...