The link between the “inner” life and the “outer” manifestation is obvious. It’s always there. And it always plays big. Every child knows it when the school is so boring that it actually hurts - and escape from this damaging environment is the only reasonable option. Every employable adult knows it when daily work is so monotonous, absurd and devoid of any personal incentive that “catching” an illness (real or fake) is the only acceptable way to have a healthy rest away from the dumb workplace, dead walking colleagues or bosses who have never grown out.
The body is chemistry. Whatever you do comes from chemical reactions and produces chemical reactions. Every body. Animals know it and are tuned up to detect weakness - physical or mental or emotional - and to go after this easy prey. Humans do the same. Watch stupid things on your “smart” toys and you will quickly become vulnerable to natural illness (due to self-damaging your body) and external attacks by professionals who can recognize a weak person in an instant - and take away his/her goods, money, dignity or future.
Do things against yourself, speak what you don’t mean, agree to what you know is bad for you, pursue what you cannot afford, follow false dreams and ideas spread by others, and you will become a living laboratory of psychosomatic issues.
GNM is a brilliant venture into natural life. Complex and unnecessarily pretending to be “scientific”, but highly useful.
If you want easier ways, try Donna Eden and folks working in similar fields of energy medicine. Try Caroline Myss, an absolutely amazing wonderful lady who will open your eyes and soul all at once. Try Wayne Dyer, a unique legend. Try rebirthing, the only tool that could literally transform your life into a living life in a very short time.
No motivational speakers, no fortune promises. You have to experiment on yourself. You will have to expose yourself to yourself, including all those stupidities that you habitually do to cause self-harm and to take revenge on others. It won’t be easy, initially. And if it is easy, you may be sure that you walk a wrong path.
When I had cancer and I learned about Dr. Hamer, I realized, that if I did chemo and radiation... I would have sympathy from the community, also I could go on long term disability. It was a choice. Or, I could do supportive things to finish the healing that my body was already doing and and get back to work and looking after my family. It was actually a tough choice. I really wanted some support and empathy, but I knew that road was toxic and the risk was too great. Imagine how many people could avoid the suffering if they considered their psyche before they embark on the standard cancer treatments. Tragic really.
"Pretending to be scientific" ? Only someone that has not studied who Hamer was, what he achieved, and what he proved, medically and scientifically, let alone been savvy enough to comprehend his Five Biological Laws could make such an obtuse statement.
“Science” is supposedly an implied determinant of something a) advanced, b) truthful, c) verified, d) working, e) beyond criticism, and so on… The public is expected to recognize “scientific” as “good, great and no questions asked”. Scientific measurements are perfectly accurate - even though we have no means to measure the speed of light (as an example). Scientific theories are to be trusted and respected - even though they are mere theories and have no reasonable rationale to be based on. “Scientific” is a new “saint” - believe, obey and respect.
Fortunately, the years 2020-2024 proved that the peak science (medicine in general, genetics and virology in particular) is only a bunch of out-of-focus fantasies, freely skewed to fit the agenda at hand. And then whey do not fit, definitions and whole chapters of scientific knowledge are changed to make all things look perfect again.
The areas of knowledge with deep, ancient roots, like astrology or energy medicine (the underlying and functional Oriental “science”) have never pretended to be “scientific”. There was no need. Well, it was the case before the Western “science” put all native, nature-based systems of knowledge at the very bottom of human experience and hailed them bad, wrong, atheistic, childish, unfounded or primitive.
At that time, genius people like Hamer started to model their systems in a “scientific” way, adding complex terminology, twisting words, creating unnecessarily tweaked relationships between ingredients of their knowledge, and laying down structure-based “access” to their new approaches. Modern psychology is a true master in this field: you can label me as having a obsessive scientific malfunctioning distancing syndrome.
These relatively new - and often truly brilliant approaches to human experience of Life - waste a lot of energy on modeling themselves after the “scientific” template. They often add degrees, diplomas, layered courses, complicated charts and tables, and a lot of disclaimers (obviously), and often put high price tags on their “inventions”. This is exactly how great insights become compromised and slowly decay. Obviously, they do it in fear of being called “superstitious” or “unscientific” - thus being subconsciously banned from the market by creating negative perception in the public.
Yes, GNM is not scientific. It is far better than science - although it uses scientific modeling. Unnecessarily.
"I know that I am in prison, sentenced on 9-9-1997 to 19 months of imprisonment, for having spread the scientific truth for all the people to whom New Medicine can still be of help. I am holding it without protest, for having, literally, "talked three times with a patient of New Medicine, free of charge". From which it follows that for three times it is one consultation, three treatments."
"In the New Medicine there are only 5 biological laws that are scientific and verifiable at any time. They have to be valid, in a naturalistic sense, for each particular case and for each particular symptom, also of secondary disease (which classical medicine still erroneously calls "metastasis")."
"Since September 11, 1998, the New Medicine has been officially confirmed according to the verification carried out on September 8 and 9, 1998 at the University of Trnava (Bratislava, Western Slovakia). The document was signed by the prorector (professor of mathematics), by the dean (professor of oncology) and by the president of the scientific commission (professor of psychiatry).
For this reason, the competence of the signatories cannot be questioned. For 17 years, Western European universities, in particular the University of Tübingen (Germany), have categorically refused to carry out a similar scientific verification."
"The New Medicine is not a doctrine of faith, as are the dogmas of the dominant medicine, for the lack of respect of which one can suffer the prohibition to practice a profession, be psychiatrized or branded forever, sent to prison, even if it is for a global biological vision that can be scientifically proven and reproduced at any time and with any case."
Aside from any aspects stated by you, and the fate of GNM or Hamer, or its being just or unjust, good or bad or whatever…
1. “Medicine” is an established international field with solid firewalls and legal foundations. If I were to “discover” some new ground-breaking approach(es) which can (or not) solve persistent problems of the humanity (already explored, managed and protected by other established cults), I would never use their territory to advertise and promote my discovery. Even if I were a PhD in 28 fields of traditional medicine. It’s like you cannot claim to be able to “treat” people if you do not have a relevant, legally valid authorization from local governing bodies to do so. Clearly, it then becomes an open challenge to a giant multi-trillion business venture. Whose lawyers will gladly be paid for throwing off that almost negligible attack. However, I respect Hamer and GNM people for their assertions and practice.
2. Being accepted by one person (university, country) is not proof that the approach is good, beneficial, worthwhile or whatever. Subjectivity of decisions is the power of all people in power. Where some can see advantages, others see threats. All are right, paradoxically.
3. Declaring that human physiology is governed (or manageable) by 5 rules only is a daring statement. It is also a complete absurd, which is clear when you understand that we can perceive and operate within a very very very minute part of the “reality”. We can hardly function within the visible light electromagnetic spectrum bandwidth - and the remaining 99.9999% of Life is completely beyond our grasp or even awareness. For this reason GNM would be an honest approach if it called itself an “attempt” at understanding the human being, and not a “scientific” “medicine”. Even though I find these 5 laws accurate and valuable in exploring our existence.
I understand that people invest a lot of energy, beliefs and time into glorifying selected narrow aspects of Life, obviously better than others, or even best or unique or one of its kind. We simply love to be different (= better) from others. Pure marketing :-)
The latter: not recommending, only pointing out the existence of. Along with 365 other methods which I omitted to save space.
All in all: my comments are neutral to NGM. The point is to enhance the understanding of how we (all) choose to prefer some things over others where we a) have little knowledge of either, b) could benefit from taking advantage of both, c) have too limited and fragmentary perception of Life to really boast about anything.
On my part, I am trying to give other readers more aspects to look for and expand their understanding, hoping that it will be inspiring to them.
Instead of defending "my" position or finding "faults" with your responses.
While The Germanic medicine may seem complex at first glance, it's essential to recognize that its foundations ARE deeply scientific, accurate, and grounded in the precise mapping of the brain's connections to the body's organs. Dr. Hamer's work has shown time and again that specific areas of the brain correspond directly to specific organs, with CT scans providing undeniable evidence of this relationship. This accuracy is precisely why GHK faces such heavy opposition from mainstream medicine—its potential to challenge the conventional medical industry, which profits immensely from treatments like chemotherapy and morphine, is enormous. Unfortunately, powerful interests (Zionists) have worked to suppress this knowledge, keeping the public in the dark about its life-saving potential. While you may find “easier” to learn methods you will miss the actual cause of symptoms in the body and stay on the search for things that may or may not work. There is no experimentation, no guesswork with GHK, this is in fact biological laws of nature.
Well said. In a world less perfect than ours, GNM would take over the collective medical mind in an instant. Just imagine yourself, a true doctor who provides the patient with usable and actionable curing tools for self-work right on the first consultation. The competition continue to write out prescriptions and drain the pockets of their patients. And you are providing tangible steps to change bad outcomes into the expected positive health status.
Still, our world is far more perfect. It prevents the tyranny of doctors, traditional or GNM-educated, by leaving the control over health in the hands of the patient. And patients love being ill, falling ill, not recovering or acquiring new medical challenges once old ones are worn out. It’s more than addiction. It’s almost a perfect symbiosis.
Which is why ineffective methods will always be favored and will always gain traction among the leading elites - because they appeal to the patient. They will not provide actual solutions which render the particular ailment (problem) helpless. The patient is not threatened with the inevitable departure of their favorite associate: an excuse to not live a happy, problem-free life.
Let’s be sincere for a while. Imagine a “Magic Pill” sold in every pharmacy for $0.99. That pill removes headaches for ever. One pill. The pill is available in variants, and one of them removes tiredness for ever. Again, one pill. Another removes colds and flu, one pill, lifelong warranty. Will you buy this pill? Will you believe its scientifically proven success record?
We become so accustomed to our pains and complaining and time “free from normal life” that most of us will never try GNM or other methods which provide, promise and deliver. As if we had a built-in early warning system against effective solutions.
For the same reason we waste about 20 best years of life on “learning” stuff that can be effectively taught within 5 years. Oh, yes, teachers will lose their livelihood then… Scientists will lose their sources of income if they delivered effective inventions. Doctors will lose their positions if they actually treated their patients. Leaders will never win any followers if they really delivered what they promise.
These mechanisms are the core source of our problems, with health or other. GNM will not treat them. No system can treat them. There is only one way to resolve these problems: through personal transformation. Not a popular way…
Correct. The organism is designed to be self healing. A full comprehension of GHk will liberate you from the clutches of the white coats and Big Pharma, alternative health care, orthodoxy diets, vitamins, snake oil salesmen. And you will comprehend why you have a headache, why you have a pain, and become sovereign of your own body and mind.
The murder of Dirk Hamer by the last prince of Italy, Vittorio Emanuele, Prince of Naples, is depicted in the Netflix docuseries The King Who Never Was. Sean Hross, who has a wealth of knowledge on the Black Nobility, talks about this incident in this video: https://youtu.be/pZqUY5IDRu4?si=U6HM3Hh84mMNoGTN .
The King Who Never Was was stunning, and heartbreaking. I was so shocked it was mostly dedicated to Dirk, and the Hamer family, even though they made a vague attempt to vilify the good doctor.
The link you posted, he is totally wrong about Adolf Hitler.
Thanks for sharing this 😊 A friend of mine had given me a book on this but unfortunately I hadn’t gotten around to reading it much. I’m seeing a lot of these patterns in my own life. In fact, I’m quite certain one of my biggest health issues (fibroids) is strongly related to traumatic experiences in my life. It’s a topic worth looking into more!
I am thrilled to see this! I studied homeopathy for 25 years. These German thinkers are amazing! Dr. Hahneman (1755-1843) did not use a remedy to treat a disease, he matched the mental and physical symptoms, to a proving, with the interest to trigger a healing. The body healed.
Dr. Hamer (1935-2017) is this century's most brilliant medical mind. All of the diseases we experience is our *body* dealing with shock and trauma. Only vaccine injury, poisoning and severe nutritional deficiencies cover the remaining illnesses.
Why do some woman have breast cancer on strictly one side or the other? Even late stage, only one side if the cancer is "in the blood"? It is the conflict and their handedness! One sided breast cancer is a conflict worry with either their child or their partner. Which, with most women is their primary concern in life. Those with cancer in both breasts, have both conflicts partner and child. What a tragedy that these women are not in a position to heal. And worse, the trauma of diagnosis and treatment is more cancer, everywhere! Lung cancer and bone cancer.
German New Medicine is the only thing that explains it all. It trumps all the other methods and modalities I have seen.
I love this simple video of a cow, that developed breast cancer. This cow would normally be put down. Intead, the farmer knew his animals and knew German medicine. The cancer grew, was absolutely disgusting and ulcerous and then it healed and fell off. Because the conflict resolved. In terms of biology, are we any different? But dairy farmers are not going to pay billions for chemo. Watch https://ghk-academy.info/testimonial-breast-cancer-in-a-cow/
This topic is special to me, I had a late stage cancer. I researched everything. The type of cancer I had was not in my family. I had none of the risks. It was also very fast and unusual for my age group. Nothing made since. Then I was invited to a cancer talk and Dr. Hamer's work was introduced. Click!! The cancer I had, was a direct result of a personal conflict that I had resolved. Which freed me from submitting to chemo and radiation. There was no reason to poison or torture myself, the conflict was resolved and would never return. And I have passed 5 years, there has been no return. But I also know that I have to manage my stress and my reaction to conflict and shock, because if I take everything so seriously, I could trigger a new "healing" or biological process. Much better to bless others and be at peace, than to draw out and extend an issue. Letting stuff go... happier life.
This makes so much sense to me. I was lucky to be allergic to almost all medicines prescribed by my physicians so that my body was forced to heal without them. My body knew better what was good for me.
Allergies, or anything chronic, was scientifically proven by Hamer to be a hanging healing. Meaning, the SBS (Special/Sensible Biological Program) could not complete because the organism keeps stepping on a track.
A track is anything in the environment at the moment of the DHS (an unexpected, isolating event, that caught us off the back foot), recorded by the psyche. For instance, dust, pollen, a food, milk, a person, a place etc. If one cannot identify the track, the organism remains trapped between the two phases of the SBS, and remains in a permanent state of conflict active, presenting chronic symptoms.
Our bodies are designed to heal on their own. Mother Nature makes no mistakes.
I have experienced the 'occurrence of symptoms during the healing phase' on various occasions, in myself and others, and have often wondered about this... GNM is offering a convincing explanation.
However, there is an error in this interview. Homœopathic medicine is listed as a method aimed at 'getting rid of symptoms'. That's incorrect. Samuel Hahnemann (founder of homœopathy) had his own theories about causation of disease (so-called miasms), and he was writing about the importance of considering the 'mental state' of the patient over 200 years ago. Classical homœopathy doesn't treat the symptoms but takes the whole person and their life story into account.
Whilst that is correct, people only ever reach for their homeopathy or homeopathist, when they are presenting symptoms.
The quote you refer to:
"They all do not know the cause of disease and focus exclusively on getting rid of the symptoms."
That is correct, homeopathy does not know the cause.
I have spent the last 6 years studying GHk. It is difficult to let go of other paradigms of healing. I was very attached to homeopathy, and plant medicine. But once you have grasped the Five Biological Laws, and lived it, and breathed it, you can finally let go of those attachments.
True. That's because most people try to apply homœopathy in the allopathic way. They don't understand the principles. The fundamental truth Hahnemann discovered and attempted to share was that human beings are self-healing organisms. Not so different from 'German New Medicine'.
"I investigated the PSA test as our friend was prescribed big pharma to “keep his PSA levels down.” The white coat witch doctors believe that the PSA levels indicate there is cancer, and testosterone increases the cancer cells. I already knew one of his drugs was going to be a testosterone blocker, literally a chemical castration. I got the names of the drugs and researched them because he was convinced the medication was causing his night sweats, but I knew that was because he has the TB symbiont working on him. He is a classic KTC (Kidney Collecting Tubule/s open with the refugee/abandonment/feeling left out/don’t know where I belong) case.
BOOM!! The PSA test was invented in 1970 by Richard Ablin, PhD. He later wrote a book called The Great Prostate Hoax: How Big Medicine Hijacked the PSA Test and Caused a Public Health Disaster. A la Kary Mullis’ PCR test and the HIV/AIDS and Covid scam. Mullis spent 20+ years of his life, until his death in December 2019, speaking out about the misuse of his invention, the PCR test:
“There are many things you can do with PCR, but using it as a diagnostic tool is not one of them”
Ablin explains that his PSA test is not a cancer-specific biomarker, and he asserts that the use of the PSA as a diagnostic test has crippled millions of healthy men, afflicting them with incontinence and impotence. With the 78% false-positive rate, and being wrong 80% of the time, he also covers what it cost the biotech companies to approach the FDA for approval: one million dollars, suggesting that there was a pay-off. Albin said:
“How else could they approve a test with an 80% false-positive rate?”
Wow!! Great to meet you. I love the blog series. Also, I should not be shocked about the PSA but the abuse of that test makes sense. How people are terrified and tortured by "medicine" is a crime of such magnitude that only God can bring to justice.
“All so-called diseases have a special biological meaning. While we used to regard Mother Nature as fallible and had the audacity to believe that She constantly made mistakes and caused breakdowns (malignant, senseless, degenerative cancerous growths, etc.) we can now see, as the scales fall from our eyes, that it was our ignorance and pride that were and are the only foolishness in our cosmos. Blinded, we brought upon ourselves this senseless, soulless and brutal medicine. Full of wonder, we can now understand for the first time that Nature is orderly and that every occurrence in Nature is meaningful, even in the framework of the whole. Nothing in Nature is meaningless, malignant or diseased.”
I recently came across this German new medicine but had not read much about it. Some explanations are appealing, but the part about flu and colds does not convince me. Years ago my ex came home sick from work after sitting a whole day next to a sick colleague. 2 hours later, I got it too (I had not been outside in cold and dreary weather - it was nice and sunny). We were sick for a week without appetite and feeling aches all over. Does not fit in the explanation at all. I think some illnesses DO transmit, anyone who had this happen, will probably agree with me. But for illnesses like cancer I think their theory might be a lot closer to the truth than the cut-burn-poison doctors, which have proven they cannot heal but a handful of the millions.
Why bother to comment on the GHk if you "had not read much about it." ?
Your description of what happened to you fits the Hamer paradigm perfectly. When the organism is without appetite it is in the conflict active phase.
Sitting next to a sick colleague, who really ought to have been at home, in bed resting, gave you a scent (stink) conflict. That is how "colds" "flu" "viruses" get spread around, it is your psyche, programmed by mainstream medicine and Big Pharma, who push Pasteur's lies and deception, reacting to someone else showing symptoms.
I used to believe that as well. It's the exception to that rule that behooves me. 3 people in a family get sick and the other 2 don't, why? Looking at the individuals involved, their eating, exercise, sleeping habits etc., I think a common denominator can be found.
Perhaps off topic, I brought my family to Mexico one year. My mother and I were bulletproof, while all the others got what was called Montezuma's Revenge and spent almost the entire trip in close proximity to a toilet. I ate street tacos and local (bathtub) beer and no ill effects. 6 out of 8 got sick. The other 2 sailed thru it all. Get my point?
Exactly. My point being there has never been a study that has proven transmission of a medical condition from a sick person to a well person, and believe me, they have tried everything. It is said, and I believe it, that Pasteur finally admitted he was wrong about transmission, on his deathbed. Didn't matter. The Rockefeller's ran with the Pasteurian Germ Theory and convinced people to wear masks for a virus never proven to exist.
Many alternative therapies were invented by Germans. This is quite an intriguing phenomenon.
I have a scientific framework for evaluating the effectiveness of natural or alternative cancer therapies:
Which alternative therapies are effective? I believe almost none are, though I'm not saying they lack value entirely. The reasoning for my judgment that alternative therapies are ineffective for cancer is as follows: In the U.S., any therapy using a new active substance, if submitted as a new cancer drug, would automatically receive a five-year market exclusivity from the FDA. If it's a new indication for a known drug, there would be a three-year exclusivity period. This represents a significant revenue opportunity. If there were an effective alternative cancer therapy, it would easily pass clinical trials. If it cannot pass clinical trials, then it is naturally ineffective against cancer. Passing clinical trials would grant market exclusivity and the potential for substantial income. Yet, why haven't we seen any alternative therapy undergo such a transformation?
Clearly, there hasn't been any. Considering future possibilities, if an alternative therapy remains an alternative for an extended period, I can confidently conclude that it is ineffective for cancer.
I suppose your premise would be valid if BigPharma was actually interested in curing cancer. My theory is they have absolutely no interest in finding a cure. There is much more profit in keeping people sick and reliant on their traditional “treatments” such as chemo, radiation, surgery, and other exorbitantly expensive drugs. Proof of this general concept played out in the COVID era when there were safe, effective, affordable treatments (Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, Vitamin D) that were censored/suppressed to make way for expensive, harmful drugs (Remdesivir, monoclonal antibodies) and cancer is no different. If it doesn’t have the potential to increase their bank account into perpetuity, they are not interested.
Obtaining new drug approval is not monopolized by big pharmaceutical companies. Take ivermectin, for example. We know the FLCCC Alliance is currently advocating for its use in cancer treatment. Organizations like the FLCCC can easily initiate clinical trials. How can big pharma suppress this? Even if you're not a big pharma company, if you're a billionaire, you can still start such trials. For a drug like ivermectin, a Phase 1 clinical trial may only require around $1 million. Once past Phase 1, it can be used under compassionate use for late-stage cancer patients in the U.S. Even for a Phase 3 trial, the total investment wouldn't exceed $100 million. If it withstands Phase 3 trials and gets approved, the revenue during the three-year market exclusivity period would far exceed the $100 million investment cost.
Is it really only possible for big pharma to come up with $100 million? Additionally, big pharma isn't a single entity; fierce competition among them. If one realizes a potential alternative therapy or for cancer that's superior to existing treatments, that company would surely race to advance its approval process.
Some people swear by chemical drugs. My body can not have most of them, and I have to fall back on herbs and homeopathic. But if chemicals help for you, I will be the last one to say no.
Cancer patients, especially those with advanced stages, often turn to alternative therapies. Some may try dozens of them. The main reason people explore these options is that conventional treatments for late-stage cancer are often ineffective. Here, I analyze the ineffectiveness of alternative therapies from a scientific perspective, without claiming that chemotherapy is superior. In fact, I encourage patients to explore alternative therapies and not rely solely on chemotherapy.
However, I believe that future alternative therapies could surpass traditional treatments and successfully cure patients. I am the inventor of the intratumoral chlorine dioxide injection therapy, which is not yet approved, though I am advocating for its approval. Currently, I guide late-stage breast cancer patients in self-administering this treatment at home, which is one of the few legal avenues available. Three late-stage breast cancer patients are now following my guidance, and they consistently show significant results: more than a 50% reduction in tumor size within one month and over 70% within two months. I am confident that this therapy can pass FDA clinical trials and soon transition from an alternative to a standard therapy.
Hi! I appreciate where you are coming from, because you have been researching and treating cancer with much resistance from the medical industry.
But you must examine the evidence of German New Medicine to understand ***why*** cancer happens, also why "good treatments" fail.
Think about the times your protocol failed, why? Did they not follow instructions or did they start too late? But then think about your successes? Did they 100% follow instructions and start early enough? What is the evidence? I think you will agree, the mental condition and psyche of the patient, has a much bigger role. And German New Medicine provides the biological basis for understanding, with many 1,000s of patients.
The link between the “inner” life and the “outer” manifestation is obvious. It’s always there. And it always plays big. Every child knows it when the school is so boring that it actually hurts - and escape from this damaging environment is the only reasonable option. Every employable adult knows it when daily work is so monotonous, absurd and devoid of any personal incentive that “catching” an illness (real or fake) is the only acceptable way to have a healthy rest away from the dumb workplace, dead walking colleagues or bosses who have never grown out.
The body is chemistry. Whatever you do comes from chemical reactions and produces chemical reactions. Every body. Animals know it and are tuned up to detect weakness - physical or mental or emotional - and to go after this easy prey. Humans do the same. Watch stupid things on your “smart” toys and you will quickly become vulnerable to natural illness (due to self-damaging your body) and external attacks by professionals who can recognize a weak person in an instant - and take away his/her goods, money, dignity or future.
Do things against yourself, speak what you don’t mean, agree to what you know is bad for you, pursue what you cannot afford, follow false dreams and ideas spread by others, and you will become a living laboratory of psychosomatic issues.
GNM is a brilliant venture into natural life. Complex and unnecessarily pretending to be “scientific”, but highly useful.
If you want easier ways, try Donna Eden and folks working in similar fields of energy medicine. Try Caroline Myss, an absolutely amazing wonderful lady who will open your eyes and soul all at once. Try Wayne Dyer, a unique legend. Try rebirthing, the only tool that could literally transform your life into a living life in a very short time.
No motivational speakers, no fortune promises. You have to experiment on yourself. You will have to expose yourself to yourself, including all those stupidities that you habitually do to cause self-harm and to take revenge on others. It won’t be easy, initially. And if it is easy, you may be sure that you walk a wrong path.
When I had cancer and I learned about Dr. Hamer, I realized, that if I did chemo and radiation... I would have sympathy from the community, also I could go on long term disability. It was a choice. Or, I could do supportive things to finish the healing that my body was already doing and and get back to work and looking after my family. It was actually a tough choice. I really wanted some support and empathy, but I knew that road was toxic and the risk was too great. Imagine how many people could avoid the suffering if they considered their psyche before they embark on the standard cancer treatments. Tragic really.
"Pretending to be scientific" ? Only someone that has not studied who Hamer was, what he achieved, and what he proved, medically and scientifically, let alone been savvy enough to comprehend his Five Biological Laws could make such an obtuse statement.
Dr. Hamer was the most scientific. He used evidence to shape and prove his theories. Unlike the rest of science, which cherry picks.
“Science” is supposedly an implied determinant of something a) advanced, b) truthful, c) verified, d) working, e) beyond criticism, and so on… The public is expected to recognize “scientific” as “good, great and no questions asked”. Scientific measurements are perfectly accurate - even though we have no means to measure the speed of light (as an example). Scientific theories are to be trusted and respected - even though they are mere theories and have no reasonable rationale to be based on. “Scientific” is a new “saint” - believe, obey and respect.
Fortunately, the years 2020-2024 proved that the peak science (medicine in general, genetics and virology in particular) is only a bunch of out-of-focus fantasies, freely skewed to fit the agenda at hand. And then whey do not fit, definitions and whole chapters of scientific knowledge are changed to make all things look perfect again.
The areas of knowledge with deep, ancient roots, like astrology or energy medicine (the underlying and functional Oriental “science”) have never pretended to be “scientific”. There was no need. Well, it was the case before the Western “science” put all native, nature-based systems of knowledge at the very bottom of human experience and hailed them bad, wrong, atheistic, childish, unfounded or primitive.
At that time, genius people like Hamer started to model their systems in a “scientific” way, adding complex terminology, twisting words, creating unnecessarily tweaked relationships between ingredients of their knowledge, and laying down structure-based “access” to their new approaches. Modern psychology is a true master in this field: you can label me as having a obsessive scientific malfunctioning distancing syndrome.
These relatively new - and often truly brilliant approaches to human experience of Life - waste a lot of energy on modeling themselves after the “scientific” template. They often add degrees, diplomas, layered courses, complicated charts and tables, and a lot of disclaimers (obviously), and often put high price tags on their “inventions”. This is exactly how great insights become compromised and slowly decay. Obviously, they do it in fear of being called “superstitious” or “unscientific” - thus being subconsciously banned from the market by creating negative perception in the public.
Yes, GNM is not scientific. It is far better than science - although it uses scientific modeling. Unnecessarily.
"I know that I am in prison, sentenced on 9-9-1997 to 19 months of imprisonment, for having spread the scientific truth for all the people to whom New Medicine can still be of help. I am holding it without protest, for having, literally, "talked three times with a patient of New Medicine, free of charge". From which it follows that for three times it is one consultation, three treatments."
"In the New Medicine there are only 5 biological laws that are scientific and verifiable at any time. They have to be valid, in a naturalistic sense, for each particular case and for each particular symptom, also of secondary disease (which classical medicine still erroneously calls "metastasis")."
"Since September 11, 1998, the New Medicine has been officially confirmed according to the verification carried out on September 8 and 9, 1998 at the University of Trnava (Bratislava, Western Slovakia). The document was signed by the prorector (professor of mathematics), by the dean (professor of oncology) and by the president of the scientific commission (professor of psychiatry).
For this reason, the competence of the signatories cannot be questioned. For 17 years, Western European universities, in particular the University of Tübingen (Germany), have categorically refused to carry out a similar scientific verification."
"The New Medicine is not a doctrine of faith, as are the dogmas of the dominant medicine, for the lack of respect of which one can suffer the prohibition to practice a profession, be psychiatrized or branded forever, sent to prison, even if it is for a global biological vision that can be scientifically proven and reproduced at any time and with any case."
Hamer disagreed with you, evidently.
Aside from any aspects stated by you, and the fate of GNM or Hamer, or its being just or unjust, good or bad or whatever…
1. “Medicine” is an established international field with solid firewalls and legal foundations. If I were to “discover” some new ground-breaking approach(es) which can (or not) solve persistent problems of the humanity (already explored, managed and protected by other established cults), I would never use their territory to advertise and promote my discovery. Even if I were a PhD in 28 fields of traditional medicine. It’s like you cannot claim to be able to “treat” people if you do not have a relevant, legally valid authorization from local governing bodies to do so. Clearly, it then becomes an open challenge to a giant multi-trillion business venture. Whose lawyers will gladly be paid for throwing off that almost negligible attack. However, I respect Hamer and GNM people for their assertions and practice.
2. Being accepted by one person (university, country) is not proof that the approach is good, beneficial, worthwhile or whatever. Subjectivity of decisions is the power of all people in power. Where some can see advantages, others see threats. All are right, paradoxically.
3. Declaring that human physiology is governed (or manageable) by 5 rules only is a daring statement. It is also a complete absurd, which is clear when you understand that we can perceive and operate within a very very very minute part of the “reality”. We can hardly function within the visible light electromagnetic spectrum bandwidth - and the remaining 99.9999% of Life is completely beyond our grasp or even awareness. For this reason GNM would be an honest approach if it called itself an “attempt” at understanding the human being, and not a “scientific” “medicine”. Even though I find these 5 laws accurate and valuable in exploring our existence.
I understand that people invest a lot of energy, beliefs and time into glorifying selected narrow aspects of Life, obviously better than others, or even best or unique or one of its kind. We simply love to be different (= better) from others. Pure marketing :-)
And all that from someone who hasn't studied Hamer's discoveries, but recommends Rebirthing....
Exactly. Except:
The former: you don't know that.
The latter: not recommending, only pointing out the existence of. Along with 365 other methods which I omitted to save space.
All in all: my comments are neutral to NGM. The point is to enhance the understanding of how we (all) choose to prefer some things over others where we a) have little knowledge of either, b) could benefit from taking advantage of both, c) have too limited and fragmentary perception of Life to really boast about anything.
On my part, I am trying to give other readers more aspects to look for and expand their understanding, hoping that it will be inspiring to them.
Instead of defending "my" position or finding "faults" with your responses.
This makes our conversation valuable - thank you.
While The Germanic medicine may seem complex at first glance, it's essential to recognize that its foundations ARE deeply scientific, accurate, and grounded in the precise mapping of the brain's connections to the body's organs. Dr. Hamer's work has shown time and again that specific areas of the brain correspond directly to specific organs, with CT scans providing undeniable evidence of this relationship. This accuracy is precisely why GHK faces such heavy opposition from mainstream medicine—its potential to challenge the conventional medical industry, which profits immensely from treatments like chemotherapy and morphine, is enormous. Unfortunately, powerful interests (Zionists) have worked to suppress this knowledge, keeping the public in the dark about its life-saving potential. While you may find “easier” to learn methods you will miss the actual cause of symptoms in the body and stay on the search for things that may or may not work. There is no experimentation, no guesswork with GHK, this is in fact biological laws of nature.
Dr. Hamer's CT work blew my mind. Brilliant and repeatable.
Well said. In a world less perfect than ours, GNM would take over the collective medical mind in an instant. Just imagine yourself, a true doctor who provides the patient with usable and actionable curing tools for self-work right on the first consultation. The competition continue to write out prescriptions and drain the pockets of their patients. And you are providing tangible steps to change bad outcomes into the expected positive health status.
Still, our world is far more perfect. It prevents the tyranny of doctors, traditional or GNM-educated, by leaving the control over health in the hands of the patient. And patients love being ill, falling ill, not recovering or acquiring new medical challenges once old ones are worn out. It’s more than addiction. It’s almost a perfect symbiosis.
Which is why ineffective methods will always be favored and will always gain traction among the leading elites - because they appeal to the patient. They will not provide actual solutions which render the particular ailment (problem) helpless. The patient is not threatened with the inevitable departure of their favorite associate: an excuse to not live a happy, problem-free life.
Let’s be sincere for a while. Imagine a “Magic Pill” sold in every pharmacy for $0.99. That pill removes headaches for ever. One pill. The pill is available in variants, and one of them removes tiredness for ever. Again, one pill. Another removes colds and flu, one pill, lifelong warranty. Will you buy this pill? Will you believe its scientifically proven success record?
We become so accustomed to our pains and complaining and time “free from normal life” that most of us will never try GNM or other methods which provide, promise and deliver. As if we had a built-in early warning system against effective solutions.
For the same reason we waste about 20 best years of life on “learning” stuff that can be effectively taught within 5 years. Oh, yes, teachers will lose their livelihood then… Scientists will lose their sources of income if they delivered effective inventions. Doctors will lose their positions if they actually treated their patients. Leaders will never win any followers if they really delivered what they promise.
These mechanisms are the core source of our problems, with health or other. GNM will not treat them. No system can treat them. There is only one way to resolve these problems: through personal transformation. Not a popular way…
"GNM will not treat them."
Correct. The organism is designed to be self healing. A full comprehension of GHk will liberate you from the clutches of the white coats and Big Pharma, alternative health care, orthodoxy diets, vitamins, snake oil salesmen. And you will comprehend why you have a headache, why you have a pain, and become sovereign of your own body and mind.
We are talking about the same things, only using different languages.
The murder of Dirk Hamer by the last prince of Italy, Vittorio Emanuele, Prince of Naples, is depicted in the Netflix docuseries The King Who Never Was. Sean Hross, who has a wealth of knowledge on the Black Nobility, talks about this incident in this video: https://youtu.be/pZqUY5IDRu4?si=U6HM3Hh84mMNoGTN .
The King Who Never Was was stunning, and heartbreaking. I was so shocked it was mostly dedicated to Dirk, and the Hamer family, even though they made a vague attempt to vilify the good doctor.
The link you posted, he is totally wrong about Adolf Hitler.
Sounds like they would vilify Dr. Hamer. Can't remember what Hross said about Schicklgruber.
Hamer survived eight assassination attempts. And two jail sentences...
Thanks for sharing this 😊 A friend of mine had given me a book on this but unfortunately I hadn’t gotten around to reading it much. I’m seeing a lot of these patterns in my own life. In fact, I’m quite certain one of my biggest health issues (fibroids) is strongly related to traumatic experiences in my life. It’s a topic worth looking into more!
I am thrilled to see this! I studied homeopathy for 25 years. These German thinkers are amazing! Dr. Hahneman (1755-1843) did not use a remedy to treat a disease, he matched the mental and physical symptoms, to a proving, with the interest to trigger a healing. The body healed.
Dr. Hamer (1935-2017) is this century's most brilliant medical mind. All of the diseases we experience is our *body* dealing with shock and trauma. Only vaccine injury, poisoning and severe nutritional deficiencies cover the remaining illnesses.
Why do some woman have breast cancer on strictly one side or the other? Even late stage, only one side if the cancer is "in the blood"? It is the conflict and their handedness! One sided breast cancer is a conflict worry with either their child or their partner. Which, with most women is their primary concern in life. Those with cancer in both breasts, have both conflicts partner and child. What a tragedy that these women are not in a position to heal. And worse, the trauma of diagnosis and treatment is more cancer, everywhere! Lung cancer and bone cancer.
German New Medicine is the only thing that explains it all. It trumps all the other methods and modalities I have seen.
I love this simple video of a cow, that developed breast cancer. This cow would normally be put down. Intead, the farmer knew his animals and knew German medicine. The cancer grew, was absolutely disgusting and ulcerous and then it healed and fell off. Because the conflict resolved. In terms of biology, are we any different? But dairy farmers are not going to pay billions for chemo. Watch https://ghk-academy.info/testimonial-breast-cancer-in-a-cow/
This topic is special to me, I had a late stage cancer. I researched everything. The type of cancer I had was not in my family. I had none of the risks. It was also very fast and unusual for my age group. Nothing made since. Then I was invited to a cancer talk and Dr. Hamer's work was introduced. Click!! The cancer I had, was a direct result of a personal conflict that I had resolved. Which freed me from submitting to chemo and radiation. There was no reason to poison or torture myself, the conflict was resolved and would never return. And I have passed 5 years, there has been no return. But I also know that I have to manage my stress and my reaction to conflict and shock, because if I take everything so seriously, I could trigger a new "healing" or biological process. Much better to bless others and be at peace, than to draw out and extend an issue. Letting stuff go... happier life.
This makes so much sense to me. I was lucky to be allergic to almost all medicines prescribed by my physicians so that my body was forced to heal without them. My body knew better what was good for me.
Allergies, or anything chronic, was scientifically proven by Hamer to be a hanging healing. Meaning, the SBS (Special/Sensible Biological Program) could not complete because the organism keeps stepping on a track.
A track is anything in the environment at the moment of the DHS (an unexpected, isolating event, that caught us off the back foot), recorded by the psyche. For instance, dust, pollen, a food, milk, a person, a place etc. If one cannot identify the track, the organism remains trapped between the two phases of the SBS, and remains in a permanent state of conflict active, presenting chronic symptoms.
Our bodies are designed to heal on their own. Mother Nature makes no mistakes.
very interesting, thank you so much for sharing!
I have experienced the 'occurrence of symptoms during the healing phase' on various occasions, in myself and others, and have often wondered about this... GNM is offering a convincing explanation.
However, there is an error in this interview. Homœopathic medicine is listed as a method aimed at 'getting rid of symptoms'. That's incorrect. Samuel Hahnemann (founder of homœopathy) had his own theories about causation of disease (so-called miasms), and he was writing about the importance of considering the 'mental state' of the patient over 200 years ago. Classical homœopathy doesn't treat the symptoms but takes the whole person and their life story into account.
Whilst that is correct, people only ever reach for their homeopathy or homeopathist, when they are presenting symptoms.
The quote you refer to:
"They all do not know the cause of disease and focus exclusively on getting rid of the symptoms."
That is correct, homeopathy does not know the cause.
I have spent the last 6 years studying GHk. It is difficult to let go of other paradigms of healing. I was very attached to homeopathy, and plant medicine. But once you have grasped the Five Biological Laws, and lived it, and breathed it, you can finally let go of those attachments.
True. That's because most people try to apply homœopathy in the allopathic way. They don't understand the principles. The fundamental truth Hahnemann discovered and attempted to share was that human beings are self-healing organisms. Not so different from 'German New Medicine'.
🎉😍👁💖🤩💎
A testimony I wrote:
https://ghk-academy.info/prostate-psa-test-results/
"I investigated the PSA test as our friend was prescribed big pharma to “keep his PSA levels down.” The white coat witch doctors believe that the PSA levels indicate there is cancer, and testosterone increases the cancer cells. I already knew one of his drugs was going to be a testosterone blocker, literally a chemical castration. I got the names of the drugs and researched them because he was convinced the medication was causing his night sweats, but I knew that was because he has the TB symbiont working on him. He is a classic KTC (Kidney Collecting Tubule/s open with the refugee/abandonment/feeling left out/don’t know where I belong) case.
BOOM!! The PSA test was invented in 1970 by Richard Ablin, PhD. He later wrote a book called The Great Prostate Hoax: How Big Medicine Hijacked the PSA Test and Caused a Public Health Disaster. A la Kary Mullis’ PCR test and the HIV/AIDS and Covid scam. Mullis spent 20+ years of his life, until his death in December 2019, speaking out about the misuse of his invention, the PCR test:
“There are many things you can do with PCR, but using it as a diagnostic tool is not one of them”
Ablin explains that his PSA test is not a cancer-specific biomarker, and he asserts that the use of the PSA as a diagnostic test has crippled millions of healthy men, afflicting them with incontinence and impotence. With the 78% false-positive rate, and being wrong 80% of the time, he also covers what it cost the biotech companies to approach the FDA for approval: one million dollars, suggesting that there was a pay-off. Albin said:
“How else could they approve a test with an 80% false-positive rate?”
Wow!! Great to meet you. I love the blog series. Also, I should not be shocked about the PSA but the abuse of that test makes sense. How people are terrified and tortured by "medicine" is a crime of such magnitude that only God can bring to justice.
Dr. Hamer:
“All so-called diseases have a special biological meaning. While we used to regard Mother Nature as fallible and had the audacity to believe that She constantly made mistakes and caused breakdowns (malignant, senseless, degenerative cancerous growths, etc.) we can now see, as the scales fall from our eyes, that it was our ignorance and pride that were and are the only foolishness in our cosmos. Blinded, we brought upon ourselves this senseless, soulless and brutal medicine. Full of wonder, we can now understand for the first time that Nature is orderly and that every occurrence in Nature is meaningful, even in the framework of the whole. Nothing in Nature is meaningless, malignant or diseased.”
I recently came across this German new medicine but had not read much about it. Some explanations are appealing, but the part about flu and colds does not convince me. Years ago my ex came home sick from work after sitting a whole day next to a sick colleague. 2 hours later, I got it too (I had not been outside in cold and dreary weather - it was nice and sunny). We were sick for a week without appetite and feeling aches all over. Does not fit in the explanation at all. I think some illnesses DO transmit, anyone who had this happen, will probably agree with me. But for illnesses like cancer I think their theory might be a lot closer to the truth than the cut-burn-poison doctors, which have proven they cannot heal but a handful of the millions.
Why bother to comment on the GHk if you "had not read much about it." ?
Your description of what happened to you fits the Hamer paradigm perfectly. When the organism is without appetite it is in the conflict active phase.
Sitting next to a sick colleague, who really ought to have been at home, in bed resting, gave you a scent (stink) conflict. That is how "colds" "flu" "viruses" get spread around, it is your psyche, programmed by mainstream medicine and Big Pharma, who push Pasteur's lies and deception, reacting to someone else showing symptoms.
I used to believe that as well. It's the exception to that rule that behooves me. 3 people in a family get sick and the other 2 don't, why? Looking at the individuals involved, their eating, exercise, sleeping habits etc., I think a common denominator can be found.
Perhaps off topic, I brought my family to Mexico one year. My mother and I were bulletproof, while all the others got what was called Montezuma's Revenge and spent almost the entire trip in close proximity to a toilet. I ate street tacos and local (bathtub) beer and no ill effects. 6 out of 8 got sick. The other 2 sailed thru it all. Get my point?
That does not mean that the Revenge is not infectious. It just means your terrain is sturdy enough to deal with it.
Exactly. My point being there has never been a study that has proven transmission of a medical condition from a sick person to a well person, and believe me, they have tried everything. It is said, and I believe it, that Pasteur finally admitted he was wrong about transmission, on his deathbed. Didn't matter. The Rockefeller's ran with the Pasteurian Germ Theory and convinced people to wear masks for a virus never proven to exist.
Have you check this book CAN YOU CATCH A COLD? by Daniel Roytas?
Thank you
Many alternative therapies were invented by Germans. This is quite an intriguing phenomenon.
I have a scientific framework for evaluating the effectiveness of natural or alternative cancer therapies:
Which alternative therapies are effective? I believe almost none are, though I'm not saying they lack value entirely. The reasoning for my judgment that alternative therapies are ineffective for cancer is as follows: In the U.S., any therapy using a new active substance, if submitted as a new cancer drug, would automatically receive a five-year market exclusivity from the FDA. If it's a new indication for a known drug, there would be a three-year exclusivity period. This represents a significant revenue opportunity. If there were an effective alternative cancer therapy, it would easily pass clinical trials. If it cannot pass clinical trials, then it is naturally ineffective against cancer. Passing clinical trials would grant market exclusivity and the potential for substantial income. Yet, why haven't we seen any alternative therapy undergo such a transformation?
Clearly, there hasn't been any. Considering future possibilities, if an alternative therapy remains an alternative for an extended period, I can confidently conclude that it is ineffective for cancer.
I suppose your premise would be valid if BigPharma was actually interested in curing cancer. My theory is they have absolutely no interest in finding a cure. There is much more profit in keeping people sick and reliant on their traditional “treatments” such as chemo, radiation, surgery, and other exorbitantly expensive drugs. Proof of this general concept played out in the COVID era when there were safe, effective, affordable treatments (Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, Vitamin D) that were censored/suppressed to make way for expensive, harmful drugs (Remdesivir, monoclonal antibodies) and cancer is no different. If it doesn’t have the potential to increase their bank account into perpetuity, they are not interested.
Obtaining new drug approval is not monopolized by big pharmaceutical companies. Take ivermectin, for example. We know the FLCCC Alliance is currently advocating for its use in cancer treatment. Organizations like the FLCCC can easily initiate clinical trials. How can big pharma suppress this? Even if you're not a big pharma company, if you're a billionaire, you can still start such trials. For a drug like ivermectin, a Phase 1 clinical trial may only require around $1 million. Once past Phase 1, it can be used under compassionate use for late-stage cancer patients in the U.S. Even for a Phase 3 trial, the total investment wouldn't exceed $100 million. If it withstands Phase 3 trials and gets approved, the revenue during the three-year market exclusivity period would far exceed the $100 million investment cost.
Is it really only possible for big pharma to come up with $100 million? Additionally, big pharma isn't a single entity; fierce competition among them. If one realizes a potential alternative therapy or for cancer that's superior to existing treatments, that company would surely race to advance its approval process.
Flccc is initiating a clinical trial currently
GNM is NOT an alternative therapy...
Some people swear by chemical drugs. My body can not have most of them, and I have to fall back on herbs and homeopathic. But if chemicals help for you, I will be the last one to say no.
Cancer patients, especially those with advanced stages, often turn to alternative therapies. Some may try dozens of them. The main reason people explore these options is that conventional treatments for late-stage cancer are often ineffective. Here, I analyze the ineffectiveness of alternative therapies from a scientific perspective, without claiming that chemotherapy is superior. In fact, I encourage patients to explore alternative therapies and not rely solely on chemotherapy.
However, I believe that future alternative therapies could surpass traditional treatments and successfully cure patients. I am the inventor of the intratumoral chlorine dioxide injection therapy, which is not yet approved, though I am advocating for its approval. Currently, I guide late-stage breast cancer patients in self-administering this treatment at home, which is one of the few legal avenues available. Three late-stage breast cancer patients are now following my guidance, and they consistently show significant results: more than a 50% reduction in tumor size within one month and over 70% within two months. I am confident that this therapy can pass FDA clinical trials and soon transition from an alternative to a standard therapy.
Cancer doesn't kill people, the cancer treatment does.
Hi! I appreciate where you are coming from, because you have been researching and treating cancer with much resistance from the medical industry.
But you must examine the evidence of German New Medicine to understand ***why*** cancer happens, also why "good treatments" fail.
Think about the times your protocol failed, why? Did they not follow instructions or did they start too late? But then think about your successes? Did they 100% follow instructions and start early enough? What is the evidence? I think you will agree, the mental condition and psyche of the patient, has a much bigger role. And German New Medicine provides the biological basis for understanding, with many 1,000s of patients.
https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=anti+cancer+substance+found+in+tobacco+leaves&atb=v223-1&ia=web
https://vaccineliberationarmy.com/rooms/liberty-freedom-room/dr-burzynski-cure-for-cancer-texas/
I've watched his documentary. He has multiple Phase 1 clinical trial applications for new drugs, but few have progressed to further clinical stages.
https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=%2F_OceanofPDF.com_World_Without_Cancer_-_G_Edward_Griffin-2.pdf&atb=v223-1&ia=web
I wonder is this modality the root of where the whole idea of 'contagion is a myth' and viruses don't cause illness in healthy people comes from?
Stefan Lanka used to work closely with Dr Hamer. He still references him nowadays.
Once I heard about Dr. Hamer, I realized many people know and use his work.