Discussion about this post

User's avatar
CM Maccioli's avatar

The Winter of "92-'93 was a horror for my young family. My husband had 4 successive heart attacks and each and every time was told only the then ubiquitous heart by-pass surgery could save his life. The horror of that operation put my husband in a panic attack so I went to the library to research what heart by-pass was. In the center of this wave of books was a book titled "Bypassing By'Pass". The addendum listed Dr's Von Kiel and Maulfair. I chose the latter who saw my husband immediately.

It came to pass that my husbands case came to be one of the gold standards of chelation care and posted his story and initial condition before and after chelation therapy, in his office profiles. After a week or two my husband came home from treatment and said "guess what", my BP is 120/80. My husbands BP was a standing 180/120 for most of his life and no BP medication could keep it under control. Needless to say he never had a by-pass.

If you remember the movie "Awakenings" where Robin Williams played a doctor who prescribed a medication for all his catatonic patients, all of which were awakened to normalcy, he was never able to duplicate that exact procedure in the future, the same in reverse happened to chelation. A doctor over prescribed EDTA and a patient died. That's all that was needed to demonize chelation and maintain cash flow for by-pass surgery. Bill Gates did the exact same thing 4 years ago by recommending using a quadruple amount of hydroxychloroquine required to cure covid and people had heart attacks and died. That's all they needed to reject counter measure treatments.

I don't know, what could be more profitable for Pharma other than pediatricians, cardiologists and oncologists? And what could be most disastrous? Unvaccinated children, chelation and the resurrection of known cancer cures would be the death knell to these charlatans. Not possible, ain't gonna happen.

Expand full comment
Greg Pilcher's avatar

I'm surprised there is so little discussion about the results of the TACT trial despite the teaser suggesting it could be definitive. I have no confidence in an NIH-funded study about anything, and especially not a study of an alternative treatment like EDTA-based chelation therapy that if proven effective would mean reduced profits for institutional medicine as patients opt for less expensive and more effective alternatives. Such studies routinely are "designed to fail." As it happens, the TACT trial was finished years ago, only to spawn another trial -- unsurprisingly called TACT2 -- that also is finished. NIH says although the TACT2 research team shared results four months ago, on April 7, 2024, NIH has not and will not update its website to disclose those results because NIH wants to wait for the researchers to first publish their article about TACT2. (The NIH "update" is at the link Unbekoming posted at the end of the article after Question #30.) As for the first TACT trial, NIH reports what appears to be beneficial effects of EDTA chelation yet claims, "These results are not, by themselves, sufficient to support the routine use of chelation . . . ." No surprise there, given that by now most people know NIH is wholly corrupt. As for TACT2, while NIH doesn't even hint at the results, it wasn't difficult to find an article reporting that TACT2 purportedly found chelation offers no benefits, that TACT2 was a complete waste of resources, and that chelation therapy is "quackery." That assessment was posted by David Gorski, whose web site reads like that of a Big Pharma-shill.

Expand full comment
21 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?