I think this is all part of Agenda 2030/2050 from the UN. The globalists want no air travel by 2050. Except of course for them. This is corporate espionage.
Have a look at this article and the different sections that talk about 'making everything worse.' After I published this article the website hosting the transcript was deleted but there are links to the Wayback Machine and you can listen to the tapes (highly recommend).
Good compilation of issues out of Boeing. We have watched the fear grow for years. Underlying cause - Deregulation, cheap fares, inadequate revenue, no place to go for relief from suffering maintenance services, a product arising from insufficient manufacturing funds. Painted into a corner, the answer - cut the corner. Politics, economics held hostage. Airbus should be watching its U.S. operations closely.
Comparing Boeing to Big Pharma in the manner presented here is hysteria of the same ilk the pre-plandemic fear mongers that softened the ground for their death-jabs.
While I’m convinced that the US industrial base has indeed been targeted for export for decades and that China has been the repository for every artifact for globalist control aka “technocracy”, there are some glaring flaws in this article: 1) ascribing defects of maintenance (as in the SWA instance) to an airplane (737-800) whose design predates the merger is radical overreach and pure fear mongering. That airplane’s structure was designed pre-merger; I have seen other instances of this elsewhere (UAL 777 landing gear). 2) speculation that the witness “did not kill himself” is also just that - speculation.
Attacking Boeing and its employees is merely arranging the firing squad into a circle. The author is complicit in doing the wet-work for those that set this up. The so-called “leadership” deserves scrutiny and criticism as does US policy that for decades set up the economic destruction of the US industrial base. But, please apply some discernment.
I've been following aircraft incidents for over 3 decades now, and I've read every major crash report and hundreds of incident reports.
I want to point out that the example you used of the Southwest plane above, is almost certainly not a problem with Boeing for the following reasons:
1) That is an older plane so it is fully under the maintenance of SouthWest
2) The engine isn't even made by Boeing so a problem with the cowling is a problem with the engine manufacturer
3) Since the plane and engine are not new it has been serviced many times by SW mechanics
4) Engine cowlings are simply held on by latches which if not closed properly will result in what happened
Here is the update from the NTSB on April 11.
"On Apr 11th 2024 the NTSB reported the aircraft had undergone maintenance the night before the occurrence flight, the NTSB is satisfied with the understanding of the occurrence of being a maintenance issue, that the airline is addressing, and is not going to open an investigation."
Maintenance the night before. If you look through the comments in the link above, you'll see people noting that SW pilots do NOT do a walkaround of the plane like most other airlines. At SW it's the ground crew's responsibility.
Also, take a look at the AVHerald site. I have been reading it for many many years, and the frequency of issues has not really increased to be honest.
No question, the crashes described in the documentary were abysmal and should never have happened. Many of us in the air safety forums (including AVHerald) I frequent suspected after the first crash there was a problem with the plane, there was enough evidence already. There is no question the FAA and Boeing knew enough to have grounded the planes at that point. The culture issue at Boeing was a real problem but so were the changes in regulation. From the 90's through to today, almost every regulated industry shifted from government inspection to "self" inspection. This resulted in a number of big accidents, including the transocean explosion, killer drugs released all through thw 2000's, and eventually the two crashes of the 737 Max's.
Those crashes were entirely preventable. However, I would have no issues flying a 737 Max today. There is nothing fundamentally wrong with the design outside of that poorly implemented function they hid from everyone.
I think this is all part of Agenda 2030/2050 from the UN. The globalists want no air travel by 2050. Except of course for them. This is corporate espionage.
It's part of a much older plan than that.
Have a look at this article and the different sections that talk about 'making everything worse.' After I published this article the website hosting the transcript was deleted but there are links to the Wayback Machine and you can listen to the tapes (highly recommend).
https://vicparkpetition.substack.com/p/here-is-the-depopulation-plan-the
Thanks for mentioning David Martin. Finding him in the early days of the scamdemic saved my sanity.
I agree. David Martin was one of the first out of the gate in 2020. He laid the foundation for all my investigative work on this plandemic.
Despite Boeing’s present commercial failures they are a MAJOR US Defense contractor. Problem solved.
Thank you so much for this. I know a lot of people who will be very interested in this article.
Good compilation of issues out of Boeing. We have watched the fear grow for years. Underlying cause - Deregulation, cheap fares, inadequate revenue, no place to go for relief from suffering maintenance services, a product arising from insufficient manufacturing funds. Painted into a corner, the answer - cut the corner. Politics, economics held hostage. Airbus should be watching its U.S. operations closely.
Comparing Boeing to Big Pharma in the manner presented here is hysteria of the same ilk the pre-plandemic fear mongers that softened the ground for their death-jabs.
While I’m convinced that the US industrial base has indeed been targeted for export for decades and that China has been the repository for every artifact for globalist control aka “technocracy”, there are some glaring flaws in this article: 1) ascribing defects of maintenance (as in the SWA instance) to an airplane (737-800) whose design predates the merger is radical overreach and pure fear mongering. That airplane’s structure was designed pre-merger; I have seen other instances of this elsewhere (UAL 777 landing gear). 2) speculation that the witness “did not kill himself” is also just that - speculation.
Attacking Boeing and its employees is merely arranging the firing squad into a circle. The author is complicit in doing the wet-work for those that set this up. The so-called “leadership” deserves scrutiny and criticism as does US policy that for decades set up the economic destruction of the US industrial base. But, please apply some discernment.
I've been following aircraft incidents for over 3 decades now, and I've read every major crash report and hundreds of incident reports.
I want to point out that the example you used of the Southwest plane above, is almost certainly not a problem with Boeing for the following reasons:
1) That is an older plane so it is fully under the maintenance of SouthWest
2) The engine isn't even made by Boeing so a problem with the cowling is a problem with the engine manufacturer
3) Since the plane and engine are not new it has been serviced many times by SW mechanics
4) Engine cowlings are simply held on by latches which if not closed properly will result in what happened
Here is the update from the NTSB on April 11.
"On Apr 11th 2024 the NTSB reported the aircraft had undergone maintenance the night before the occurrence flight, the NTSB is satisfied with the understanding of the occurrence of being a maintenance issue, that the airline is addressing, and is not going to open an investigation."
https://avherald.com/h?article=51721379&opt=0
Maintenance the night before. If you look through the comments in the link above, you'll see people noting that SW pilots do NOT do a walkaround of the plane like most other airlines. At SW it's the ground crew's responsibility.
Also, take a look at the AVHerald site. I have been reading it for many many years, and the frequency of issues has not really increased to be honest.
No question, the crashes described in the documentary were abysmal and should never have happened. Many of us in the air safety forums (including AVHerald) I frequent suspected after the first crash there was a problem with the plane, there was enough evidence already. There is no question the FAA and Boeing knew enough to have grounded the planes at that point. The culture issue at Boeing was a real problem but so were the changes in regulation. From the 90's through to today, almost every regulated industry shifted from government inspection to "self" inspection. This resulted in a number of big accidents, including the transocean explosion, killer drugs released all through thw 2000's, and eventually the two crashes of the 737 Max's.
Those crashes were entirely preventable. However, I would have no issues flying a 737 Max today. There is nothing fundamentally wrong with the design outside of that poorly implemented function they hid from everyone.