The belief that injecting synthetic chemicals made by habitually criminal companies who profit from perpetual disease somehow produces health is not only ridiculous and unproven— it is a foundational teaching of a dangerous religious cult that western medicine has become.
Lost in the fog of history is the fact that one year before the 1986 Vaccine Act was passed Pharma Cos. were pulling out of the vaxx industry (through the 70's-80's) due to costs of litigation/fines. Pharmaceutical companies were being inundated with lawsuits for injuries that would soon bankrupt them.
For every $1 they made off the DTP vaccine, they were losing $20 to injury lawsuits. The 1986 law was enacted because there was only one manufacturer left for each of the only three routine vaccines at that time, and the harms they caused created financial liability exceeding their revenue.
Even as all vaccines are toxic it is no longer the case when you are receiving a single vaccine you are receiving a single vaccine. Multivalent vaccines are the norm so when someone gets 3 shots e.g. they are receiving well beyond 3 antigens. The number varies depending on shots given.
This was done so that Pharma could get all their 90 or so antigens on the schedule from birth to 18 without having to have the kids marched into the pediatricians for each and every one. This was an intentional tactic done in part to manage the situation where parents did not want to keep bringing their kids in with the increasing number of shots as it is such an unpleasant experience.
Of course there are exactly zero studies ever done that examine the combinative and synergistic impacts of these multivalent witches brew and I'd say that such a study is quite impossible to do.
Of course the Pharma hubris and their wholly owned media subsidiaries label all of this madness as 'safe and effective'.
Wow - thanks for this! The Vitamin K shot was the one shot that our pediatrician required and that was the only shot they got. Everything else was not taken.
But seeing that there’s also a negative effect there, I’ll be looking more into this, so that’s for that.
PS: I made this comment on Sasha’s page yesterday as it’s a very similar topic so sharing here to provide value to this piece:
“To add more to the child vaccine commentary, surprisingly, here’s some info from Meta AI when I asked it about a study I recall seeing years ago:
“There's a pilot study comparing the health of vaccinated and unvaccinated children in the United States, specifically looking at allergies and other health outcomes. The study, conducted by Mawson et al. in 2017, found that vaccinated children were more likely to have allergies and other health issues compared to unvaccinated children ¹.
The study surveyed over 400 children aged 6-12 and found that vaccinated children were more likely to have:
• Allergies: 22.2% of vaccinated children had allergies, compared to 6.3% of unvaccinated children
• Eczema: 9.5% of vaccinated children had eczema, compared to 3.6% of unvaccinated children
• Learning disabilities: 5.6% of vaccinated children had learning disabilities, compared to 1.2% of unvaccinated children”
It’s funny that RFK Jr’s own CHD shows the danger of vaccines, but he wants to “make Americans trust vaccines again” (Thanks Peggy Hall for shedding light on this)
Can you please point to exactly where is RFK Jr saying that he wants to make Americans to trust vaccines again? And if he indeed did say that, when was that? As far as I can tell over the years he's stance on vaccines changed substantially.
That's because of the flu vaccine damaging his vocal cords. He admitted to that. Now he's up against a highly controversial vaccine he knows was never a vaccine that's killing millions. He has to show some allegiance to the cartel or risk being destroyed. So he uses the "theory" of vaccines being safe, but others need more research. He's playing the game telling half truths.
I remember years ago he being very careful and only pushing for proper testing and freedom of choice, which was a very good start. It's not a game. Bluntly saying to mainstream that vaccines are killing people is not going anywhere, asking for clear open tests and data is something practical that more people can align with.
I'm 76, had 2 flu shots in my life, for the last 2 'bad' ones, coerced into them. With in an hour I had full blown Flu, for 2 weeks. Only food poisoning was worse. First encounter with jab reactions were my boys. DPT. Why does a infant need a Tetanus shot? Dr said it was the Pertussis. All 3 had small neuralgically issues. I had no jabs as a child, except Small Pox, key word 'FREE'. We were to poor to afford them. Now ins. covers them, or government. ILLEGALS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO TAKE THEM. Yet they bring them into the USA. TB was rampant as a Jr HS level, so every one had TB Tine Test. NO one looked for the Rampant Lice. still don't. A retired Journalist I know, had a grandson get 18 jabs at once, severe Autism was the result. My granddaughter nearly died from Gardasil. She is grown and married now, baby 1 is getting NO jabs, and clean organic foods.
It’s an argument tactic he uses. Siri and Bigtree at ICAN have come under fire for similar ploys. What they’re driving at is that if we honestly look for safety and demand proof, the whole house of cards collapses. And who could be opposed to an honest look?
What I have heard him say in the past is that he is for the development of safe vaccines that are tested against true placebos. So he seems to think there could be safe vaccines but the ones we currently have are not. Some argue that there can never be safe vaccines because it is a flawed concept
Yes, years back he was saying that. I still think this is the right approach, arguing back and forth is not going anywhere, let's honestly look at the data. This would end the controversy.
As a social scientist, I agree wholeheartedly with the following statement: "The biggest problem that all of this comes down to is the refusal of most people to believe that people in power wish them harm, actively want to do harm to them. This is the hardest thing for most people to accept". - Bob Moran
Unfortunately, we don't wield enough power to stop this.
They were willing to bomb Florida and blame Castro so they could attack Cuba. They contaminated alcohol during prohibition and sickened and killed thousands. They sprayed marijuana with parquat. They have done numerous medical experiments on citizens without informed consent. They lied about weapons of mass destruction to engage in the war in Iraq. They knowingly exposed service members and civilians to radiation from nuclear testing. I came up with all of these from memory and if a given another few minutes I can probably come up with more. They are willing to maim, kill and exploit citizens to achieve their ends have been willing to do so for a very long time
The biggest problem that all of this comes down to is the disbelief of most people to believe that every single one of us, acting as a souvereign being, wields sufficient power to stop this. This is the hardest thing for most people to accept.
All most peoples lives they bow down to a form of authority. Parents, teachers, military, bankers on and on . By age 20 most humans have No personal sovereignty and lack real abilities to think organically!
So as this goes, China 2.0 is being implemented and the digital prison will be completed. Nothing imo will stop this.
Why? -because humanity will comply..
Welcome to prison planet run by psychopaths…
Reality is the ultimate form of fate and acceptance. Very saddening…
Sadly, I can’t agree more! The sad truth is most of us who have tried to wake up others are laughed at, mocked and told we are conspiracy theorists! It is frustrating and infuriating and most of us don’t want the divide it causes in our families! I would love to know how to wake up those who we love and want to empower with the truth and are willing to believe it!
The only thing one can do is rage against it. We can rebuild whatever they destroy. This health freedom movement is slowly but surely discovering the way. God and nature, and the unstoppable human spirit, will prevail, and these deterministic demons will be exposed for the disembodied and ungodly fools they’ve always been. Quite a few have flown over the vaccinators’ nest. Some of us have been working for decades to fix the damage inside ourselves, and we have successfully done so. Soldiers arrayed on the spiritual plane. This has only just begun.
There has been propaganda and censorship around this issue for decades. Besides the financial aspects that benefit doctors and pharma, it is a horrible prospect for parents and medical professionals to think they may have injured children
the vitamin k shot is a perfect analogy to what we have been going through with covid shots vs. putting medicine in the nose or mouth. You can purchase rapid absorption k1 in a bio emulsion tincture form cheap. If the k1 is important, the baby can be given a few drops orally of k1 blended into sesame oil. It would be easy to do a study to see how many drops are needed for desired levels to be achieved. The high end tincture with the rapid absorption is $35 a bottle instead of $22 for the ones they would be willing to test that don't work rapidly . I think this is a good ground to stand on in the battles with the hospital. Instead of allowing the hospital to frame you as a bad parent refusing the k injection, people could insist on the oral form. I'm not sure of the importance of vitamin k early, but we need to redirect them away from injections when other methods of delivery are correct. I am pretty sure that a few drops of k1 orally are not going to be harmful and we can reframe the argument from people who are "refusing the science" to people who demand a safe method of delivery for the medicines they take. It would be good to explain ahead of time that you will be using the oral form. This forces the hospital to admit that their desire to inject is more important than k1, and allows the parent to say "I agree that k1 is important, I have researched this and purchased the best form available orally, I will be happy to review your advice on oral administration." Let us not assume that there is no value to small amounts of this vitamin administered orally the first couple days of life just because the injection is obviously bad and should not be given. This approach is important because we need to establish the right to avoid injections whenever possible since there is almost always a better path.
Hospital births are often very violent for the baby, and can produce internal bleeding. The K-shot can help cover up these injuries. Additionally, when they manage to produce a case of autism (or other vaccine injuries) via the aluminum adjuvant in the K-shot, then pharma can obtusely claim "See there? An 'unvaccinated' kid has autism, so therefore vaccines cannot possibly cause autism." ;-) That's their version of "science."
This is simply untrue. I read a paper on this subject wherein the manufacturers attempted to explain the presence of aluminum in the K-shot, claiming the aluminum is added to "balance the ph." Although the FDA has more recently approved the inclusion of aluminum as an "excipient" that no longer needs to be LISTED AS AN INGREDIENT, aluminum IS still in these shots.
This entire game is much like the way they renamed mercury, calling it "Thimerosol" (which is made with mercury) in order to deny there was any mercury in the vaccines. Most people don't look up the components/constituents of the various ingredients in order to understand where they're hiding still more toxins. They look at the ingredients but never go further. And much truth is also seriously censored and covered-over with endlessly blasting announcements of pure propaganda, claiming anyone who dares question the FDA is a nut job. Regardless, the truth is there if you look for it.
Yes, there is allowable contaminating amounts of aluminum (in this case, 0.00012%) because nothing is 100% pure, not even the water you drink, which likely contains significantly higher levels of aluminum than this. In fact, these levels pale in comparison to those in some foods, such as bananas.
David, where exactly did you get your specific (0.00012%) figure? And for which injectable product exactly? Link please?
And btw: Only extremely obtuse people conflate a dose that's ingested, with a dose that's directly injected. Injection results in up to 100% actual dosage being absorbed, and ingestion can reduced the actual absorption to less that 1% of the total dosage consumed.
Further, are you aware that the FDA no longer requires that aluminum oxides (no matter the dose) need to be listed as an ingredient in injectable drugs?
It's not even considered safe to come in contact with the SKIN. And yet, over 99% of all babies born in U.S. hospitals are INJECTED with it. And oh yeah, and it's made with aluminum, which it is how the chemical's PH is "balanced" and thereby considered "safe" to inject directly into the human body.
Again, the FDA no longer requires the makers to disclose the presence of aluminum in K-shot injections, (and many other injectables, such as products labelled as being nothing more than "saline").
Further, when independent testing is done on these vials, they're finding as much as 50k times the amount of aluminum that the FDA says is beyond the "safe" limit set for FOODS.
My first clue that you're not seeing this issue correctly, is that you've conflated injection with ingestion. There is a HUGE difference between these two methods of obtaining a dosage.
You need to keep safety data sheet information in proper perspective. Yes, all chemicals have toxicity at some level. Look up the SDS for sodium chloride (table salt), a major ingredient in saline. It is also listed as an eye irritant but causes no issues when used properly in correct amounts. Bleeding disorders that are preventable in infants by vitamin K injections would otherwise occur in around 1% of births resulting in serious and often devastating complications. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11305608/#REF1 Vitamin K injections have been used for decades to greatly reduce this problem with no reported adverse effects. Compare that to the increase in incidence of infant bleeding disorders, largely attributable to parental refusal of prophylactic vitamin K. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35190810/. Disinformation is deadly.
We've gone from no aluminium in the k shot to...ok, but just a little. I look forward to the day when garbage like you and your ilk cannot walk down a street feeling safe.
Yep, From "no aluminum" to "just a trace" and without providing the link showing the "trace" amount of aluminum. Lies always end this way, with no EVIDENCE and merely an argument that a' safety data sheet' which states a chemical is too dangerous to come in contact with our skin, is somehow okay to INJECT into a newborn baby.
All a big con job. But hey, if you believe the propaganda, go get as many different jabs as you wish. Nobody is trying to stop you. But step back from repeating pharma lies on this feed please. ("Lies are Unbecoming") Nobody is buying any of it, and these lies are used to bolster arguments for mandating the injections on others, so they're particularly offensive in this forum where we don't WANT to be injected with pharma poison.
I agree but what a weird program. Does it select for people with better detox pathways? Better glutathione production and recycling? Higher birth weights? More resilient and self-correcting immune systems? Or is just a shotgun blast into the face of humanity? I get that many people know, while most don’t, and that that can protect the coastal classes and the insiders while they cull the hoi polloi… but they aren’t killing enough of us.
Just have patience. They’re planning to cull 6 billion by 2030 , according to Claus Schwab’s last meeting of the Davos Satans. To make people less suspicious of their motives , they blew up the Georgia Guidestone which spelled out their schecanary
I’m leaning toward shotgun. With vax at the top of the list. But add to it food / GMOs / pesticides / drugs in general / etc. Fast might be too fast so slow burn, all the while gathering up money spent on healthcare, and confident we will go sooner or later.
Glyphosates in soil stops plants from absorbing vitamins and minerals .. glyphosates in the body stops one from absorbing minerals and vitamin D .. funny coincidence.
“The rate of autism in entirely unvaccinated individuals with no exposure to the Vitamin K shot or maternal vaccines was 0%, compared to the national rate of 2.79% in 2019 and 3.49% in 2020.” Ok wow.
I am from and live in Mississippi. I have a seven week old son. I am not vaccinating him. I didn’t take the TDAP when I was pregnant or any other vaccine. He did get the vitamin K shot, but that’s because I was unaware of them giving it. No one asked me or anything about him receiving it. Within the last year or so, I believe our state finally made a way for kids to attend school if they are unvaxxed, but I intend to home school so I don’t really care. There’s no way on God’s green earth they are touching my son with their poison. I wish I had not gotten them when I was a kid.
Also, I refused the hep B vaccine for him before I gave birth. Dumbest thing in the world to give that to a newborn. He isn’t out having sex or doing drugs. Why in the world do they give this to a newborn?!
It makes ZERO sense. Their reasoning is what if they run across a needle on the playground? Or some random highly doubtful scenarios. It’s called they just want to kill and maim as many as possible as fast as possible. If they can’t get to them in the womb they try outside the womb. If we refuse vaccines period then they try to screw us with our food and water supply. I feel like a conspiracy theorist but my God in Heaven, this is truly what they do.
This is such a brilliant article, simply put with the great orchard analogy, but aligned with credible detailed research findings to back the claims. I agree with interviewee, people just can’t fathom or comprehend that their government want them sick or worse. Thats the stumbling block . When you realise that, all the other lies we’ve been exposed to, fall neatly into place and make sense.
🙌🏼🙌🏼🙌🏼 and my 90 year olds who never jabbed their whole life are indeed! much healthier than all the 60-70 year olds all jabbed up! 0-1 rx compared to 6-12 rx too.
The belief that injecting synthetic chemicals made by habitually criminal companies who profit from perpetual disease somehow produces health is not only ridiculous and unproven— it is a foundational teaching of a dangerous religious cult that western medicine has become.
Lost in the fog of history is the fact that one year before the 1986 Vaccine Act was passed Pharma Cos. were pulling out of the vaxx industry (through the 70's-80's) due to costs of litigation/fines. Pharmaceutical companies were being inundated with lawsuits for injuries that would soon bankrupt them.
For every $1 they made off the DTP vaccine, they were losing $20 to injury lawsuits. The 1986 law was enacted because there was only one manufacturer left for each of the only three routine vaccines at that time, and the harms they caused created financial liability exceeding their revenue.
Even as all vaccines are toxic it is no longer the case when you are receiving a single vaccine you are receiving a single vaccine. Multivalent vaccines are the norm so when someone gets 3 shots e.g. they are receiving well beyond 3 antigens. The number varies depending on shots given.
This was done so that Pharma could get all their 90 or so antigens on the schedule from birth to 18 without having to have the kids marched into the pediatricians for each and every one. This was an intentional tactic done in part to manage the situation where parents did not want to keep bringing their kids in with the increasing number of shots as it is such an unpleasant experience.
Of course there are exactly zero studies ever done that examine the combinative and synergistic impacts of these multivalent witches brew and I'd say that such a study is quite impossible to do.
Of course the Pharma hubris and their wholly owned media subsidiaries label all of this madness as 'safe and effective'.
This comment gives me hope.
The western medical cult system is more dangerous than any politician or religious group.
Or non-religious group. :)
And there are "combined" injections for three "diseases" (and they only harm).
Wow - thanks for this! The Vitamin K shot was the one shot that our pediatrician required and that was the only shot they got. Everything else was not taken.
But seeing that there’s also a negative effect there, I’ll be looking more into this, so that’s for that.
PS: I made this comment on Sasha’s page yesterday as it’s a very similar topic so sharing here to provide value to this piece:
“To add more to the child vaccine commentary, surprisingly, here’s some info from Meta AI when I asked it about a study I recall seeing years ago:
“There's a pilot study comparing the health of vaccinated and unvaccinated children in the United States, specifically looking at allergies and other health outcomes. The study, conducted by Mawson et al. in 2017, found that vaccinated children were more likely to have allergies and other health issues compared to unvaccinated children ¹.
The study surveyed over 400 children aged 6-12 and found that vaccinated children were more likely to have:
• Allergies: 22.2% of vaccinated children had allergies, compared to 6.3% of unvaccinated children
• Eczema: 9.5% of vaccinated children had eczema, compared to 3.6% of unvaccinated children
• Learning disabilities: 5.6% of vaccinated children had learning disabilities, compared to 1.2% of unvaccinated children”
It’s funny that RFK Jr’s own CHD shows the danger of vaccines, but he wants to “make Americans trust vaccines again” (Thanks Peggy Hall for shedding light on this)
It definitely sounds good and we all agree with “making America healthier again,” but as I just called out in my newest article, it’s up to US not THEM to change the country for the better: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/how-the-democrats-are-destroying
Link to the study: https://www.oatext.com/Pilot-comparative-study-on-the-health-of-vaccinated-and-unvaccinated-6-to-12-year-old-U-S-children.php”
Can you please point to exactly where is RFK Jr saying that he wants to make Americans to trust vaccines again? And if he indeed did say that, when was that? As far as I can tell over the years he's stance on vaccines changed substantially.
That's because of the flu vaccine damaging his vocal cords. He admitted to that. Now he's up against a highly controversial vaccine he knows was never a vaccine that's killing millions. He has to show some allegiance to the cartel or risk being destroyed. So he uses the "theory" of vaccines being safe, but others need more research. He's playing the game telling half truths.
Can you point to where he is playing that game?
I remember years ago he being very careful and only pushing for proper testing and freedom of choice, which was a very good start. It's not a game. Bluntly saying to mainstream that vaccines are killing people is not going anywhere, asking for clear open tests and data is something practical that more people can align with.
I'm 76, had 2 flu shots in my life, for the last 2 'bad' ones, coerced into them. With in an hour I had full blown Flu, for 2 weeks. Only food poisoning was worse. First encounter with jab reactions were my boys. DPT. Why does a infant need a Tetanus shot? Dr said it was the Pertussis. All 3 had small neuralgically issues. I had no jabs as a child, except Small Pox, key word 'FREE'. We were to poor to afford them. Now ins. covers them, or government. ILLEGALS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO TAKE THEM. Yet they bring them into the USA. TB was rampant as a Jr HS level, so every one had TB Tine Test. NO one looked for the Rampant Lice. still don't. A retired Journalist I know, had a grandson get 18 jabs at once, severe Autism was the result. My granddaughter nearly died from Gardasil. She is grown and married now, baby 1 is getting NO jabs, and clean organic foods.
It’s an argument tactic he uses. Siri and Bigtree at ICAN have come under fire for similar ploys. What they’re driving at is that if we honestly look for safety and demand proof, the whole house of cards collapses. And who could be opposed to an honest look?
The problem is is that the “honest” look will be anything, but, just like previous research sponsored by the usual suspects.
No comma after anything.
Exactly. How is this a ploy? It's honest, it starts at a point where the dialogue has a chance.
What I have heard him say in the past is that he is for the development of safe vaccines that are tested against true placebos. So he seems to think there could be safe vaccines but the ones we currently have are not. Some argue that there can never be safe vaccines because it is a flawed concept
Yes, years back he was saying that. I still think this is the right approach, arguing back and forth is not going anywhere, let's honestly look at the data. This would end the controversy.
Thank you Franklin.
As a social scientist, I agree wholeheartedly with the following statement: "The biggest problem that all of this comes down to is the refusal of most people to believe that people in power wish them harm, actively want to do harm to them. This is the hardest thing for most people to accept". - Bob Moran
Unfortunately, we don't wield enough power to stop this.
They were willing to bomb Florida and blame Castro so they could attack Cuba. They contaminated alcohol during prohibition and sickened and killed thousands. They sprayed marijuana with parquat. They have done numerous medical experiments on citizens without informed consent. They lied about weapons of mass destruction to engage in the war in Iraq. They knowingly exposed service members and civilians to radiation from nuclear testing. I came up with all of these from memory and if a given another few minutes I can probably come up with more. They are willing to maim, kill and exploit citizens to achieve their ends have been willing to do so for a very long time
We’re all just cattle
No! Cattle farts cause global warming. They can’t possibly treat us like that……can they?
😂😂
😆whatever we are, we’re being‘harvested’.
Good list. And they staged a worldwide “pandemic” without a virus.
The biggest problem that all of this comes down to is the disbelief of most people to believe that every single one of us, acting as a souvereign being, wields sufficient power to stop this. This is the hardest thing for most people to accept.
All most peoples lives they bow down to a form of authority. Parents, teachers, military, bankers on and on . By age 20 most humans have No personal sovereignty and lack real abilities to think organically!
So as this goes, China 2.0 is being implemented and the digital prison will be completed. Nothing imo will stop this.
Why? -because humanity will comply..
Welcome to prison planet run by psychopaths…
Reality is the ultimate form of fate and acceptance. Very saddening…
And Luc even people who freely accept "they wish us harm" have trouble going to the next level, and identifying and accepting who "they" are.
It's a bridge too far for most.
Many people have many theories. And as long as "they" are something distant and amorphous like "evil globalists" that's ok.
The trouble really arises when you realize its the people you align with, who may in fact be working against you.
Sadly, I can’t agree more! The sad truth is most of us who have tried to wake up others are laughed at, mocked and told we are conspiracy theorists! It is frustrating and infuriating and most of us don’t want the divide it causes in our families! I would love to know how to wake up those who we love and want to empower with the truth and are willing to believe it!
Finally, great exposure to the mass culling, thank you.
And let's not forget the well baby vi$it$, trick...nothing to do with health or wellness.
and schools mandatory policies, nasty, evil, scam.
It's not possible to research childhood vaccines in earnest and come out the other side pro-vaccine...IMPOSSIBLE!
The only thing one can do is rage against it. We can rebuild whatever they destroy. This health freedom movement is slowly but surely discovering the way. God and nature, and the unstoppable human spirit, will prevail, and these deterministic demons will be exposed for the disembodied and ungodly fools they’ve always been. Quite a few have flown over the vaccinators’ nest. Some of us have been working for decades to fix the damage inside ourselves, and we have successfully done so. Soldiers arrayed on the spiritual plane. This has only just begun.
Great post, and I will share around...
Unfortunately, most of my vaxxed friends will never read it.
That's simply the way it is, very difficult to admit you've been duped.
There has been propaganda and censorship around this issue for decades. Besides the financial aspects that benefit doctors and pharma, it is a horrible prospect for parents and medical professionals to think they may have injured children
“Man is born free, but is everywhere in chains.”
Another French philosopher, Votaire.
*It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere.
*Doctors put drugs of which they know little into bodies of which they know less for diseases of which they know nothing at all.
Great post, and I will share around...
Unfortunately, most of my vaxxed friends will never read it.
That's simply the way it is, very difficult to admit you've been duped.
Share it anyway. No blood on your hands. You made an effort to warn them.
Godspeed, Joy
Abracadabra - your word is your spell!
You want your friends to read it?
Why manifesting teh opposite?
the vitamin k shot is a perfect analogy to what we have been going through with covid shots vs. putting medicine in the nose or mouth. You can purchase rapid absorption k1 in a bio emulsion tincture form cheap. If the k1 is important, the baby can be given a few drops orally of k1 blended into sesame oil. It would be easy to do a study to see how many drops are needed for desired levels to be achieved. The high end tincture with the rapid absorption is $35 a bottle instead of $22 for the ones they would be willing to test that don't work rapidly . I think this is a good ground to stand on in the battles with the hospital. Instead of allowing the hospital to frame you as a bad parent refusing the k injection, people could insist on the oral form. I'm not sure of the importance of vitamin k early, but we need to redirect them away from injections when other methods of delivery are correct. I am pretty sure that a few drops of k1 orally are not going to be harmful and we can reframe the argument from people who are "refusing the science" to people who demand a safe method of delivery for the medicines they take. It would be good to explain ahead of time that you will be using the oral form. This forces the hospital to admit that their desire to inject is more important than k1, and allows the parent to say "I agree that k1 is important, I have researched this and purchased the best form available orally, I will be happy to review your advice on oral administration." Let us not assume that there is no value to small amounts of this vitamin administered orally the first couple days of life just because the injection is obviously bad and should not be given. This approach is important because we need to establish the right to avoid injections whenever possible since there is almost always a better path.
Hospital births are often very violent for the baby, and can produce internal bleeding. The K-shot can help cover up these injuries. Additionally, when they manage to produce a case of autism (or other vaccine injuries) via the aluminum adjuvant in the K-shot, then pharma can obtusely claim "See there? An 'unvaccinated' kid has autism, so therefore vaccines cannot possibly cause autism." ;-) That's their version of "science."
There is no aluminum or any other adjuvant in the vitamin K shot. Only a buffer to adjust pH and a preservative, benzyl alcohol.
This is simply untrue. I read a paper on this subject wherein the manufacturers attempted to explain the presence of aluminum in the K-shot, claiming the aluminum is added to "balance the ph." Although the FDA has more recently approved the inclusion of aluminum as an "excipient" that no longer needs to be LISTED AS AN INGREDIENT, aluminum IS still in these shots.
Please take a look at the warnings still seen for use of this product here: https://www.drugs.com/pro/vitamin-k1.html - where you will see this statement:
"Severe reactions, including fatalities, have also been reported following INTRAMUSCULAR administration."
Also see: https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/fda/fdaDrugXsl.cfm?setid=c91ede49-c7cc-47b7-0f93-e6841dd5916a&type=display which explains that the ingredient "sodium acetate" (listed here on the label: https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/lookup.cfm?setid=e0b0c8f1-75be-4f25-898a-7b97b608c615) is actually made with aluminum.
This entire game is much like the way they renamed mercury, calling it "Thimerosol" (which is made with mercury) in order to deny there was any mercury in the vaccines. Most people don't look up the components/constituents of the various ingredients in order to understand where they're hiding still more toxins. They look at the ingredients but never go further. And much truth is also seriously censored and covered-over with endlessly blasting announcements of pure propaganda, claiming anyone who dares question the FDA is a nut job. Regardless, the truth is there if you look for it.
Godspeed,
Joy
Yes, there is allowable contaminating amounts of aluminum (in this case, 0.00012%) because nothing is 100% pure, not even the water you drink, which likely contains significantly higher levels of aluminum than this. In fact, these levels pale in comparison to those in some foods, such as bananas.
David, where exactly did you get your specific (0.00012%) figure? And for which injectable product exactly? Link please?
And btw: Only extremely obtuse people conflate a dose that's ingested, with a dose that's directly injected. Injection results in up to 100% actual dosage being absorbed, and ingestion can reduced the actual absorption to less that 1% of the total dosage consumed.
Further, are you aware that the FDA no longer requires that aluminum oxides (no matter the dose) need to be listed as an ingredient in injectable drugs?
Do you know what sodium acetate is made of? It's one of the primary ingredients admitted to be in the K-shot. Have you ever seen a safety data sheet for it? HERE: https://www.carlroth.com/medias/SDB-0151-AU-EN.pdf?context=bWFzdGVyfHNlY3VyaXR5RGF0YXNoZWV0c3wzMjAzNDJ8YXBwbGljYXRpb24vcGRmfGMyVmpkWEpwZEhsRVlYUmhjMmhsWlhSekwyaGhZaTlvWldNdk9UQTROVFkwTXpNeU5UUTNNQzV3WkdZfDhkNWJjZTE1MGFlMjQ1NWE2YTI0N2U4YWRiNDc0M2U0NWEyYjg2Y2ZkYjZiMGZjODk2OTk4MjgxODQ4MGU5Mzc
It's not even considered safe to come in contact with the SKIN. And yet, over 99% of all babies born in U.S. hospitals are INJECTED with it. And oh yeah, and it's made with aluminum, which it is how the chemical's PH is "balanced" and thereby considered "safe" to inject directly into the human body.
Again, the FDA no longer requires the makers to disclose the presence of aluminum in K-shot injections, (and many other injectables, such as products labelled as being nothing more than "saline").
Further, when independent testing is done on these vials, they're finding as much as 50k times the amount of aluminum that the FDA says is beyond the "safe" limit set for FOODS.
My first clue that you're not seeing this issue correctly, is that you've conflated injection with ingestion. There is a HUGE difference between these two methods of obtaining a dosage.
I can't believe this tiny hat asshole levy has the pure audacity too keep on making an ass out of himself 😂
+
I guess you didn' notice the ingredient "sodium acetate" ????
SEE: https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/fda/fdaDrugXsl.cfm?setid=c89a776d-7886-42fe-afcb-5842eb893c23
Scroll down to "inactive ingredients" to see the following:
POLYSORBATE 80 (UNII: 6OZP39ZG8H)
PROPYLENE GLYCOL (UNII: 6DC9Q167V3)
SODIUM ACETATE ANHYDROUS (UNII: NVG71ZZ7P0)
ACETIC ACID (UNII: Q40Q9N063P)
ALSO SEE the sheet for SODUIM ACETATE ANYHYDROUS: https://labeling.pfizer.com/ShowLabeling.aspx?id=4597 which states:
WARNING: This product contains aluminum that may be toxic.
You need to keep safety data sheet information in proper perspective. Yes, all chemicals have toxicity at some level. Look up the SDS for sodium chloride (table salt), a major ingredient in saline. It is also listed as an eye irritant but causes no issues when used properly in correct amounts. Bleeding disorders that are preventable in infants by vitamin K injections would otherwise occur in around 1% of births resulting in serious and often devastating complications. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11305608/#REF1 Vitamin K injections have been used for decades to greatly reduce this problem with no reported adverse effects. Compare that to the increase in incidence of infant bleeding disorders, largely attributable to parental refusal of prophylactic vitamin K. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35190810/. Disinformation is deadly.
99.9% of infants do not bleed internally. We should demand that parents allow an unnecessary injection in their fragile newborn with these odds?
The same deceitful reasoning is given for the HPV vaccine.
We've gone from no aluminium in the k shot to...ok, but just a little. I look forward to the day when garbage like you and your ilk cannot walk down a street feeling safe.
Yep, From "no aluminum" to "just a trace" and without providing the link showing the "trace" amount of aluminum. Lies always end this way, with no EVIDENCE and merely an argument that a' safety data sheet' which states a chemical is too dangerous to come in contact with our skin, is somehow okay to INJECT into a newborn baby.
All a big con job. But hey, if you believe the propaganda, go get as many different jabs as you wish. Nobody is trying to stop you. But step back from repeating pharma lies on this feed please. ("Lies are Unbecoming") Nobody is buying any of it, and these lies are used to bolster arguments for mandating the injections on others, so they're particularly offensive in this forum where we don't WANT to be injected with pharma poison.
Clearly and undeniable, a program of eugenics. What else could it possibly be...
I agree but what a weird program. Does it select for people with better detox pathways? Better glutathione production and recycling? Higher birth weights? More resilient and self-correcting immune systems? Or is just a shotgun blast into the face of humanity? I get that many people know, while most don’t, and that that can protect the coastal classes and the insiders while they cull the hoi polloi… but they aren’t killing enough of us.
Just have patience. They’re planning to cull 6 billion by 2030 , according to Claus Schwab’s last meeting of the Davos Satans. To make people less suspicious of their motives , they blew up the Georgia Guidestone which spelled out their schecanary
I’m leaning toward shotgun. With vax at the top of the list. But add to it food / GMOs / pesticides / drugs in general / etc. Fast might be too fast so slow burn, all the while gathering up money spent on healthcare, and confident we will go sooner or later.
Glyphosates in soil stops plants from absorbing vitamins and minerals .. glyphosates in the body stops one from absorbing minerals and vitamin D .. funny coincidence.
“The rate of autism in entirely unvaccinated individuals with no exposure to the Vitamin K shot or maternal vaccines was 0%, compared to the national rate of 2.79% in 2019 and 3.49% in 2020.” Ok wow.
This is Stellar coverage of this imperative issue, crisp and clear, easy to understand, and it truly gets the points across.
God bless you for covering this!
Joy
I am from and live in Mississippi. I have a seven week old son. I am not vaccinating him. I didn’t take the TDAP when I was pregnant or any other vaccine. He did get the vitamin K shot, but that’s because I was unaware of them giving it. No one asked me or anything about him receiving it. Within the last year or so, I believe our state finally made a way for kids to attend school if they are unvaxxed, but I intend to home school so I don’t really care. There’s no way on God’s green earth they are touching my son with their poison. I wish I had not gotten them when I was a kid.
Also, I refused the hep B vaccine for him before I gave birth. Dumbest thing in the world to give that to a newborn. He isn’t out having sex or doing drugs. Why in the world do they give this to a newborn?!
Lo and behold, it seems to me you have common sense.
It makes ZERO sense. Their reasoning is what if they run across a needle on the playground? Or some random highly doubtful scenarios. It’s called they just want to kill and maim as many as possible as fast as possible. If they can’t get to them in the womb they try outside the womb. If we refuse vaccines period then they try to screw us with our food and water supply. I feel like a conspiracy theorist but my God in Heaven, this is truly what they do.
"Why in the world would they give this to a newborn?"
ANSWER: Because this is an EXTERMINATION
We know the enemy comes to KILL STEAL AND DESTROY. That tells us what we need to know!
Serpents with a university degree.
This is such a brilliant article, simply put with the great orchard analogy, but aligned with credible detailed research findings to back the claims. I agree with interviewee, people just can’t fathom or comprehend that their government want them sick or worse. Thats the stumbling block . When you realise that, all the other lies we’ve been exposed to, fall neatly into place and make sense.
Yes, it reminds them too much of papa and mamma.
🙌🏼🙌🏼🙌🏼 and my 90 year olds who never jabbed their whole life are indeed! much healthier than all the 60-70 year olds all jabbed up! 0-1 rx compared to 6-12 rx too.