Yes, this is what I found in the Australian Novavax contracts that Sasha Latypova helped me access. I am glad this is finally sinking in with Australians and you are passing on the message: pharma is just the bag man because the Australian government gave pharma liability and this was pre-planned with the Australian Department of Defence through a quadrilateral (4-country) countermeasures MOU.
Here is Australia's Novavax contract with DOD links. I am still waiting on the others.
If you want to go further, here is the gain-of-function research Australia has been performing out in the open. While the US (Fauci and Rand Paul) were arguing about whether GOF 'happened,' Australia was doing it out in the open, signed off by Greg Hunt in an NHMRC report: https://vicparkpetition.substack.com/p/australias-gain-of-function-research
👏👏👏👏👏👍👍👍Exactly! I've said it before, but it's worth repeating. If every single country that took mass orders of these shots, look at their military and regulatory bodies, they will find a trail leading directly from their military to USA DoD.
You are so welcome. It is the 'how.' I will have much more coming. As for the why...many people consider this to be a possbility. Also, the transcripts have disappeared from the web after being up for years. Good thing I downloaded them before they went missing. https://vicparkpetition.substack.com/p/here-is-the-depopulation-plan-the
I hope Bobby and/or Sasha mentioned all of Katherine Watts from Balliwick Substack work on this as well. She was tracking the legalities of how the DoD and governments around the world were able to be in this position to action this 5th gen tactics and tranhumanism recruitment drive. She's the reason we know this actually "started" in 2012.
DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH*: I've got a special guest and I've been waiting to get her on the program for so long and I tell you what she has red-hot information. Probably the most important issue that's in front of everybody who's taken one of the vaccines, and what we're going to get into is an answer to I think one of the most fundamental questions, the hardest question that Joe Rogan** asked me is that why do some people have problems with the vaccines and others don't?
Our guest is Dr. Alexandria [Alexandra] Latypova*** who received her undergraduate education in the Ukraine and then received a masters of business administration at Dartmouth, so she didn't receive a doctoral degree but she's worked in the pharmaceutical industry as an executive and now is a freelance analyst and she's done I think the most important analysis and that is on the lot variability. Sasha, welcome to the McCullough Report.
ALEXANDRA [SASHA] LATYPOVA: Thank you, Dr. McCullough. Thank you for inviting me. I'm really glad to speak to your audience and discuss the result of my over-a-year-long analysis.
DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH: OK. So to set the stage, recently the Zogby Survey Company comes out and they do what looks like a representative survey**** and of people out there, two thirds of people took the vaccine, a third who didn't, but of the two thirds that take the vaccine 15% have some new medical problem and they regret taking the vaccine. But that means 85% are fine.
Second piece of information. The CDC under court order has to release the V-safe data, the self-reported data that people have on their cell phones which they electively do, you take a vaccine, they ask you to do V-safe [an app] and they did it. CDC didn't want to release that to the public. Aaron Siri the attorney forces them to release it to the NGO ICAN.* ICAN puts it up on their server and they analyze it, and they find that between 7 and 8% of people who take the vaccine, something bad happens and they have to go an ER, an urgent care, be hospitalized. OK so that piece of information is out there.
And then we have the peer-reviewed literature, a thousand peer-reviewed literature papers now on fatal and nonfatal vaccine injuries.**
And then we have the safety data bases, the VAERS vaccine adverse event reporting system,*** the UK Yellow Card system, the [inaudible] system, the WHO VigiBase system, and there's actually 39 total safety systems. It's all summarized in the World Council for Health Report on Pharmacovigilance for the vaccines.**** And they're all pointing to the same observation, that there's a proportion of patients who take the vaccines and it appears as if nothing happens. And that proportion is the majority and thank goodness. But there is a real minority where they take the vaccines and something happens, including serious injuries and deaths.
So with that backdrop let's start out with what you've analyzed with respect to the companies and who makes these vaccines. And walk us through how a covid 19 vaccine is made. And I think for simplicity's sake why don't we just stick with the messenger RNA vaccines.
ALEXANDRA [SASHA] LATYPOVA: Yeah so that's exactly right. So the first thing I did when I became alarmed by the actions of regulatory authorities, especially with respect to suppression of hydoxychloroquine and other early treatments, as a professional I was extremely alarmed by this and I started looking into this issue much more closely. You know I'm a private citizen, I only have access to VAERS, as everyone else does, and so that's where I went to look. And I wanted to specifically look at the VAERS reports by manufacturing lot numbers. That information exists in VAERS and no other, none of these other data bases that you mention contain this information, so my analysis was to look at adverse events and deaths reported for these mRNA shots per lot number.
As you probably understand as common sense for everyone to know that a lot of something mass-produced, including drugs, food or beverage should always look about the same. If you buy aspirin today in a pharmacy, next month when you buy the same bottle of aspirin it should have the same performance about safety and efficacy as you expect from this product, as you know, as physicians know, as consumers know. So what we are supposed to see when we look at adverse events and deaths by lot number is a straight line across and as close to zero as possible as far as the adverse events and deaths. And that's called safe, effective, and well-manufactured product, product manufactured according to Good Manufacturing Practices, which is a set of laws in the United States covered by a code of federal regulation [inaudible] actually very, very extensive.
And so to do that I looked at the flu vaccines which are very widely administered in the United States, about 50% of the population gets them every year, it's a wide variety of people, children and older adults, so that's a good comparator. And when I looked at the flu vaccines they looked as expected. They looked as a, you know, all the lots looked as a line across the bottom of the graph close to zero. The maximum we ever found, and this is spanning 20, 30 years of data in VAERS, was 37 reports, serious adverse event reports for a lot, and there were probably a couple of deaths. And deaths were very few and far in between, not every lot had them, really just very rare occurrence you could say. And again, flu vaccines are administered in millions and millions of doses, half the population of the US every year. So that was as expected.
And then when I looked at these mRNA shots, at the time also contained Jansen, it's barely used today, the picture looked extremely, extremely alarming.
SASHA LATYPOVA: The range of the adverse events was you know, some lots had maybe 3 to 5 and some lots had 5,000 to 6,000. So the variation by thousands of times was absolutely abnormal, completely not expected from a good manufacturing practice produced product. And so that answer was right away that these products are not produced to good manufacturing practices. Something very wrong is going with this manufacturing.
I then started you know this research, you know continued this research for a year. I wrote letters, Senator Ron Johnson used my data in one his letters to FDA, CDC, manufacturers, which still remains unanswered, you know, asking questions, why this data looks this way.
We also found very abnormal patterns for, based on geography. There were clustering of lots with really bad performance, really bad set of adverse events and deaths. Some lots have several hundreds deaths in one lot, which is just incredible.
The data looks also really bad when you look geographically by each state in the United States. For example states like South Dakota and Kentucky look like death zone, they each have over 30 deaths per 100,000 vaccinated people, that's just VAERS, and you know it's very underreported.
And also there are lots that have dozens of deaths in them in those states. And again I do not believe that this is not known to health authorities in those states. And any lot of anything that produces you know even a couple of deaths, five deaths, is immediately suspect for removal from the market, recalled. And those recalls never happened.
In fact I found that on January 18th 2021, just couple of weeks after full roll out of these mRNA and DNA vaccines in the United States, the health authority of Orange County California accidentally did their job and they found a lot of Moderna that had abnormal number of, they called it allergic reactions, and they said that we're pausing injections from this lot. And this was identified in numerous news reports including even on CNN. They— after a very brief investigation seems like, nothing was done. The lot continued to be distributed all over United States until end of March when it ran out, and it resulted ultimately in about 3,500 serious adverse events and 60 deaths across the United States.
So this is after it was flagged by a county health department. After it was flagged by a county health department it continued to be distributed all over United States and resulted in at least 60 deaths.
So that is an extremely alarming finding. And also of course points to intentional acts.
But you know the question is, how is these vaccines made, how they manufactured, who makes them? That was a much longer investigation and ultimately, and I'll give you a short summary of this, these products are made by a consortium of companies. A majority of this consortium is kind of a hidden to the public, kind of like an iceberg. What you see is Pfizer and Moderna and Jansen being advertised everywhere as manufacturers of these products, but in reality is it's a consortium of traditional and nontraditional suppliers to the Department of Defense. And this consortium has been put in place over a long period of time. I have contracts going back at least to 2012. These are millions, they've established millions of square feet of manufacturing capacity, equipment, supplies, assays, kits, staff, you know, infrastructure, security systems, logistics and so forth, to enable manufacturing of these kinds of products. And those are the companies that are making them. Pfizer and Moderna and Jansen are involved somewhat in some pieces of it, but the entire product is made in this sort of opaque black box DOD completely controlled by the Department of Defense set of contracts and regulations and rules that these guys have to comply with. And so they are producing something that cannot be traced.
And today there is no clarity at all about the manufacturing process. Obviously it's broken. Obviously it's producing bad product, a very inconsistent product. And you know these questions remain unanswered. So the raw material suppliers and intermediate vendors are not good manufacturing practice compliant, nor are Pfizer or Moderna really because the entire chain needs to be compliant for it to be a compliant product.
Inconvenient truth for McCullough as he continues to dance around Trump's involvement in OWS and the DOD in general. That guy is gunning for a government job for sure.
How is Bobby so brilliant on the subject of vaccines and big pharma—yet have these crazy thoughts about climate change and gun laws? I thank god for the work hes doing but i just dont get it.
Yeah, I'm not sold on the Bobby train either. Not saying he hasn't done great work, but I don't think he is the answer to America's prayers. I'm open to changing my mind but I'll start that just as soon as he reexamines the climate change narrative (cross ch ercking with the actual data) and then asks some pointed questions re HAARPs long term climate experimentation.🤨🤨
The 2004 Project Bioshield Act amendments codified at 21 USC 360bbb-3, Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies, commonly known as the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) program, represent the key expansion that enabled the Covid-19 biochemical weapons attack on the American people.
As summarized below under the "Case Study" heading, the EUA Program authorized the HHS Secretary, at his or her sole discretion, to knowingly, deliberately suspend federal drug safety regulation13 for the duration of any "public health emergency" as determined and extended by the HHS Secretary at his or her sole discretion...
21 USC 360bbb-3(c)(2)(A): The only required product efficacy standard authorizing "use" of such products is that "based on the totality of scientific evidence available to the Secretary, including data from adequate and well-controlled clinical trials, if available, it is reasonable to believe that — the product may be effective in diagnosing, treating, or preventing—(i) such disease or condition [SARS-CoV-2]; or (ii) a serious or life-threatening disease or condition caused by a product authorized under this section, approved or cleared under this chapter, or licensed under section 351 of the Public Health Service Act [42 U.S.C. 262], for diagnosing, treating, or preventing such a disease or condition caused by such an agent," with all risk and benefit assessments reserved to HHS Secretary alone, no data required and no data or decisional review by Congress, courts or individual recipients authorized.
Jun 27, 2023·edited Jun 27, 2023Liked by Unbekoming
I think you would really like these three short presentations if you haven't already seen them, I think they are a good summary of Sasha Latypova's work, Corey Linn's findings about the dark and fake US govt dept (?) budgets and completely uncontrolled international travel etc of many many organisations including any DoD contractors but way more, and a little of John Titus' work too - he is amazing, he was a lawyer and spotted the 2008 GFC before it happened. He is speaking now about the current financial crisis and heading towards CBDC - I highly recommend all of his work on various platforms as well (oldest stuff is only on youtube).
Yes, this is what I found in the Australian Novavax contracts that Sasha Latypova helped me access. I am glad this is finally sinking in with Australians and you are passing on the message: pharma is just the bag man because the Australian government gave pharma liability and this was pre-planned with the Australian Department of Defence through a quadrilateral (4-country) countermeasures MOU.
Here is Australia's Novavax contract with DOD links. I am still waiting on the others.
https://vicparkpetition.substack.com/p/australias-novavax-contract
Here are the implications of the contract: https://vicparkpetition.substack.com/p/the-banality-of-evil
If you want to go further, here is the gain-of-function research Australia has been performing out in the open. While the US (Fauci and Rand Paul) were arguing about whether GOF 'happened,' Australia was doing it out in the open, signed off by Greg Hunt in an NHMRC report: https://vicparkpetition.substack.com/p/australias-gain-of-function-research
👏👏👏👏👏👍👍👍Exactly! I've said it before, but it's worth repeating. If every single country that took mass orders of these shots, look at their military and regulatory bodies, they will find a trail leading directly from their military to USA DoD.
Thank you, I need to spend some time on this aspect of the Australian story.
You are so welcome. It is the 'how.' I will have much more coming. As for the why...many people consider this to be a possbility. Also, the transcripts have disappeared from the web after being up for years. Good thing I downloaded them before they went missing. https://vicparkpetition.substack.com/p/here-is-the-depopulation-plan-the
Remember who enabled all of this either willingly or unwillingly and now refuses to discuss it as it might upend his presidential aspirations.
I hope Bobby and/or Sasha mentioned all of Katherine Watts from Balliwick Substack work on this as well. She was tracking the legalities of how the DoD and governments around the world were able to be in this position to action this 5th gen tactics and tranhumanism recruitment drive. She's the reason we know this actually "started" in 2012.
Yes, Watts was acknowledged.
her work is stunning
Relatedly:
Department of Defense Driving Mass Vaccination While FDA and Vaccine Companies are Powerless to Stop It
Peter McCullough, Nov 8, 2022
https://www.americaoutloud.com/department-of-defense-driving-mass-vaccination-while-fda-and-vaccine-companies-are-powerless-to-stop-it/
TRANSCRIPT — EXCERPT
10:57
DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH*: I've got a special guest and I've been waiting to get her on the program for so long and I tell you what she has red-hot information. Probably the most important issue that's in front of everybody who's taken one of the vaccines, and what we're going to get into is an answer to I think one of the most fundamental questions, the hardest question that Joe Rogan** asked me is that why do some people have problems with the vaccines and others don't?
Our guest is Dr. Alexandria [Alexandra] Latypova*** who received her undergraduate education in the Ukraine and then received a masters of business administration at Dartmouth, so she didn't receive a doctoral degree but she's worked in the pharmaceutical industry as an executive and now is a freelance analyst and she's done I think the most important analysis and that is on the lot variability. Sasha, welcome to the McCullough Report.
ALEXANDRA [SASHA] LATYPOVA: Thank you, Dr. McCullough. Thank you for inviting me. I'm really glad to speak to your audience and discuss the result of my over-a-year-long analysis.
DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH: OK. So to set the stage, recently the Zogby Survey Company comes out and they do what looks like a representative survey**** and of people out there, two thirds of people took the vaccine, a third who didn't, but of the two thirds that take the vaccine 15% have some new medical problem and they regret taking the vaccine. But that means 85% are fine.
Second piece of information. The CDC under court order has to release the V-safe data, the self-reported data that people have on their cell phones which they electively do, you take a vaccine, they ask you to do V-safe [an app] and they did it. CDC didn't want to release that to the public. Aaron Siri the attorney forces them to release it to the NGO ICAN.* ICAN puts it up on their server and they analyze it, and they find that between 7 and 8% of people who take the vaccine, something bad happens and they have to go an ER, an urgent care, be hospitalized. OK so that piece of information is out there.
And then we have the peer-reviewed literature, a thousand peer-reviewed literature papers now on fatal and nonfatal vaccine injuries.**
And then we have the safety data bases, the VAERS vaccine adverse event reporting system,*** the UK Yellow Card system, the [inaudible] system, the WHO VigiBase system, and there's actually 39 total safety systems. It's all summarized in the World Council for Health Report on Pharmacovigilance for the vaccines.**** And they're all pointing to the same observation, that there's a proportion of patients who take the vaccines and it appears as if nothing happens. And that proportion is the majority and thank goodness. But there is a real minority where they take the vaccines and something happens, including serious injuries and deaths.
So with that backdrop let's start out with what you've analyzed with respect to the companies and who makes these vaccines. And walk us through how a covid 19 vaccine is made. And I think for simplicity's sake why don't we just stick with the messenger RNA vaccines.
ALEXANDRA [SASHA] LATYPOVA: Yeah so that's exactly right. So the first thing I did when I became alarmed by the actions of regulatory authorities, especially with respect to suppression of hydoxychloroquine and other early treatments, as a professional I was extremely alarmed by this and I started looking into this issue much more closely. You know I'm a private citizen, I only have access to VAERS, as everyone else does, and so that's where I went to look. And I wanted to specifically look at the VAERS reports by manufacturing lot numbers. That information exists in VAERS and no other, none of these other data bases that you mention contain this information, so my analysis was to look at adverse events and deaths reported for these mRNA shots per lot number.
As you probably understand as common sense for everyone to know that a lot of something mass-produced, including drugs, food or beverage should always look about the same. If you buy aspirin today in a pharmacy, next month when you buy the same bottle of aspirin it should have the same performance about safety and efficacy as you expect from this product, as you know, as physicians know, as consumers know. So what we are supposed to see when we look at adverse events and deaths by lot number is a straight line across and as close to zero as possible as far as the adverse events and deaths. And that's called safe, effective, and well-manufactured product, product manufactured according to Good Manufacturing Practices, which is a set of laws in the United States covered by a code of federal regulation [inaudible] actually very, very extensive.
And so to do that I looked at the flu vaccines which are very widely administered in the United States, about 50% of the population gets them every year, it's a wide variety of people, children and older adults, so that's a good comparator. And when I looked at the flu vaccines they looked as expected. They looked as a, you know, all the lots looked as a line across the bottom of the graph close to zero. The maximum we ever found, and this is spanning 20, 30 years of data in VAERS, was 37 reports, serious adverse event reports for a lot, and there were probably a couple of deaths. And deaths were very few and far in between, not every lot had them, really just very rare occurrence you could say. And again, flu vaccines are administered in millions and millions of doses, half the population of the US every year. So that was as expected.
And then when I looked at these mRNA shots, at the time also contained Jansen, it's barely used today, the picture looked extremely, extremely alarming.
...continued...
...continued... TRANSCRIPT - EXCERPT
SASHA LATYPOVA: The range of the adverse events was you know, some lots had maybe 3 to 5 and some lots had 5,000 to 6,000. So the variation by thousands of times was absolutely abnormal, completely not expected from a good manufacturing practice produced product. And so that answer was right away that these products are not produced to good manufacturing practices. Something very wrong is going with this manufacturing.
I then started you know this research, you know continued this research for a year. I wrote letters, Senator Ron Johnson used my data in one his letters to FDA, CDC, manufacturers, which still remains unanswered, you know, asking questions, why this data looks this way.
We also found very abnormal patterns for, based on geography. There were clustering of lots with really bad performance, really bad set of adverse events and deaths. Some lots have several hundreds deaths in one lot, which is just incredible.
The data looks also really bad when you look geographically by each state in the United States. For example states like South Dakota and Kentucky look like death zone, they each have over 30 deaths per 100,000 vaccinated people, that's just VAERS, and you know it's very underreported.
And also there are lots that have dozens of deaths in them in those states. And again I do not believe that this is not known to health authorities in those states. And any lot of anything that produces you know even a couple of deaths, five deaths, is immediately suspect for removal from the market, recalled. And those recalls never happened.
In fact I found that on January 18th 2021, just couple of weeks after full roll out of these mRNA and DNA vaccines in the United States, the health authority of Orange County California accidentally did their job and they found a lot of Moderna that had abnormal number of, they called it allergic reactions, and they said that we're pausing injections from this lot. And this was identified in numerous news reports including even on CNN. They— after a very brief investigation seems like, nothing was done. The lot continued to be distributed all over United States until end of March when it ran out, and it resulted ultimately in about 3,500 serious adverse events and 60 deaths across the United States.
So this is after it was flagged by a county health department. After it was flagged by a county health department it continued to be distributed all over United States and resulted in at least 60 deaths.
So that is an extremely alarming finding. And also of course points to intentional acts.
But you know the question is, how is these vaccines made, how they manufactured, who makes them? That was a much longer investigation and ultimately, and I'll give you a short summary of this, these products are made by a consortium of companies. A majority of this consortium is kind of a hidden to the public, kind of like an iceberg. What you see is Pfizer and Moderna and Jansen being advertised everywhere as manufacturers of these products, but in reality is it's a consortium of traditional and nontraditional suppliers to the Department of Defense. And this consortium has been put in place over a long period of time. I have contracts going back at least to 2012. These are millions, they've established millions of square feet of manufacturing capacity, equipment, supplies, assays, kits, staff, you know, infrastructure, security systems, logistics and so forth, to enable manufacturing of these kinds of products. And those are the companies that are making them. Pfizer and Moderna and Jansen are involved somewhat in some pieces of it, but the entire product is made in this sort of opaque black box DOD completely controlled by the Department of Defense set of contracts and regulations and rules that these guys have to comply with. And so they are producing something that cannot be traced.
And today there is no clarity at all about the manufacturing process. Obviously it's broken. Obviously it's producing bad product, a very inconsistent product. And you know these questions remain unanswered. So the raw material suppliers and intermediate vendors are not good manufacturing practice compliant, nor are Pfizer or Moderna really because the entire chain needs to be compliant for it to be a compliant product.
23:08
[END OF EXCERPT]
# # #
TRANSCRIBER'S NOTES:
*Dr. Peter McCullough links:
website: https://www.petermcculloughmd.com/
Substack (co-authored with John Leake): https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/archive
Podcast: The McCullough Report https://www.americaoutloud.com/author/dr-peter-mccullough/
**Joe Rogan interviewed Dr. Peter McCullough podcast #1747
[note: I have had trouble finding the original link, will update ASAP
https://rumble.com/vqv99d-joe-rogan-video-dr.-peter-mccullough-full-interveiw-a-very-experienced-doct.html ]
***Alexandra Latypova's Substack: https://substack.com/profile/50868935-sasha-latypova
****Zogby Survey: see https://childrenshealthdefense.org/press-release/15-of-american-adults-diagnosed-with-new-condition-after-covid-vaccine-zogby-survey-finds/
Direct downloads to Zogby survey results:
https://johnzogbystrategies.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/XTABS_ALL-ADULTS-and-COVID-Vaccines-Survey_July-2022.pdf
https://johnzogbystrategies.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/XTABS_18-49-and-COVID-Vaccines-Survey_July-2022.pdf
*Aaron Siri's substack: https://aaronsiri.substack.com
ICAN is the Informed Consent Action Network, webpage is https://icandecide.org
The V-safe data can be found at https://icandecide.org/v-safe-data/
**Peer-reviewed literature on vaccine injuries, see for example:
https://react19.org/1250-covid-vaccine-reports/
***VAERS is the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, official US government data base.
https://vaers.hhs.gov/about.html
(Note: https://openvaers.com/covid-data provides VAERS data in a more reader-friendly presentation)
****World Council for Health Report on Pharmacovigilance for the vaccines
See https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/news/independent-pharmacovigilance-report-recall-of-covid-19-vaccines/
Inconvenient truth for McCullough as he continues to dance around Trump's involvement in OWS and the DOD in general. That guy is gunning for a government job for sure.
I give Dr. McCullough huge credit for speaking out early on, and for interviewing Sasha Latypova as early as he did, November 2022.
So do I. It's a strange turn of events. Perhaps he received The Visit.
Interesting. I didn't realize that about McCullough.
Outside of that, didn't the title, "Operation Warp Speed," give us a BIG CLUE? I can still hear Trump's voice speak it, celebrate it even.
Once you see it about McCullough you cannot unsee it.
Is he one who is hyper-focusing on pharma?
Why did they "allow" the issues with the J & J vaccine to become public knowledge, but not Pfizer or Moderna?
Because mRNA.
And Pfizer keeps Moderna in a deep shadow.
And the declaration of a Public Health Energency was made by?
And the appointment of Azar as HHS Sec was made by?
Funny that.
How is Bobby so brilliant on the subject of vaccines and big pharma—yet have these crazy thoughts about climate change and gun laws? I thank god for the work hes doing but i just dont get it.
@Jerms 0654 ~ Bobby admitted publicly he was originally snowed by all the #RussiaGate propaganda, but he's awake on this issue now.
I am hoping it will be just a matter of time before he sees the light re: #ClimateGate, as well.
I wonder too. How can all the people he's surrounded with, not have explained them to him??
One foot out the door . . .
trading a Health Marxist for a Climate Marxist?
https://sagehana.substack.com/p/all-of-these-people-rfk-jr-spoke?publication_id=702469&isFreemail=true
Yeah, I'm not sold on the Bobby train either. Not saying he hasn't done great work, but I don't think he is the answer to America's prayers. I'm open to changing my mind but I'll start that just as soon as he reexamines the climate change narrative (cross ch ercking with the actual data) and then asks some pointed questions re HAARPs long term climate experimentation.🤨🤨
https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/us-department-of-defense/comment/17760837
For those who haven't delved into Sasha/Katherine's work,
https://open.substack.com/pub/bailiwicknews/p/construction-of-the-kill-box-legal is a thorough summary of Katherine's work. Zeroing in,
/quote
The 2004 Project Bioshield Act amendments codified at 21 USC 360bbb-3, Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies, commonly known as the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) program, represent the key expansion that enabled the Covid-19 biochemical weapons attack on the American people.
As summarized below under the "Case Study" heading, the EUA Program authorized the HHS Secretary, at his or her sole discretion, to knowingly, deliberately suspend federal drug safety regulation13 for the duration of any "public health emergency" as determined and extended by the HHS Secretary at his or her sole discretion...
21 USC 360bbb-3(c)(2)(A): The only required product efficacy standard authorizing "use" of such products is that "based on the totality of scientific evidence available to the Secretary, including data from adequate and well-controlled clinical trials, if available, it is reasonable to believe that — the product may be effective in diagnosing, treating, or preventing—(i) such disease or condition [SARS-CoV-2]; or (ii) a serious or life-threatening disease or condition caused by a product authorized under this section, approved or cleared under this chapter, or licensed under section 351 of the Public Health Service Act [42 U.S.C. 262], for diagnosing, treating, or preventing such a disease or condition caused by such an agent," with all risk and benefit assessments reserved to HHS Secretary alone, no data required and no data or decisional review by Congress, courts or individual recipients authorized.
/endquote
Was the Astra Zeneca shot also formulated by the military?
Don't know, but good question.
I'm also curious about this and the Jassen vaccine.
I think you would really like these three short presentations if you haven't already seen them, I think they are a good summary of Sasha Latypova's work, Corey Linn's findings about the dark and fake US govt dept (?) budgets and completely uncontrolled international travel etc of many many organisations including any DoD contractors but way more, and a little of John Titus' work too - he is amazing, he was a lawyer and spotted the 2008 GFC before it happened. He is speaking now about the current financial crisis and heading towards CBDC - I highly recommend all of his work on various platforms as well (oldest stuff is only on youtube).
The 3 presentations https://doctors4covidethics.org/session-iii-getting-away-from-the-control-grid-2/
John Titus most recent https://www.bitchute.com/channel/yQGtlz56XDCB/
Old stuff by John Titus https://www.youtube.com/@BestEvidence/videos