Uninformed Consent

A Documentary

Bloody hell, Canadians make great documentaries!

I’ve had this one on my to-watch list for a while, and I’m glad I finally got around to it.

The first half is very good, the second half is simply excellent!

You can watch it HERE.

Doesn’t matter where you are on the awakened spectrum, there is something for everybody here.

It took me down memory lane and I’m glad to see more of these very well produced docos piecing together our GMC history for a new, waking up, audience, but also as a matter of public, historical record.

There are so many threads that they touch on and cover, and I’m not going to do a full review of the whole thing, but I’ll pick up on just some of those threads, especially those that for me (in my awakened state) appreciated and found interesting.

At around minute 37, Dr. Paul Thomas gets a mention. I’m glad that he does.

Toby Rogers first introduced me to Thomas in his simply excellent stack from Sept 2021. If you have any doubts (as I used to) about the relationship between childhood vaccination and autism, this is a wonderful place to start:

The Political Economy of Autism

What the makers of the doco are doing is laying crumbs, for those who are waking up to medical corruption in the covid/jab space, that can be followed towards waking up around childhood vaccination. Nice.

Paul Thomas is also mentioned and highlighted here:

Jabbing GPs: An Australian mother’s story

I also learnt in the doco that DDT was a Monsanto product. I didn’t know that.

So, if DDT was causal to polio, and to understand that you really need to read Maready’s masterpiece The Moth in the Iron Lung, then the polio narrative helped to distract attention from someone. Well, it seems Monsanto is a primary piece of that puzzle, that they are the “someone”. But as you will see from Maready’s book, the history of polio malfeasance precedes DDT, it has been multiple waves of “hide the ball”.

Also, you can see this excellent comment from Ray about the history of polio. I’m going to need to repurpose that at some point into a stack. Thanks Ray.

I took plenty out of this doco, but if I’m called to pick just one thing it was this comment from Alan Cassels at around 1:20:40 and again around 1:22:08.

Here he is talking about the influence of doctors:

“The science of influence is about 40 years ahead of the science of evidence-based medicine”.

“The science used to convince them to prescribe something is way more advanced than the science that has been used to actually develop the treatment in the first place.”

WOW! The framing and execution of this thought is simply perfect and exquisite!

Yes, the science of INFLUENCE, is an actual SCIENCE and they are very, very, very good at it.

I hadn’t come across Alan Cassels before, so glad the doco introduced me to him, and he was given good airtime. I looked him up, and he is the author of Selling Sickness from 2006, so clearly awake THEM for a long time. This is the short book synopsis on Amazon:

Thirty years ago, the head of the drug company Merck made some remarkably candid comments about his distress that his company's market was limited to sick people. Suggesting he would like Merck to be more like the maker of Wrigley's chewing gum, the CEO said it had long been his dream to make drugs for healthy people, to sell to everyone. That dream now drives the marketing machinery of the most profitable industry on earth. From award-winning Ray Moynihan, -- one of the world's top medical journalists -- Selling Sickness reveals how widening the boundaries of illness and lowering the threshold for treatments is creating millions of new patients and billions in new profits. This in turn is driving up personal drug bills and threatening to bankrupt national health systems all over the world. As more and more ordinary life is medicalized, the industry moves ever closer to being able to sell to everyone.

As I read that, it made me think of the term Disease Branding that I bumped into in The HPV Vaccine On Trial. Here is an excerpt from the book, it’s Merck again:

“DISEASE BRANDING” OR SELLING CERVICAL CANCER

Although the FDA approved Gardasil in June 2006, less than two years after Vioxx came off the market, Merck’s aggressive direct-to-consumer marketing started in September 2005, seven months ahead of FDA approval. In a marketing effort that CEO Richard Clark dubbed “flawlessly” executed, Merck sold fear of cervical cancer, not the vaccine itself, to consumers. Scholar Carl Elliott explains that “disease branding” is the marketing buzzword for promoting a disease that a new drug can treat. Merck has perfected this reverse engineering over decades. As far back as the 1960s, Merck’s strategy for marketing a new antidepressant drug, amitriptyline, was to “sell clinical depression.”

While Merck could sell clinical depression—and thus amitriptyline—only to doctors at the time, since the mid-1990s, the FDA has allowed direct-to-consumer (DTC) pharmaceutical marketing. The United States is an outlier on this. New Zealand, with only four million people, is the only other country allowing DTC prescription drug advertising. The overwhelming majority of countries do not accept that advertising prescription medical products to consumers is in the public interest. Even the American Medical Association, the US voice of mainstream medicine, has called for a halt to DTC marketing for prescription drugs and medical devices. It expressed concern in 2015 that commercial drug promotion drives demand for expensive treatments when less expensive and more effective alternatives exist. Overall, DTC advertising contributes substantially to the ultimate cost for drugs and medical care, with advertising at $4.5 billion per year. With billions invested in consumer outreach, you can bet Merck and other pharmaceutical giants are factoring that expenditure into their pricing models.

Recognizing that most girls and women were ignorant of any relationship between HPV and cervical cancer, Merck first drew attention to the issue in two widespread ad campaigns that did not even mention “Gardasil.” Following Edward Bernays’s advice in the classic 1928 book Propaganda, Merck understood that “it is not enough to sell a product. Instead, you need to sell the vision that will lead to desire for the product, with the consumer believing that it is their [sic] own idea.”

First, Merck funded a group called Cancer Research and Prevention Foundation, “a drug industry funded group wrapped in non-profit clothing,” to run a campaign called “Make the Connection.” Merck urged women to link HPV with cervical cancer; a bracelet-making component of the campaign symbolized making a connection. Then it launched the “Tell Someone” ad campaign, urging women to tell their loved ones about the connection between the virus and cancer.

Finally, having primed the market, Merck launched an advertising blitz aimed at preteen girls urging each to “Be One Less” victim of cervical cancer in her lifetime. Merck saturated print and broadcast media with ads for Gardasil as the only solution to the omnipresent threat of cervical cancer. Such an ad campaign would have been illegal in almost every other country in the world, but not the US.

As I reread this, and reflect on the GMC, whatever happened to the DTC laws? The companies were prevented from marketing the jabs directly to us, so the governments stepped in and did it, in direct contravention of their DTC laws. Interesting.

Andrew Wakefield of Vaxxed 1 fame gets some airtime. The machine went after him and did its utmost to smear and discredit him.

This slide popped up during the doco. Take some time to read the unhighlighted section:

I didn’t know that Murdoch had a primary hand in going after Wakefield and destroying his career.

But I’m not surprised really considering the Murdoch vaccine full court press in Australia during the GMC. Paul Collits aptly calls The Australian newspaper, owned by Murdoch, The Daily Vaccinator:

The Murdoch Media and the Pandemic of the Vaccinated

The Murdoch press in Australia specialises in Covid ideology and pro-vaxx disinformation. It is a corporatist media spruiker for Big Pharma.

The doco covers some good ground on Ivermectin and Andrew Hill, as was covered here:

The assassination of Ivermectin and the death of millions

But what I didn’t know is that Andrew Hill, Unitaid and the University of Liverpool, were connected via a $40 million “grant”.

Researcher Andrew Hill’s conflict: A $40 million Gates Foundation grant vs a half million human lives

Four days before publication, Hill’s sponsor Unitaid gave the University of Liverpool, Hill’s employer $40 million. Unitaid, it turns out, was also an author of the conclusions of Hill’s study.

So, what do you call a BRIBE in polite society? A GRANT.

What is the going rate for 500,000 lives (and counting)? $40m.

At around 1:39:10 we see the Heather McDonald stand-up clip in full, where she is bragging about all her jabs and making fun of the unjabbed and then she collapses. The crowd thought it was part of the act. Again, it’s important to keep these as a matter of public record.

At around 1:14:13 Malone talks about why vaccines historically have taken years because of Delayed Adverse Events. Obviously, we have made the case, as lay people, that off course you need to figure out if an immunological intervention has adverse reactions, but hearing Malone use the term Delayed Adverse Events was like a penny drop moment for me. Off course! They even have a term for it. DAE discovery is vaccine development 101, yet I haven’t heard ANYONE use that technical term until I heard Malone use it.

At around 1:43:15 Malone talks about Nuremberg, and I liked his very simple framing of that Code. He said, with minimal paraphrasing, that as to medical treatments, the Code determined that the rights of the individual outweigh the rights of the collective.

Yep, that’s it in a nutshell. So, if you accept that to be true (Robert, I’m talking to you now) and you believe that the rights of the individual have been violated by outweighing the collective, well surely that means you also believe that childhood vaccination mandates are a violation of Nuremberg…yes? Malone unfortunately doesn’t want to cross over into that territory because he doesn’t want to be smeared as a childhood vaccine denier, that is a fate even worse than being labelled a Covid jab denier.

One of the best things about the doco was that they gave plenty of airtime to Dr. Stephen Malthouse (who I had not heard of before) and Christopher Shaw, author of Dispatches from the Vaccine Wars (who I knew of but had never heard). Listening to these two men was worth the price of admission alone.

At around 1:48:06 Hoffe talks about cancer. This is a subject I want to understand better. I want to understand what we know about the mechanism of action between genetic jabs and rises in cancer. I especially need to find teachers who can explain it in simple English to a layperson like me.

Anyway, Hoffe put it this way. Very simple and very helpful. I am happy to assume that it is basically true. This is the shape of what he said:

That spike damages your ability to repair DNA which means you’ll have a much higher cancer risk, and they also damage your body’s ability to recognise tumour cells.

If anyone believes this to be untrue, please let me know.

If anyone has any supporting material to the truthiness of this, please send that through also.

At some point I want to do a layman’s stack on Covid jabs and cancer. If some else has already done it, please point me to it.

And lastly, the doco talked about the tobacco industry and how The Science was captured then, and the decades it took for real science to be allowed to come through and the public to wake up. I wonder how much “tobacco tech” has found its way into “disease branding tech”?

This was The Science™ at the time. If you think it’s any different today, you haven’t been paying attention.

---

Thank you for reading this Substack.

Please consider a small paid subscription (donation). The money goes to a good cause.

I am always looking for good, personal GMC or childhood vaccination stories. Shared stories help others.

In the comments, please let me know what’s on your mind.

You can write to me privately: unbekoming@outlook.com

---

ONE HEALTH?