I could not have said it any better! AMEN! These tests/screenings have but one purpose: to find ways to justify more tests and/or procedures.
Related note - Contrary to popular opinion (brainwashing), cancer screenings do not statistically reduce cancer deaths. (I personally know of only one person who died from actual cancer. I know tons of people who died during "cancer treatment." So....)
***********
"I'm now firmly of the view, that if you are healthy (they call that “asymptomatic” nowadays) you should not volunteer for any type of checkup, screening or test."
Fascinating read…..yet another piece of an intimidatingly complex puzzle that the miracle of birth, and life continues to be. My poor wife has had so many ultrasounds during her pregnancies…..we are always looking for clues, for confirmation, for hope, yet she has lost 6 of the 7 babies, the last two mid term, with devastating effects on her, our one surviving child, and myself. I don’t know where the answer lies, or if there even is one, but I do know ow I firmly believe that most medical intervention causes more harm than good. Our system is brilliant at saving, stabilizing, and reconstructing a body after a car crash or some equally traumatic event, but, apart from that, results are mixed at best and often cause far, far more illness, disease and general harm than would be the case absent medical intervention.
I ran into another former Marine at jury duty a year ago….while we were swapping stories of medical experimentation done on our teeth, as we were being used for training for the young Navy corpsmen, he told me that the rationale behind drilling out his healthy teeth and putting in fillings, was that they were all “future cavities”. Just as now you point out so succinctly, yet so brilliantly, that now healthy people have been re-labeled as “asymptomatic”…..
May God have mercy on us all! Thanks to all of those who fight the good fight, who keep the faith.
Yes. When they say you are government property, they really mean it. They can do whatever they want with you and there are no repercussions and no press conferences and no lobbyist and no one to advocate for you.
I had one ultrasound with my first born in the late 80s and then decided not to have any more. My doctor said he wouldn’t follow me for the birth. I never did any more ultrasounds (had two more children with home births). I didn’t have evidence of harm, just no evidence of NO harm and I felt it made sense to avoid new technological interventions. Almost 40 years later, it seems like they’ve avoided doing good studies - just as with the vaccines. The increase in autism also coincides with the increased vaccine schedule. It would be interesting to see data on how many of the parents choosing not to vaccinate their children also chose not to do multiple ultrasounds. The rates of autism in unvaccinated children is extremely low.
I'd like to add my 2 cent's worth to this - I had a pregnancy in the late 80's and the fetus was obviously not growing. They performed ultrasounds on me and said that the fetus was perfectly fine. At my 7 months physical exam, the doctor found the fetus had died. I knew something was wrong months before but if the ultrasound says it's fine, then it's fine. Same if the doctor says it's fine. I wonder how many ultrasounds didn't detect any problems but they never go into the statistics, they just get waved aside.
" I knew something was wrong months before but it the ultrasound says it's fine, then it's fine." This relates to how doctors do not really seek clues from patients' anecdotal firsthand accounts, and instead go so far as to label patients' questions as signs of "noncompliance." It's also medical misogyny in its purest form, ignoring the experiences and voices of women regarding a "women's issue."
It is misogynistic yes indeed. So is delivering on your back. That is also sadistic because the pelvis softens to allow the head of the baby to slip through when there is gravity pushing the baby's head down on it. How can men know these things? It's not something you learn from a text book! But it's up to women now to use their voice and have total say in how they birth their baby. And maybe even educate men. They cannot know about our bodies just like we cannot know about theirs. The only reason we have mostly male doctors (or doctors at all) is because we live in a patriarchal designed framework where women had no say whatsoever in how society was designed. Those days are over now so women must step up to the plate.
For that matter, pregnant women are also expected to receive "vaccines," and are often treated with antibiotics, each of which drastically increases the occurrence of "asthma" (one of the many invented illnesses with real symptoms) in the offspring:
Maybe that explains 2 things, mother is at least 4 times C-jabbed, both have frequent bouts of Steph, and granddaughter has mild asthma, but that could be from the 7 people and animals that live in a 3 bedroom house. Now they have her addicted to a tablet or TV.
Asthma is an invented illness of the kind, when the patient or their surroundings are blamed for some kind of industrial-grade poisoning. Wi-Fi, cell phone signals, and high-voltage power lines also cause or exacerbate the symptoms. EMF/ELF is also bad (e.g. sitting too close to the TV, a monitor, or a computer, holding a handheld device, a "smart" appliance/meter, or the electric wiring of the home). The latest home routers also emit 5G signals, which are probably the worst...
The medical definition of Patient: potential victim.
Like you said, the easiest way to avoid becoming a victim is to avoid "preventive" visits (which are used for early victim identification). And just plain avoid hospitals at all costs. Only go there for trauma treatment, if you are unconscious, or are clearly in some sort of crisis that you can't manage on your own.
We all need to learn to take control of our own health. Dr. Mercola was where my health journey began in earnest, so he's a good place to start. Dr. John Bergman, DC is another great resource. A Midwestern Doctor's substack is awesome, especially for those of us whose age cohort experiences a high degree of chronic disease (after the latest bioweapon attack, isn't that just about everyone?).
And women can't wait to get that very first ultrasound of the baby they now carry, is it a boy or a girl? My DIL couldn't, with either child, The 6-year-old is a bright healthy girl. The one due in June is also a girl, much to the disappointment of my son, he would have loved a son, but girls run in her family. A Never Before Seen Look At Human Life In The Womb | Baby Olivia
Babies with IUGR naturally get more ultrasounds to assess fetal health. Is this a correlation but not necessarily a causation between increased ultrasounds and IUGR?
All these techniques may be helpful in special cases, that’s obvious. Overusing them to generate empty profits is also quite obvious.
The real question is what actual value do you get from this procedure?
Is the performing physician knowledgeable enough? Does he/she know what they are looking at? Do they know what does this image as a whole and these white, black and grey dots mean?
How much training has he/she got in interpreting the results? Was he/she certified? With that final grade? What does this grade tell?
Buying an USG machine is cheap. Moving the head here and there is equally cheap, just like the snake oil sellers did. Profits - way beyond business plans. Tools change, but what about the mind using these tools?
Exactly. I’ve understood this for decades and am so relieved that finally the truth is coming out in a more widespread way. For the longest time, people paid by the system couldn’t or wouldn’t see the truth or speak up and the everyday person was so brainwashed that they refused to consider this.
The ultrasonic cleaning machine that I use for my watch repair hobby will tear holes in aluminum foil. I wonder what the fetal ultrasound machines would do?
joinin' the club--with my older daughter who has ASD I had MULTIPLE ultrasounds against my will--at first it wuz jus' 1x/month but after 35 weeks my dok-turd insisted I come in weekly for ultrasounds--lastin' from 15-30 min. EACH! My only "high risk" wuz that I was over 35 but NOT otherwise a risk in any way (zero health issues) BUT they insisted... I tried ta avoid it--tried ta postpone an' refused ta answer the phone callin' me for "reminders" non-stop (many times per day) when I didn't come in. Then my dokturd told me that he'd dump me if I didn't come in an' take the "safe" ultrasounds. At 35+ weeks it's not time ta find a'nuther MD so I caved--I'll regret cavin' all my life--I didn't know JUST how bad it would be -- tho DD is high functionin' we got all manner of health issues with her, sensory issues, sound sensitivity--I'm SURE harm wuz done by the ultrasounds I tried ta avoid (like a convict hidin' out from the sherrif!). They also forced the VitK shot on her... I had Vit K drops but they said the shot wuz needed otherwise they'd call child protective services on me an' take the baby away... TRUE story! They totally ignored my birth plan that said drops-not-shot. I got strong armed on both, I'll be carin' for my older girl all her life unless (ha!) some "cure" is found... fat chance, "zey" always murder all the docs that figger out a way ta help. With my 2nd daughter I tried ta have a home birth so I avoided all the ultrasounds an' had mebbe a couple short dopplers--didn't end up at home (that's a long story) but daughter 2 is neurotypical an' has none of the health issues #1 had so there is likely lots ta this ultrasound theory (it heats up cells too--bad nooz). The issue is, the authori-tease will threaten mamas ta comply--they put ya 'tween a rock an' a hard place an' don't give a sh*t when there are problems -for-life b/c they didn't get sued... it's a sick sick whirled out there in the Medi-Cull in-dust-ree.
Look, sorry, I like what you do but "evidence" like: "Women who receive multiple ultrasounds, like those with high-risk pregnancies, have higher rates of autistic children." is laughable. What is the chicken and what the egg? You have presented convincing evidence that this is an economic industry and essentially a cosmetic operation, but NONE for any harm. There's no smoke, no fire, nothing.
I could not have said it any better! AMEN! These tests/screenings have but one purpose: to find ways to justify more tests and/or procedures.
Related note - Contrary to popular opinion (brainwashing), cancer screenings do not statistically reduce cancer deaths. (I personally know of only one person who died from actual cancer. I know tons of people who died during "cancer treatment." So....)
***********
"I'm now firmly of the view, that if you are healthy (they call that “asymptomatic” nowadays) you should not volunteer for any type of checkup, screening or test."
Fish in a barrel
Fascinating read…..yet another piece of an intimidatingly complex puzzle that the miracle of birth, and life continues to be. My poor wife has had so many ultrasounds during her pregnancies…..we are always looking for clues, for confirmation, for hope, yet she has lost 6 of the 7 babies, the last two mid term, with devastating effects on her, our one surviving child, and myself. I don’t know where the answer lies, or if there even is one, but I do know ow I firmly believe that most medical intervention causes more harm than good. Our system is brilliant at saving, stabilizing, and reconstructing a body after a car crash or some equally traumatic event, but, apart from that, results are mixed at best and often cause far, far more illness, disease and general harm than would be the case absent medical intervention.
I ran into another former Marine at jury duty a year ago….while we were swapping stories of medical experimentation done on our teeth, as we were being used for training for the young Navy corpsmen, he told me that the rationale behind drilling out his healthy teeth and putting in fillings, was that they were all “future cavities”. Just as now you point out so succinctly, yet so brilliantly, that now healthy people have been re-labeled as “asymptomatic”…..
May God have mercy on us all! Thanks to all of those who fight the good fight, who keep the faith.
Yes. When they say you are government property, they really mean it. They can do whatever they want with you and there are no repercussions and no press conferences and no lobbyist and no one to advocate for you.
I had one ultrasound with my first born in the late 80s and then decided not to have any more. My doctor said he wouldn’t follow me for the birth. I never did any more ultrasounds (had two more children with home births). I didn’t have evidence of harm, just no evidence of NO harm and I felt it made sense to avoid new technological interventions. Almost 40 years later, it seems like they’ve avoided doing good studies - just as with the vaccines. The increase in autism also coincides with the increased vaccine schedule. It would be interesting to see data on how many of the parents choosing not to vaccinate their children also chose not to do multiple ultrasounds. The rates of autism in unvaccinated children is extremely low.
Yes, without doubt, the primary cause of autism is childhood vaccination. I think it would explain 80-90% of it.
https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/real-autism-science
But there are other ways to damage a baby's brain.
Yes. I’m increasingly concerned with EMF with the ramping up…
I'd like to add my 2 cent's worth to this - I had a pregnancy in the late 80's and the fetus was obviously not growing. They performed ultrasounds on me and said that the fetus was perfectly fine. At my 7 months physical exam, the doctor found the fetus had died. I knew something was wrong months before but if the ultrasound says it's fine, then it's fine. Same if the doctor says it's fine. I wonder how many ultrasounds didn't detect any problems but they never go into the statistics, they just get waved aside.
" I knew something was wrong months before but it the ultrasound says it's fine, then it's fine." This relates to how doctors do not really seek clues from patients' anecdotal firsthand accounts, and instead go so far as to label patients' questions as signs of "noncompliance." It's also medical misogyny in its purest form, ignoring the experiences and voices of women regarding a "women's issue."
It is misogynistic yes indeed. So is delivering on your back. That is also sadistic because the pelvis softens to allow the head of the baby to slip through when there is gravity pushing the baby's head down on it. How can men know these things? It's not something you learn from a text book! But it's up to women now to use their voice and have total say in how they birth their baby. And maybe even educate men. They cannot know about our bodies just like we cannot know about theirs. The only reason we have mostly male doctors (or doctors at all) is because we live in a patriarchal designed framework where women had no say whatsoever in how society was designed. Those days are over now so women must step up to the plate.
Important information.
For that matter, pregnant women are also expected to receive "vaccines," and are often treated with antibiotics, each of which drastically increases the occurrence of "asthma" (one of the many invented illnesses with real symptoms) in the offspring:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/asthma-and-traditional-vaccines-during
Maybe that explains 2 things, mother is at least 4 times C-jabbed, both have frequent bouts of Steph, and granddaughter has mild asthma, but that could be from the 7 people and animals that live in a 3 bedroom house. Now they have her addicted to a tablet or TV.
Asthma is an invented illness of the kind, when the patient or their surroundings are blamed for some kind of industrial-grade poisoning. Wi-Fi, cell phone signals, and high-voltage power lines also cause or exacerbate the symptoms. EMF/ELF is also bad (e.g. sitting too close to the TV, a monitor, or a computer, holding a handheld device, a "smart" appliance/meter, or the electric wiring of the home). The latest home routers also emit 5G signals, which are probably the worst...
Her being jabbed worries me about the new baby on June 1.
The medical definition of Patient: potential victim.
Like you said, the easiest way to avoid becoming a victim is to avoid "preventive" visits (which are used for early victim identification). And just plain avoid hospitals at all costs. Only go there for trauma treatment, if you are unconscious, or are clearly in some sort of crisis that you can't manage on your own.
We all need to learn to take control of our own health. Dr. Mercola was where my health journey began in earnest, so he's a good place to start. Dr. John Bergman, DC is another great resource. A Midwestern Doctor's substack is awesome, especially for those of us whose age cohort experiences a high degree of chronic disease (after the latest bioweapon attack, isn't that just about everyone?).
"victim identification"...nice!
'i had a job getting out of these with my first in germany. then 4 years later, in holland, did not even come up. no invasive anything. ''
And women can't wait to get that very first ultrasound of the baby they now carry, is it a boy or a girl? My DIL couldn't, with either child, The 6-year-old is a bright healthy girl. The one due in June is also a girl, much to the disappointment of my son, he would have loved a son, but girls run in her family. A Never Before Seen Look At Human Life In The Womb | Baby Olivia
https://youtu.be/S-lQOooYAs8?t=44
Babies with IUGR naturally get more ultrasounds to assess fetal health. Is this a correlation but not necessarily a causation between increased ultrasounds and IUGR?
All these techniques may be helpful in special cases, that’s obvious. Overusing them to generate empty profits is also quite obvious.
The real question is what actual value do you get from this procedure?
Is the performing physician knowledgeable enough? Does he/she know what they are looking at? Do they know what does this image as a whole and these white, black and grey dots mean?
How much training has he/she got in interpreting the results? Was he/she certified? With that final grade? What does this grade tell?
Buying an USG machine is cheap. Moving the head here and there is equally cheap, just like the snake oil sellers did. Profits - way beyond business plans. Tools change, but what about the mind using these tools?
The first sentence. Spot on!
Exactly. I’ve understood this for decades and am so relieved that finally the truth is coming out in a more widespread way. For the longest time, people paid by the system couldn’t or wouldn’t see the truth or speak up and the everyday person was so brainwashed that they refused to consider this.
The ultrasonic cleaning machine that I use for my watch repair hobby will tear holes in aluminum foil. I wonder what the fetal ultrasound machines would do?
joinin' the club--with my older daughter who has ASD I had MULTIPLE ultrasounds against my will--at first it wuz jus' 1x/month but after 35 weeks my dok-turd insisted I come in weekly for ultrasounds--lastin' from 15-30 min. EACH! My only "high risk" wuz that I was over 35 but NOT otherwise a risk in any way (zero health issues) BUT they insisted... I tried ta avoid it--tried ta postpone an' refused ta answer the phone callin' me for "reminders" non-stop (many times per day) when I didn't come in. Then my dokturd told me that he'd dump me if I didn't come in an' take the "safe" ultrasounds. At 35+ weeks it's not time ta find a'nuther MD so I caved--I'll regret cavin' all my life--I didn't know JUST how bad it would be -- tho DD is high functionin' we got all manner of health issues with her, sensory issues, sound sensitivity--I'm SURE harm wuz done by the ultrasounds I tried ta avoid (like a convict hidin' out from the sherrif!). They also forced the VitK shot on her... I had Vit K drops but they said the shot wuz needed otherwise they'd call child protective services on me an' take the baby away... TRUE story! They totally ignored my birth plan that said drops-not-shot. I got strong armed on both, I'll be carin' for my older girl all her life unless (ha!) some "cure" is found... fat chance, "zey" always murder all the docs that figger out a way ta help. With my 2nd daughter I tried ta have a home birth so I avoided all the ultrasounds an' had mebbe a couple short dopplers--didn't end up at home (that's a long story) but daughter 2 is neurotypical an' has none of the health issues #1 had so there is likely lots ta this ultrasound theory (it heats up cells too--bad nooz). The issue is, the authori-tease will threaten mamas ta comply--they put ya 'tween a rock an' a hard place an' don't give a sh*t when there are problems -for-life b/c they didn't get sued... it's a sick sick whirled out there in the Medi-Cull in-dust-ree.
Great stack, glad ya covered this!
Excellent!
Look, sorry, I like what you do but "evidence" like: "Women who receive multiple ultrasounds, like those with high-risk pregnancies, have higher rates of autistic children." is laughable. What is the chicken and what the egg? You have presented convincing evidence that this is an economic industry and essentially a cosmetic operation, but NONE for any harm. There's no smoke, no fire, nothing.