24 Comments

dear UNBEKOMING, your substack is immensely helpful, thank you for your unselfish work. Only if you could get rid of those cringeworthy AI generated heading images that burn a hole in the best writings published on your site...

Expand full comment

The articles are remarkable. So many Substacks are doing this now with AI-generated images. Personal creativity is wonderful, when possible. There are artists who want work, or get the nerdy kid next door to draw something!

I keep wondering how many clones Unbekoming has! I don't know how he can read so many books, interview so many people, and write such in depth and clear articles. He must work twenty hour days. :)

Expand full comment

Some of us love the images as much as the posts!

Expand full comment

Awesome Sharing!!!

Expand full comment

Very nice to see challenges to the idea DNA alone defines life! :~)

Expand full comment

Thank you for this detailed and comprehensive summary - amazing! I have been following Jack Kruse for a few months on his various podcast interviews and I am going to keep this paper for reference. His information is a LOT to take in and his speaking style doesn’t always help.

Expand full comment

Maybe you forget mention SOUND as fundamental to health as well

Expand full comment

I’ve been listening to Uncle Jack for awhile now and have too many gaps in my knowledge base to really grok the basis of his healing modalities. His vast experience in healing people, both as a surgeon and ‘woo’ doctor, is held in such a large context that, as a lay person, I have only aspired to understand.

Your summary is a big step forward for my aspirations!

Thanks heaps, mate. ✨

Expand full comment

8: How does light structure water at a molecular level?

Light interaction with water creates phase transitions that alter its molecular structure, transforming it from simple H2O into a liquid crystalline state.

Rubbish

Hydrogen and oxygen gases do not make up the structure of water. It’s a huge mis-direct. Hydrogen and oxygen are dry gases. They have no properties like we experience with water. They are both combustive given a spark.

Water will put out a spark. Just think for a moment, do the criminal class lie?

We learn in our youngest schooled daze that water is H2O. It’s accepted as a belief, just like Santa Claus, only most of us learn, one is a lie early on.

The definition of liquid from wiki: A liquid is a nearly incompressible fluid that conforms to the shape of its container but retains a nearly constant volume independent of pressure. A liquid maintains a fairly constant density.

The definition of a crystalline structure from geologyin.com: The smallest repeating unit within a lattice, called the unit cell, replicates in all three dimensions to form the full lattice. In crystallography, unit cell corners are designated as lattice points, and these points connect in a way that delineates the unit cell boundaries (or crystallographic axes). In two-dimensional space, only five types of lattices exist: Square, Rectangular, Centered rectangular, Parallelogram, Hexagonal.

In three-dimensional space, only 14 unique lattices are possible, known as Bravais lattices. These types account for different unit cell shapes and arrangements, from simple cubes to complex hexagonal structures.

Water reveal no such structures in its liquid state. Show me the corners.

I’ll keep explaining - Water and air are the same element in different states of energy.

Air has more energy. Air is bubbles.

Water is full bubbles or drops. When air loses energy it condenses into drops or full bubbles. When water gains energy from heat or movement it shakes off liquid and rises as bubbles.

Bubbles being the fractal and carrier of stuff. When water decomposes a compound into its ‘ions’ it is reorganising like with like. The bubbles carry the like particles. Density is another way bubbles structure like with like.

Pressure is influenced by the amount of moisture held in the air. As air cools it dries and loses pressure.

Lastly I’ll assert the atomic theory is also a fraud. The bubble is the smallest particle. No imaginary electrons required. The atomic model uses spheres because the criminal class loves to mock as it hides truth in plain sight.

The oceans make the air we breathe. Every wave sends up trillions and trillions of salty bubbles.

Bubble dynamics explain cell biology. ATP is a tri phosphorus surfactant that aids drops or full bubbles moving across the cell membrane carrying ionic salts.

Distilled water is a good insulator.

Electrolysis always requires TDS total dissolved solids or decomposition of compounds into their parts. The charge arises from the parts carried within bubbles not the water. The water is inert which is why it can be distilled from contaminants. Water remains the carrier or vessel.

All gases are carried in air bubbles. Water contamination is always managed in pipelines because of this.

If you read my article: We breathe air not oxygen, I explain why the only difference between air and oxygen is moisture. Oxygen and nitrogen are manufactured from air not constituents of air. Oxygen is made by stripping air of moisture to the parts per million. Medical oxygen has 67ppm. Medical oxygen has zero humidity. Nitrogen also has zero humidity.

Oxygen and nitrogen are alleged to make up 99% of the air.

Yet air is measured by it moisture at a given temperature: humidity.

Our lungs require air inhaled to be in the range of 30-50% humidity or they struggle.

Check out the humidity map for the US.

https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/most-humid-states

Yep, I tip over a few sacred cows. The criminal class have been telling tall stories long before cv19. They lie to exploit with no remorse.

Expand full comment

I’ve read some of your work, Jane, and your writing is very accessible. But as some (unsolicited) feedback, I find your pugnacious style leaves my mind in an agitated state which isn’t helpful for absorbing your sensible approach to health and healing. This is my obstacle to overcome it seems contention is a catalyst for change however, in service of expanding our collective wisdom, I offer my obstacle. 🕊

Expand full comment

Thank you for your feedback Watersnake.

I can picture a boxing match.

I do get a little frustrated when I see how little thought goes into understanding water.

Gerald’s fourth phase is based on the mis-direct of H2O and then he pivots to ‘electrons’ and still gets a free pass as people just memorise new faux having never thrown off their schooled daze. Gerald is observing bubbles moving particles in to like with like.

Maintaining the H2O model enables the old men behind the curtain to reign over sickness.

We won’t be getting to the other side, to new healing technology until we demand scrutiny and due diligence of everything we were taught.

And Water is key to the place we live.

Expand full comment

Bubble theory, love it:).

Expand full comment

There is a huge amount of research on bubble dynamics. But we can observe it by filling a glass or boiling a pot of water. Watching condensation form on a glass of ice water.

Expand full comment

So who is the main advocate of your view of reality? Who has taken the time to coherently and succinctly articulate these ideas in published, thoroughly-cited form, to enable any reader to come to their own conclusions about the things you suggest? What you say is interesting. But I'd like to see this all distilled down, and not end up chasing down what could be a lot of poorly organized ramblings with only a veneer of cohesion.

Expand full comment

I am the originator of the bubble drop structure of water. I’m sure it was known in the past. Before we were indoctrinated instead of educated, long ago.

Visit my 3 articles and ponder.

Expand full comment

Hi Klimer

Temperature determines the holding power of air to retain moisture. Copilot supplied me these temps and moisture figures.

At -20 Celsius air can hold a maximum of 1g/cubic meter

At 20 Celsius air can hold a maximum of 17g/cubic meter.

At 45 Celsius air can hold a maximum of 65g/cubic meter.

At 55 Celsius air can hold a maximum of 147g/cubic meter.

Mt Everest temperatures: -35 to -55 Celsius (-31 to -67 F). Humidity at the summit is ~1%.

Planes cruise in air -54 to -60 Celsius, a maximum of 0.64g/ cubic meter which (thanks to copilot) converts to 559ppm of water contamination.

Now let’s compare this to manufactured oxygen.

Medical oxygen has 67ppm of water contamination. Industrial oxygen has 0.5ppm of water contamination.

So air temperature influences the air’s ability to hold moisture.

Our lungs are very sensitive to the moisture available in the air we breathe.

The water content in air at 37°C and 50% humidity is 30,986 ppm and the value for medical oxygen 67 ppm.

The lungs require the air to reach 100% humidity or 62,000ppm at the alveoli.

Can you see a problem?

If 100% oxygen is used, death will occur from dehydration.

Oxygen extracts moisture from its surroundings to return to its natural state air. Oxygen is an extremely dry state of air. A manufactured product of air. Not an element.

Maple sap is dried to become maple syrup and dried again to become maple sugar. All products of the maple tree.

Nitrogen is a product of oxygen. It’s the non combustible form of oxygen.

Both have zero humidity.

If the air was made up of 99% nitrogen (78%) and oxygen (21%) it would have zero humidity. This is obviously not the case.

Air and water are the same element in different energy forms.

Humidity in Brisbane climbs over 70% frequently in summer. It’s not pleasant, but it’s fine for short periods. More lymphatic fluid needs to be drained from the lungs.

In dry climates, below 30% humidity ensuring hydration is paramount.

What are all the signs of low blood volume or low salt or dehydration?

Can you list 5?

Expand full comment

"When water gains energy from heat or movement it shakes off liquid and rises as bubbles."

Hmmm... Let's see, water is made of some undefined other liquid? Some special kind of non-water liquid? Or is water shaking itself off? Which it does magically in the presence of energy to become a bubble? And it's got nothing to do with a phase transition of water becoming vapor in the presence of sufficient heat?

If there's logic there, it seems circular. At best.

How do we know that energy is not trapped in the bubble, and the bubble is made of nothing but water and nothing?

Air at 0% humidity is 99% oxygen and nitrogen.

Air at 10% humidity is air with added water vapor (there's plenty of emptiness around those oxygen nitrogen atoms to provide room for water, however you define it). If water vapor was a component of air, shouldn't it be consistent everywhere? Is there a place where air is not 99% oxygen and nitrogen? Or maybe water is a component of air, but a variable component? So you express the composition of the constants separately from the variables.

I live in a desert where humidity can at extreme times be in the teens for prolonged periods. I've never experienced any struggle with my lungs, as you suggest. Though it is a bit easier to get a nose bleed. I suspect at 17% humidity my body provides the moisture necessary to bring lung air up to 30% humidity.

"All gases are carried in air bubbles."

I've a bottle of water that contains dissolved chlorine dioxide gas. I don't see any tiny bubbles. I guess they're just really, really, really small bubbles? Like quantum bubbles, not Newtonian bubbles?

Can air even be a bubble? If it's just oxygen and nitrogen? Or does it have to be humid air to form a bubble? If so, how humid? Wouldn't it be possible for humidity to be low enough that no bubble would form to carry "all gases?"

There's no crystalline state of water? Then what did Gerald Pollack discover in The Fourth Phase of Water? Water that became crystalline something-else-that-is-wet (but not water)? Have you looked at the structure of the water in your cells?

Again, it seems like you are using circular arguments.

I'm not saying you are wrong. Just that there isn't sufficient clarity in what you write. Certainly not enough to follow you down the Rabbit Hole.

Expand full comment

WISH you would do a deep dive into Gastroparesis and gut nutrition. 90% of the immune system is in the gut. Gastroparesis will be a big issue for those taking the weight loss jabs. For me, it was a vertigo fall on my AB on concrete that damaged the nerves. The chronic diarrhea and undigestible food make for an unbalanced diet. 80 billion multi-strain probiotics are not enough to stave off bouts of SIBO. I hate Rifaximin (XIFAXAN).

Expand full comment

See Johnny Storm Substack. How he cured his gastroparesis.

You might be interested in Remnant MD's Substack. He has some insightful knowledge and personal experiences. He notes that melatonin helps greatly with GI stuff. The best thing to do is to get early morning sunlight or red/infrared light in the morning right on the abdomen. Light makes melatonin. Melatonin supplement is as needed, not continuous.

I am having wonderful improvements with topical DMSO for nerve and other damage.

I also would like to see some comprehensive info on IBD and digestive issues.

Expand full comment

A very complex and thorough paper, thank you. This is an interesting one too. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S147549160290055X

Expand full comment

For anyone interested in water, seek out Veda Austin, YT

Her interview with Isabel Friend is amazing.

Veda believes water is “source”. Her method of flash freezing water and then checking to see what message was sent is beyond crazy.

Expand full comment

I'm convinced that Jack Kruse has a lot of great insights. I am not convinced that any Holy Trinity of health would not include oxygen.

Everything I'm reading lately seems to suggest we are electron harvesting machines: from light, from the atmosphere, from water, from food, from pretty much any source of energy - if we can find and use it, we will, provided we are healthy enough to do so. And if electrons are so essential to life, would we have evolved to favor a source, like sunlight, with great daily and seasonal variation as our primary source? Highly doubtful. In fact, probably patently absurd!

The one consistent source of electrons, recently posited by Gerald Pollock, is the air we breathe. It is with us 100% of the time, and if we go without it for a few minutes, we're dead. Nobody has ever died suddenly from a lack of sunlight, water or magnetism.

Pollack's theory is that the notion of oxygen being absorbed into our blood is wrong. We don't absorb the atom oxygen, we take two of its electrons, because it uniquely can donate that many (compared with other common elements of air). Those electrons get transferred to hemoglobin, which is transported by RBCs directly to our cells, and from there the electrons are released and go directly into fueling the electron transport chain.

Everyone is figuring out that cellular dysfunction is a hallmark of chronic disease. And that the cause of dysfunction arises from the mitochondria and the electron transport chain. Either there are insufficient electrons to drive the process, or there are insufficient nutrients needed for the process (magnesium being the key player here).

It's really that simple. You need charge separation to create structured water, you need a constant source of electrons (electricity), and you need sufficient nutrients (chemistry). All disease is a lack of one or more of those components. We are biophysical beings. We need bioelectricity, biochemistry and water to achieve homeostasis and health.

Expand full comment

Thank you, thank you. Any and all things I have spent long hours listening to Dr. Kruse, has been more education than almost a life time of what non-education I have ever gotten. Nothing I have learned compares....period. He has so much information that it feels like a jet engine has zoomed past my brain 14-15 times. Definitely have to listen to him four times or more to un-do what garbage has been shoved into our minds for 12+ years. I love him & will always make the time to listen to what he knows. Very moral man. This is what kind of doctors humanity needs.

Expand full comment