Howden's book is a good read. Thanks for the info. Saint Jenner was just another quack. He and his chums made some £3 mn in today's money - from the UK government. A criminal cartel was born. This is true and unknown:
"After the 1853 Compulsory Vaccination Act, smallpox epidemics actually increased in severity. Between 1857-9, there were more than 14,000 deaths from smallpox; in the 1863-5 epidemic, deaths increased to 20,000; and in 1871-2, they totaled 44,800. While the population increased by 7 percent between the first and second epidemics, smallpox deaths increased by 41 percent. Between the second and third epidemics, population growth was 9 percent, but smallpox deaths rose by 120 percent."
Smallpox has nothing to do with a 'virus'. Neither do the other 'diseases'. Filth, lack of sanitation, hygiene, slums, poor diets, black soot, dead pigs in your yard etc etc. Not more than 5% of the geneal pop knows anything about this. This is why the totalitarians can pull off a Rona or similar.
Both vested interests (vax pushers and vax contestants) make the same mistake. They review literature only in terms of its contents - they examine words and numbers.
A far more important factor is the mindset behind the written sources.
Authors before around 1950s cannot be regarded as credible or authoritative because: 1) they had no real opposition (= neutral dialogue opportunities), therefore they could speak any gibberish they wanted and the public swallowed it no questions asked, while other authors/doctors did the same; 2) they had no idea about their own limitations (“what? me? limitations? are you crazy?”) - what we now call biases; 3) the public was not allowed (trained, used to) to ask questions or challenge them or request explanations or demand rationale; 4) the fate of the patient was practically irrelevant.
When you read a book from 1896... it’s ancient history. Mostly fantasy - because “science” did not exist at that time. If you were to publish a book (any book) at that time, you would automatically be included in semi-gods of medicine. Regardless of contents.
Whether the publication was reasonable or not is irrelevant. It originated at the time so radically different from now. Now we can assess, test, evaluate, reconsider, challenge, placebo-test, and re-test again. Now we know that people of different composure (body, fitness, sex, race, height, habits, nutrition) react differently to the same stimulus - even at different points of day. Now we are aware of the complex inter-relationships within the body itself. By the way, the injectable mercury is still ok for the minds of many doctors - and we are in 2025, almost mid-21st century. In 1896, nobody would even stop to think about it...
So, whenever you read literature from before 1950s, remember that it is basically free-style fantasy with adjuvants in the form or stories, some of which may even be true.
How scientific is this literature? For comparison: the whole climate change subject was based on a SINGLE journey of a single U.S. warship in the end of 1940s, which allegedly measured something and reported something. The results were never evaluated. Why was it in the middle of the Pacific? Nobody knows and nobody even asks this question. Was it of any scientific value? Come on...
Change just the dates and names a few more things about this article and have it written in 2051 and it would be the same old song and dance as in the beginning. They never seem to come up with any new chapters in that playbook of human misery and can't wait to use us to keep the funeral homes in business. I often wonder if they get exactly what they want how quickly they would turn against each other in a desperate play for amusement in the chase of evil.
Howden's book is a good read. Thanks for the info. Saint Jenner was just another quack. He and his chums made some £3 mn in today's money - from the UK government. A criminal cartel was born. This is true and unknown:
"After the 1853 Compulsory Vaccination Act, smallpox epidemics actually increased in severity. Between 1857-9, there were more than 14,000 deaths from smallpox; in the 1863-5 epidemic, deaths increased to 20,000; and in 1871-2, they totaled 44,800. While the population increased by 7 percent between the first and second epidemics, smallpox deaths increased by 41 percent. Between the second and third epidemics, population growth was 9 percent, but smallpox deaths rose by 120 percent."
Smallpox has nothing to do with a 'virus'. Neither do the other 'diseases'. Filth, lack of sanitation, hygiene, slums, poor diets, black soot, dead pigs in your yard etc etc. Not more than 5% of the geneal pop knows anything about this. This is why the totalitarians can pull off a Rona or similar.
The correlation between Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) and vaccination is so damning: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/how-sids-became-the-perfect-cover
nutritive healing should never have been forgotten. https://artemisforestfairy.substack.com/p/from-my-heart-to-yours
Both vested interests (vax pushers and vax contestants) make the same mistake. They review literature only in terms of its contents - they examine words and numbers.
A far more important factor is the mindset behind the written sources.
Authors before around 1950s cannot be regarded as credible or authoritative because: 1) they had no real opposition (= neutral dialogue opportunities), therefore they could speak any gibberish they wanted and the public swallowed it no questions asked, while other authors/doctors did the same; 2) they had no idea about their own limitations (“what? me? limitations? are you crazy?”) - what we now call biases; 3) the public was not allowed (trained, used to) to ask questions or challenge them or request explanations or demand rationale; 4) the fate of the patient was practically irrelevant.
When you read a book from 1896... it’s ancient history. Mostly fantasy - because “science” did not exist at that time. If you were to publish a book (any book) at that time, you would automatically be included in semi-gods of medicine. Regardless of contents.
Whether the publication was reasonable or not is irrelevant. It originated at the time so radically different from now. Now we can assess, test, evaluate, reconsider, challenge, placebo-test, and re-test again. Now we know that people of different composure (body, fitness, sex, race, height, habits, nutrition) react differently to the same stimulus - even at different points of day. Now we are aware of the complex inter-relationships within the body itself. By the way, the injectable mercury is still ok for the minds of many doctors - and we are in 2025, almost mid-21st century. In 1896, nobody would even stop to think about it...
So, whenever you read literature from before 1950s, remember that it is basically free-style fantasy with adjuvants in the form or stories, some of which may even be true.
How scientific is this literature? For comparison: the whole climate change subject was based on a SINGLE journey of a single U.S. warship in the end of 1940s, which allegedly measured something and reported something. The results were never evaluated. Why was it in the middle of the Pacific? Nobody knows and nobody even asks this question. Was it of any scientific value? Come on...
Nice share, thank you.
Chemical scent fills my lungs
Plain white color burns my eyes
This isn’t orange in autumn
Notice death reminds us of life
The same way victory goes
back to the beginning
Taste the plastic in the liquid
That the sugar can’t hide
If this is nutrition you can decide
Is denial giving you bliss?
Trapped in society always
Each repeat leaves empty
Aluminum metal fills every brain
Plain white coat dabs every arm
This is our new definition of sane
How much until we aren’t ourselves?
Graves covered with opioid calm
A similar way prozac burns around
Trapped in society again
Each repeat leaves to begin
Taste victory if only a taste
that dies at the alter of medicine
You have another choice to face
The scent of guilt
filling your lungs
--------------
Her face roams to avoid all of mine
The few smiles crooked that I can see
She's the end of the bell curve line
I beg for sleep but where will we be
In a future that's already here?
His wails seep into my hopeless mind
The few moments of silence too loud
He's somewhere on the bell curve line
I wish for happiness to come around
In a future that's never here
My hands pour the beer down the drain
No chemical can bring this line down
We're all on this bell curve in time
The kids born on death beds
Need me to break this line
Need you to break this crime
Else it's too late for them
Else it's too late
------
Another flip through the media feed
You're bored but can't pull away
Blinking along with the screens
I'm tired but rest eludes today
I'm not a preacher here to lie
We're socially disconnected
Emotionally raped and blunted
It's too late to be saved
Our brains soaked in aluminum
Dead dendrites can't save them
Another pill is life better now?
You're numb but want to escape
Thinking along with all the screens
Broken but purpose can create
For a moment look at the children
Can you pull away from the screen?
Patter step, carrying laugh, wet cheek
Do you see yourself in any of them?
Do you feel yourself out of time?
I'm not a martyr here to judge
I just wrote this dumbass line
The screen's better for your time
It's too late to be saved
Disconnected raped and blunted
our brains soaked in aluminum
Suffer the children
Suffer the pieces of us
or save them
or save them
------
Only junkies use needles.
Change just the dates and names a few more things about this article and have it written in 2051 and it would be the same old song and dance as in the beginning. They never seem to come up with any new chapters in that playbook of human misery and can't wait to use us to keep the funeral homes in business. I often wonder if they get exactly what they want how quickly they would turn against each other in a desperate play for amusement in the chase of evil.