Just knowing there used to be very detailed diagnostic codes in the ICD manual for vax injuries/deaths which were later removed, explains why doctors have to either fight to uphold a diagnosis which "does not exist," or capitulate to the industry. Makes me very angry.
Just knowing there used to be very detailed diagnostic codes in the ICD manual for vax injuries/deaths which were later removed, explains why doctors have to either fight to uphold a diagnosis which "does not exist," or capitulate to the industry. Makes me very angry.
Yes that one took me by surprise, but it shouldn't have. It's such an obvious way of polluting all the data sets and switching off people's brains. And it goes back to the 70s!! If there is no ICD then obviously there is no link. If a tree falls in the forest, and there is no ICD...did it really happen?
Just knowing there used to be very detailed diagnostic codes in the ICD manual for vax injuries/deaths which were later removed, explains why doctors have to either fight to uphold a diagnosis which "does not exist," or capitulate to the industry. Makes me very angry.
Yes that one took me by surprise, but it shouldn't have. It's such an obvious way of polluting all the data sets and switching off people's brains. And it goes back to the 70s!! If there is no ICD then obviously there is no link. If a tree falls in the forest, and there is no ICD...did it really happen?