Question: how smart does one have to be to craft 30 questions to tease out thoughtful analysis of Putin’s statements? Answer: pretty darn smart!!!! What a gift you have.
Glad for this link. Part of me would fall into "deifying Putin" because I do believe that the US has screwed the world over, and Putin seems benevolent (and much more intelligent) by comparison. Didn't watch the whole Slavsquat video but enough to confirm that yes, Russia mandated the shots, is promulgating 'sustainable development' and evidently has already started using CBDCs.
Russia didn't even try to stop Libya getting destroyed and they didn't use their UN power to call out the US.
In Syria, they don't say shit about Israel illegally entering and bombing. They also don't say shit about the US doing it and not much about the bases the US put in Syria.
Ukraine also sounds like a shit storm that never ends. Russia is still recruiting people for it, despite claiming that they got it under control already... Really?
I remember reading Secret Team by Lt Col Fletcher Prouty and he said that after the atomic bomb was successful, war was later meant to last long and have no winners because a loser could launch a nuke.
-why did Russia continue to follow the western con-vid sham with lockdowns even after they found out it was like a flu.
-why did Russia push their equally dangerous and untested clot shots thru regional mandates and still pretend like it didn't injure people?
-why is Russia now going into CBDCs and digital IDs?
-why is Russia jailing people who criticize the war? I thought they were pro freedom. One man who was a donbass military leader was locked up for having issues with the crooked military leadership and their flawed operations (which is also why the war is never ending, hmm)
I wish the interview had gotten around to discussing US bioweapons labs in Ukraine, one of the other main reasons for Russia's intervention. Here's a link to an excellent article exposing the existence of US bioweapons labs in twenty five countries, including Ukraine and Georgia, dating back decades. If you haven't already read this, it's well worth your time.
The fact that biolabs weren't brought up tells us about the parameters set for the interview, which likely tells us something about which topics are taboo to those who control alternative media with large followings, such as may be the case with Carlson. The fact that Putin didn't bring it up when it is a compelling argument in his favor, may tell us Putin functions within the same constraints.
Biolabs are, I believe, too important to their future plans to risk mainstream discussions that could result in protests demanding their closure, like we're seeing globally with farmers. Or, God forbid, it being turned into an election issue.
I'd say that interviews purpose was to ensconce Carlson as "the" alternative media to watch and to portray Putin as an intelligent, benevolent, reasonable human being: the kind of leader we all wish we had right now.
Sadly though he's not a hero out to rescue humanity any more than Trump is.
I hope Tucker was intentionally not preaching to the choir, and trying to get a wider audience to look a little more closely at what is really going on in Ukraine, and why.
I don't think any of them are out to rescue humanity, but here's something to think about: A few years ago Russia invaded Georgia, stopped a genocide, straightened out the local thuggocracy....and left. Obviously, the purpose of the invasion was not to annex Georgia, which they could have easily done.
This is what happened in Ukraine. Putin did not invade at all. Moscows help was requested by the dpr and lpr.
I’ve been following the Ukraine conflict closely since 2014. Just beforehand in 2013 the USA govt legalised using propaganda against the American people in the 2013 ndaa.
The Ukraine govt hold torchlight parades to glorify Stepan Bandera every year and the govt is controlled by naxis.
This is what happened. It’s not hard to actually discover for yourself. There’s things here you won’t see written anywhere else
Putin is a product of his environment, global gangsters. His peace offerings are real but ends in the same place with one world government. Which by itself is not a bad thing. It has the potential to end the bitter in fighting and wars over the planets resources. The rub is under which system will the globe run, a Totalitarian Dictatorship or a Representative Republic? This is the story line of the Star Trek and Star Wars movies. I have no doubt if we don't blow ourselves up we will eventually come to some similar system portrayed in those saga's.
Yes; ' The proof of the pudding is in the Future Result.'???
I believe that intentions and current actions will influence that Future. An enterprise which is founded on greed and tyranny, is unlikely to generate a Utopian future. Rather, such a foundation, is a perfect recipe for continued inequality and injustice and a dystopian future.
I like to keep it short and sweet. Here is a parody I made back in 2014 (I think, I had to reupload when they unceremoniously deleted my YT channel). This a "Putin Never Quits", a parody of "Puttin' On The Ritz". Enjoy:
This is only partly true. The jab was indeed provided to the population, correct. But the jab did NOT contain the devilish mRNA concoction that was injected into other populations by their governments! It is very important to understand that Sputnik, the vax in Russia, consisted of what is called a "classical" vaccine. This is a type of brew that is similar to other vaccines that are an extract of the stuff that they aim to fight, and DOES NOT contain any DNA altering RNA substance with pseudouridine in it, as the Pfizer stuff does. Read up on "classical vaccines." Please inform yourself before you shout.
Many of your questions are almost beside the point as in being non-sequitur as they do not recognize the propaganda from both sides. Tucker Carlson provided Pooties 2 hours to spew his propaganda to us without a single correction.
Start with the most glaring bit of history not recognized by both sides. Before WW II Stalin starved 9 million Ukrainian farmers to death and replaced many of them with Russian speakers from elsewhere in the Soviet Union. This clearly explains the Russian Separatists in Eastern Ukraine and the fact many Ukrainians welcomed Hitler and his Nazism in opposition to the murdering Soviets.
A couple of other high points. Even though Stalin allied with Hitler before and during the beginning of the war, Pooties still blamed Poland for not being cooperative enough with Hitler forcing Hitler to invade them.
Pooties clearly stated that the Soviets did NOT collapse. They only implemented a "hide the face of the enemy" policy to be able to continue to operate without the west feeling threatened. If this is true it explains why NATO went from being welcoming to ex-Soviet Russia to returning almost to a Cold War stance as they learned of the deception from actual activity by Russia and especially Pooties regime when he took over.
Wish I had more time to dissect the questions for you.
Question: how smart does one have to be to craft 30 questions to tease out thoughtful analysis of Putin’s statements? Answer: pretty darn smart!!!! What a gift you have.
Just what I am thinking! By far the clearest, most comprehensive re-cap of all that I've read.
Putin pushed the Russian jab like a Pfizer Rep. He will not save Western Civilization any more that the Orange Vaccine Salesman.
The dummies who are fans of the East think that the Eastern shots are safe and effective, lol
The Sputnik shots are reported to be very similar to Astra zeneca clot shots.
But every time I try to bring this up to the Duran or others that report on Russia, they gaslight me like that's western propaganda.
Nope, it's propaganda that they believe in 😂
Here's a good source of what Russians see in Russia
https://edwardslavsquat.substack.com/
Glad for this link. Part of me would fall into "deifying Putin" because I do believe that the US has screwed the world over, and Putin seems benevolent (and much more intelligent) by comparison. Didn't watch the whole Slavsquat video but enough to confirm that yes, Russia mandated the shots, is promulgating 'sustainable development' and evidently has already started using CBDCs.
I too fell for Putin's charm.
But I did have some annoyances.
Russia didn't even try to stop Libya getting destroyed and they didn't use their UN power to call out the US.
In Syria, they don't say shit about Israel illegally entering and bombing. They also don't say shit about the US doing it and not much about the bases the US put in Syria.
Ukraine also sounds like a shit storm that never ends. Russia is still recruiting people for it, despite claiming that they got it under control already... Really?
I remember reading Secret Team by Lt Col Fletcher Prouty and he said that after the atomic bomb was successful, war was later meant to last long and have no winners because a loser could launch a nuke.
Well, I guess Russia looks after itself first, which is better is it not than the USA meddling in every other country's affairs.
Maybe the recruiting is in case of WWIII!
Chilling last point you made there... maybe so 😐
Exactly!
More questions unanswered:
-why did Russia continue to follow the western con-vid sham with lockdowns even after they found out it was like a flu.
-why did Russia push their equally dangerous and untested clot shots thru regional mandates and still pretend like it didn't injure people?
-why is Russia now going into CBDCs and digital IDs?
-why is Russia jailing people who criticize the war? I thought they were pro freedom. One man who was a donbass military leader was locked up for having issues with the crooked military leadership and their flawed operations (which is also why the war is never ending, hmm)
Also this:
https://off-guardian.org/2024/02/10/what-no-one-is-saying-about-tucker-carlsons-putin-interview/
The article - So very true
Excellent analysis. Thank you.
I wish the interview had gotten around to discussing US bioweapons labs in Ukraine, one of the other main reasons for Russia's intervention. Here's a link to an excellent article exposing the existence of US bioweapons labs in twenty five countries, including Ukraine and Georgia, dating back decades. If you haven't already read this, it's well worth your time.
http://dilyana.bg/the-pentagon-bio-weapons/
The fact that biolabs weren't brought up tells us about the parameters set for the interview, which likely tells us something about which topics are taboo to those who control alternative media with large followings, such as may be the case with Carlson. The fact that Putin didn't bring it up when it is a compelling argument in his favor, may tell us Putin functions within the same constraints.
Biolabs are, I believe, too important to their future plans to risk mainstream discussions that could result in protests demanding their closure, like we're seeing globally with farmers. Or, God forbid, it being turned into an election issue.
I'd say that interviews purpose was to ensconce Carlson as "the" alternative media to watch and to portray Putin as an intelligent, benevolent, reasonable human being: the kind of leader we all wish we had right now.
Sadly though he's not a hero out to rescue humanity any more than Trump is.
I hope Tucker was intentionally not preaching to the choir, and trying to get a wider audience to look a little more closely at what is really going on in Ukraine, and why.
I don't think any of them are out to rescue humanity, but here's something to think about: A few years ago Russia invaded Georgia, stopped a genocide, straightened out the local thuggocracy....and left. Obviously, the purpose of the invasion was not to annex Georgia, which they could have easily done.
This is what happened in Ukraine. Putin did not invade at all. Moscows help was requested by the dpr and lpr.
I’ve been following the Ukraine conflict closely since 2014. Just beforehand in 2013 the USA govt legalised using propaganda against the American people in the 2013 ndaa.
The Ukraine govt hold torchlight parades to glorify Stepan Bandera every year and the govt is controlled by naxis.
This is what happened. It’s not hard to actually discover for yourself. There’s things here you won’t see written anywhere else
https://open.substack.com/pub/thestonetablet/p/russiaukraine-who-to-support?r=1e6k8r&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
Putin is a product of his environment, global gangsters. His peace offerings are real but ends in the same place with one world government. Which by itself is not a bad thing. It has the potential to end the bitter in fighting and wars over the planets resources. The rub is under which system will the globe run, a Totalitarian Dictatorship or a Representative Republic? This is the story line of the Star Trek and Star Wars movies. I have no doubt if we don't blow ourselves up we will eventually come to some similar system portrayed in those saga's.
Yes; ' The proof of the pudding is in the Future Result.'???
I believe that intentions and current actions will influence that Future. An enterprise which is founded on greed and tyranny, is unlikely to generate a Utopian future. Rather, such a foundation, is a perfect recipe for continued inequality and injustice and a dystopian future.
I like to keep it short and sweet. Here is a parody I made back in 2014 (I think, I had to reupload when they unceremoniously deleted my YT channel). This a "Putin Never Quits", a parody of "Puttin' On The Ritz". Enjoy:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/A7Fzn9xyLanK/
This is only partly true. The jab was indeed provided to the population, correct. But the jab did NOT contain the devilish mRNA concoction that was injected into other populations by their governments! It is very important to understand that Sputnik, the vax in Russia, consisted of what is called a "classical" vaccine. This is a type of brew that is similar to other vaccines that are an extract of the stuff that they aim to fight, and DOES NOT contain any DNA altering RNA substance with pseudouridine in it, as the Pfizer stuff does. Read up on "classical vaccines." Please inform yourself before you shout.
Read this:
https://zonderreden.substack.com/p/mrna-building-blocks-pseudouridine
Sputnik is in NO WAY the same as this horror. If you have any well supported facts to the contrary, please inform me asap!
Responding to some of the many questions here: Putin would have known completely about Nato and he tried for years to get
Ukraine to sign an alliance that they wouldn't join Nato. The corrupt leaders refused. Note that the common people were
totally against these leaders, going way back.
I felt Putin did not react well regarding Donbas which housed many Ukrainian Russians. The horrors done there should never
have been tolerated by Putin, reason enough to put Ukraine on notice. THAT could have been an excellent pretext for the war.
I'm also surprised that Putin did not act more swiftly, far more KGB style with the leaders. So many lives and destruction would
have been spared for the common people if Putin would have TAKEN OUT the major leaders. He had the spies, the
ability, and knew what was going on. That's ALL Putin wanted was a sympathetic government to Russia.
I would need that term 'defined', but assuming it was just 'amenable', then he was certainly within reasonable grounds
for this since Ukraine was in favor of Nazi's even though the leader was Jewish. Often Jews did both, were Jews
and also Nazi supporters.
The religious background is a bond, but the people of Ukraine wouldn't agree it allowed Russia to control them, and
their own sovereignty.
It was difficult with the US involvement, and those biolabs and Hunter and Joe Biden and others blocking whatever
happened for their own benefits.
I think Putin is in fantasy about the past history of Russia and that this won't continue at all once he is no longer
the leader of Russia. The next leaders won't have this great love of Russian history or any spiritual feelings.
I view this as fairly temporary and a shock will occur once Putin is gone, one way or the other.
Christianity of all kinds is on the wane, and Putin is trying to uphold his particular views of it.
I'd suggest (q. 13) that Putin is an imperialist, wanting to dominate Ukraine, and who knows where else.
We don't know. Maybe at this time Putin does not know either.
Q. 14....Definitely US, and whoever else has hurt the Ukrainian situation. I'd say bilking Ukraine.
Q.15 Russia has shown brilliance in all the many sanctions put upon Russia. I doubt he's let his own
people know just what 'they' have done, so they could accept their own restrictions.
Q, 16,,,,the power players want TOTAL control, not some 'multi' agreement.
Q, 17 I didn't know the West had 'values', at least not ethical. Maybe control, maybe corruption, but how is that a 'value'?
Tucker Carlson did a fine job of breaking the 'old, cold war attitude' and showing the discussion should be the way
to forming some kind of bonding in some areas.
Tucker Carlson doesn't look like he's the 'sharpest knife in the drawer' and this worked very well, as Putin trusted
him, sitting only a few feet away, enjoying his time. This was a game changer.
An absolute change in leaders from the corrupt to those actually concerned for the great country and people
of US. Follow both Joe and Donald's past to see what and who they were. They must be removed.
But who can replace? Let us hope it is never Hillary, who is running.
It will be a compromise for sure.
I would have thought a big country like USA with all it's ability and brilliance could find wealthy enough
runners who really cared.
While Vivek does care, and has the money, the Hindu part would likely be a problem later.
It is always good to question things.
Do you think this is a one time thing for Tucker Carlson?
Many of your questions are almost beside the point as in being non-sequitur as they do not recognize the propaganda from both sides. Tucker Carlson provided Pooties 2 hours to spew his propaganda to us without a single correction.
Start with the most glaring bit of history not recognized by both sides. Before WW II Stalin starved 9 million Ukrainian farmers to death and replaced many of them with Russian speakers from elsewhere in the Soviet Union. This clearly explains the Russian Separatists in Eastern Ukraine and the fact many Ukrainians welcomed Hitler and his Nazism in opposition to the murdering Soviets.
A couple of other high points. Even though Stalin allied with Hitler before and during the beginning of the war, Pooties still blamed Poland for not being cooperative enough with Hitler forcing Hitler to invade them.
Pooties clearly stated that the Soviets did NOT collapse. They only implemented a "hide the face of the enemy" policy to be able to continue to operate without the west feeling threatened. If this is true it explains why NATO went from being welcoming to ex-Soviet Russia to returning almost to a Cold War stance as they learned of the deception from actual activity by Russia and especially Pooties regime when he took over.
Wish I had more time to dissect the questions for you.
Putin's version of history bears as much relation to reality as Himmler's version of history did.
Himmler's "History" was a fabricated myth, founded on less than 200 years of history.