23 Comments

Re: Your son and his buddies all getting sick, testing positive after summer vacation and bringing it home to your family.

Seems Australia was deliberately hit hard as an isolated test country for the most outrageous totalitarian tactics, including involuntary quarantine camps. Appears the Australian government passed the tested with flying colors. I hope, knowing what we know now, Australians never let that happen again.

Expand full comment

Yes, I think back to that summer in Dec 21 and Jan 22, and something very very weird happened in this country.

Expand full comment

The terrifying reality is that Aussie’s were/are? On the whole willing to sacrifice their fellow countrymen that were not prepared to go along with the safe and effective propaganda.

At the height of the propaganda, there was general acceptance by the population of the idea of quarantining the unvaxxed in “Wellness centres” aka Concentration Camps.

How did Australia get here? I thought Australians lived and died for freedom - just look at Australia’s outstanding performance on the battle field in every military campaign that they’ve been a part of over the last 100 years or so. So how do you reconcile the mateship shown at Gallipoli or the Western front with this?

Expand full comment

It's not the same country it was 100 years ago. The freedom loving meme is just tourism marketing.

Expand full comment

Socialism: Remember what happened after the school shooting, they were told to turn in their guns, and they did., Knife attacks went up along with rapes, Those were not considered the same type of weapons. Yet in the long run are, just as hands, feet, cars, poisons, fence posts, hammers, and crowbars are, and you can add in killer drugs like covid, or longer-term cancer ones, even all that Fast Fried Foods you eat is artery clogging killers. Don't want to believe the last, my 52 yr old son was District Manager, then down to Manager, then age and covid caught up, only Assitant Manager jobs, less income, and he ate at work so he could pay rent/utilities, car/health ins. He faces a 4-85% artery blockage, Stents are NOT viable, nor can you have a Bypass once you get Stents. So Thurs. he has a Quadruple Bypass, 6-7 hr surgery, and a change in lifestyle for a man who used to work 6 days, 60+ hrs a week. To not working, meds that are dangerous.

Expand full comment

Was it the Aussies who gave up their guns enmasse a few years ago? Happen again, it will...

Expand full comment

During a recent visit to a NP, she told me that the rona was back, but now it only affects the gut (no lung, smell, etc symptoms). She was double masked while I had on none.

It is the illness that keeps on giving.

Expand full comment

But I know people who:

tested negative

tested negative

got sick with symptoms

tested positive

felt better

tested negative

tested negative

If everyone already had the virus, would there be so many correlations like that?

Expand full comment

Correlations would only exist if the tests were accurately pinging for covid (or whatever they were primed to ping for), but we know they ping for a variety of other reasons, including other endemic cold viruses. I think the variance in the tests is part of the issue and I suspect it's another feature and not a bug. But I dont understand the tech of pcr testing and priming to give you a better answer.

Expand full comment

Even the guy who created PCR tests said they weren't designed for what they were being used for. Stated...they will detect anything you want. They are also used to detect HIV. PCR tests are worthless and the rapid tests have dangerous cancer causing materials. It was just another form of flu, in my opinion. Why do I think that...I ONLY get new strong strains of a flu. I don't get the dangerous chemical filled flu shot either! In 2009 I got swine flu. The one Obummer Hussain said was "nothing to worry about." I was WAY WAY WAY sicker with it! It was the pits! I got rona, I assume, because like you stated was different. I wasn't that sick though. I was insanely tired for 2 weeks and and couldn't smell for 6 months, but never felt that bad. Three long years later...'It's harder to convince people they've been fooled than it was to fool them! Great article btw!

Expand full comment

PCR is not a test. It can never be a test.

The Nobel-Prize winning "guy," Kary Mullis, did not invent a test. He invented a process. For amplifying genetic material. Making copies while enlarging. Of all genetic material in a sample.

Fiddling with how the PCR process works to market and abuse it as a "test" is fraud. It does not make the process "worthless." It makes those who intentionally abused PCR to enact their crime 𝒄𝒓𝒊𝒎𝒊𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒔.

Expand full comment

1000% agree! Here's my question that plays over and over in my mind...our CDC stopped using them due to false positives...not too long after Gates and Soros went in together on a "pcr" tests type company. In which, crickets a few days after announced. Not another word. CDC also instructed facilities to use said tests still in stock. Which wow...just wow! So what are they using to "supposedly" detect what can't even be seen under a microscope?! I wish every day that from beginning of Scamdemic until now I'd kept a diary of everything to reference back to. There's so much going on every day news, even conservative news, quickly moves on to next topic. However, 1000% agree criminals...but I'll even add murderers! Medical field being JUST as guilty for "playing along" to not lose their jobs/licenses! I even have nurse friends that say it's all been a scam. (As far as acting like it's so deadly.) However, they still work and "play along" and administrator the clot shot and I have to bite my tongue. I assume they feel like they are doing "something" by at least admitting it?! I understand people need their jobs and money, but can you imagine if everyone that felt like us would have stood up??? Scamdemic would have ended first month! You can't run a hospital/scam with just a handful!

Expand full comment

I used to think maybe they were testing for histamine, a correlation with hay fever was noted back in 2020, but in reality, the PCR tests never turned positive for anything or they wouldn't almost uniformly be using the 45 cycle threshold. If youn's all tested by way of a 45 cycle pcr, and think it means something, you have to at least add in to your analysis that you're swimming up stream against established science. Yet, with the rapid antigen self-test kits, people with or without the clot shot turn positive when sick with ANYTHING (including fortunately from being sick from the shot), and with or without the clot shot, show negative if sick with nothing. So as for the rapid antigen tests , they test for something to do with stress from illness, any illness. But as its a home test, you could easily get ahold of a bunch of them and quietly get the antigen tests tested to see what they really are doing!

Expand full comment

The strange risk profile for this 'virus' had me wondering in early 2020. Virtually zero for anyone under 60, rapidly increasing risk after this age and for comorbidities... it was really odd. It would make the perfect bioweapon, I thought. Then I read this today: https://open.substack.com/pub/igorchudov/p/ralph-barics-description-of-the-perfect?r=lcww7&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Expand full comment

Negative interest rates are still with us, I'm afraid, as long as the rates are below the rate of monetary inflation. Why do you think corporations such as Apple, flush with $billions in cash, still borrow money? As you said, they are being effectively paid to borrow it, plus they get a nice tax break on the borrowing "costs". Ever-expanding supplies of fiat money are behind all the problems in the world. It sort of "works" until it doesn't, which is where we're finding ourselves now.

Expand full comment

Like pushing on a string...

Expand full comment

Said in early Feb 2020 that this was an "operation," an operation coming out of the financial system.

Expand full comment

"You can aerosolize these things and spray them" in Couey's subsequent lecture (UK doctors in the title, dateline March 27th) Nick [Hudson] is first to ask at Q&A and asks about (clone) distribution - a question I'd been waiting to be addressed - and is very vague in his reply offering just one tenuous mechanism. Just so you know...

Expand full comment

Thanks, haven't seen that. He needs to spend more time on the point about the likely tech used to release.

Expand full comment

In a nutshell what is the clone hypothesis?

From a clinical perspective I can say I did see something that appeared novel. Contagious and dangerous to people with comorbidites...

Expand full comment

I would love to be able to nutshell it, maybe one day, but spend a bit of time with Couey who is leading the charge on the idea.

The infectious clone thesis allows for the disease that was witnessed.

https://open.substack.com/pub/unbekoming/p/j-jay-couey?r=lo15j&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Expand full comment

Thankfully others also found his memo worth saving before he removed it from his archives. It's on Wayback Machine:

https://web.archive.org/web/20191021032057/https://www.oaktreecapital.com/docs/default-source/memos/mysterious.pdf

Expand full comment

Look at the current round of bank failures. Said to be stemming from rising interest rate targets, on reserves, filtering through to rising interest rates on NEW Treasuries, leading to falling prices on MARKET prices for lower interet rate OLD Treasuries. I am pretty sure that counted as a negative interest rate return on those bonds those banks had to suddenly liquidate as they bankrupted.

Now, you, as everyone does, conflate all interest rates. In this post, central bank target rates on the overnight lending rate on reserves with all and any rates across the economy, I think you mentioned mortgage rates for instance. Of course those rates would, normally (note the recent bank bankruptcies and their strongly negative return on suddenly liquidated bonds as a great counter-example), float somewhere atop the base of central bank reserve target rates, in turn, slightly above whatever floor rate system the central bank is using during the period in question.

Going back just to reserve rates. Aside from central banks actively trying to push against the straw of low economic demand by actively pushing rates lower, a simple plentiful reserve passive zero interest rate policy is one proposed by Warren Mosler, a kind of laissez-faire approach of sorts. Of course, during lethargic economic conditions, that strikes me as kind of aggrevating the lethargy (even though, long-term, lowering the interest money Treasuries, and currently, interest on reserves, inject into the economy), but what do I know.

Nathan Tankus points out, I guess in a Pileus podcast interview, or maybe the other one that is kind of like Pileus, that Treasury Bonds work as bank accounts for corporations, in that bank deposits are only insured up to $250,000. Seen as such, a, slightly, negative rate on Treasuries does not seem so bad as you are thinking. If they want a higher rate, they have their investments--a bank account is just the account a company uses for payments, not actually for investment, one would think. Except, do I and Tankus show some confusion: the recent bank failures suggest some wide fluctuations in Treasury returns when traded at market prices, the exact prices corporatins would get if trading them in for cash to use for payments.

Expand full comment