“Building disappeared.” Like what happened 9/11/2001. I thought no one believed propaganda anymore, but I was wrong. Millions got jabbed, people I know. We are in a war between good and evil. Between ignorance and truth.
Before I lose the thought (easy to do at 68 lol) and stating that I have yet to read the Q and A...
Since I’m guessing everyone here knows that the 9-11 narrative is false and the probability that there were no planes, or at least not 4 planes, is extremely high...then the same question is something that has nibbled at me for years. What happened to those flights. And the people on those flights who boarded and never returned.
They fake deaths all the time and what happens to the alleged dead people who knows? Some are made up and a significant number were made up for 9/11 I think - also quite a few would have been agents who were given special identifies for 9/11 - it was an event planned very much in advance. It wasn't just the deaths of the people in the planes that were faked - it was also the deaths of those in the buildings.
9/11 was a demolition job and normal protocol as we all know is to fully evacuate both the buildings and surrounding areas before demolition. We have no reason to believe other than that happened on the day although it is certainly possible that a few people were targeted or were accidentally killed or injured. The jumpers, the people at the windows, the loved ones, the alleged witnesses and "miracle" survivors - all faked or actors.
This is an analysis of the alleged victims showing fakery - The Vicsim Report (simulated victims)
Yes, it was a missal that hit the pentagon. We need to question everything. Truth is light, Jesus is both. Opposite of light is darkness. Be in the light.
YES! I have been wondering the same question; it’s possible that the flight that supposedly crashed in a field in Pennsylvania was shot down as debris was found scattered over miles nearby; but what of the others?
Regarding the MH370 documentary. All of us "know" that documentaries don't make any money, outside of perhaps selling the video as content to a cable or streaming service. So it seems to me that at best, a documentary is a break-even proposition.
So I pose two questions:
1. Why make a documentary?
2. Who funds a documentary?
Starting with the first question, I think documentaries serve the purpose of presenting revisionist history. If you read, you get a different view of historical events than if you watch documentaries. If this is true, then who benefits from a documentary presenting a certain point-of-view? As in all news, the important things are not reported, as if they never happened.
So who funds a documentary? I have often wondered who are all those production companies listed at the beginning of a documentary with strange names that you will never see twice. I have never investigated, but could these be layer upon impenetrable layer of shell companies and trusts?
I used to love watching documentaries, but these days they are hard for me to watch without wondering about the ulterior motive.
Agree. A documentary, especially in recent years, on Netflix, is wholly or at least partially serving a narrative. I fell for the vegan one a couple of years ago 🤦♂️, I hadn't quite figured out what they were up to then.
The Netflix movie has many inaccuracies and it makes me wonder why? It’s so bad that it should be removed as it’s misleading people. Obama is on the board? What are they distracting from?
This article was very good and raises many questions. Especially about the water sensors.
I would lean towards this theory except I’m still stuck on the pilot theory.
The pilot had many issues and characteristics that lead to him. I also consider the cockpit activities at the time. The final reason I’m with the pilot theory is because of his staring into the security camera while being searched. He appeared angry/defiant. To me….that was “ the tell”.
"What is Operation Northwoods, and how does its proposal relate to conspiracy theories surrounding MH370?"
Operation Northwoods was not a "genuine" false flag proposal but rather a faked false flag proposal with a propagandistic agenda. I worked this out a couple of months ago when it occurred to me that it was very strange for such an incriminating document ever to be declassified ... and when I took a little look and blew away the magic propaganda dust ... lo and behold I could see it was laid as bait 36 years before it was supposedly "declassified" in 1998 in preparation to mislead the anticipated disbelievers of the 9/11 nonsense. There is evidence that 9/11 was planned quite a few decades before the towers were event built. (Video of numerous references to 9/11 in the decades before - https://youtu.be/_AUclXzapJo?si=wegOxMRxncJbugge&t=44)
You start by quoting Florence de Changy. Her book favours the theory that MH370 was likely shot down somewhere along the Vietnam coast, by US forces who then desperately covered it up, and the entire Australia / Indian Ocean search was a diversion. She also analyses and dismisses the various debris found on Mauritius etc and Maldives viewing. She travelled out there and reports first-hand.
The plane parts that were found were not authentic and looked planted.
There’s a lot of 5-D chess being played in the world right now, often way over the heads of the average citizens to understand. Do not underestimate the pathology of our globalist rulers. If something doesn’t look or feel right, trust your instincts.
I knew MH370 had to be faked but I'd never looked at it. I suggest Blaine Gibson is an agent whose job is to suggest there really was a plane crash when it was just another fake one.
I have looked at MH17, PS-752 in Tehran and Asiana Flight 24 in San Francisco - all faked. Faked airliner crashes are a pretty big thing (of course, the four on the fateful day plus I've heard the German Wings one was and also the one with all the Polish government officials) and so are train crashes and bus crashes.
This is an hilarious analysis by Aussie analyst, Peekay, of the PS-752 "wreckage", "Seats and People" https://youtu.be/vftD3hh6Yro
"In March of this year, United Australia Party Senator Ralph Babet tabled a motion calling for acknowledgment of Australia’s record excess deaths, and the need for an inquiry. The motion was voted down 30:29, with most Liberals, Nationals and the cross bench for Aye, and most Labor and Greens for No." Another reason to be ashamed for holding an Australian passport!
As a person who has followed aviation incidents for decades -- including reading almost every accident report for major incidents -- i think it is important to add some more context.
First, plane crashes always involve an outsized attention from the public, press, and consequently governments. this has been the case for as long as i have been studying them.
Second, this is not the first aircraft that disappeared over a body of water which proved very difficult to find. Years earlier there was an air france crash over the atlantic and it took years before they finally found the plane. The cause of the crash was pretty definitive as a small mechanical failure followed by gross mismanagement by the pilots resulting in a high altitude stall lasting several minutes and terminating with a crash into the ocean. A fully functional modern plane.
Third, there is also precedent for the official report and investigation being blunted or limited in findings due to the sensitive nature of the cause. There was an air egypt crash into the ocean where one of the pilots waited for the other to go to the restroom and while he was gone the other pilot took control and started a dive into the ocean clearly trying to commit suicide and mass murder. The second pilot returned to the flight deck and the two wrestled for control of the plane which ultimately pitched up and then down again straight into the ocean. They suppressed the findings for political reasons as they didn't want to damage the reputation of some arab countries and the religion involved.
Now what have we learned. It can be very hard to even today to locate a plane lost in a large body of water. Reports and investigations can be hindered or suppressed for political or religious reasons especially when it involves suicidal pilots. A single pilot intent on crashing a plane is very hard to stop.
Now we come to this crash. I believe we have indications of tampering with the investigation as there was a lot of evidence about one of the pilots which was ignored particularly about the state of mind.
We will never know until more hard evidence comes to light but i would the balance of evidence and history and context leads me to believe the theory of the suicidal pilot in this case.
Why too did they not listen to those who saw the wreckage on the day it went missing. Totally ignore it. I went hunting for it using maps on a now closed down site, worked out where, and hunted it down. I no longer have the exact details (latitude and longitude) but was off the coast of Western Australia.
I zoomed in as far as I was allowed and could make out a structure that was either the horizontal or vertical stabilizer or the wing with engines facing down. The image that still remains was of the right wing.
Imagine if the air heads had listened to me and to many others who also saw it via an interaction map and had gone to check it out - how many would have been saved?
Some investigation!! How about looking at the real truth & the witness of MH370 being shot down by a high powered laser on a U.S. navy ship!! The witness was a New Zealander who was on a smoko break on an oil rig on the south china sea when he watched the tail of the plane being shot off!! He then emailed the authorities in Vietnam & then he was immediately shipped off the oil rig, threatened with his life & is living somewhere here in New Zealand, never allowed to talk about this again!!!
I watched a video a long time ago from Ukraine, with two women witnesses to the MH17 crash, that said that the bodies falling down from the sky had a smell of formalin, used to preserve dead bodies.
“Building disappeared.” Like what happened 9/11/2001. I thought no one believed propaganda anymore, but I was wrong. Millions got jabbed, people I know. We are in a war between good and evil. Between ignorance and truth.
Before I lose the thought (easy to do at 68 lol) and stating that I have yet to read the Q and A...
Since I’m guessing everyone here knows that the 9-11 narrative is false and the probability that there were no planes, or at least not 4 planes, is extremely high...then the same question is something that has nibbled at me for years. What happened to those flights. And the people on those flights who boarded and never returned.
They fake deaths all the time and what happens to the alleged dead people who knows? Some are made up and a significant number were made up for 9/11 I think - also quite a few would have been agents who were given special identifies for 9/11 - it was an event planned very much in advance. It wasn't just the deaths of the people in the planes that were faked - it was also the deaths of those in the buildings.
9/11 was a demolition job and normal protocol as we all know is to fully evacuate both the buildings and surrounding areas before demolition. We have no reason to believe other than that happened on the day although it is certainly possible that a few people were targeted or were accidentally killed or injured. The jumpers, the people at the windows, the loved ones, the alleged witnesses and "miracle" survivors - all faked or actors.
This is an analysis of the alleged victims showing fakery - The Vicsim Report (simulated victims)
https://septemberclues.org/vicsims/9-11-9%20the%20Vicsim%20Report.pdf
I have a page on 9/11 with posts addressing various aspects.
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/911
Yes, it was a missal that hit the pentagon. We need to question everything. Truth is light, Jesus is both. Opposite of light is darkness. Be in the light.
YES! I have been wondering the same question; it’s possible that the flight that supposedly crashed in a field in Pennsylvania was shot down as debris was found scattered over miles nearby; but what of the others?
Regarding the MH370 documentary. All of us "know" that documentaries don't make any money, outside of perhaps selling the video as content to a cable or streaming service. So it seems to me that at best, a documentary is a break-even proposition.
So I pose two questions:
1. Why make a documentary?
2. Who funds a documentary?
Starting with the first question, I think documentaries serve the purpose of presenting revisionist history. If you read, you get a different view of historical events than if you watch documentaries. If this is true, then who benefits from a documentary presenting a certain point-of-view? As in all news, the important things are not reported, as if they never happened.
So who funds a documentary? I have often wondered who are all those production companies listed at the beginning of a documentary with strange names that you will never see twice. I have never investigated, but could these be layer upon impenetrable layer of shell companies and trusts?
I used to love watching documentaries, but these days they are hard for me to watch without wondering about the ulterior motive.
Agree. A documentary, especially in recent years, on Netflix, is wholly or at least partially serving a narrative. I fell for the vegan one a couple of years ago 🤦♂️, I hadn't quite figured out what they were up to then.
Ironically, my husband (totally caught in the narrative) is a documentary editor…
Great interview.
The Netflix movie has many inaccuracies and it makes me wonder why? It’s so bad that it should be removed as it’s misleading people. Obama is on the board? What are they distracting from?
This article was very good and raises many questions. Especially about the water sensors.
I would lean towards this theory except I’m still stuck on the pilot theory.
The pilot had many issues and characteristics that lead to him. I also consider the cockpit activities at the time. The final reason I’m with the pilot theory is because of his staring into the security camera while being searched. He appeared angry/defiant. To me….that was “ the tell”.
"What is Operation Northwoods, and how does its proposal relate to conspiracy theories surrounding MH370?"
Operation Northwoods was not a "genuine" false flag proposal but rather a faked false flag proposal with a propagandistic agenda. I worked this out a couple of months ago when it occurred to me that it was very strange for such an incriminating document ever to be declassified ... and when I took a little look and blew away the magic propaganda dust ... lo and behold I could see it was laid as bait 36 years before it was supposedly "declassified" in 1998 in preparation to mislead the anticipated disbelievers of the 9/11 nonsense. There is evidence that 9/11 was planned quite a few decades before the towers were event built. (Video of numerous references to 9/11 in the decades before - https://youtu.be/_AUclXzapJo?si=wegOxMRxncJbugge&t=44)
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/operation-northwoods-false-flag-proposal
You start by quoting Florence de Changy. Her book favours the theory that MH370 was likely shot down somewhere along the Vietnam coast, by US forces who then desperately covered it up, and the entire Australia / Indian Ocean search was a diversion. She also analyses and dismisses the various debris found on Mauritius etc and Maldives viewing. She travelled out there and reports first-hand.
Not saying I support or dismiss her theory.
The plane parts that were found were not authentic and looked planted.
There’s a lot of 5-D chess being played in the world right now, often way over the heads of the average citizens to understand. Do not underestimate the pathology of our globalist rulers. If something doesn’t look or feel right, trust your instincts.
I knew MH370 had to be faked but I'd never looked at it. I suggest Blaine Gibson is an agent whose job is to suggest there really was a plane crash when it was just another fake one.
I have looked at MH17, PS-752 in Tehran and Asiana Flight 24 in San Francisco - all faked. Faked airliner crashes are a pretty big thing (of course, the four on the fateful day plus I've heard the German Wings one was and also the one with all the Polish government officials) and so are train crashes and bus crashes.
This is an hilarious analysis by Aussie analyst, Peekay, of the PS-752 "wreckage", "Seats and People" https://youtu.be/vftD3hh6Yro
https://occamsrazorterrorevents.weebly.com/blog/did-mh-17-crash-in-eastern-ukraine
https://occamsrazorterrorevents.weebly.com/blog/did-ps-752-crash-in-tehran
https://occamsrazorterrorevents.weebly.com/blog/did-asiana-flight-214-crash-in-san-francisco
https://occamsrazorterrorevents.weebly.com/four-faked-plane-crashes.html
You have many interesting scenarios in the comments…
"In March of this year, United Australia Party Senator Ralph Babet tabled a motion calling for acknowledgment of Australia’s record excess deaths, and the need for an inquiry. The motion was voted down 30:29, with most Liberals, Nationals and the cross bench for Aye, and most Labor and Greens for No." Another reason to be ashamed for holding an Australian passport!
Indeed. We are ruled by hollowed out psychopaths.
OMG! Thank you for this one ... I was just pondering this topic the other day!!
As a person who has followed aviation incidents for decades -- including reading almost every accident report for major incidents -- i think it is important to add some more context.
First, plane crashes always involve an outsized attention from the public, press, and consequently governments. this has been the case for as long as i have been studying them.
Second, this is not the first aircraft that disappeared over a body of water which proved very difficult to find. Years earlier there was an air france crash over the atlantic and it took years before they finally found the plane. The cause of the crash was pretty definitive as a small mechanical failure followed by gross mismanagement by the pilots resulting in a high altitude stall lasting several minutes and terminating with a crash into the ocean. A fully functional modern plane.
Third, there is also precedent for the official report and investigation being blunted or limited in findings due to the sensitive nature of the cause. There was an air egypt crash into the ocean where one of the pilots waited for the other to go to the restroom and while he was gone the other pilot took control and started a dive into the ocean clearly trying to commit suicide and mass murder. The second pilot returned to the flight deck and the two wrestled for control of the plane which ultimately pitched up and then down again straight into the ocean. They suppressed the findings for political reasons as they didn't want to damage the reputation of some arab countries and the religion involved.
Now what have we learned. It can be very hard to even today to locate a plane lost in a large body of water. Reports and investigations can be hindered or suppressed for political or religious reasons especially when it involves suicidal pilots. A single pilot intent on crashing a plane is very hard to stop.
Now we come to this crash. I believe we have indications of tampering with the investigation as there was a lot of evidence about one of the pilots which was ignored particularly about the state of mind.
We will never know until more hard evidence comes to light but i would the balance of evidence and history and context leads me to believe the theory of the suicidal pilot in this case.
Why too did they not listen to those who saw the wreckage on the day it went missing. Totally ignore it. I went hunting for it using maps on a now closed down site, worked out where, and hunted it down. I no longer have the exact details (latitude and longitude) but was off the coast of Western Australia.
I zoomed in as far as I was allowed and could make out a structure that was either the horizontal or vertical stabilizer or the wing with engines facing down. The image that still remains was of the right wing.
Imagine if the air heads had listened to me and to many others who also saw it via an interaction map and had gone to check it out - how many would have been saved?
Some investigation!! How about looking at the real truth & the witness of MH370 being shot down by a high powered laser on a U.S. navy ship!! The witness was a New Zealander who was on a smoko break on an oil rig on the south china sea when he watched the tail of the plane being shot off!! He then emailed the authorities in Vietnam & then he was immediately shipped off the oil rig, threatened with his life & is living somewhere here in New Zealand, never allowed to talk about this again!!!
“Missing building” ..... we did just that..... building seven on 9/11.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xrnx5yhihj8
Check out Ashton Forbes’ work on this. Pretty incredible and fascinating. Here’s his X (Twitter) page:
https://x.com/justxashton?s=21&t=U-gpenKl09wSsNWZ_vcjWQ
I watched a video a long time ago from Ukraine, with two women witnesses to the MH17 crash, that said that the bodies falling down from the sky had a smell of formalin, used to preserve dead bodies.