39 Comments

Had a mammogram done eleven years ago when I turned 50….never went again, and throw out all the reminders. One can learn how to take care of oneself, breast exams are best done at home, and by the one with the breasts. :-)

Expand full comment

The reason I went was my family said I really should as a younger sister had breast cancer with 32 years of age. I am older by 8 years. I have never really believed in her diagnoses, and it’s possible her rounds of chemo and radiation were for nought. The medical cartel is alive and kicks….hard. Especially women. Just say NO!

Expand full comment

Exactly!! We know our own bodies better than anyone else.

Expand full comment
Oct 14Edited

Retired OB-gyn Chris Northrup says mammography compresses breast tissue at 44 pds psi. Thats enuf to rupture a DCIS (ductal carcinoma in situ), if present. Needle biopsies do the same, and initiate metastasis. Yet "centralized medicine" ob-gyns, as Dr. Jack Cruse has termed them, still recommend mammographs. Buyer beware.

Expand full comment

Good point!

Expand full comment

I avoided all mammograms until I got really sick (later revealed to be Palm Tree Toxicity). During that time, they took me for endless testing for breast cancer, but didn't test for what we knew was obvious (as I sustained an injury to my ankle with a palm tree spike in my foot, which made me very ill). The breast screen experience was horrific, I will never do it again.... I was horrified how much pressure they put on the breast, almost causing injuries. I dread to think what they do to young women and mothers planning to breast feed and what injuries other women might experience. Since CONIVD, I can now see there are few areas of "health care" that are untainted by Big Pharma's money laundering/wealth-transfer machine.

Expand full comment

What is palm tree toxicity and how did you become toxic?

Expand full comment

I prefer the idea of thermography over the mammogram(rip my boob of my chest and squish the hell out of it). Sounds like torture. At 58, still never had one. No plans either.

Look up German New Medicine and what it tells us of a “tumour”.

Expand full comment

Luckily I lived thru a time where screening didn't exist. Only after your elders could not come up with a cure for your condition did you go to a doctor and he was a simple GP. When mammography and airport screening came into vogue, I was like, hell no, not going there. And I never have. Irradiating me for cancer using radiation that causes cancer was a no-brainer.

Expand full comment

"For the predatory monster that is Cartel Medicine needs to feed, and it has a special taste for women."

So very true! We are its favourite food. And unfortunately alternative medicine has, for the most part, been swallowed up by the same system.

Doctors are for emergency purposes only! As is willingly exposing yourself to more radiation.

Expand full comment

Prevention/Screening = Early victim identification.

The sooner they hook you, the sooner they can begin their favorite procedure, the total cashectomy, on you.

There's been a lot of fear mongering going on for decades, and that fear is used to drive the herd toward the slaughterhouse. We all need to cultivate a very healthy fear of following the herd. Fear = manipulation. And it's not manipulation for benevolent purposes.

To repeat Dr. John Bergman, DC's three favorite screening methods:

1. Thermography - to find inflammation where it is not supposed to be. Inflammation = disease. It can find cancer years before it gets out of control.

2. Live Blood Cell Analysis with a Dark Field Microscope - to quickly determine blood viscosity and whether blood cells are clumping together. Thick blood and clumped blood cells mean you've got capillaries that are getting gummed up. Over time that will degrade ALL of your organs. Organs are massively capillary-dense.

3. Heart Rate Variability - to track how balanced your nervous system is. Too sympathetic dominant and you fail to rest and digest, impairing your body's ability to maintain and repair itself.

Expand full comment

My sister’s doctor had ordered Thermography for her breast cancer. It is a good diagnostic tool and completely safe. The cancerous tissue has a higher temperature than a healthy tissue, and it shows in the Thermogram.

Expand full comment

Don’t forget the harm of intense radiation exposure aimed at the boobs with every screening

Expand full comment

Agree, Boobs the documentary does a great job explaining that issue.

Expand full comment

Not just breast cancer, but early diagnosis and treatment of most solid tumors often serve as excuses for overtreatment until significant treatment advancements are made. My article argues this point: https://clo2xuewuliu.substack.com/p/the-chaos-of-overtreatment-in-cancer

Expand full comment

yep. only always. intuition showed me to never to dat, and i listen-in'! ever soooo great full ... you rock dude!

Expand full comment

great 🙃🙃🙃🤗🤗🤗😘😘😘😍😍😍🥰🥰🥰

Expand full comment

In general, prevention is more profitable than cure, profitable even when no disease is present. Emphasizing the benefits of prevention while minimizing the negative consequences and risks continues to increase profit as effectiveness decreases. Increasing the effectiveness by limiting the use of preventatice actions to cases where they are actually beneficial overall decreases profit. Insurance companies also benefit from increased business when preventatives are oversold.

Expand full comment

You would be most angry if you knew the truths of 911. It is still the GR8st hoax of the 21st Century, surpassing vaxx's, Oct 7th in occupied Palestine. There are still many questions about 911 though, but those scanners were already made and had to be put in place, as planes were flying about 10 days later. 911 was implemented to control travel. Three towers came down with 2 planes? Come on.

Expand full comment

Point taken, but 9/11 was implemented so Blair, Netanyahu & Bush (in that order) would have a viable excuse to get into and control the M.E. Do you see how the M.E. has changed today where once there was relative stability? Better to have left the M.E alone.

Expand full comment

CM Maccioll: WRONG! 911 was for i$rahell, blaming the Muslims that had nothing to do with it. i$rahell's owned the buildings and collected GR8 amounts of insurance. i$rahell also had all the equipment made to sell to the airports for surveillance. Planes that hit towers? Maybe holograms? Maybe special built titanium nose cones? In 1945 a Boeing bomber hit the Empire State bldg. in NYC with only minor damage to the building. There's another concept by some very learned engineers that the towers were taken down like the homes in LaHania, Muai. By heat rays from above. There was NOT enough debris on the ground from the towers, as much of it went up in dust.

Expand full comment

Blair represented Rothschild financiers, Netanyahu was the architect and Bush was the patsy. I thought I made that quite clear. In all humility, there's nothing I've not learned from investigating 9/11 that you can school me on. My research showed that everyone of any significance connected to this provable false flag was Jewish/Zionist. Also, OBL died in December 2001 as revealed by Benazir Bhutto, who was silenced thereafter for, among other things, that slip of the tongue. Lahaina was DEW's without a doubt and both recent hurricanes were provable weather manipulation. Trump's assassination attempts, all bogus.

Expand full comment

That is what I keep saying all these assignation attempts are bogus just dog and pony show garbage

Expand full comment

Says Allah ?

Expand full comment

DO NOT PARTICIPATE IN THE MEDICAL MAFIA 😕

Expand full comment

Screening for prostate cancer. Same?

Expand full comment

A Midwestern Doctor on Substack has covered this I believe. Perhaps do a search of their incredible stack.

Expand full comment

never had one, never will... its radiation which when splits a cell can cause cancer... I watched them torture my 84 year old mom.. smashing her breasts then ... arg... feel your boobs... you know when there is a lump!

Expand full comment