I'm in the middle of reading "The Falsification of History" and definitely recommend it. Some of it sounds like it was written in the middle of the covid hysteria but the book is actually over a decade old. I've listened to Mr. Hamer on a couple of podcasts and I look forward to reading more of his work.
What my dense brain needs now, after reading this account of yet another false flag to drag nations into war, is an elucidation of precisely how the resulting wars benefit those promoting them. Is it strictly through the moneys involved in weapons manufacturing and sales? Is it yet more darkly, the fulfillment of depopulation?
I know that money is lower on the scale than raw power itself, but ongoing wars in particular bring them the $ and the death count, to ensure future economic and political domination. War machine as perpetual meat grinder to keep us all down, I guess.
Before I continue reading, please accept my humble but frustrated typo correction: you state at the beginning; "I noticed that he was reading a book about the Nazi’s and World War 2,". You meant to say Nazis, plural not Nazi's, possessive. This mistake has taken hold so badly and I'm on a mission to correct it. Best.
Shouldn’t we change our negative opinions about war and killing civilians in general?
If we browse through the pages of history, the only dominant theme back from ancient times to now is killing other people. We do it on business days and on weekends and on holy-days, we love it so much. We don’t live to love and to give our kids good examples of decency. It’s all break time short stories. Once a kid is strong enough to hold a gun, we prepare them to take over our favorite sport. We even have changed our language to reflect this love of ours: hunters go out to kill game. Not a living being.
Maybe in early 20th century we were emotionally and psychologically underdeveloped - which is obvious from writings and movies of that time. Then came WW2 and we quickly proclaimed it the tragedy of all times. Until the time when backstage dealings were disclosed, a famous US citizen from a famous family of long presidential connections was sentenced and his bank was found guilty of laundering money for the Nazi throughout the war…
But we ended WW2 as highly sophisticated species, so well outspoken, so articulate about love, friendship, peace, one global community, sharing and coexistence… that we had to spring into Korea, Vietnam and all other smaller wars run in the meantime or in parallel, because why not. It’s good money, and the best of this money is unaccounted for, anyway. No love, no humane feelings, no recognition of suffering, because why not.
All art, music, painting, theatre, even cinema goes into the “additional activities” section. Killing other people is what we do best. We even give medals and honor those who kill best or get killed. In the latter instance, we honor only those events which will help to advertise more hatred and killing. The rest remains is not mentioned because why should they be.
Obviously, our love of killing is reserved for us. The other guys, the bad guys, when they kill other people in wars, like defending their countries, they are enemies, they should be killed because they can kill us one day. We have called it “pre-emptive” killing. Because why not, it’s easier (especially for kids flying drone games in containers in comfy backyards), cost-effective and practically no-risk. The other guys should not have any weapons because we say so. But we don’t do much about it because they have to have some weapons for us to justify why we want them killed first before they can kill us.
Talking? Negotiations? Agreements? Coexistence? Shared purposes? Future? Humanity? Don’t be childish. That’s not for real men.
Real men go out there and kill civilians. This is what wars are about. If you don’t believe it, think:
If wars were the game for soldiers only, both sides would make arrangements to meet on selected practice grounds, training grounds, military-only sites, away from cities, infrastructure and civilians. They never do - it has never happened in history.
It’s like with MMA or boxing events. The fighters do not go out to your neighborhood or market or park, they do their thing in an isolated space, designed specifically not to harm anyone, and the fighters are specifically taught and trained not to touch anyone except the “enemy”. Even the referee who prevents them from going full-scale and vent off is untouchable. Strange…
These stories are all fascinating, as they challenge the storying telling by the victors.
One thing I find fascinating though, is the lense through which we perceive these reveals.
"The Lusitania is a very important WW1 event, maybe one of the most important."
This is a fascinating perspective to be honest. It is posed in such a way to present the idea that this event was pivotal, and without it, the Americans would not have entered the war. But I will argue that is a false premise because I don't think false flags are pivotal in a sense that their absence would have changed the course of events. Much akin to a massive forest fire, the spark is not really a pivotal event because the conditions are a result of a long slow buildup at which point any number of sparks can trigger the event.
If the Americans wanted to join the war, and in fact, were already participating in it, then this is not pivotal. It was simply the tactic that succeeded in breaking it to the public who due to propaganda didn't know the intentions ahead of time. If the Germans had not sunk the Lucitania, I am certain, there was a plan B, a plan C, and a plan D that would have involved informing the public that America was going to war with the Germans.
I also don't think the bankers and such fear this particular act as portrayed. What they really fear, is the exposition of any act of public manipulation because they fear being exposed for the way they have manipulated the public for over a century through complicit media. They are losing that battle thanks to social media, and some of the craziness we see is a last gasp attempt to replace old media with a new version of control of information.
So while these stories are absolutely essential to tell to help accelerate our shift away from a century of mainstream propaganda, I think we're doing a disservice by presenting them as pivotal events that changed the course of history. The only thing that was pivotal was the carefully crafted and manipulated public opinion which was going to be changed no matter what because the course of history had already long been set before any of these pivotal events.
In the world wars, the real pivotal events were set by diplomacy between Germany and Russia. Those were actual pivotal events that set the course of history as they determined the outcome of the strategic wars.
This is definitely another of those 'print it out, wrap it in plastic, bury it in the back yard' articles. Having read (and re-read) your interview re the Titanic, it adds to the list of exposés refuting all we've been taught. They seem never ending. As each day passes, 2024 appears more and more about unveiling these lies and bringing the truth to light. Thanks for all your work supporting this.
For those who enjoy learning some history in the form of a novel, the book Dead Wake has a lot of this information and more. (I listened to the audio book, which was terrific.)
Who would sacrifice civilians to steer public opinion towards war? That is a helluva crooked mindset. Interestingly, that mindset echoes so much with the tactics of the Hamas.
I'm in the middle of reading "The Falsification of History" and definitely recommend it. Some of it sounds like it was written in the middle of the covid hysteria but the book is actually over a decade old. I've listened to Mr. Hamer on a couple of podcasts and I look forward to reading more of his work.
What my dense brain needs now, after reading this account of yet another false flag to drag nations into war, is an elucidation of precisely how the resulting wars benefit those promoting them. Is it strictly through the moneys involved in weapons manufacturing and sales? Is it yet more darkly, the fulfillment of depopulation?
Money and pop control are lower order outcomes.
I think things make sense when viewed through the lens of Power and domination.
There are the ruled and then the rulers, there always has been.
We have arrived at a point in history where a few can rule over ALL.
One of their stated aims is "world peace" as an outcome of that "power over all". What a noble aim.
That end "world peace", or shall we say Utopia, justifies all ends including a few thousand dead here and there with a false flag.
It is for the greater good, our good, after all.
I know that money is lower on the scale than raw power itself, but ongoing wars in particular bring them the $ and the death count, to ensure future economic and political domination. War machine as perpetual meat grinder to keep us all down, I guess.
👍
Before I continue reading, please accept my humble but frustrated typo correction: you state at the beginning; "I noticed that he was reading a book about the Nazi’s and World War 2,". You meant to say Nazis, plural not Nazi's, possessive. This mistake has taken hold so badly and I'm on a mission to correct it. Best.
👍
Shouldn’t we change our negative opinions about war and killing civilians in general?
If we browse through the pages of history, the only dominant theme back from ancient times to now is killing other people. We do it on business days and on weekends and on holy-days, we love it so much. We don’t live to love and to give our kids good examples of decency. It’s all break time short stories. Once a kid is strong enough to hold a gun, we prepare them to take over our favorite sport. We even have changed our language to reflect this love of ours: hunters go out to kill game. Not a living being.
Maybe in early 20th century we were emotionally and psychologically underdeveloped - which is obvious from writings and movies of that time. Then came WW2 and we quickly proclaimed it the tragedy of all times. Until the time when backstage dealings were disclosed, a famous US citizen from a famous family of long presidential connections was sentenced and his bank was found guilty of laundering money for the Nazi throughout the war…
But we ended WW2 as highly sophisticated species, so well outspoken, so articulate about love, friendship, peace, one global community, sharing and coexistence… that we had to spring into Korea, Vietnam and all other smaller wars run in the meantime or in parallel, because why not. It’s good money, and the best of this money is unaccounted for, anyway. No love, no humane feelings, no recognition of suffering, because why not.
All art, music, painting, theatre, even cinema goes into the “additional activities” section. Killing other people is what we do best. We even give medals and honor those who kill best or get killed. In the latter instance, we honor only those events which will help to advertise more hatred and killing. The rest remains is not mentioned because why should they be.
Obviously, our love of killing is reserved for us. The other guys, the bad guys, when they kill other people in wars, like defending their countries, they are enemies, they should be killed because they can kill us one day. We have called it “pre-emptive” killing. Because why not, it’s easier (especially for kids flying drone games in containers in comfy backyards), cost-effective and practically no-risk. The other guys should not have any weapons because we say so. But we don’t do much about it because they have to have some weapons for us to justify why we want them killed first before they can kill us.
Talking? Negotiations? Agreements? Coexistence? Shared purposes? Future? Humanity? Don’t be childish. That’s not for real men.
Real men go out there and kill civilians. This is what wars are about. If you don’t believe it, think:
If wars were the game for soldiers only, both sides would make arrangements to meet on selected practice grounds, training grounds, military-only sites, away from cities, infrastructure and civilians. They never do - it has never happened in history.
It’s like with MMA or boxing events. The fighters do not go out to your neighborhood or market or park, they do their thing in an isolated space, designed specifically not to harm anyone, and the fighters are specifically taught and trained not to touch anyone except the “enemy”. Even the referee who prevents them from going full-scale and vent off is untouchable. Strange…
We are all live Lusitanias.
Well put!
So often, I hope that I am wrong.
These stories are all fascinating, as they challenge the storying telling by the victors.
One thing I find fascinating though, is the lense through which we perceive these reveals.
"The Lusitania is a very important WW1 event, maybe one of the most important."
This is a fascinating perspective to be honest. It is posed in such a way to present the idea that this event was pivotal, and without it, the Americans would not have entered the war. But I will argue that is a false premise because I don't think false flags are pivotal in a sense that their absence would have changed the course of events. Much akin to a massive forest fire, the spark is not really a pivotal event because the conditions are a result of a long slow buildup at which point any number of sparks can trigger the event.
If the Americans wanted to join the war, and in fact, were already participating in it, then this is not pivotal. It was simply the tactic that succeeded in breaking it to the public who due to propaganda didn't know the intentions ahead of time. If the Germans had not sunk the Lucitania, I am certain, there was a plan B, a plan C, and a plan D that would have involved informing the public that America was going to war with the Germans.
I also don't think the bankers and such fear this particular act as portrayed. What they really fear, is the exposition of any act of public manipulation because they fear being exposed for the way they have manipulated the public for over a century through complicit media. They are losing that battle thanks to social media, and some of the craziness we see is a last gasp attempt to replace old media with a new version of control of information.
So while these stories are absolutely essential to tell to help accelerate our shift away from a century of mainstream propaganda, I think we're doing a disservice by presenting them as pivotal events that changed the course of history. The only thing that was pivotal was the carefully crafted and manipulated public opinion which was going to be changed no matter what because the course of history had already long been set before any of these pivotal events.
In the world wars, the real pivotal events were set by diplomacy between Germany and Russia. Those were actual pivotal events that set the course of history as they determined the outcome of the strategic wars.
Good point.
This is definitely another of those 'print it out, wrap it in plastic, bury it in the back yard' articles. Having read (and re-read) your interview re the Titanic, it adds to the list of exposés refuting all we've been taught. They seem never ending. As each day passes, 2024 appears more and more about unveiling these lies and bringing the truth to light. Thanks for all your work supporting this.
For those who enjoy learning some history in the form of a novel, the book Dead Wake has a lot of this information and more. (I listened to the audio book, which was terrific.)
https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/98118/dead-wake-by-erik-larson/
Who would sacrifice civilians to steer public opinion towards war? That is a helluva crooked mindset. Interestingly, that mindset echoes so much with the tactics of the Hamas.
Aleister Crowley role, Secret Agent 666
https://ia802503.us.archive.org/21/items/our-biblical-origins-biwf/Secret%20Agent.pdf