If the media is tightly controlled, and the majority still watches the controlled media instead of doing their own research such that they can more longer listen to anyone else who is not a medical professional wearing a white jacket or their favorite news commentator, what can we do?
If the media is tightly controlled, and the majority still watches the controlled media instead of doing their own research such that they can more longer listen to anyone else who is not a medical professional wearing a white jacket or their favorite news commentator, what can we do?
We can continue to make offhand comments and change the subject.
The power of propaganda lies largely in its ability to isolate people from each other. Using the offhand remark technique results in some very surprising and encouraging replies.
The importance of understatement cannot be stressed too much. The deliberately-induced unnecessary trauma sensitized people, which is what it was designed to do. We are, however, beginning to see the result of that sensitization as the number of "unexplained" deaths accrue.
There will always be a sizable cohort of citizens taking refuge in deliberate refusal to acknowledge verified facts; there always has been. Those poor souls cannot be helped, their neuroses are a combination of learned behaviors and congenital vulnerability. It's those whose credulity was leveraged to induce adaptive behavior that are now beginning to desist.
Stoddard did quite a bit of research on the reversal of adaptive learning and behavior back in the eighties, and we're seeing the proof of that research now. This is why so many changes were imposed so quickly; the behavioral scientists providing the methodology to the propagandists would have cautioned them about the timelines. They knew that time was of the essence and that adaptation requires continual reinforcement or it wanes.
Yes, we're seeing the guilty covering their tracks, but do not let that affect your resolve. It's enough to remember and discuss., from the winning hearts and minds standpoint.
If the media is tightly controlled, and the majority still watches the controlled media instead of doing their own research such that they can more longer listen to anyone else who is not a medical professional wearing a white jacket or their favorite news commentator, what can we do?
We can continue to make offhand comments and change the subject.
The power of propaganda lies largely in its ability to isolate people from each other. Using the offhand remark technique results in some very surprising and encouraging replies.
The importance of understatement cannot be stressed too much. The deliberately-induced unnecessary trauma sensitized people, which is what it was designed to do. We are, however, beginning to see the result of that sensitization as the number of "unexplained" deaths accrue.
There will always be a sizable cohort of citizens taking refuge in deliberate refusal to acknowledge verified facts; there always has been. Those poor souls cannot be helped, their neuroses are a combination of learned behaviors and congenital vulnerability. It's those whose credulity was leveraged to induce adaptive behavior that are now beginning to desist.
Stoddard did quite a bit of research on the reversal of adaptive learning and behavior back in the eighties, and we're seeing the proof of that research now. This is why so many changes were imposed so quickly; the behavioral scientists providing the methodology to the propagandists would have cautioned them about the timelines. They knew that time was of the essence and that adaptation requires continual reinforcement or it wanes.
Yes, we're seeing the guilty covering their tracks, but do not let that affect your resolve. It's enough to remember and discuss., from the winning hearts and minds standpoint.
No Amnesty