Jabbing GPs: An Australian mother’s story

And ninth-grade algebra

I asked for stories, and have received.

This is the first story I am publishing from an Australian reader. In her words, it’s the story of a mother’s “personal journey towards enlightenment on vaccination”. She’s right, this journey is a very personal one, and each takes it, or not, in their own way.

The point she makes about doctors and GPs in particular is one I have also reached and agree with. Links and emphasis have been added by me. I’ll outline some thoughts this story invoked at the end.

If you want to send me your story, you can do so here: unbekoming@outlook.com

And now over to this Australian mother, with thanks:

---

I wasn’t expecting to be offered the Hep B vaccine for my first newborn baby 18 years ago. I didn’t have access to information in the hospital and accepted it because I trusted the medical system. Then I researched Hepatitis B and could find no logical reason for giving the vaccine to babies. So, I asked a GP I knew socially: ‘Why do you all recommend it?’ assuming I would be given a logical reason that I hadn’t been able to figure out from what I had read. The answer was: ‘If we didn’t recommend vaccines we would be deregistered.’

People do not take toxic drugs based on the opinion of people who they will never meet; public health experts.  People take toxic drugs based on the opinion of their GPs. People trust GPs because they know it is a GP's job to be on their patients’ side, they know GPs are legally obliged to tell patients what patients expect to be told. This GP admitted GPs lie to patients to keep their jobs. 18 years ago. We are told that compliance with the vaccine schedule for babies has been over 90% for decades so I infer that most GPs lie about vaccines, perhaps more often by omission than by commission.

How do they lie by omission? Every GP knows that the combination of vaccines given to Australian babies has never been tested for its cumulative effect. Every GP knows they get a lot more repeat business from fully vaccinated child patients who have chronic health problems than from unvaccinated child patients. So, they benefit financially from encouraging parents to accept an untested combination of around three dozen doses of vaccines against a dozen diseases before they are old enough to talk, which means they are unable to tell their parents about any side effects they suffer.

My unvaccinated children can count their visits to a GP on their fingers. I’m not a fanatic about healthy eating, I don’t take them to alternative health care practitioners, it’s just that they rarely get sick enough to warrant getting treatment. Both have the occasional day asleep on the sofa with a slight temperature. Both got a weird dose of chickenpox (perhaps caught from someone who was shedding the vaccine virus) and had two days asleep on the sofa (and two weeks quarantined at home). My children are not unusual, look at the data in thecontrolgroup.org or look at the data on paediatrician Dr Paul Thomas’ 15,000 patients: Relative Incidence of Office Visits and Cumulative Rates of Billed Diagnoses Along the Axis of Vaccination.

For decades doctors in Australia have chosen to accept the gag on vaccines. No one forces them to work as GPs. If a GP didn't want to look into the eyes of trusting parents of healthy newborn babies and then encourage them to believe the benefits of following the vaccination schedule outweighs the risk, they could resign or become an 'integrative' GP, which would enable them to follow their conscience on vaccines to some extent. 

Drs John Piesse (Victoria) and Kevin Coleman (NSW) were suspended in 2017 for criticising 'No Jab No Play' State laws and the childhood vaccination schedule in public. Their suspensions prove the rule that doctors must not criticise vaccines preceded Covid-19.  When APHRA told doctors they are gagged on the experimental Covid-19 vaccine APHRA was effectively telling them the gag they all accept on approved vaccines also applies to these experimental vaccines.

As far as I can see all the vaccine risk awareness campaigners ignore the role of doctors. They criticise vaccine manufacturers, public health experts, regulators, and politicians. As they make no mention of doctors people infer they have found no reason to criticise doctors. People then think: why would I pay attention to these people who I will never meet and ignore the advice of my GP, who knows me, who I trust, who would only ever give me the right advice?

If large numbers of people eventually come to accept that giving babies so many vaccines before they are old enough to tell anyone about side effects is a terrible idea, they will look for someone to blame. In Australia my guess is they’ll first blame politicians for passing ‘No Jab No Pay’ and ‘No Jab No Play’ laws. (Only the Informed Medical Options Party and their partner the Great Australian Party, oppose these laws.)

If that were to happen if politicians, then tried to shift the blame onto vaccine manufacturers they could say: ‘Don’t blame us!  We make a few vaccines. We don’t advise anyone to take any of our products. We don’t advise anyone to let their babies have an untested combination of around three dozen doses against a dozen diseases. And we tell doctors about the side effects of our vaccines. Check out our ‘Vaccine Information Sheets’ and the ‘Vaccine Inserts’ we put in every box of vaccines. Some of them include advice like: do not give this vaccine to anyone who has suffered blurred vision or fainting after being given a previous dose of this vaccine. It’s not our fault if doctors don’t point out its impossible to tell if a baby suffers blurred vision and if a baby in a car seat faints it looks like the baby has fallen asleep. It’s not our fault if doctors chose not to obtain informed consent from patients.

When my second child was born the nurse came in to offer me the Hep B vaccine. I said: “We have had a chat, he has promised me that he won’t have anal sex or use dirty needles to inject illegal drugs into himself any time soon, we’ve agreed he doesn’t need the vaccine.” She walked out without saying a thing. Doctors and nurses know what they are doing.

We all are on our own personal journey on vaccination. I reached the destination relatively early and said no to all vaccines after doing my own research on risks, benefits, and alternative methods of protecting myself and my family. I have spent years warning friends about the dangers of vaccines and that doctors are gagged. Most smile and change the subject and continue to accept vaccines for their children. Each is on their own journey.  When someone joins me at the destination I do not say 'what took you so long', I say 'welcome'.

---

There are so many interesting threads in this story:

• It’s Australian for starters and that makes it close to home

• It highlights the authoritarian nature of Australian medical regulators long before the GMC came along

• It makes the point well that readiness to coerce childhood vaccination simply got extended to Covid jabs

• It highlights Paul Thomas, and he is worthy of highlighting

• It points the finger, correctly in my view, at GPs

• It highlights the “cumulative effect” problem

The comment about “cumulative effective” is true:

Every GP knows that the combination of vaccines given to Australian babies has never been tested for its cumulative effect. 

It made me think back to what I learned from Kennedy Jr. about the Simpsonwood conference of 2000.

The Day Jake Tapper Sold His Soul to Pharma • Children's Health Defense (childrenshealthdefense.org)

Verstraeten’s findings propelled CDC into DEFCON 1. The agency’s top vaccine officials summoned 52 pharmaceutical industry leaders, the foremost vaccinologists from academia and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), and public health regulators from the National Institutes of Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), CDC, World Health Organization (WHO) and European Medicines Agency to a secret two-day meeting at the remote Simpsonwood retreat center in Norcross, Georgia, to strategize about how to hide these awful revelations from the public.

---

Dr. Peter Patriarca, the then-director of the FDA Office on Vaccine Research and Review, expressed the general feeling of horror when he asked why no one had calculated the cumulative mercury exposure to children as policymakers added this cascade of new vaccines to the childhood schedule: “Conversion of the percentage thimerosal to actual micrograms of mercury involves ninth-grade algebra. What took the FDA so long to do the calculations?”

---

In the tense days leading up to the Simpsonwood conclave, children’s health champion Dr. Ruth Etzel of the EPA pleaded with her fellow public health leaders to publicly admit they made a terrible mistake by inadvertently poisoning American children, and to repair the damage.

“Ninth-grade algebra”, yes that’s all it takes to figure out that the ACCUMULATION of mercury adjuvants, and now aluminium adjuvants plus a laundry list of other toxicants piled on via an ever expanding, mandated and coerced, childhood schedule, into a baby’s body…is NOT A GOOD IDEA.

GPs (and Pediatricians for that matter) have done far more than nine-grade algebra, unless their excuse is that they went into medicine to avoid maths; that it’s not their strong suit.

On a final note, I overheard a good friend (and reader of this Substack) talking to someone about “adjuvants” yesterday…it put a smile on my face and warmed my heart.

Hoodwinked