This “narrative control” is a crime against humanity that exceeds the already inestimable costs of the lives lost during the pandemic scam. Along the way, they have destroyed trust in the medical establishment, the government, and created animus between brothers and sisters. We will be a generation recovering from this IF we are able to restore truth to the public square.
Then what is the difference between Flagyl an anti-parasitic that was used for my Diverticulitis attack and Stromectol-Ivermectin? About the same side effects.
Thanks for putting this together. As you allude to, the "us vs. them" lines are drawn and the efficacy of ivermectin - like so many aspects of the plandemic - is largely pre-determined depending on whether you went along with the narrative or dug for facts underneath it. (Alex Berenson is an interesting outlier in the particular example of Ivermectin.) So we won't really be able to persuade anyone even if the case is cast-iron :( Bret & Heather have discussed the interesting set of (Ivermectin, Vax, Lab-leak) and we have seen that #3 is widely discussed and largely become "common knowledge", #2 is shifting in the same direction, #1 is still taboo. I can't remember what they concluded, but Berenson might be the key to unlocking it?
Similar situation happened with HCQ as Mathew Crawford from Rounding the Earth could explain. There was likely no better way to take down that drug than to have Trump promote it, especially after following up that promotion with the couple who ingested aquarium cleaner. I believe the husband died. The couple were actually Democrat donors which is interesting and makes one wonder if the entire story was fake.
If it's true that a vaccine could not have an EUA if there is an effective treatment, then how did the vaccine get EUA approval if remdesivir and monoclonal antibodies were available? Also now there is Paxlovid and Mulnovopir (sp?) so why wouldn't the vaccines be pulled? Is it because none of these are actually FDA approved? I think the real reason they did not want an effective treatment is because if there were one, how many would bother to take a vaccine?
I find it interesting that they still push for boosters even though the narrative acknowledges there are actual treatments available in the form of Paxlovid and Mulnovapir. What is so odd is that one never sees people say that they're not going to take the next booster because what's the point of taking a vaccine that doesn't even prevent infection when there are treatments available? It's frankly astonishing to see universities still mandating vaccines and boosters given that their own sources claim there are treatments available. Before 2020 who would line up for a vaccine if there was a known treatment? This is just bizarre behavior which may be due to psychosis or some other phenomenon.
I'm kind of curious if Ivermectin is effective against other viruses as well. If not ivermectin specifically I'd be curious if any generic drugs would be effective in mitigating against the diseases the childhood vaccine schedule has been setup for. A full audit seems warranted.
This “narrative control” is a crime against humanity that exceeds the already inestimable costs of the lives lost during the pandemic scam. Along the way, they have destroyed trust in the medical establishment, the government, and created animus between brothers and sisters. We will be a generation recovering from this IF we are able to restore truth to the public square.
Then what is the difference between Flagyl an anti-parasitic that was used for my Diverticulitis attack and Stromectol-Ivermectin? About the same side effects.
Thanks for putting this together. As you allude to, the "us vs. them" lines are drawn and the efficacy of ivermectin - like so many aspects of the plandemic - is largely pre-determined depending on whether you went along with the narrative or dug for facts underneath it. (Alex Berenson is an interesting outlier in the particular example of Ivermectin.) So we won't really be able to persuade anyone even if the case is cast-iron :( Bret & Heather have discussed the interesting set of (Ivermectin, Vax, Lab-leak) and we have seen that #3 is widely discussed and largely become "common knowledge", #2 is shifting in the same direction, #1 is still taboo. I can't remember what they concluded, but Berenson might be the key to unlocking it?
Similar situation happened with HCQ as Mathew Crawford from Rounding the Earth could explain. There was likely no better way to take down that drug than to have Trump promote it, especially after following up that promotion with the couple who ingested aquarium cleaner. I believe the husband died. The couple were actually Democrat donors which is interesting and makes one wonder if the entire story was fake.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/03/24/coronavirus-chloroquine-poisoning-death/
If it's true that a vaccine could not have an EUA if there is an effective treatment, then how did the vaccine get EUA approval if remdesivir and monoclonal antibodies were available? Also now there is Paxlovid and Mulnovopir (sp?) so why wouldn't the vaccines be pulled? Is it because none of these are actually FDA approved? I think the real reason they did not want an effective treatment is because if there were one, how many would bother to take a vaccine?
I find it interesting that they still push for boosters even though the narrative acknowledges there are actual treatments available in the form of Paxlovid and Mulnovapir. What is so odd is that one never sees people say that they're not going to take the next booster because what's the point of taking a vaccine that doesn't even prevent infection when there are treatments available? It's frankly astonishing to see universities still mandating vaccines and boosters given that their own sources claim there are treatments available. Before 2020 who would line up for a vaccine if there was a known treatment? This is just bizarre behavior which may be due to psychosis or some other phenomenon.
I'm kind of curious if Ivermectin is effective against other viruses as well. If not ivermectin specifically I'd be curious if any generic drugs would be effective in mitigating against the diseases the childhood vaccine schedule has been setup for. A full audit seems warranted.
Whatever happened to “Healthy as a horse!”?
That’s the only response that was/is ever needed!