Share this comment
If it were not for the 2020 forcing of “novel” medical approaches to diagnosing, drug licensing, drug administration forcing, and binding drug use with employment or civil rights, we would probably never discuss such things. The so called medicine science would go along as they have been doing for ages: blindly following “standard operat…
If it were not for the 2020 forcing of “novel” medical approaches to diagnosing, drug licensing, drug administration forcing, and binding drug use with employment or civil rights, we would probably never discuss such things. The so called medicine science would go along as they have been doing for ages: blindly following “standard operating procedures” as laid out by forerunners, none of which being probably properly vetted for both application viability and/or common sense justification.
The issue described in the article is merely one of a number of questionable surgical habits (considering the question marks in the above text, you really couldn’t call it “treatments”). It all looks like a shortcut resolution of problems which would put huge burden on a medical professional: think, consider, reconsider, test, check again, cancel the original diagnosis, test again, read peer-reviewed papers, think again… why would you go to such lengths when you can simply order to cut out the location of the problem, and all your efforts are heftily rewarded - and the patient is happy to go home with relief. Ah, and there is the electrocution of the healthy heart “muscle”, supposedly treating wrong electrical impulses in the heart… although a number of thinking physicians indicate non-invasive chemical regulation as a successful measure…
We are already habitually addicted to cutting out tonsils, removing healthy teeth, and obviously cutting out the appendix, originally considered to be of no use for the living being. We have made a huge business out of laser deformation of eyeballs. And there is an immensely profit-promising “beauty” surgery, which in essence is the destruction of healthy tissue.
What’s there left and unattended to? Heart removal, why not - so many people appear to be heartless… Brain removal, sure enough, why would you need a brain if you cannot think logically or coexist in the community… Cutting out is easier, faster, simpler. Why? Is it because none of the helpless patients comes to the doctor in the assistance of a lawyer demanding a written contract for the removal procedure?
To understand the context and “why”, you should watch a short mini-series on “The Artful Dodger” (https://www.imdb.com/title/tt20285780/), or how to easily cut out whatever you want from an injured person and be rewarded for it, regardless of survival issues. It seems that the “modern” medicine is still somewhere around the 16th century…