33 Comments
User's avatar
Dave's avatar

What a masterpiece! This was a spectacular read, applies to political arena as well.

Steven Johnston's avatar

Yes. I came across Kruse for the first time relatively recently and listened to several podcasts he was on. To that extent, he was a bit of a Johnny-come-lately for me.

Plenty of what he says is impressive, but I never bought into him for many of the reasons you articulate. I have similar misgivings about Andrew Bridgen and plenty of others who came out of the woodwork after the damage was done.

Unless I'm convinced otherwise, they're all gatekeepers.

Allen's avatar

There's also the blowhard factor which describes Kruse IMO.

He entrances some by simply drowning people in quasi-esoteric "health" and "biology" jargon and does it at a decibel level and with such arrogant conviction that the un-initiated will just "step back in awe" at his sound and fury.

yantra's avatar

i understand, having listened to many of his podcasts/videos. but, in his defense i have to say, often genius is paired with some unbecoming traits. he really does have a lot of valuable insights into health and the human condition.

Allen's avatar

Kruse is no genius by any definition.

His solar exposure schtick is reductionist claptrap. If you doubt that come to where I live and I'll show you plenty of folks who get abundant sunlight and are in extremely poor health.

His bitcoin fetish is another of his harebrained ideas.

yantra's avatar

totally agree about the bitcoin promo. but i would bet that most of the unhealthy folks who get plenty of unfiltered sunlight are also glued to wireless devices a lot of the time and/or constantly staring into a blue-lit screen.

Denis Rancourt's avatar

It's because your posts are so darn good that I want to add to the discussion, today as follows.

Regarding: "the four actual assaults on human health—poisoning, electromagnetic exposure, chronic stress, and malnutrition". IMO, you are missing a dominant and universal actual assault on human health: AGING, the cumulative damage to cells, tissues and organs that eventually must lead to decreased health and death irrespective of anything else.

Regarding "The Five Walls": brilliant way to organize the lies of medicine.

IMO, "Wall Three: Bacteriology — the confusion of firefighters with firestarters" goes too far and has the highest risk of being in error in many circumstances. Where deleterious imbalances and runoff toxicity of our microbiomes occur, all bacterial populations are not merely tryin to "clean up", but some are putting the organism at high risk. I daringly wrote about this criticism here: https://substack.com/@denisrancourt/p-150901888 (starting at the eight paragraph).

See also my in-depth article: "Medical Hypothesis: Respiratory epidemics and pandemics without viral transmission" https://substack.com/@denisrancourt/p-152476528

Since then, as an aside, I have also done a search for controlled clinical studies that evaluate the use of antibiotics. Many studies find that recommended and accepted antibiotic protocols are of no detectable or significant benefit (bad medicine bad). However, several reliable studies and reviews identify circumstances in which the use of antibiotics certainly saves lives. (see the front and back threads connected here and references: https://x.com/denisrancourt/status/1953687539421692372 )

Unbekoming's avatar

Thanks Denis. Insightful and valuable as always.

yantra's avatar

agree with your bacteriology comments here.

eileen's avatar

Which is why you need another paradigm. Holistic doctors (including veterinarians) fall into the same category. They want testing: food sensitivities, glyphosate, heavy metals, parasites, Vit D, you name it, they want it. Labels are invented like Leaky Gut, leaky vessels, leaky brain, to describe a pattern of symptoms that still assume the five walls. For example, leaky gut assumes the bad guys create holes in your gut wall and food escapes into your circulation. While they don't accuse the bad guys of a disease, they do assume that the bad guys mess up your terrain.

I am of the opinion that febrile illness is a Herxheimer reaction: the same one that you get when you use ivermectin to clear an invader (type irrelevant) from your body. What if instead we start with the assumption that you are an electric being, interacting with an electric field from the planet and this creates frequency? This frequency determines how much matter composes your body and how much energy your body carries to allow what we call altered states.

Sickness is nothing more than a state where the electric field no longer work the way it is designed to work and the state of existence we call disease is the body's attempt to recreate the field. How did it get that way? Well let's start with the obvious: injections of pathogens (a vaccine), GMO food, which lowers your frequency, making you less energetically compatible with the planet, genetically modified mosquitoes or the creation of ticks to inject more stuff into your body, spraying of the air to so you breathe in heavy metals, flouridating the water to create a charge imbalance in your body so it doesn't work right. These are just some of the insults we allowed into our bodies by refusing to say no.

Maybe it's too late now, but we bought into the idea that it was ok to dump industrial waste into our drinking water just so we could continue to eat sugar rather than change our oral hygiene to prevent cavities. Turns out all this industrial waste did was make our teeth black (fluorosis) but we still got these little holes in our teeth where we dutifully let an expert put mercury into our mouths (a filling). We bought into the idea that splicing genetic material from an animal into a plant will feed the world because we hated to see starving children on the devices used to transmit us propaganda, believing that we were too stupid to do our own research.

It really does boil down to our own unwillingness to think for ourselves, just like this essay asserts, letting educated people (ever think that an educational institution is nothing more than a thinly disguised agent of the Ministry of Holograms?) think for us rather than us thinking for ourselves.

Juliet Romeo's avatar

This is a profoundly insightful essay. I consider vaccination at birth as the medical cartel’s moat- built to isolate and imprison us on the ill health island for life.

Disturbing, demonic. We must dismantle it (thank God for Bobby Kennedy and his warriors) and free children whilst we man the lookouts at the next checkpoints of ‘health’ care. This will be a long war we must win.

Steven Johnston's avatar

Bobby "you must be vaccinated if you want to come to my party" Kennedy? That Bobby Kennedy?

Katherine's avatar

I'm glad you've taken on Kruse. A few sources have told me he can be quite an intellectual bully.

Good on you AND your critical thinking! 👏

Allen's avatar

Another excellent piece.

Another category that I think could be added/sussed out is "disease categorization." While it is wrapped within some of what you have already delineated it could also stand on its own.

The way in which the "diseases" acquire their own unique terminology then defines the manner in which the medical industry presents the issue to "patients." This not only results in the pending (mis)treatment but it also forestalls any useful forensic analysis of conditions from entering the picture. This is intentional.

This manner of categorization also jump starts the coding process (though you could argue the coding often defines, or at least influences, the prognosis) which in today's world of wholly financialized medicine is pretty much the entire ballgame from the perspective of the medical mafia.

Unbekoming's avatar

Thanks Allen.

Tony Porcaro's avatar

Dr Kruse does not provide anymore additional insight than the Pasteurian model which was wrong from its inception; it's a "have your cake and eat it" approach that essentially supports and apologizes for allopathic medicine and the failings of all those still believing that medical science has promoted medical progress and human health; the historical realities tell a different story, not of sometime lies and deception but of repeated lies and deception.

Grant Wickham's avatar

Wow! This is a great mind map.

I wonder too how people such as Dr Samantha Bailey, Dr Tom Cowan, Dr Andrew Kaufman, et al would be classed for want of a better word, after being interrogated using this map.

INGRID C DURDEN's avatar

and there are quite a few more! people who know I am always looking into food, supplements, herbals, homeopathy to heal, recommend their 'converted' doctors. When I watch or read them though, I come to this same conclusion. Several of the Tube doctors talk A and do B. Or they proclaim the one size fits all solution, which I truly detest. There is not one solution for all and everyone! And when it comes to solving problems I tend now to watch animals. What do they do? Not everything is appetizing, most is not, but they heal.

Tony Porcaro's avatar

They do not fall into the Kruse paradigm, as their work clearly reveals!

EasterNow's avatar

Dr. Tom Cowan for win. Keep to observable facts and admit what you don't know. I think the most important Axiom is: Your body is wiser than you, everything it does, it does for a good reason. TRUST YOUR VITAL BODY. The creator seems to have known what they were doing. Never heard of Kruse...found Cowan on Bitchute years ago.

ShieldMaiden's avatar

THANK YOU!

Dean Fraser's avatar

Eccelente. And, just what the ‘Doctor’ ordered.

Curious Outlier's avatar

You have left out part of the framework for literally all of these other walls. Evolution. Evolution is the foundation for all of this pseudo scientific nonsense that they are pulling off. If they can get you to believe that you came from a monkey and more than that that you came from in organic material and for that matter, nothing at all, they can make you believe anything.

Paul Vonharnish's avatar

I disagree with the notion that pathogens do not exist. Get yourself a case of Lyme disease, malaria, or perhaps syphilis sometime. You'll feel much better - now that you don't *believe* in pathogenic microbes and bacteria... Get a grip.

jacquelyn sauriol's avatar

The old question parents have put to their children forever, when captivated by some persons ideals.....'If they told you to jump off a bridge would you do it?'....and with the jabs, they indeed have jumped off that bridge.

yantra's avatar
19hEdited

about bacteria: although i no longer buy into the virus theory (see microbiologist Stefan Lanka) i do think bacteria can become a problem. it may not be that some are "bad" and some "good", but an overgrowth of any of them can cause bad health outcomes. in 1999 i had a minor foot operation resulting in a bad infection, in which i learned how crucial antibiotics can be. people used to die agonizing deaths from such infections. the bacteria that get labeled "bad" may just be those able to out-compete everything else.

Michael G's avatar

I see bacteria in much the same way. A plant in its proper natural environment is part of a diverse ecosystem but in the wrong environment can become a weed, becoming a problem in the new ecosystem