I knew about the theory generally but did not know enough to read about it so I really appreciate this interview. I can tell you that when I saw a map of an international shipping route from Singapore to Lazaro Cardenas, Mexico up to Kansas City, it stopped me cold. The traitors of trade negotiations defined an international port zone over the top of our border with Mexico 100 miles wide going from the Gulf of Mexico to the Pacific Ocean. It was a border breach through our soft underbelly - the midwest. That was in 1983 - treaty signed in La Paz, Mexico. We have been dealing with mass illegal immigration ever since. Reagan (IMO) sold us out in 1986 when he gave amnesty to the illegals. Of course the ultimate idea is the Free Trade Area of the Americas - including North, Central and South America with America's sovereignty in the dustbin of history as the prize. I guess our "brilliant" intellectuals knew the heartland theory and tried to replicate it but failed to take into account the fact that culture matters and ours is incompatible with Mexico and nation-states south.
It reads like a new scenario for another Bond movie, so many big things, so many worlds to save, so many wars to wage.
But it’s all outdated and irrelevant AD 2024.
With the lockstep presentation of 2020, we now know that there are no rivaling powers or superpowers, and what we perceive as enemies are in fact good old buddies acting before our eyes and sharing profits from the same table when journalists are dismissed.
And they may be located anywhere, but not in any physical place where they could be tracked and found. You can imagine the most powerful modern dictator sitting in their private WC safe room, with a tablet in hands, tapping the spots on the screen where to buy or sell or attack or give up. No brains needed. No respect needed, no expertise or respect or understanding of anything. Actually, as we can see from press meetings with politicians, an average journalist is better qualified to run any country or department than all those seasoned lifelong doing-nothingers.
Land or sea power? An ancient concept, not valid any more. Aircraft carriers, battleships, largest warplanes or super tanks are all important ONLY and solely for the purpose of draining money from your pockets (taxation) into personal accounts of hundreds of real beneficiaries. The inertia of the physical war machinery has rendered the whole concept of physical war completely useless some 20 years ago. They are building $10m tanks - which cannot do literally anything autonomously - only because their expected life on the battlefield is 5 minutes, boom, and here you get another 10 million bucks stolen from taxpayers. Or the overpriced, overadvertized $120m warplanes which - again - cannot do anything autonomously, and - if a tricky short-circuit occurs - literally cannot be flown manually and will go down brick-style. If anyone wanted to run a war now, they would buy or build a swarm of drones and deploy them locally. Undetectable, impossible to escape or defend against, the only modern weapon that may actually count. $1000 per unit, much less when you buy wholesale. Training required: 5 hours, non-military, non-confidential, anyone can fly this thing.
Why don’t they go this line? Because any war now is too expensive and non-sustainable. Why fight if you can buy all central banks in the world and ensure silent and undetectable never-ending continuous supply of any volumes of money you want? Volumes, not amounts. War is a relic. They keep it alive only because of “public spending” - a visible sign that $$ trillions will always be not enough (for them). It’s all a huge theater. It has always been so, as best evidenced by the replacement of original Russian czar families with Western-funded Marx, Lenin and all the subsequent “communist” representatives of the Western financing investors.
Yes, yes, yes! I thought that taking out the pipeline was just to ensure that Europe would remain dependent on US oil interests, but preventing future cooperation between Russia and Germany which might have begun with the oil deal makes so much sense.
I’ve never been convinced by history as taught. There always seemed to be more to it than was being said. If you study people instead of places, you get a better idea of what happened and why
These are theories for nation states. Wondering on the theories the international financial pyramid cap follow as they manipulate nation states to do their bidding in advancing the 'cap's' interests. One such might be : Always provide the selected winner in a designed conflict with enough credit to win while driving up the indebtedness of the loser.
I knew about the theory generally but did not know enough to read about it so I really appreciate this interview. I can tell you that when I saw a map of an international shipping route from Singapore to Lazaro Cardenas, Mexico up to Kansas City, it stopped me cold. The traitors of trade negotiations defined an international port zone over the top of our border with Mexico 100 miles wide going from the Gulf of Mexico to the Pacific Ocean. It was a border breach through our soft underbelly - the midwest. That was in 1983 - treaty signed in La Paz, Mexico. We have been dealing with mass illegal immigration ever since. Reagan (IMO) sold us out in 1986 when he gave amnesty to the illegals. Of course the ultimate idea is the Free Trade Area of the Americas - including North, Central and South America with America's sovereignty in the dustbin of history as the prize. I guess our "brilliant" intellectuals knew the heartland theory and tried to replicate it but failed to take into account the fact that culture matters and ours is incompatible with Mexico and nation-states south.
Thanks Vicky. As you said in our interview, they did it with International Agreements.
It reads like a new scenario for another Bond movie, so many big things, so many worlds to save, so many wars to wage.
But it’s all outdated and irrelevant AD 2024.
With the lockstep presentation of 2020, we now know that there are no rivaling powers or superpowers, and what we perceive as enemies are in fact good old buddies acting before our eyes and sharing profits from the same table when journalists are dismissed.
And they may be located anywhere, but not in any physical place where they could be tracked and found. You can imagine the most powerful modern dictator sitting in their private WC safe room, with a tablet in hands, tapping the spots on the screen where to buy or sell or attack or give up. No brains needed. No respect needed, no expertise or respect or understanding of anything. Actually, as we can see from press meetings with politicians, an average journalist is better qualified to run any country or department than all those seasoned lifelong doing-nothingers.
Land or sea power? An ancient concept, not valid any more. Aircraft carriers, battleships, largest warplanes or super tanks are all important ONLY and solely for the purpose of draining money from your pockets (taxation) into personal accounts of hundreds of real beneficiaries. The inertia of the physical war machinery has rendered the whole concept of physical war completely useless some 20 years ago. They are building $10m tanks - which cannot do literally anything autonomously - only because their expected life on the battlefield is 5 minutes, boom, and here you get another 10 million bucks stolen from taxpayers. Or the overpriced, overadvertized $120m warplanes which - again - cannot do anything autonomously, and - if a tricky short-circuit occurs - literally cannot be flown manually and will go down brick-style. If anyone wanted to run a war now, they would buy or build a swarm of drones and deploy them locally. Undetectable, impossible to escape or defend against, the only modern weapon that may actually count. $1000 per unit, much less when you buy wholesale. Training required: 5 hours, non-military, non-confidential, anyone can fly this thing.
Why don’t they go this line? Because any war now is too expensive and non-sustainable. Why fight if you can buy all central banks in the world and ensure silent and undetectable never-ending continuous supply of any volumes of money you want? Volumes, not amounts. War is a relic. They keep it alive only because of “public spending” - a visible sign that $$ trillions will always be not enough (for them). It’s all a huge theater. It has always been so, as best evidenced by the replacement of original Russian czar families with Western-funded Marx, Lenin and all the subsequent “communist” representatives of the Western financing investors.
We live in a different world now.
Yes, yes, yes! I thought that taking out the pipeline was just to ensure that Europe would remain dependent on US oil interests, but preventing future cooperation between Russia and Germany which might have begun with the oil deal makes so much sense.
I’ve never been convinced by history as taught. There always seemed to be more to it than was being said. If you study people instead of places, you get a better idea of what happened and why
These are theories for nation states. Wondering on the theories the international financial pyramid cap follow as they manipulate nation states to do their bidding in advancing the 'cap's' interests. One such might be : Always provide the selected winner in a designed conflict with enough credit to win while driving up the indebtedness of the loser.
You lost me at "Carlsen."